Imagine the world

Chapter 495 I Can't Help When I See Mortal Flow

"If you allow evil, the evil will be added to your body; if you let the disaster go, you will go with the disaster. This is not a good deed, and this is not a kind of good. Those who cause disasters will be punished together, and those who let disasters will be expelled. If they are not expelled, they will be punished. It has been said since ancient times. Decided."

——This is Ding Qi's answer to Bai Shaoliu's assumption just now.

There is no doubt that Mrs. Lin violated the commandment of communism, and the evidence is conclusive, and Lu Gaogan broke it.

If Lu Gaogan was threatened and persecuted by Lin Taiwei, he was afraid of his own safety and did not dare to report Lin Taiwei, this is another situation.

This kind of thing often happens in reality. When someone sees a gangster committing a crime, he does not dare to stand up to stop it. When he finds clues of the gangster's crime, he dare not report to the police, for fear that the gangster will hurt himself.

But Lu Gaogan does not belong to this situation, nor should he be this kind of person.

Lu Gaoqian is a Kunlun monk and a disciple of Yuan Shuomen, one of the thirteen Kunlun sects.By analogy to the above situation, he is equivalent to a civil servant "in the system", such as a police officer.

At that time, Mrs. Lin was injured after beheading Hou Nianming, even if he was not injured, Lu Gaoqian's cultivation was much higher than him.Lin Dawei can't threaten Lu Gaogan at all, and Lu Gaogan can stop him on the spot.

However, Lu Gaogan let Lin Taiwei go and concealed it for him, allowing him to violate the precepts of communism, so he did evil.

Under the circumstances of having both responsibility and ability, allowing others to do evil and ignoring it, if everyone is like this, it will harm everyone, so it is a misfortune.

If you allow evil, the evil will be added to your body; if you let disaster go, you will flow with the disaster.

No matter what his motives are, Lu Gaogan is not qualified to forgive Lin Taiwei at all.If the perpetrators are not even punished, how can people stop them?

It's not like this kind of thing hasn't happened in the world of practice since ancient times. The predecessors have long been rigorously questioned, and the punishment for this situation has long been settled: those who cause disasters are punished together, and those who release disasters are expelled together.

Needless to say, there are several forms of the so-called total excommunication, the most important one is to abolish cultivation and expel from the sect.

For Dacheng monks, their cultivation realm cannot be destroyed by others, and they can be exiled from the world with their own aura and mana, and they can also choose to close life and death and never reappear in the world.

What if it's just an ordinary person with no cultivation base?This issue is beyond the scope of the discussion.

As for how to punish Lu Gaogan, there is no doubt so far.

If Lu Gaogan let Lin Dawei go 30 years ago and deliberately concealed his evil deeds, but did nothing else, the Kunlun League would find out and exile him.But in fact, Lu Gaogan's evil is even worse, so he used this to force Lin Taiwei to continue to do evil, and he should be punished together!
Bai Shaoliu asked again: "Don't you hear that 'put down the butcher's knife and become a Buddha immediately'?"

Hua Zhenxing almost wanted to find a chair to sit down again, can Bai Shaoliu ask such a question?Of course, this is not what he himself asked, but it represents the point of view of some people, or it continues the previous assumption.

The discussion in this round has already gone beyond the scope of joint punishment, and it is not only about Lin Dawei and Lu Gaogan, or even monks, it extends to a wider sense of world affairs.

Assuming that Lu Gaogan let Lin Taiwei go, there is a reason for his pity.And Mrs. Lin wept bitterly, and vowed to make amends, sincerely repent, and never do such a thing again.

The matter has already happened and it is irreversible, so why take Lin Taiwei's life again?If he changes his mind from now on, is it worth saving?
Ding Qi's answer was actually a verse: "After punishment, you will ascend to immortality, and you will become a Buddha in prison. Put down the butcher knife, and please imprison yourself first. If you can't cross the sea of ​​suffering, why talk about samadhi. If the Buddha doesn't go to hell, whoever goes to hell will go to hell."

