From university lecturer to chief academician.

Journal of Physics: Cosmos and Microphysics.

Title of the paper: "Analysis of Decay and Undiscovered Particles".

Authors: Wang Hao, Paul Phil-Jones.

After briefly reviewing the content of the paper, Ledley-Parsons felt that his heart was filled with a combination of 'grievance', 'suffocation' and anger.

A scholar, of course, has research freedom.

For the study of physical theory, there is no limitation on the field of scholars, but because the basic definition of annihilation theory conflicts with string theory, the two theories can be said to be in a semi-contradictory nature.

To scholars of string theory, scholars of annihilation theory are heretics.

Academic heretics, of course, will not have any other influence, but in the academic circle of string theory, first studying string theory and then switching to annihilation theory, it will be considered an absolute betrayal.

In the academic circle of string theory, Ridley-Parsons' reputation can be described as bad.

Not to mention in other colleges and universities, even in Florida State University, some people said he was a 'traitor', a 'villain'.

Some students also believe that there is no respect for academics, and it is completely a betrayal of their previous beliefs for funds.

Ledley-Parsons didn't feel much before, and turning to an opposite direction would naturally have an impact, but now he only feels very aggrieved and very angry.

He felt aggrieved that he was not the only one, the famous Paul Phil-Jones also turned to study the theory of annihilation.

He was angry that Paul Phil-Jones went to study the theory of annihilation!
Ledley-Parsons has a feeling of collapse of faith. From the bottom of his heart, he feels that Paul Phil-Jones is not at the same level as himself.Paul Phil-Jones, a genius of string theory, is a representative figure of the young generation in the academic circle of string theory.

In Ledley-Parsons' heart, Paul Phil-Jones is the pure white lotus among scholars engaged in string theory research. People can keep up with him.

It is not surprising that Paul Phil-Jones can reach the height of Edward Witten in the future. He is the kind of person who is truly gifted and talented.

In addition, Ledley-Parsons also believes that it is precisely because he has no talent or talent that he turns to the research of annihilation theory to cheat "more funds to pay for going to bars to find girls."

Paul Phil-Jones doesn't have to do this at all. He has always insisted on the research of string theory, and the school will give him enough financial support.

As a result, Paul Phil-Jones also went to study the annihilation theory, and what's more, he did the research with Wang Hao, the founder of the annihilation theory, and made great achievements and published them.

This is so infuriating!
Ledley-Parsons gritted his teeth thinking about it. It turns out that Paul is the biggest traitor!

I was only for money, but he was an absolute betrayal, a betrayal in behavior and heart!
Last time, he also said that he was determined to study and find out the problem of annihilation theory, so he went to China to study together? …

Shameful!

After Ledley-Parsons confirmed the content of the paper, he immediately sent a Tweet message--
Let's see who is the traitor!
Attached below is a picture with key information from the Journal of Cosmology and Microphysics, Resolved Decay and Undiscovered Particles, and the author, Paul Phil-Jones.

Ridley-Parsons still has a certain influence. He is a full professor at Florida State University and is well-known in the academic circle of string theory.

It is precisely because of this that he is considered a traitor, otherwise, if an unknown scholar changes his research direction, it will not have any impact.

Many string theory scholars have seen the news released by Ledley-Parsons.

They feel incredible.

After carefully reviewing the content of the paper, they also understood why Ledley-Parsons would say that.

Paul Phil Jones!

That guy who is super obsessed with string theory turned to study annihilation theory, and has some results?

This is definitely a major blow to the string theory camp!
If the camp in the field of string theory is compared to an army, then Edward Witten of Princeton University is the commander-in-chief of the army, and Paul Phil Jones is a young general who has made many achievements and is regarded by many as the future commander-in-chief. Commander's successor.

As a result, the "successor-in-chief" suddenly surrendered to the enemy, and made great contributions in a battle.

For a while, string theory scholars were silent.

None of them knew what to say, and the only thing they could do was to give a thumbs up to the Tweet message sent by Ledley-Parsons, and then silently check the paper.

Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton University.

Edward Witten had the same reaction as other string theory scholars. He also noticed the message sent by Ledley Parsons, and then went to check the content of the paper, and his heart suddenly became very complicated.

He was mainly depressed by the new research content, and he studied string theory all his life, and even developed string theory into a recognized "unified" theory. As a result, a new theory opposed to string theory emerged.

This new theory is not just a theory, but can also make predictions in advance in connection with experiments.

Edward Witten took a general look at the content and basically confirmed the process of the argument. Wang Hao and Paul Phil-Jones did the research together, so there is no need to question the rigor of the argument.

The part related to the annihilation theory is still the basic definition of annihilation force.

Edward-Witten could easily understand the core content in the very first part of mathematics—the annihilation force has a higher dimension than the other three microcosmic forces.

Some subsequent mathematical systems have conflicts with string theory research.

If the final experiment proves that the conclusion is correct, it can be explained to a certain extent that the annihilation force is likely to exist.

Although the "missing data" of the last particle collision experiment and the new particles analyzed now are only side demonstrations of the annihilation force, they are all based on the assumption of the existence of the annihilation force, and give a basic definition of the annihilation force. If the experimental verification can be predicted continuously, more times will naturally prove that the annihilation force is real. …

That's the problem.

The fundamental definition of annihilation theory is partly in conflict with string theory.If the annihilation force is proved to be real, wouldn't it prove that string theory is wrong in reverse?

I have been engaged in the research of string theory all my life, and it turns out that string theory is proved to be wrong by others. Edward Witten's mood can be imagined.

With a long sigh, he found a handwritten letter from the drawer.

This letter is from Paul Phil-Jones, written before he went to China.Edward-Witten opened the letter, and it was written, Dear Mr. Witten,

String theory has ushered in the biggest crisis in decades, and annihilation theory is the biggest challenge of string theory.

So I decided to go to Xihai University to study annihilation theory.

In the process of learning Chinese, I learned that there is a philosophical meaning in a sentence, “Know yourself and the enemy, and win every battle, which means that you must understand the enemy to defeat the enemy.

Only by studying the annihilation theory can we find out the problems of the annihilation theory...

Looking at the contents of the letter, Edward Witten couldn't help but nodded, thinking, is this Paul's method?There are research results published...

Then, the experiment will prove that there is no discovery?At that time, the research will be wrong, and the high-dimensional definition of annihilation force will naturally be wrong.

Going deeper into the analysis, maybe other definitions are also wrong, and the explanation that replaces it with string theory makes sense...

Although I feel that the inference is a bit unreliable, Edward Witten still has some expectations.

Because he believed in Paul Phil-Jones.

Paul Phil-Jones is as enthusiastic about string theory as he was when he was young!
······
It is not only Edward Witten's experimental verification.

When the paper was actually published, it was noticed by many people. "Cosmos and Microphysics" is the top academic journal of quantum physics, and the number of orders in the field is still very large. Combined with the reputation of Wang Hao and Paul Phil-Jones , naturally more attractive.

Research papers are not purely mathematical demonstrations, but are linked to experimental problems.

Whether there are new particles in the energy range of 183GeV-187GeV can be researched and proved, and professionals soon began to search for past experimental reports.

Regarding the energy range of 183GeV-187GeV, there have been two relevant reports in the past, and one seems to be the latest report, saying that there are numerical signal fluctuations in the range of 178-195GeV'.

The other report was eight years ago, saying that there were abnormal numerical fluctuations around '182GeV', but the judgment given was 'due to experimental errors'.

Putting the two pieces of information together, under normal circumstances, it is still difficult to cause, because there are many reports of similar energy points.

In particle collision experiments, subtle anomalies abound, most of which are just statistical data fluctuations caused by the large number of events generated and recorded by the experiment.

In this case, many random anomalies disappear when more data is collected.

However, when it comes to the research conducted by Wang Hao and Paul Phil-Jones, the feeling is different.

