Football on the ground: Ronaldo thought I was going to assist him

Chapter 129 The Big Difference Between European and American Styles

Seeing that Ronaldo was excited to ask the referee to argue, Deng Kai immediately stepped forward to hold Ronaldo.

In fact, Ronaldo's fall in the penalty area this time can be awarded a penalty kick.

But again, if you want to say that the penalty for diving is not a big problem, the probability of both is equal.

Because Ronaldo has a state of "passive confrontation".

This is also the biggest difference between football and basketball.

Every once in a while, some epoch-making players appear in the NBA.

Four centers.

Jordan.

The four major points.

james.

After them, two players changed basketball.

One is Curry.

He brought basketball into the three-point era.

One is Harden.

He brought basketball into the era of touch porcelain.

Before Harden, fouls in basketball were actually the same as fouls in football, that is head-to-head.

Those who cause others to foul must also bear a certain price of confrontation.

At that time, fouling was a double-edged sword, and it was one of the ways to prove a hero, with a high gold content.But until the end, few stars would choose to use this self-harming style of play.

However, Harden's Wanciwang style of play, all kinds of active touches, made fouling a derogatory term.

This style of play seems to comply with the rules, or even take advantage of the rules.

At one time, people dared not approach him within a radius of one meter.

Those shooting actions that are not shooting at all have repeatedly won him free throw opportunities and created space to hold the ball.

This style of play is essentially anti-basketball.

It is to overdraw the fans' passion and love for the sport of basketball.

This is also a super booster for the originally fierce basketball to enter the era of "glass basketball".

Since then, as long as there is a breakthrough, there must be a foul. This is a change in degree.

In the past, pitching fouls were mostly committed by thugs, but now pitching, as long as you dare to defend the opponent, you can almost draw a foul. This is a change in purpose and nature.

The seemingly problematic style of play happened to be in line with the rules, so that the NBA couldn't think of a way to restrain Harden for a while.

Only through the introduction of regulations such as "invalidation of foul-making actions that tilt to the defender at an abnormal angle when shooting" did the Pengci style gradually change.

This can't help but make people think about a question, that is, are we playing the rules or playing basketball.

This is actually related to a problem that many people didn't understand in childhood... Everyone, including the police, knows that the other party is a bad person, but why can't they arrest the other party, and the other party can still get away with it?

This is a classic debate, and it's very hard to say right or wrong.

In terms of sports, some things are not written in the rules, not because there are omissions in the rules, but because those things are not in line with this sport in the first place, and everyone understands it without saying it, but I didn’t expect someone to be so shameless later.

For various reasons, Americans have become metaphysical and made many jokes in this aspect and even in many aspects.

But the Europeans have never forgotten the original intention of football.

It is also not allowed for someone to take advantage of the loopholes in the rules to benefit from it.

Therefore, many fouls in football, some of which are punished, some are not punished, and the reason for excluding the influence of black whistle and match-fixing lies in the referee's judgment of the motivation of both parties.

According to the American point of view, when entering the penalty area, the opponent and the ball holder's legs are in contact, and the ball holder falls, an absolute penalty is awarded.

Even if the ball holder deliberately hooks the defender's foot with his own foot, it is a penalty.

But in Europe, in football, the referee believes that after the ball holder enters the penalty area, he has not completely controlled the football. At this time, the scale of confrontation between the two sides will be much larger than that of the opponent after you control the ball.

Falling easily at this time belongs to your own lack of resistance.

Or you have no intention to attack after entering the penalty area, or you actively fall to the ground within the normal range of confrontation strength, etc.

These are not awarded penalties.

So Ronaldo was in the penalty area just now, which belongs to the "penalty kick under the American ideology", and also belongs to the "diving under the European concept".

He deserved this yellow card.

Many people are debating which of these two attitudes towards rules is better.

These two kinds of confrontation actually exist in every country and every field.

"Absolutely follow the rules" seems to be fair at first glance, and it is very deceptive.

But in fact, if you study carefully, you will find that it is too idealistic, and it is too easy to be exploited. It is just a big pie drawn by capitalists.

Any loophole in the rules can be exploited by ordinary people, so capitalists can exploit it.But normal people can only drill once in a certain period of time, while capitalists can drill countless times in a certain period of time through employment, copying and other means.

Who do you think benefits the most?

This seemingly fairness immediately turned into an absolute unfairness.

Therefore, for any public social platform, as long as time goes by, the voices of real users will almost disappear when the accounts of capital trolls flood in.

This is the absolute crushing of individuals by capital.

And "subjective control" seems unfair, full of a crisis of trust.

But just being able to shield the interference of capital to a certain extent, so that individual competitors are still individuals, this has given ordinary people great opportunities.

Even if the subjective regulator is corrupted by capital and falsified, in the large-scale data, this is still a small probability event.

It is far [-] times better than capital can openly crush ordinary people by modifying the rules.

This is why there are many impressive black whistle games in European football, and there seem to be fewer black whistle games in American basketball, but in fact everyone knows that the NBA's control over the game is far better than the five major leagues.

So many people love to watch basketball when they are young, and football when they are older.

……

During halftime, Violante was brainstorming with the coaching staff.

They tried to plan a better ground fit to penetrate Poland.

But Deng Kai thinks this will not work.

The iron walls of the Poles are really strong, and the ground penetration is extremely difficult.

What's more...the Portuguese actually have a better way.

"Actually... Almeida's header ability is very strong." Deng Kai expressed his opinion on the side.

The coaches looked at Deng Kai with some doubts, as if saying, you shouldn't be here, you should be under the car.

You're just a player, and it's a discussion for the coaches.

However, the head coach Violante kept silent. Instead, he looked at Deng Kai, meaning to let him speak.

Deng Kai also continued: "There were several times in the first half, and Almeida won the top. Although the quality of the goal is not high, as long as you can touch the football, the quality is just a matter of angle adjustment and luck."

"Almeida is very tall. Even if he can't jump, he has the possibility to compete for the top of the football."

"C Ronaldo's bounce is good, and his header ability is also very good."

"If the two of them can always compete for the same point, then the opponent will be very difficult to defend. It is difficult to keep an eye on both at the same time!"

"And in our team, there are more than one or two good crossers."

(End of this chapter)