Hua Zhenxing suddenly became interested again and stood up straighter.Because of the sound-hearing wisdom in Teacher Ding's words, with his cultivation and knowledge, he didn't fully understand it.

What does it mean to be sentenced to immortality, imprisoned and become a Buddha?Hua Zhenxing only had a vague feeling, but couldn't figure it out.

Are these two monks debating scriptures?There were also Buddhist monks present, but neither Bai Shaoliu nor Teacher Ding were monks, and they didn't seem to be debating scriptures, they seemed to be just making excuses.

Hua Zhenxing understood some other words.

Ordinary people understand that putting down the butcher's knife may mean that the murderer no longer kills. There are many reasons for this, such as being too old to lift the knife, being afraid of the wind, regretting and not wanting to kill anymore, and the person who wanted to kill has already been killed. There is no need to kill any more.

But from the perspective of practice, neither of these situations is to put down the butcher's knife.

People are familiar with a kind of Buddhist allusion, for example, a great warlord with many murders and a famous knight-errant who is famous all over the world, one day he suddenly got tired of the emperor's hegemony and the fighting in the rivers and lakes, and decided to convert to Buddhism...

This kind of story can also add a bit of old stuff, the hero is because an old monk wakes up with a word, and suddenly realizes that there will be one less butcher in the world, and one more monk under the blue lantern.

So here comes the question, I don’t judge the butcher here, but only evaluate the behavior of the old monk. Is he good or evil?
The wisdom of sound and hearing is related to everyone's cognition, so in the ears of Hua Zhenxing, Teacher Ding gave two examples. The first example is actually Jin Datou, a member of the Datou Gang in Feisuogang.

If Jin Datou came to Dongguo to travel before the new alliance appeared, he happened to walk into the Jiulin Temple in Wucheng, met three old monks, was enlightened by them, and realized his past mistakes.

So Jin Datou became a monk in Jiulin Temple, his bald head was ready-made and he didn’t need to shave it, or he found a serious job in the local area, such as delivering couriers and doing part-time Buddhist chanting as a volunteer.

The second example is a serial murderer in Dongguo who went to Jiulin Temple and found three old monks. He confessed his identity and crimes, expressed his willingness to repent and rehabilitate, and hoped to hide in the temple. Taken in.

What is the difference between these two examples?The difference is not only whether order exists, whether procedural justice can be realized?What is more important in the eyes of the monks is the reason why the old monk did this and the resulting results.

Look at the first example first.

At that time, the Fiso Port was in a state of collapse of order, and countless golden heads existed openly.Jin Datou's purpose is not to escape punishment. No matter whether the old monk persuades him or not, the officials of Jili Kingdom and Dongguo will not arrest him.

The old monks of Jiulin Temple can't change the status quo of Jili Kingdom, and the streets of Feisuo Port are not under their control. They just persuade Jin Datou to change his ways, at least not to do evil again.

The stories about the great warlords and heroes mentioned above basically belong to this kind of situation.There is no order to punish them, otherwise they should go to prison, and temples are not the place for them to come.

For the three old monks, this is a kind deed within their ability.

As for the second example, the purpose of the old monk is to help fugitives avoid punishment, and his behavior is to harbor fugitives. This is an evil deed that cannot be more standard!

Of course, the three old monks should be taken away by the police station, and if this temple that intentionally harbors fugitives is not closed, it will be a dereliction of duty by the police!
If we talk about repentance, prison is more suitable for redemption, and if we talk about facing Buddha, chanting scriptures is more necessary in hell.As for salvation, this is salvation, not only the salvation of the butcher, but also the salvation of innocent people.

If you have a stick, you may have to ask again, what if the fugitive committed the crime out of necessity, or was he wronged?This is not the case in this question.