Several professional teams in CERN have begun to seriously analyze the data in the energy range of 183GeV-187GeV in past experiments. …

For example, Gesner-Rainier.

When Gessner-Rainier saw the latest research paper, he just felt very stupid, because he always knew that in the last week, Didier-Mayor's team was doing intensive experimental data screening In the analysis work, a large number of experimental raw data are also used.

Plus, he knew the opposing team was looking for new particles.

When he knew the news, Gesner-Reinier didn't take it seriously at all, because he looked down on Didier-Mayor's level, thinking that the other party was just wasting time.

Now Gesner-Rainier understood that this guy must have known something in advance.

Maybe it is the news from Wang Hao that the data work will be done on a large scale!

There are no such coincidences in the world.

Gessner-Reinier is 100% sure that Mayor's team is doing this research, and he immediately explained the research work, hoping to catch up with the progress of Mayor's team.

Unfortunately, it's too late...

One week is enough to do a lot of things.

At this time, Didier-Mayor has achieved results, 183GeV-187GeV, the calculated energy range is too accurate, so accurate that the work to be done is greatly reduced, they found the middle range of past experiments All data, even raw data, can be analyzed.

Finally, the conclusion that '183GeV-187GeV energy is very likely to exist new particles' is concluded.

What made Didier-Mayor feel depressed was that Wang Hao published the paper too fast, he was only a week ahead of schedule, and other teams must be doing research.

Therefore, if there is a result, it must be published, and he originally hoped to do it in a more in-depth and precise manner.

CERN has cooperated with Cosmos and Microcosm, and Didier-Mayor also knew the editor-in-chief Resal, so he simply called and asked, we have achieved results in the research of new particles, and what was published in the research When can it be published?
Resal's eyes lit up when he heard it, and he immediately asked, is it confirmed that the new particles exist?

Didier-Major said that it is still not completely sure, but the degree of confidence is also very high.

Resal suddenly became uninterested. He thought for a while and said, let's do it in the next issue. After the next test, the results will be published together.

Didier-Mayor twitched his lips and finally gave up publishing in Cosmos and Microcosmos.

next episode?After the particle collision experiment?
At that time, other research groups must have achieved results, and they may all be sure to discover new particles. What is the significance of their team's results?Didier-Mayor simply put the results on the homepage of the experimental team's report, and also submitted a summary of the results report to the Nuclear Organization. Soon, the official homepage of the Nuclear Organization also updated the new results of the Mayor team. information--
"There are likely to be new particles in the 183GeV-187GeV interval".

Likely, not sure.

There is a difference of one standard deviation in value, and physicists agree that five standard deviations can be used to determine the discovery of new particles.

In the data analysis of the physical experiment, an abnormal signal was suddenly discovered. Is the particle really detected, or is the system data falsely reported?This is a matter of judgment, and the method of judgment is to set a confidence interval and calculate the degree of deviation. …

The stronger the signal and the more the value deviates from the theoretical value in the particle-free state, the higher the authenticity of the signal, and the standard deviation is used to represent the deviation of the signal in statistics.

Under the normal distribution, the 95% two-tailed confidence interval is 1.96 standard deviations, which means that when the deviation of the signal is 1.96 standard deviations, there is a 95% probability that it is a true detection, but there are still 5 % chance of false positives.

Five standard deviations, in order to determine the possibility of eliminating interference and discover new particles.

The Mayor team's confidence in finding the new particle seems to be 1.85 standard deviations, which translates to about 90 percent.

Under normal circumstances, the conclusion of 1.85 standard deviations cannot explain the discovery of new particles, but combined with the research of Wang Hao and Paul Phil-Jones, the conclusion seems to be very convincing.

Many people are starting next month's particle collision test experiment.

At that time, more intensive experiments and more complete data should be able to discover this new particle!
Xihai University, Mason Mathematical Sciences Laboratory.Office of the Director.

