My system is not decent

In short, we have reason to believe that it was the ancestors of China who brought Chinese culture to America.

And it has been passed down from generation to generation, giving Indian culture Chinese characteristics.

If so, world history should be rewritten.

Or back to Di Xin, who said he was cruel, in fact, it was all Zhou people who said Di Xin was cruel, and this definitely needs to be compared.

In comparison, Zhou people are actually more brutal.

In the Battle of Muye, according to records, as many as [-] merchants were killed.

At that time, the main forces of the Shang Dynasty were all in the southeast, which shows that most of them were civilians.

Moreover, the Zhou people also hunted and killed a large number of tigers, bears, rhinos, deer and other animals.

There are more than [-] heads in the name of King Wu of Zhou alone, and there are only a few hundred heads in Di Xin's meat forest in the wine pool.

And it's just livestock and birds. In this comparison, is Emperor Xin cruel, or King Wu of Zhou?

Finally, in the history of our country, there are more cruel and fatuous emperors than Di Xin.

Why can Di Xin's "notoriety" sit firmly in the "top spot"?
Although there are reasons why various novels and history books have made special mention of him, isn't there a figure of Zhou people among them?
Of course, it is useless to say these now, because we are the descendants of all dynasties of Xia, Shang, Zhou, Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing.

Dynasty rotation, until now, we can really say clearly, who exactly did our ancestors pinpoint?
As the Han nationality, we can only say that we are descendants of Yan and Huang. As for others, it is really difficult to confirm.

Therefore, no matter Jie Zhou is good or not, they are always our ancestors.

We also pursue history, just to understand the truth of history and restore some historical events that have been misinterpreted by later generations.

There are too many things like this.

And the most concentrated ones must be the Qing Dynasty. They made unremitting efforts to ruin the celebrities of the Ming Dynasty.

For example, Zhu Yuanzhang, his body is the hardest hit area.

To put it simply, is he really ugly?

What kind of affinity can an ugly person have?

You know, in ancient times, it was difficult to be an official even with a handicap.

One more thing, many people now know that Zhu Yuanzhang started his career as a beggar and was a monk.

Such a person must be illiterate?

Therefore, a bowl at the beginning has become a good talk.

However, beggars and monks do not mean illiterate or foolish.

In fact, among the many figures in the history of our country, few people's inspirational deeds can be compared with Zhu Yuanzhang, the founding emperor of the Ming Dynasty.

Tang Zong, Song Zu, and Qin Shihuang are not as good as Zhu Yuanzhang, because he has the most upright position, and no one can blame him for this!
This ancestor, it can be said that he was really poor and fighting the world for nothing.

And Liu Bang, the emperor of the Han Dynasty, who was also known as the commoner emperor, had a significantly higher standard of living than Zhu Yuanzhang.

In his day, there was no universal compulsory education.

But Liu Bang was able to go to school, which proved that the family conditions are not bad, much better than most families.

Zhu Yuanzhang came from a real poor background. Although he claims to have a tofu shop, it is obvious that Zhu's tofu shop may not be operating at a loss.

...

At least he doesn't make much money, otherwise Zhu Yuanzhang wouldn't be herding cattle with the landlord Liu De.

Zhu Yuanzhang's childhood can be described in two words-miserable.

Because of Zhu Yuanzhang's immediate family members, most of the deaths were caused by starvation.

A person will starve to death, and the general situation is just one word-poor, how to fill the stomach without money.

How can Zhu Yuanzhang be poor?Parents died and there was no place to bury them, although later a kind person gave Zhu Yuanzhang a piece of land to bury his parents.

But there is still a practical problem in front of us, how to solve it, and that is the problem of eating.

In order to solve the problem of food and clothing, Zhu Yuanzhang became a monk, which temporarily solved the problem of food and clothing.

But then the famine was too severe, and Zhu Yuanzhang could not be supported in the temple and could only beg for alms.

The so-called begging is actually begging, and it must be the main area of ​​famine.

I have nothing to eat, so how could I be destined for you?

Zhu Yuanzhang grew up in various unfortunate, poor and harsh conditions.

It can be said that Zhu Yuanzhang's growth path was more difficult than many poor college students.

But few people can match Zhu Yuanzhang's achievements.

A child from a poor family who counterattacks and becomes a figure of ninety-five respects, logically speaking, should be able to set an inspirational example for others.

But in fact, Zhu Yuanzhang rarely appears in front of the public as an inspirational figure.

Since Chen Wenzhe began to learn to read, people's evaluation of Zhu Yuanzhang is generally a butcher, a psychopath and other negative evaluations.

The reason why Zhu Yuanzhang can't become an inspirational historical public figure is that Zhu Yuanzhang's story is indeed inspirational, but he killed too many wolf-hearted intellectuals.

Therefore, they accused Luo Zhi of many crimes, saying that he could not do it.

For example, is it nonsense that the pursuit of life goals is not ambitious enough?
I also use Liu Bang, the great ancestor of the Han Dynasty, as a metaphor. For example, although Liu Bang was born in the market, he has lofty goals and ideal pursuits in life. He once determined to become as majestic as Qin Shihuang.

In fact, Chen Wenzhe still had another idea. He still wanted to be as majestic as Daozu Hongjun, but he didn't say it.

So, let’s talk about Zhu Yuanzhang again, he is different, his ideal is really popular.

His ideal is to live a good life, marry a wife and have children.

This way of life is peace and quiet.

For many experts, this is lack of ambition, because there are no lofty ideals and goals.

It's not just the experts who think so, many parents and teachers should think so too.

However, I think many parents want their sons to follow Lao Zhu as an example.

Although Zhu Yuanzhang did not go to school, his education level is very high, which is beyond doubt.

Many people say that Zhu Yuanzhang's education is at most the level of not graduating from junior high school.

However, their level of governance and entrepreneurship are among the top few in China's five thousand years.

Such a person, you say he is uneducated?What about fooling a fool?

Some people would say that Zhu Yuanzhang was able to be an emperor because of the war that made heroes!

Of course, this is the fact that Ming Taizu Zhu Yuanzhang started from a poor body and eventually established the Ming Empire.

From joining the army when he was young, to being a vassal, and then becoming the king of a country, he has experienced countless wars.

It can be said that every war is an opportunity for him to grow.

It would be a big mistake to say that he has learned nothing!

Not only learned, but also learned thoroughly, thoroughly learned!
However, it cannot be said that Zhu Yuanzhang's literary attainments are poor!
Zhu Yuanzhang grew up in a poor family, and it was good enough to eat enough when he was a child, so he couldn't talk about studying.

Fortunately, when he was young, his father sent him to a private school for a period of time, and he knew a few big characters.

Including being a monk in Huangjue Temple, facing the scriptures all day long, so in terms of culture, I can be regarded as a little proficient in literature and ink.

My system is not decent