Hearing this, Hua Zhenxing was also a little confused. Teacher Ding talked about it, why did he always give questions to the old monks of Jiulin Temple in Wucheng? Could it be that he was bullying them for not being present today?

In fact, Bai Shaoliu's question represents that many people misinterpret metaphysical epiphanies into metaphysical sophistry, and misinterpret delusions, malice, and ego that should be put aside as real criminal acts.

In fact, the act of "putting down the butcher's knife" itself contains the behavior of facing guilt calmly.Hua Zhenxing understood it, but he was still a little surprised. He was surprised that such a simple truth, why did he ask about it on this occasion?
Up to this point, the question and discussion went smoothly, that is, Bai Shaoliu and Teacher Ding were asking and answering in turn, and the content of the sravakas of everyone present was different, but no one interrupted.

At this time, someone suddenly said: "Leader Mei, fellow Taoists, I have something to say."

According to the reputation, the person who spoke was Zhou Rong, the deacon of Zhenhuamen, a capable female cultivator.In this Kunlun League investigation, she is also responsible for the analysis and summary of various information, which should be related to her profession, as a lawyer in the secular world.

Mei Yeshi: "Friend Zhou, please tell me."

Zhou Rong: "Leader Mei mentioned yesterday that Dingfengtan was destroyed in the past, let's not talk about Lu Mubai's later actions, before he and Shang Haiping fought, he did not touch Shang Haiping's family.

After he accidentally killed Shang Haiping, he did not touch Shang Haiping's family.

Let's talk about what Lin Tai did this time, let alone what he did 30 years ago, only what he did the day before yesterday.From the beginning to the end, Mrs. Lin never really touched the family members of Shi Buquan and Shang Ni.

Can it be redeemed when its words are not done?From this point of view, is it necessary to be punished together? "

Zhou Rong asked a very special question. She took Lu Mubai and Mrs. Lin as examples and pointed out a specific situation.

Judging from the facts, Lu Mubai did not touch Shang Haiping's family. Later, the Shang family was assassinated by Cambistine great magician Ling Jiwei.

As for Lin Taiwei, he just sent a text message, which contained the identity information of Shi Buquan's child and his grandmother and grandfather. In fact, he didn't really touch the family members of Shi Buquan and his wife.

Should one be punished for what one said but did not do?Even if it is punished, is it necessary to follow the standard of "the whole world must punish it"?

In other words, if you are going to be jointly hunted down by the Kunlun League because of a word of hi, is the "sentence" too severe?

Hua Zhenxing couldn't help frowning secretly when he heard the words. This is a secret change of concept. On this occasion, how could someone ask such a question?At the Zhengyi Sanshan Meeting 200 years ago, Patriarch Zhengyi should have made it very clear.

But looking at today's posture, I still have to take it out and talk about it again!
The times are progressing, and the achievements of future generations will always be higher than those of the predecessors.But don't forget that the progress of future generations is also based on the achievements of predecessors. The achievements of each era are not created by contemporary people from scratch.

With the development of the times, some things that do not meet the requirements of the times need to be eliminated and changes need to be made, but this does not mean that the achievements of the predecessors will be completely denied and the cornerstone of development will also be shaken.

The progress of the times is not inevitable. Where there is progress, there may be regression, and even decline, collapse and perdition.

For example, in the eyes of Hua Zhenxing, Fangwaimen replaced Yuanshuomen this time and became one of the 25 executive sects of the Kunlun League, which is a kind of progress, even a major breakthrough change.

But what does it mean when someone brings the topic up to the topic of total punishment?
Just listen to Mei Yeshi's answer: "Words are deeds, joint punishment is to admonish this action, otherwise there is no need to set up a precept. Joint punishment is our responsibility, not someone's right."

Hua Zhenxing heard from Guangren how Patriarch Zhengyi announced the prohibition against communism in those days. In contrast, Mei Yeshi's answer today is not outstanding, and it seems to be balanced, probably because the occasion is different from that of the audience.

