Global Cards: I Create Mythical Paradise

"I seem to...know what kind of field this is!"

Soon, Jin Buqi spoke.

Not only him, but everyone else also knows, because this type of field...

But it’s quite famous!
"The field of rules..."

Yan Yunxin nodded, with a solemn look on his face.

In various senses, this type of field is the most troublesome, because the rules are cumbersome and complicated, and if you are not careful, your own mental power will be eroded and polluted to a great extent!
"I remember that the last rules-based field that appeared was called... [Yuying Middle School]?"

At this time, Jin Buqi thought about it.

"Yes."

Yan Yunxin nodded.

"That time, it was also because of the emergence of a crazy cult that tens of thousands of people died in the field and turned into ghost-like walking zombies. And the field also grew to be close to the legendary level..."

Growth is the foundation of the rules field.

"If things hadn't escalated and a legendary powerhouse had taken action, that area might have become a city-level disaster!"

Everyone's expressions were extremely heavy.

but……

"Okay, let's make peace with what we have come. Now we are the only ones who can save ourselves. In this rule-based field, waiting for rescue is unrealistic."

Yan Yunxin clapped her hands, attracting everyone's attention, and performed her duties as a squad leader.

"No matter what, at least one thing can be confirmed. According to the experience of the previous seniors, this rule-based field has its own particularities. As long as you can abide by its rules and dig deeper behind the rules, you should survive in it... It’s no problem!”

With that said, she began to invite everyone to gather around, and then studied the rules in her hands...

……

……

【1】

The first rule can be divided into four parts:
[-]. There is no problem with the safety measures and it is impossible for the animals to escape.

[-]. "Small herbivores" are kept in a closed environment that cannot be touched.

[-]. If you see an escaped rabbit on the roadside, stay away immediately and report it to the staff.

[-]. Do not approach or touch the rabbit, especially when the rabbit discovers it and starts to approach you at high speed.

Among them, the first part "Animals have no possibility of escaping" is obviously contradictory to the third part "Rabbits escaping on the roadside", which also shows that there is probably something wrong with these "escaping rabbits".

This is also confirmed in the fourth part, which emphasizes "don't get close" and "don't touch". It also says that the rabbit will "find" and "move at high speed"...

Combined with the ability of the rules field to corrode and pollute mental power, it is not difficult to determine that this "escaping rabbit" is likely to be one of the "sources of pollution".

Looking at the second part, "small herbivores" are "imprisoned" in an "untouchable closed environment", which obviously does not follow normal logic.

Moreover, it mentioned "small herbivores", not "rabbits" directly, which means that in addition to "rabbits", there should be other animals being imprisoned.

At the same time, "imprisonment" and "intouchable closed environment" are obviously not like treating animals, but like treating something "dangerous"...

This also echoes the "don't come close" and "don't touch" in the fourth part, basically confirming the guess of "pollution source".

The third part, "escaping rabbits" and "staff" is the focus. Combined with the first part, it can be seen that these rabbits did not really "escape"...

It is very likely that they appear through other means, but what this means is needs to continue to be explored.

Then there are the "staff". Obviously, the "Tourist Code" hopes that tourists will trust the "staff".

At least for now, the "staff" are likely to be of great help to our side, and this must be kept in mind.

Finally, there is the fourth part. In fact, the analysis has been almost done before.

The key points are "don't get close" and "don't touch", but I don't know how high this so-called "high speed" can be.

If it is difficult for ordinary people to react at a speed, then it may be a bit troublesome.

Then the key point of this article becomes "don't be discovered", well... it's better to do it to this extent, which is safer.

To sum up, just from the first rule, we can get the following information:
1. Rabbits are dangerous and may be a source of pollution.

2. In addition to rabbits, there are other dangerous animals, which may also be sources of pollution.

3. The way rabbits appear is worth exploring. This may be related to pollution.

4. Staff should be trustworthy (tentative) and able to provide help.

5. If you see a rabbit, try not to be discovered.

……

【2】

[-]. There is only one street in the ape park, which only displays apes.

[-]. If two streets are found and the animals on display include rabbits.

[-]. Select the street on the left.

[-]. End the visit to the park as quickly as possible.

