Riding the wind of rebirth

Zhou Zhi also shook hands with Li Xin: "Mr. Li, will it cause legal problems if the material is filmed without the knowledge of the person concerned?"

"Of course." Li Xin added more strength in his hands: "Don't you see that we are just asking for the opinions of the parties? If you disagree, we will naturally re-record, but whether we can do it... depends on the effect Well!"

Threats, naked threats!
Zhou Zhi sighed, so the law is not a panacea, so there is no need to be too mythical.

Because it can't solve all problems.

……

……

"Dear Comrade Judge, what we are submitting now is based on the relevant provisions of my country's GA/T73-1990 "Mechanical Anti-theft Lock Standard". This national standard divides the safety level of the main technical indicators of the mechanical anti-theft lock cylinder into There are three types: A-level, B-level and C-level.”

"A level is the lowest, requiring protection against technical opening for 1 minute or more, anti-drilling for 10 minutes or more, anti-sawing for 5 minutes or more, prying resistance for 10 minutes or more, pull-proof for 10 minutes or more, and impact resistance for 10 minutes or more. "

"B-level lock cylinders require technical opening protection for not less than 5 minutes, anti-drilling for not less than 15 minutes, anti-sawing for not less than 5 minutes, anti-prying for not less than 15 minutes, anti-pull for not less than 15 minutes, and anti-shock for not less than 15 minutes. "

"As for the C-level lock cylinder, it is required to prevent technical opening for more than or equal to 10 minutes, anti-drilling for more than or equal to 30 minutes, anti-sawing for more than or equal to 30 minutes, anti-prying for more than or equal to 30 minutes, anti-pull for more than or equal to 30 minutes, and anti-shock for more than or equal to 30 minutes. .”

"The following is the key pattern of the three types of lock cylinders that we presented. You can see that the keys of the A-level lock cylinders are flat or crescent-shaped, with a row of concave key grooves on one or both sides. There are convex key grooves on all four sides of the cross shape;”

"The key of the B-level lock cylinder is flat or crescent-shaped, with two rows of concave key grooves or cylindrical multi-point concave key holes on one or both sides;"

"The safety and anti-theft door purchased by the plaintiff this time uses a lock cylinder of Class C, which is the highest level of security: the key is flat, with two rows of concave and S-shaped key grooves on one or both sides. Or a double-snake-shaped keyway inside and outside;”

"What needs to be reminded, comrade judges, is that according to the relevant provisions of my country's current "Mechanical Anti-theft Lock Standards", there are only lower limit requirements for C-level lock cylinders, but no upper limit requirements." Attorney Hu said in court: "And in this In this case, the fire brigade opened the door lock of Professor Lu Zhongping’s house, used various tools, and finally used an electric grinder to open the door by cutting. It took a total of one hour, twenty and ten minutes. Here is Shu The police record certificate issued by the Armed Police Fire Squadron of Dujinjiang District."

"The actual responsibility for this incident, first of all, we believe that Professor Lu Zhongping did not bring a key when he went out, especially because he deliberately did not extinguish the fire source, causing a terrible safety hazard."

"The second is the improper handling of firefighters. As far as we know, the reinforced anti-theft fence enclosed by the balcony of Professor Lu Zhongping's house can be clamped open with the steel clamps equipped by the fire squadron. You can enter the room in this way and open the door. , and there is no need to use violence to break the door."

"The third is that we provide a customer service phone number for every customer who installs an anti-theft door. As long as you dial the customer service phone number, professional maintenance personnel will come to maintain it. They are more familiar with the door locks they produce than firefighters. Perfect technical means."

"In summary, the defense believes that the lawsuit brought by Professor Lu Zhongping is unreasonable, because the security door we provided to the professor prevented the opening of various means for more than 10 minutes, which fully complies with the State C highest standards."

"As for the loss caused by the prosecution's own improper operation and the subsequent consumption of national public resources, my defense also expresses its deep sympathy." Attorney Hu concluded: "Our two defendants, Jin Chief engineer Xu Anran, the legal representative of Security Lock Co., Ltd., and Zhou Zhi, the patent owner and licensor of the four-way steel shaft anti-theft security door, after hearing about Professor Lu Zhongping’s past deeds, expressed their admiration and were willing to sincerely, For the purpose of humanitarian care, a security door was replaced for Professor Lu Zhongping; at the same time, the Jinjiang District Armed Police Fire Squadron of Shudu was trained on the emergency handling of ultra-high standard C-level door locks.”

"However, we will resolutely defend the lawsuit brought by Professor Lu Zhongping, because my client has no fault or flaw in this incident. Comrade judge, I have finished my statement."

The court has entered the stage of debate. In fact, the evidence and reasons for defense have almost been submitted. Now the main thing is to use eloquence and logic to influence the judge's judgment as much as possible.

"We don't agree with some of the arguments put forward by the defense." On the opposite side of the plaintiff's table, a gray-haired, elegant-looking old man talked with the lawyer for a few words, and the prosecution lawyer surnamed Huang began to argue: " First of all, we admit that the national standard proposed by the other party does exist, but we would like to draw the attention of comrade judges that that standard is the "Standard for Mechanical Anti-theft Locks", not the "Standard for Safety Anti-theft Doors", so those level requirements are all It is a requirement for a lock cylinder, not a requirement for a security door."

Lawyer Hu immediately raised his hand: "No! Although the GA/T73-1990 standard is the "Standard for Mechanical Anti-theft Locks", as there is no "Standard for Safety Anti-theft Doors" in our country, we believe that the standard for locks installed on security doors As the overall standard of the gate, it is reasonable in itself."

"We can't imagine a C-level standard lock cylinder paired with a door that can be broken and opened in 2 minutes. Because that is an unreasonable configuration and a waste of resources, let alone be accepted by the market."

"Therefore, it is only possible to match A-level locks with A-level doors, and C-level locks with C-level doors. The plaintiff thinks that we can lower the product quality of the doors because the locks have national standards but the doors do not. We will not make such a request. Accepted."

"However, we also appeal here that the country should issue the "Security and Anti-theft Door" standard as soon as possible to avoid similar vague definitions."

Lawyer Huang said: "Comrade judge, we are a court here, and we can only refer to legal provisions when we discuss issues. Even if the country issues the "Standards for Security Doors" in the future, it will be a matter of the future and cannot be traced back to this lawsuit. "

"In the absence of a clear "safety and anti-theft door standard" in the country, we can't use guesswork and inference to forcefully create laws, and we can't think recklessly that the defendant measures and designs the door according to the lock standard. It must be reasonable and safe."

"The door of a family is different from a safe, and there are no cash or bills inside."

"It's a home, with life in it."