Umenoishi first pointed out a concept that speech itself is a kind of behavior, not another thing independent of behavior.

The reason why we combine "words and deeds" in many cases and emphasize the difference between "how to say" and "how to do it" is because speech is a unique behavior, and sometimes it cannot determine the result of behavior.

People's wishes may not always come true, and people's words may not always come true. Even Dacheng Dacheng can't do it, even if they are sincere.

Speech is only a part of the whole behavior process, not the whole behavior.But conversely, we cannot deny the fact that speech is also part of action.

Speech itself will also cause consequences, and if there are consequences, you must bear the responsibility.

Then Mei Yeshi emphasized that the joint punishment is mainly to establish a warning for words, focusing on this special behavior, and there is a premise that both parties involved in the behavior are monks.

It does not define the behavior between ordinary people, nor does it define the behavior between monks and ordinary people. It only establishes the precepts between monks and monks.

The content of the joint punishment is very simple, that is, regardless of any conflicts between monks, they must not be threatened by the other party's relatives and family members.

This is very clear, even threats are not allowed, let alone any harm.There is no such concept as "one who speaks without fault" in the collective punishment.

Why is it so strict?Because both parties involved are monks, there is no way to prevent this kind of behavior, and it cannot be stopped. Once it occurs, it will cause serious consequences.

To give a very simple example, say A and B are competing for a magic weapon, and A says to B: "If you don't give me the magic weapon, your whole family will get sick!" He doesn't even have to say that I will kill your whole family, as long as you give Just a hint.

How can B choose?Will he continue to fight for this magic weapon, or keep the whole family safe?

If you choose the latter, you will succumb to the threat of the other party; if you choose the former, you will face a moral dilemma, becoming a magic weapon regardless of the safety of your family.

If we look at the causes and causes, in fact, A should not have such behavior at all.

Someone wants to say again, B can choose to fight A on the spot!But not everyone has the courage to go all out, not to mention that B may not be A's opponent, even if the strength is equal, there is no guarantee that he will be able to beat A to death and prevent A from escaping.

Others may come up with a clever idea: if A says this, then B can say the same.For example, A said that if B did not withdraw from the competition, he would kill B's whole family, and B also said that if A dared to do so, he would kill A's whole family.

Could there be any worse advice in the world than playing a prisoner's dilemma between two diabolical men?What is the worst outcome, that the relatives of A and B suffer innocently?
Turning the question back again, even if according to the most ideal model, B's cultivation base is higher than that of A, and he shoots A to death immediately, then he still has to face Zhou Rong's question just now, why is he just saying hello, B Just kill A?

Faced with this kind of questioning, how can B defend himself?
The information contained in Umenoishi's saravaka wisdom is much more complicated than the above.

For example, in Hua Zhenxing's ears, another possibility appeared.For example, Fu Lingke went to Mei Yeshi and asked Mei Yeshi to kill Hua Zhenxing, otherwise he would kill Mei Yeshi's family.

This kind of thing is absurd, it is almost impossible to happen in reality, it is just a hypothesis.

With Mei Yeshi's cultivation base, he could kill Fu Lingke on the spot.But Fu Lingke told Mei Yeshi at the same time that it was useless to shoot him to death, he still had accomplices, and as long as he died, the accomplices would attack immediately.

So what should Mei Yeshi do, should he choose to save his family's life, or Baohua Zhenxing's life?
If you think this way, you will actually fall into the thinking trap-the thinking trap drawn by Fu Lingke, but why should you follow the ideas drawn by this kind of person?
The truth in reality is simple, Mei Yeshi has no right to hurt Hua Zhenxing in order to protect his family, he just has the responsibility to stop Fu Lingke from doing this.

The words spoken by the monks must not be interpreted as ordinary people's mouths, because they are not ordinary people, they can do what they say, the higher the cultivation level, the more so, and if they are Dacheng monks, they will say it made.