Divide the second rule into four parts as well.

The first part, "only" and "only show", should be to emphasize what the normal situation is.

This is very important in the rule field, and it also means that there is a possibility of change.

The change that occurs is most likely not an actual change, but an "illusion" produced by some kind of influence on the mental power.

This also means that my spirit has been "polluted" to a certain extent, and I must find a way as soon as possible.

The second part explains the possible changes...

This includes "Second Street," and "The Extra Rabbit."

There is no doubt that "Second Street" is an absolute no-go, who knows where it will lead.

As for the "rabbit", it has been judged as a "source of pollution" in the first rule, but since it is a "display animal", it means that it should not "escape" yet, so it is most likely to be ignored.

The third part is very simple. When the "second street" appears, you should choose the one on the "left".

This is most likely a protective measure and correct guideline, and should be referenced as much as possible.

However, there is also another piece of information, that is, it only mentions "choose the left side" and does not mention "returning the same way".

This shows that in this case, it may be safest to just "keep going", and you will still encounter dangers when you return.

The fourth part, "end the visit as quickly as possible", translated as "leave this area as quickly as possible".

This also means that when the above situation occurs, there is some unknown influence in this area. Even if you don't go into the wrong street, you need to stay away as soon as possible.

At this point, the conclusion drawn based on the second rule also comes to:
1. You should always firmly believe and emphasize to yourself that there are only apes in the ape zone.

2. When an abnormal situation occurs, you should decisively choose the street on the left to "continue forward" and leave the ape area quickly.

3. "Range pollution" may occur in the ape area, which may be related to "rabbits".

4. I don’t know where the extra street leads, but it must be related to “pollution”.

……

【3】

[-]. An elephant is a large creature with fan ears, a long trunk, and pillar-like legs. It is not white.

[-]. Please make sure you see only elephants in the elephant park.

The first part still emphasizes the proper cognition, and also mentions the third animal so far.

Given its size, the elephant itself should be safe, as it clearly does not qualify as a "small herbivore."

But the last sentence "not white" is worth noting. Combined with the previous emphasis, it shows that it is possible for "white things" to be mixed into the elephant.

Judging from the information obtained so far, this "white thing" is obviously very likely to be a "rabbit", which also means that "rabbits", or "pollution", will also invade the elephant park.

The second part, the words "please make sure", are actually illogical.

As a tourist, there is no way to "ensure" that foreign objects are not mixed into the park. The only logical way is to take appropriate measures as soon as a problem is discovered.

As for what this measure is, for now, there should be nothing wrong with "finding staff".

As for whether there are any other methods, you can continue later.

In this way, the conclusion that can be drawn from the third rule also arises:

1. Abnormalities may also occur in the elephant park, but this abnormality should not be as severe as in the ape area, because there is no emphasis on "leaving as soon as possible".

2. Once an abnormality is discovered, it is best to take appropriate correct measures, such as calling a staff member.

……

【4】

[-]. The zoo’s beverage shop does not provide “rabbit blood.”

[-]. If you find "rabbit blood" on the shelf, do not buy it.

It is another typical "enhanced cognition" and "abnormal warning". Since it has been confirmed that there is a problem with "rabbit", then there is naturally a problem with "rabbit blood".

At the same time, as a beverage store where "staff" always exist, such obvious anomalies still occur, which means that the capabilities of the "staff" are also very limited and cannot prevent the occurrence of abnormal situations.

This also leads to the conclusion:
1. Do not buy "rabbit blood", otherwise it may be dangerous.

2. It is not absolutely safe to be around the staff, and you still need to keep a clear mind at all times.

……

【5】

[-]. Don’t stay alone in the shade of the rabbit park.

The emphasis of this rule is on "alone" and "shade".

Since "Rabbit" has a problem, the problem in the Rabbit Park should naturally be quite big as well.

However, the zoo still opens the rabbit area, and there are no more abnormal reminders, which means that the rabbits locked in the area are relatively safe.

So, looking at it now, the only problem in the Rabbit Park is the "shade".

And "shade" is composed of shadows. Looking at it more broadly, it may be the "shadows" that are problematic.

Then there is "alone", which means that danger will most likely only come when you are alone.

