I really don't want to be red

Chapter 1489 Extremely Insulting

The release of "The Hunger Games" can be said to be quite popular on the Internet.

Another week early, and people are more willing to discuss this bad movie than "The Hunger Games".

What is alluded to in it, no one knows.

But this film with a reduced investment, people who watched it unexpectedly felt that the plot was not bad. If An Ran had to focus on filming and increase the investment, I am afraid that "The Hunger Games" would not be a big deal.

On Friday night, the 1.6 million blockbuster, "The Hunger Games" was released.

Because of Enron's relationship, AMR theaters still did not schedule films.

"The Hunger Games" landed in 4000 theaters in Xizhou at the same time, and scored 1600 million box office.

On Saturday the next day, the box office skyrocketed to 3200 million, a full double.

After Sunday, the three-day weekend box office added up to 9000 million.

The opening results are quite beautiful.

Everyone has a good reputation for the film, especially the special effects and performances of the actors.

But this does not affect Enron's collection of money.

After a week, the total revenue of "The Hunger Games" reached 500 million.

But after the release of "The Hunger Games", this copycat movie actually ushered in another small climax.

The sales volume was 20 on Friday, soared to 70 on Saturday, and 80 on Sunday.

It seems a bit inconspicuous, but this made Enron's movie box office nearly 700 million.

It seems to be nothing compared to "The Hunger Games".

People have tens of millions a day, but you have only a few million after so long.

But for those who know how to do it, their eyes are almost red with envy.

For example, Levine and Max have mixed feelings in their hearts.

Almost all major film companies have begun to study the two films of Enron.

Why his films are recognized by everyone.

You must know that when the first "Atlantic Rim" came out, everyone was full of criticism. Even if everyone turned their heads and interpreted it later, the favorable rate of this movie remained at 55%, and nearly half of the people still thought it was a bad movie.

But this time "The Hunger Games" scored surprisingly high, reaching 70% praise!

Do you believe it?
A movie with an investment of 20 yuan, few professional actors, rushed to work in a week, rough special effects, exaggerated acting skills, and the lines are 70% positive?
Mud, "Pacific Rim" was only 50% positive, and now "The Hunger Games" is only 75% positive.

And it's a big investment.

This is the most enviable place for major companies.

Fox, for example, has a movie box office of more than 100 billion a year, ranking first among the top ten film companies in Xizhou Films for several years in a row.

He can account for one-third of the box office of 300 billion a year, which is logically very profitable, right?

It's also really profitable.

But the box office of 120 billion, that is the total data, excluding taxes, share for theaters, and remuneration for distributors.

They have less than 40 billion in their hands!
The production cost is deducted from the 40 billion, so they fall into their hands. The good ones are 20 billion, and the almost ones are only a few billion!

If you spread it out and count, are there other movies that don't make money and movies that lose money?

A profit of 10 billion is enough for everyone to be happy.

Behind this 10 billion profit is the result of the entire company, more than 10 people working hard for a year.

This is still Fox.

What about something else?
What about Universal, Huaner, Legend, and Soni whose box office can't reach tens of billions?

Many film industries are supported by losses, relying on the DVD market and their TV stations to support them.

The better one here is Humen Films.

Humen Films follows the low-cost and small-production route, and there will often be some small hits, which can earn hundreds of millions in a year.

Even if you lose, you can't lose much.

These people are not jealous when they see that An Ran earns tens of millions of dollars in each movie.

Basically, this is a net profit!

There is no one who is not envious.

But let them make a big online movie, and they will definitely die. Everyone knows that they don't have the ability to write the script as the original.

There is another question, who the hell copied himself?Isn't that self-inflicted?
So now the top ten companies see all kinds of envy and hatred.

I wish I could pinch An Ran to death, but I have nothing to do with him.

The box office of "The Hunger Games" is very good. It won 1.6 million box office in the first week. According to this level, it is no problem to save capital, and it will be a matter of time to make money.

But the problem soon came.

After the second week, it was said.

This movie is too long-winded. If it was shot according to "The Hunger Games", it would be finished in half an hour.

People's plot is the essence!
This remark was an unintentional move at the beginning, but I didn't expect it to resonate with everyone soon.

"That's right, Mr. An Ran's bad movie... Actually, I don't even want to call it a bad movie. The plot is tight and there is no slack at all. "The Hunger Games" is almost interesting! I feel that many plots are actually unnecessary!"

"In terms of the coherence and compactness of the plot, I vote for "The Hunger Games"."

"Please, the screenwriters of "The Hunger Games", you will know how to shoot after watching "The Hunger Games". It's not that your movie is bad, but compared to this bad movie in terms of plot, you are no match!"

Such comments quickly became a trend.

Any negative reviews take a toll on a movie, especially since "The Hunger Games" has been in theaters for over a week and its first box-office run is over.

Most of the rest are optional.

If word of mouth is good and someone recommends it, then naturally the box office will be strong.

But everyone was comparing it with "The Hunger Games", which immediately dispelled the enthusiasm of this part of the audience.

It doesn't seem so good-looking either!
Then why bother to see it?Might as well wait for the DVD to come out and watch it.

As for now?

You can watch "The Hunger Games". It is said that although this movie is bad, the plot is good.

Ok!

"The Hunger Games", which was already at the end of its strength, seemed to be given a shot in the arm when the daily income was less than 1.

Daily on-demand two started to grow.

It has been 20 on-demand for several days in a row.

This is over ten million.

A movie with a low cost of 20 yuan, with the help of the Internet, the box office exceeds [-] million...

No matter who it is, it feels a little unacceptable.

If this is in a movie theater, this is equivalent to 3000 million box office!

In contrast, the box office successor of "The Hunger Games" is weak.

This movie with an investment of 1.6 million, based on the box office of the first week, should be around 4.5 million when it ends.

Let Humen Pictures make a fortune.

But now it's a good thing, getting back the money has become a problem.

Ten days later, the film's box office was advancing at a speed that could only be described as a snail's pace.

It was only 2.5 million in 600 days, and after [-] days, the daily box office was less than [-] million.

According to this situation, it is considered a high-spirited event to finally earn 3 million box office.

Of course, compared to the results of "Pacific Rim", the results are much better. It is basically not a big loss for DVD releases and the like.

But the key is to look at the comparison.

Compared with "The Hunger Games", don't mention how irritating it is!

(End of this chapter)