If he really wants to do it, ordinary people can't guard against it at all.

Hua Zhenxing suddenly remembered a warning old man Yang once gave him, if a gangster points a gun at you, you must never bet on whether the other party's gun has bullets in it or whether the marksmanship is accurate enough.

This principle applies not only to the parties who were pointed at by gunmen, but also to the police and onlookers who rushed to the scene.The cultivator himself is like a gun, and when he makes such threats, it must not be regarded as hilarious.

Establishing a communist punishment is to jump out of this kind of thinking trap and try to keep all monks away from this predicament. Its main significance is not to punish afterwards.

If the purpose is only to punish after the event, the scattered precepts are enough, and there is no need to set up another precept for joint punishment.Draw a red line in advance, this red line must never be touched, whoever touches it will die, and the world will punish everyone.

What Umenoshi said should be clear enough.But Zhou Rong still asked: "Leader Mei, I still have a doubt. Lu Mubai back then, and Lin Taiwei the day before yesterday, have already spoken their words, but they have fallen into a certain death situation before they are implemented.

In such a situation, one can only fight trapped beasts, or kill people, or be coerced by others, and there is no possibility of turning back. Couldn't there be a better solution to this matter?
The reason for saying this is that the prohibition of joint punishment has been established for thousands of years, and people still violate it today, such as Lu Mubai, such as Lin Taiwei, this has been found out, how many people have not been found out?
Because of this, Lu Mubai was controlled by Ling Jiwei, and Lin Taiwei was controlled by Lu Gaogan, and the disaster became even worse.The prohibition of joint punishment did not prevent their actions, but instead made their restraint even worse. How can it be avoided? "

Zhou Rong didn't have great cultivation, of course he didn't master the divine sense, not to mention the supernatural powers of wisdom, so she spoke normally, but Hua Zhenxing was surprised by what she said.

What surprised Hua Zhenxing was not Zhou Rong's question itself, but that someone would say such a thing!This is like discussing the four arithmetic operations within a hundred in a university mathematics class, which inevitably gives people a sense of absurdity.

Maybe it was because of his occupation, seeing Zhou Rong, Hua Zhenxing inexplicably thought of Dong Zegang.

Zhou Rong tried to make a suggestion in the name of "how to better implement the common punishment".In Hua Zhenxing's view, this is to blur the clear rules and increase the space for human manipulation.

Mei Yeshi just mentioned the debate between words and deeds, and Zhou Rong demonstrated it live.Is Zhou Rong's purpose of saying this is how to better implement the commandment of communism?of course not!

Knowing from words and deeds, seeing the cause and knowing the result.From violating the communist punishment commandment, you must be punished, to under certain circumstances, you can not punish, then whether to punish at that time or not depends on how the person in power operates.

Zhou Rong also veiledly questioned the necessity of co-criticism, which has existed for more than 1000 years, but it has not stopped people from violating the co-precepts from time to time.

That being the case, is there still a need for joint punishment?

Some views are not worth refuting, let alone appear on this occasion.Since ancient times, the law has prohibited the killing of innocent people, but people have committed crimes since ancient times and today.

You can easily come to the conclusion that the existence of laws prohibiting killing has not prevented murderers from appearing in the world.But you cannot draw another conclusion from this, that there is no need for laws against killing.

Because what didn't happen, people couldn't see.Because of the existence of joint punishment, the behavior of monks threatening each other has been greatly reduced, so that everyone has no worries. This has long been the consensus of the Kunlun practice circle.

Zhou Rong probably also felt that this was inappropriate, so the conversation turned into - Is it necessary to revise the precepts of mutual punishment?
She still used Lu Mubai as an example. Before he really caused serious consequences, he was already facing the situation of being punished by the whole world. Instead, he would be forced to the point of death, or he would have to be controlled by others.

The implication is that today's communist punishment is too strict?This question is more confusing, and it really represents the rhythm that some people want to lead.