On the other hand, if you stay with other people all the time, your safety factor will also be improved.

Next, the conclusion based on Rule [-]:
1. There may be a problem with the shadows in the park.

2. Being alone will increase the probability of danger.

……

【6】

[-]. There is no aquarium.

[-]. If there are staff selling tickets to the aquarium, refuse them.

Another rule emphasizing cognition, but this time, "staff" are mentioned.

In the previous analysis, the "staff" who were originally temporarily classified as "can provide help" have now undergone new changes.

This change shows that "staff" may also be affected in some way.

in conclusion:

1. Remember that "aquarium" does not exist.

2. Not only do staff have limited capabilities, but they are also likely to cause danger.

……

【7】

[-]. If you see an aquarium, leave immediately.

[-]. At the same time, call the phone number marked on the map to inform you.

It can be seen from this rule that "aquarium" is actually possible.

But there is also a high probability of unknown dangers, so it is best not to get close.

At the same time, the rules also give prompts to "make a call", which is equivalent to asking "staff" for help.

In other words, once you see the "aquarium", even if you leave immediately, the "aquarium" will most likely still exist, requiring the intervention of "staff".

in conclusion:

1. The emergence of the "aquarium" may also be related to "spiritual pollution", but it may also be a dangerous building that appears randomly.

2. The "staff" responsible for the map phone should be trustworthy, but of course, a certain degree of skepticism should be maintained.

……

【8】

[-]. Do not feed rabbits.

[-]. All other animals are acceptable.

Simple and clear warning, you can jump to the conclusion:

1. Whether it is an "escaped rabbit" or a "rabbit locked up in the park", both are dangerous.

2. Feeding "rabbits" is likely to cause some kind of change.

3. Other animals are much less dangerous than rabbits, and at least they can be fed.

……

【9】[-]. Rabbits don’t laugh.

[-]. If you hear laughter that obviously does not come from the direction of tourists when visiting the Rabbit Park.

[-]. Before leaving the rabbit park, tear off the dotted line on the map and hold it in your hand until you completely leave the zoo.

The first part is to remind you that if there is "laughter", it cannot be from "rabbit".

The second part "obviously does not come from the direction of tourists" means that the "laughter" may not come from tourists.

Combining these two points, we can draw a conclusion - there is someone else who makes the "laughter", and it is some kind of existence other than "tourists" and "rabbits".

At the same time, when this being "laughs", it means that danger is about to come.

This has to remind people of the "shadow" drawn previously, and there is also no mention of rabbits.

In other words, in the Rabbit Park, there is a dangerous existence that is not a "rabbit", ready to take action at any time.

As for what this existence is, it is still unknown, but it can be seen that it is more dangerous than the "rabbit".

Because the "solution" in the third part no longer mentions "staff" as before, but mentions a new thing - "the dotted line part of the map"!
Judging from the map, there is only one dotted line, and once it is torn off, there will be no more.

At the same time, I did not see any place providing new maps at the entrance of the park. In other words, the map is one for each person.

At the same time, in any of the previous dangerous situations, the "dotted line part" was not torn off, indicating that this was not a "talisman" but a "temporary means."

In other words, the "dotted line part" may be able to resist "spiritual pollution" or "fight against danger", but it must be "timely"!

At the same time, it can also be seen that the source of this "laughter" is probably in this zoo...

The most dangerous thing!

in conclusion:

1. The rabbit park may contain the most dangerous thing in the entire zoo (key point)!
2. Combined with the previous rules, this thing is likely to be hidden in the shadows.

3. The "dashed line part" of the map can help people get out of trouble, but it must be held in their hands at all times.

4. The effect of the "dotted line part" is time-sensitive, so it is best to leave the zoo as soon as possible.

……

【10】

[-]. Violate any of the above and find yourself lost and separated from other acquaintances.

[-]. Immediately find the nearest beverage store within a quarter of an hour and inform the salesperson in blue overalls (if you see the salesperson in black overalls, pretend not to hear anything the other person says).

[-]. The salesperson in blue overalls will immediately take you to the working passage of the lion park. The lion will not attack you and hide behind the rockery.

