Han Shizu

Chapter 817 Talking About Two Points
Sorry, I sent the wrong testimonial, please don't subscribe.

1. For Zhao Kuangyin, the author really appreciates it. As the founding monarch who ranks first in history, even Mao Zedong wrote poems with Qin Huang, Han Wu, Tang Zong and Song Zu in parallel, so there is no reason to deliberately belittle and smear.

The successors are unworthy. Many people blame Zhao Kuangyin for the subsequent development of the Song Dynasty. This is not objective and fair.

Anyone who has read the historical materials of that period should know what kind of era the Five Dynasties was and how cruel the disasters of the feudal towns were.Zhao Kuangyin was able to eliminate the old malpractices and flatten the kingdoms. His historical status and achievements cannot be denied.

Confiscating military power and centralizing power are also the correct direction. There is nothing wrong with the approach. As for overcorrecting, shouldn't it be right?

As for the army of the Great Song Dynasty, in Zhao Kuangyin's dynasty, and even in the early days of Zhao Guangyi, it can be described as a strong army. Otherwise, some weak brigades can pacify the world?In the early Song Dynasty, was there a shortage of famous generals?
Although Zhao Kuangyin has planted some causes of disasters, I personally think that the flaws do not hide the goodness.

It may be a black spot to oppress orphans and widows and win the country, but on the cusp of history, there is no problem with Dai Zhou's choice.

I personally think that so many people despise this point, not because they sympathize with the orphan and widowed mother, but because they feel pity for Chai Rong.After all, many people said that if Chai Rong lived a few more years, what would happen, which shows the regret for his early death.

But there are no ifs in history. The author wrote this book to make up for the regret of this period of history through imagination.To reveal a little bit, at the beginning, I wanted to write about Chai Rong, but I also felt that it was a pity that Chai Rong died early.

2. Some readers feel that the progress of this book is too slow. It has 200 million words and has not yet unified the world.This is a problem with the rhythm of the book. I filled it with too much other content and lost a lot of words.

However, according to the timeline in the book, the 11th year since the founding of the Han Dynasty and the process of unifying the world, it is really not slow to reach the step of destroying Shu, and it is even a bit fast.

You know, it took Zhao Kuangyin 13 years to basically pacify the south with the foundation laid in the last ten years.

Some people compare the protagonist with Chai Rong. I can only say that Chai Rong can be called a generation of Ming Junxiong, but comparing his achievements with the author's "son" Liu Chengyou, isn't it a bit unfair to him?

And, have you really compared the historical development in the book with the official history?

In a few years, Chai Rongneng conquered Jinyang in the north, captured Qin and Feng in the west, flattened Huainan in the south, and then conquered Youzhou in the north. Guo Weina's three-year foundation building was very important.

If in the plane of the novel, Liu Zhiyuan can also lay the foundation for Liu Chengyou for three years, after deduction, will it be similar to the current development?It's just that the protagonist in the book spends time developing and reforming himself.

As for following the development path of history, isn't it worth learning from the tested choice?

The deduction of history has its inevitability and contingency, and the choice of strategy also has its commonality.The strategy of going south first and then north was set, combined with the national conditions in the book, from Huainan, to Qinfeng, and then to Jinghu, there are traces to follow.

If for the sake of surprise and not being the same as history, you can fight in a different order, such as taking Jiangnan first, then Jinghu, and then Sichuan and Shu, don't you think it's awkward?
Of course, if I fabricate some historical circumstances, such as civil strife in the Southern Tang Dynasty, peasant uprising, etc., to create an opportunity for the protagonist to destroy the Tang Dynasty, it may not be impossible.

That's a different way, but it's not what I want to write, based on the imagination and deduction of official history.

Well, that's all for the time being, the same sentence, the benevolent sees the benevolent and the wise sees wisdom, no matter how you look at it, you can reserve your opinions.

(End of this chapter)