At this time, someone suddenly opened his mouth and said: "Drunkenness makes the green cattle trample the young crops. If you can't do it, you will have nothing? It's hard to find a path to the clouds, but it depends on the farmer's few pennies!"

Based on his reputation, the person who spoke was Tao Ranke, the leader of casual cultivators from Kunlun Wonderland and the highest seniority monk present.

Immediately afterwards, another person said: "After Huanhou became terminally ill, he suspected that the world would ask for medicine and moxibustion. He has learned the longevity technique in this life, so why do he think of obscenities when he sees things?"

The person who answered the call was a Taoist priest, Yang Jidao, the master of Fanglong Temple, who can be regarded as the proprietor of this place.

Nian Qiuye, the deacon of Xiaoyao Sect, also said, "Sow grain and wheat in spring for livelihood, and wear weaving and spinning to keep out the winter cold. I see that everything is inevitable, but you say that the big trouble is food and clothing."

Hua Zhenxing had never seen such a scene before. Could it be Zhou Rong's words that ignited everyone's enthusiasm for creation?In fact, the poems read by these few people are very special, called prophecy poems or gatha poems.

Hua Zhenxing almost became interested, but in the end he made a song without opening his mouth. He had made up his mind today to try not to talk, and besides, he was not good at it, so he had to continue studying.

If Hua Zhenxing heard correctly, these people seem to be swearing?
The purpose of establishing a joint punishment is to protect everyone present, so is the purpose of the doubters to protect those who have violated the joint punishment?
Where should we put our minds, should we protect ourselves and our relatives from harm; or try our best to let those who try to harm us escape punishment?

Lu Mubai violated the communist punishment and had to be threatened by Ling Jiwei in order to survive, and Mrs. Lin had to be driven by Lu Gaogan to survive for the violation of the communist punishment. Is this a problem of the communist punishment?
Everyone has to eat, and everyone is going to die. If you eat or not, you will inevitably die, so there is no need to eat, or simply attribute the cause of death to eating?
Now I just want to ask, would you like to have another monk who threatens you with relatives and family members?If the answer is no, it is a basic consensus to reach a common punishment.

If this consensus is not recognized, there is no need for the Kunlun League to exist... probably that is what these people want to express.

Mei Yeshi didn't sing the gatha and recited the poem. After they finished reading the poem, he asked back without changing his face: "Lu Gaogan can be punished now, and why should he be punished?"

This question is a self-answer, because Lu Gaoqian is not dead yet, and he is still locked by the sword intent of He Feng, standing by the side of the open space.

Mei Yeshi talked about the principles of discussion and execution of the Kunlun League, which are consistent with the principles of order and governance in the world.

Some people may only see a vote, but the vote itself has no real meaning, it is just a way of authorization to form a certain order.The 25 sects present at the scene did not have the right to directly decide the life and death of Lu Gaogan.

It's like a tribe lost something and the thief didn't catch it, so the whole tribe voted who was the thief... This approach and the result are meaningless and shouldn't be.

The principle of true order is that everyone first reaches a consensus that stealing is wrong and agrees on what punishment they need to be punished.Then when the theft occurs, first obtain evidence to prove that someone stole something.

After the evidence is obtained and the thief is caught, then the punishment will be decided according to the agreement of the tribe.If it is not carried out according to the agreement, then no matter whether it is forgiveness or severe punishment, there will be no basis, and the agreement of the tribe will also lose its meaning.

On this occasion, the basis for everyone to discuss issues is the consensus reached by the Kunlun League.But Zhou Rong's question just now has gone beyond this scope, and turned into whether to overthrow the consensus.

Zhou Rong still opened his mouth and said: "Then I have one last question, Ruolu Mubai, Ruolin Taiwei, the words are just out of the mouth, and the matter has not yet been accomplished, how to make it back?"