Looking at the news reported one by one, Zhu Jianrong sat on the sofa, couldn't help twitching the corners of his mouth, and calculated and analyzed the new particle
This is a small study?
When he looked at Wang Hao again, he didn't know how to speak.

really!

He was fooled again!

Zhu Jianrong pondered for a long time, but still asked, Professor Wang, can the conclusion of this new research, that is, new particles, be confirmed?

Wang Hao thought for a while and said, even if it is my own research, I dare not be 100% sure. After all, it is a new particle, and maybe the particle collision experiment next month will not be able to find it.This new particle decays very fast and has a low signal strength.

After hearing this, Zhu Jianrong turned to look at Paul Phil-Jones.

Paul Phil-Jones thought about it and said a number, more than two standard deviations.

Zhu Jianrong was suddenly confused.

Wang Hao twitched the corner of his mouth and helped to translate it. More than 90.00% nine, he was talking about the possibility that the experiment will discover next month.Didier-Mayor's team has raised the confidence level to 1.85 standard deviations based on past data. Converting the experimental intensity, the probability of discovery this time is very high.

oh oh.

Zhu Jianrong nodded continuously, only feeling that his IQ had been crushed. He still said that this research can analyze new particles, which is amazing!
He said thumbs up.

It is simply unimaginable to rely on theoretical research to calculate and analyze new particles.

The only new particle that was completely analyzed by theory before was the Higgs particle. Even neutrinos were predicted in advance by combining experimental data and theory.

The Higgs particle is a complete set of
When the standard model of particles was just taking shape, there were already relevant theories, and it was not really detected in experiments until decades later.

Now it is the analysis and calculation of a paper, and the conclusion of the existence of new particles has been drawn, which can be called a "very significant" research achievement.

Even if it is not as good as the Higgs particle, neutrino, etc., it is the top achievement of quantum physics.

Wang Hao shook his head and said, it's just a small study, the focus is on the theoretical basis, not the conclusion.

Zhu Jianrong twitched the corner of his mouth again. …

This is true.

Paul Phil-Jones nodded in approval and said that this is only an analysis of the decay process of a single particle.If it turns out that there are new particles, it means that the dimension of the annihilation force is likely to be higher.

On this basis, it can be expanded to other fields, even if only the decay of baryons is studied, new particles may be discovered again.

Conclusively proving that new particles exist, our work is only just beginning.

Afterwards, it will be expanded to other quantum physics fields, and the standard model of particles will be improved. There is still a lot of follow-up work, and the research space is very broad...

Paul Phil-Jones was looking forward to it.

The high dimension of annihilation force is the basis, and the discovery of new particles is only one of the conclusions.

On this basis, they can draw more conclusions from research.

Paul Phil-Jones became very expectant and excited as he spoke. He couldn't wait to see CERN's experiments prove their research conclusions.

At that time, you can continue to study in other directions, and while the research space becomes wider, you can also draw more conclusions.

Achievements and honors are coming!

Perhaps, I will become the most famous theoretical physicist and win the Nobel Prize in Physics for it...

The more he thought about it, the more excited he became, and he kept thinking that he would definitely discover new particles!
Sure can!
Expecting the research to be confirmed, Paul Phil-Jones returned to his office, opened his personal mailbox and saw the email from Edward Witten.

The content of the email is to ask about this research, Paul, is your research correct?

Paul Phil-Jones was suddenly full of complexities, he thought for a long time, and replied an email, Edward, I have been working hard to study the theory of annihilation.Only with more in-depth research can we find out the problem.

Plus, the research could help revise string theory.I will always work hard for this!
Immediately afterwards, he saw the email from Ledley-Parsons again.

This email is not very friendly, asking why Paul Phil-Jones did not insist on studying string theory, but instead studied annihilation theory like himself.

Paul Phil-Jones' eyes were filled with disdain.Ledley Parsons?
The traitor!

He immediately wrote back and wrote, yes, we are all going to study the theory of annihilation.

But we are different!
You're all for dirty money and I'm for science! ——

to view