Chapter 352
Li Wangen was sued in the Railway Transport Court.

According to the jurisdictional regulations, he sued on the grounds that the railway transportation company failed to perform the transportation contract correctly, which caused personal injury to the counterparty of the contract. Disputes over railway passenger transportation contracts are more complicated than ordinary contract disputes, involving whether the carrier is correct or not. Whether the passenger's personal injury has been caused by fulfilling the railway passenger transportation contract.

From the perspective of facilitating trial and litigation, and the actual connection with the case, disputes over railway passenger transportation contracts shall be under the jurisdiction of the railway transportation court at the place of departure, destination or defendant's domicile.

The destination station refers to the final destination of the passenger, which means that Li Wangen can sue in the railway transportation court of city A and the transportation court of city P where he finally returned to his hometown.

He chose the P City Railway Transport Court.

my country’s railway courts were first established in March 1954. At that time, they were called “special courts along railway lines”. Around 3, the National Railway Transport Courts were prepared to be established and officially started handling cases on May 1980, 1982.

By 2012, the national railway courts began to formally separate from the railway transport enterprises and implement territorial jurisdiction. The railway transport courts that were originally under the jurisdiction of various railway bureaus started the work of one-time overall transfer to local governments, completed the reform of the management system, and integrated them into the national judicial system.

After the railway transport courts across the country are incorporated into the national judicial management system, it will not only help to give full play to the judicial guarantee and ensure the safety and smoothness of the railway transport main artery, but also help to rationally and uniformly allocate judicial resources, facilitate the parties to participate in litigation, and enable the society The public no longer has doubts about the independence of the railway transport court, which has enhanced the judicial credibility of the railway transport court.

At present, my country's railway transportation courts are divided into two levels: the railway transportation intermediate court and the railway transportation basic court.Cases such as Li Wangen can only be prosecuted to the Railway Transportation Basic Court.

Strictly speaking, railway transportation is a systematic project. The work of railway transportation is like a large linkage machine, which often affects the whole body. Moreover, railway transportation has strong mobility and unstable personnel. Therefore, cases related to railway transportation are quite difficult to hear.

The railway transportation court has been accepting civil and criminal cases closely related to railway transportation, railway safety, railway property, etc. These cases are highly specialized. The railway transportation court has accumulated rich experience in long-term trial practice. The court's continued exclusive jurisdiction over these cases is very conducive to giving full play to the professional expertise accumulated over the years and achieving good trial results and social effects.

Soon, the Railway Transportation Court of P City notified a railway bureau group company, the superior department of the passenger section where Liu Qun was located.The passenger section is not alone as a qualified party, and only the Railway Bureau Group Company can be the defendant.

Moreover, this Li Wangen sued the Railway Bureau Group Company and the medical workers involved in the rescue as co-defendants in a very sinister manner.

It seems that this Li Wangen also hired a lawyer, otherwise he could not explain these rules clearly if he sued alone.

The Enterprise Management and Legal Affairs Department of the Railway Bureau Group Company, referred to as the Enterprise Law Department, immediately notified the passenger section, requiring the passenger section to provide on-site materials needed for the lawsuit, and make preparations to participate in the lawsuit with the relevant parties as witnesses.

Since Li Wangen also made the doctor a co-defendant, and the P City Railway Transportation Court at that time had no way of knowing the address and unit contact information of Dr. Li, it asked the Railway Bureau Group Company to provide it, and then the Railway Transportation Court A summons was served to notify Dr. Li to appear in court.

But at this time, Liu Qun's stubborn nature was fully exposed.For this question, Liu Qun has no comment. Whether it is Duan's legal counsel or the staff of the corporate law department of the group company who asks him, he always has no comment.

Of course, Duan Shang’s legal advisor is familiar with Liu Qun, and he was originally a train conductor. He also felt very shameless about Li Wangen’s behavior, but from a work perspective, he still asked Liu Qun about medical workers. contact information.

Liu Qun didn't hide anything from him, and told all the thoughts in his heart: "

We are all born in sports cars, and it is inevitable that we will encounter passengers with diseases at work. At this time, we use the radio to seek medical treatment, or register the medical workers when the passengers get on the bus. At this time, the medical workers Obviously you don’t need to come to register, but people took huge risks to register, and some even participated in our rescue activities. I don’t think it’s justified to let people take responsibility at this time.So our personal relationship is one thing, but I still have reservations about providing the contact information of passengers, so you don't need to ask. "

The legal counsel did not force it.Hearing what Liu Qun said, as the former conductor of the train, he also felt the same way, and said to Liu Qun: "Liu Che, since you don't want to talk about it, then I won't ask, I know how you are.

Let the passenger Li Wangen solve this problem by himself. If he wants to sue the other party, he should provide the information about the other party. We have no such obligation, but when asked by the court, we absolutely have Querying and registering the medical workers who are disposed of on the spot is the job. Otherwise, if we say that the medical workers are not registered, it will have an adverse impact on us, and we may bear corresponding legal risks.

Moreover, the other party seems to have hired a lawyer or has someone who studies law at home, otherwise they would not have prosecuted in such a professional manner.

The other party said that our rescue was not timely and that the doctor's treatment was problematic. If we said that we did not check the documents and register, then the other party's claim may be supported. "

Liu Qun and legal counsel Duan usually chatted speculatively, so they didn't want to get stuck, so they said: "This is a civil contract dispute case. In this case, the other party has to prove many things. Civil litigation Isn't it generally who claims and who gives evidence?
Then it is up to him to provide evidence. In a word, I will not provide the doctor's work unit, home address, certificate number, and mobile phone number.

I don't care who says it or asks me, I always have this attitude.I hope you can understand my difficulties. I have certain principles in life. A man is in the world, and there are things to do and things not to do. "

(End of this chapter)

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like