Mei Yeshi: "Just now, Master Bai and Master Ding have had a discussion, and they mentioned 'put down the butcher's knife, please imprison yourself first'. Let go of the butcher's knife when it is time, there is still a chance of survival!
He should admit his mistake on the spot, swear not to commit it, bear the burden to the Zongmen, and pass it on to Kunlun.This line of life has existed since ancient times, so there is no need to discuss it separately. If someone asks about it today, it will be clear. "

Hearing this, Hua Zhenxing suddenly understood, why did Bai Shaoliu and Ding Qifang have such a question and answer, why put down the butcher knife?It turns out that the conversation continues here!
Mei Yeshi formally answered Zhou Rong's question, still using Lu Mubai as an example.

Let’s take a look at the fact that Lu Mubai violated the communist punishment. It was his daughter Zhuang Yangquan who married the Kunlun monk Shang Haiping. As a result, Zhuang Yangquan hooked up with the foreign businessman Ling Jiwei and gave birth to a fat mixed blood seven months after marriage. boy.

Shang Haiping smashed his house in a rage, and ran to question Zhuang Yangquan face to face, but Ling Jiwei jumped out to stop him.Shang Haiping couldn't bear it anymore, he beat Ling Jiwei with his hands, and it was judged as a minor injury by judicial appraisal.

Because of this, Shang Haiping was brought into the police station by the police, and almost took criminal responsibility, but fortunately, he was caught by his family.

The Shang family couldn't swallow this breath. They still had some influence in the local area, so they decided to send both Zhuang Yangquan and Ling Jiwei in.Ling Jiwei's criminal evidence was difficult to collect, but Zhuang Yangquan's criminal evidence was still obtained, mainly economic crimes.

After hearing the news, Lu Mubai privately asked Shang Haiping out and asked him to let Zhuang Yangquan go.Shang Haiping said that he did not do it himself, but that his family could not just let it go.

Lu Mubai asked Shang Haiping to go back and stop his family, otherwise Lu Mubai would do it himself.As soon as these words came out, the faces of both of them changed, and Shang Haiping asked back on the spot: "Master Lu, do you know the precept of joint punishment?"

What Zhou Rong wanted to ask just now was what should Lu Mubai do in this situation?
Mei Yeshi gave a clear answer. At this time, Lu Mubai did have a glimmer of hope. It was the verse that Ding Qi sang just now, "Put down the butcher knife, and please imprison yourself first."
Lu Mubai may think of other ways to help his daughter, but he must not use this method to blackmail Shang Haiping.

He needs to frankly admit to Shang Haiping that he shouldn't have made such a threat just now, and vowed that he would never do that, and then go back and inform the Zongmen and Kunlun League of this matter.

In this case, the Kunlun League will not kill him, and there is no need to launch the world to punish him.But Lu Mubai, the head of Dingfengtan, will definitely not be able to do it, and being grounded against the wall is probably the lightest punishment.

If Lu Mubai still wants to act in the human world, then his magical powers will be banned and he will not be able to use them again for life.The Kunlun League has a long-standing conclusion on this situation, and it is actually written in the sect rules of the major sects, including Dingfengtan.

Of course Lu Mubai knew this, and Zhou Rong who asked the question just now actually knew it too.

Although this kind of punishment left a glimmer of life, it seemed too severe.But on second thought, is it really heavy?If from the perspective of an ordinary person, there is no punishment, Lu Mubai can still be an ordinary person!

If Lu Mubai had chosen this way, he might not have died, and the sect of Dingfengtan would not have been destroyed.

With this glimmer of hope, can it stop Lu Mubai from taking risks?Actually not!Knowing this, Lu Mubai still chose to attack Shang Haiping.

He may want to kill someone to silence him, or he may want to take down Shang Haiping and force him to keep a secret, in short, a wrong idea is a dead end.

This matter was originally a trap set up by Jambistine, the great magician Jim Malinagez, whose alias was Ling Jiwei, and Lu Mubai himself stepped into the trap.

For more than 20 years, no one knew about this episode, because Lu Mubai, Ling Jiwei, and Shang Haiping were all dead.It wasn't until last month that Dan Zicheng, the eldest disciple of the Three Dreams Sect, went to help Zhuang Yangquan move, that he found the clue.

After Mei Yeshi finished speaking, He Feng said again: "The question has come to this point, the fate has been clarified. Today the confusion has been resolved, and if someone raises the noise again in the future, it will be the same as the disaster. This is the decision of Kunlun!"

Mei Yeshi then asked: "Do you have any objections to punishing Lu Gaogan?"

None of the 25 executive sect representatives present had any objection, and Mei Yeshi looked at Lu Gaogan again: "Director Lu, please decide yourself."

But Lu Gaogan shook his head and said, "The poor are not self-determined, please be punished, who will do it?"

Mei Yeshi stretched out his hand and held out an antique bronze mirror.Ding Qi hurriedly stepped forward and said: "Leader Mei's use of the Qingming mirror to punish Lu's high-ranking officials will hurt the harmony of heaven, so Fang Waimen should do it."

At this time, someone said again: "Director Hua was injured because of this, let Director Hua kill him himself!"

Hua Zhenxing was slightly taken aback, why is there still something about him here?But he made up his mind to pretend he didn't hear it, and he didn't even look at it, but Wang Fengshou, who was standing behind him, frowned slightly.

Of course, Wang Fengshou didn't move or speak, but in Hua Zhenxing's mental image of Yuanshen, he seemed to see this Ambassador Wang took out a small notebook and wrote it down.This is similar to psychological testing, and it can be regarded as his understanding in a certain sense.

Before he finished speaking, Lu Gaoqian suddenly wilted with a flash of the knife.It turned out that it was Xian Hao who walked out from Ding Qi's side and stabbed him without saying a word, and when everyone reacted, she had already withdrawn the knife and went back.

In terms of cultivation level, Lu Gaoqian is of course much higher than Xian Hao, but he is bound by the sword intent of Master Hefeng at this moment, and there is no way to avoid it, and then there is a scene that stunned many people.

The saber Xian Hao slashed was very special. It was not so much the light of the saber as it was the trajectory of the saber that swallowed the light. The shadow swept across Lu Gaogan's figure without leaving any scars, and Lu Gaogan immediately withered and lost his vitality.

Under the watchful eyes of everyone, his body quickly dried up, cracked... scattered into dust, leaving only hairpins.

Many people were taken aback, but Mei Yeshi still didn't change his face. Xian Hao's knife can still leave some residue. If he were to use the Qingming Mirror, there might not even be ashes left.

Mei Yeshi: "Lu Gaogan has been put to death! Remember, everyone, the precept of joint execution must be joint execution! Joint execution is the responsibility of Kunlun, not our right!"

Having said that, Hua Zhenxing suddenly became enlightened, and finally understood why the Kunlun League arranged for Zhou Rong to ask such a series of questions today, just to clarify the nature of the joint punishment.

The core of joint punishment does not lie in stipulating that certain behaviors are prohibited, but lies in the word "joint punishment".

This is a responsibility that the Kunlun League must undertake, not a power that can be chosen.Some people's doubts about the prohibition of communism may be aimed at turning the responsibilities that must be assumed into powers that can be chosen.

The safety of ordinary relatives and family members of magicians should not be threatened. There are similar regulations in Cambistine's rules for magicians, but the difference between it and the Kunlun joint punishment lies in the word "joint punishment".

The whole world must be punished. Cambistine did not have such a covenant. Perhaps it is a problem of organization and execution ability, but more importantly, the logical starting point is different.

If someone violates the commandment of communism, he will be hunted down by the Kunlun League collectively. The most important guarantee of strength is the 25 sects to execute the sect.For them, this is a collective responsibility and an inescapable obligation.

There is an essential difference between having the right to deal with something and having the responsibility to deal with it.

(End of this chapter)