[-]. After all the white lions start roaring, the staff will take you out of the park, but you need to make sure that the other party's work clothes are blue.

[-]. Your family and friends will wait for you at the entrance of the lion park, and then leave the zoo immediately.

As can be seen from the first part, when you violate the rules, you are likely to be "contaminated", leading to cognitive biases.

In this case, even if you don't want to, you are likely to get separated from your companions and become "alone".

From the previous rules, we can know that it is quite dangerous to be "alone" in a zoo.

At the same time, it also shows that the "pollution" in the zoo may just start from making people "separate from the crowd" and become "alone".

Then comes the second part, the first keyword-"a quarter of an hour".

This may mean that from the time of "breaking away from the crowd", the time to be rescued is only "a quarter of an hour".

Then there are the "salesperson in blue overalls" and the "salesperson in black overalls", which also answers the previous doubts about the staff and differentiates the staff.

It’s clear that the “staff in blue smocks” can really help, and the “staff in black smocks” the opposite.

The third part, “blue overalls” you can trust, will take people to the Lions Campus.

This also shows that the Lion Park is a solution to the problem, but it needs to be led by staff.

Lions will not attack people, probably not because they are well trained, but because lions are on the side of humans.

And "behind the rockery" should be a "safe zone", because "lions will not attack people", so it is obviously hiding from other things.

As for what this thing is, it may be a "source of pollution" or a "rabbit", but it is definitely not a good thing anyway.

In the fourth part, "when all the white lions start roaring," the staff will take them away, indicating that the "white lion roaring" is a signal, perhaps to successfully expel or suppress the "pollution".

Of course, "expulsion" is obviously impossible, otherwise the zoo would not need to deal with all these bells and whistles. "Suppression" should be more likely.

Then, when being taken away, you should also pay attention to the color of the staff's clothes. This further illustrates that even the "white lion" cannot expel pollution.

In this case, "black work clothes" may still appear, so we must remain vigilant.

Finally, part five mentioned that after being taken away by "blue overalls", family and friends would wait at the entrance of the Lions Park. This may be because there is a special notice in the park.

But there is also a possibility that after a person is "contaminated", family members and friends may not be aware of his disappearance. Only after the "contamination" has been "suppressed" can relatives and friends reunite smoothly.

The last sentence, "Leave the zoo as soon as possible" also shows that the "pollution" has not really disappeared and may reappear at any time.

In this case, the best way is to leave as soon as possible.

in conclusion:

1. In the initial stage of contamination, the contaminated person is likely to leave the group automatically and will not attract the attention of family and friends.

2. There is a "quarter of an hour" safety time from the time of contamination, and staff need to be found as soon as possible within this time.

3. Staff can be temporarily divided into "blue work clothes" and "black work clothes". "Blue work clothes" can provide the greatest help, while "black work clothes" are the opposite.

4. The white lions in the lion park are "friendly", and their roars may be able to suppress "pollution" and help the polluted people escape.

5. The rockery in the Lion Park is suspected to be a "safe area", perhaps to avoid unknown beings.

6. Always pay attention to the color of staff’s work clothes to avoid being put in danger again.

7. The white lion cannot completely expel "pollution" and can only leave the zoo as soon as possible.

……

【11】

[-]. There are only four white lions in this park.

[-]. If you find more than four white lions roaring in the situation in Article [-], do not leave and inform the staff.

[-]. Wait until the number of white lions returns to four before leaving.

As a supplement to Rule 11, the first part of Rule No. [-] is still “emphasis on cognition.”

Then, the second part once again explained that the ability of the "White Lion" is also limited, and there may also be unknown entities mixed in, bringing new dangers to the contaminated.

"Informing the staff" should mean reminding the staff to handle it. This also shows that perhaps only the contaminated can discover the extra "white lion".

Obviously, the staff is capable of restoring the number of "white lions" to the correct number, which means that the extra "white lions" should not be considered powerful.

in conclusion:

1. Remember that there are only four “white lions”.

2. There are "unknown existences" that can be mixed into the "white lion", and only the contaminated can discover them.

3. This "unknown existence" is not very powerful in the lion park and can be driven away, which shows that the lion park is indeed the safest among all the zoo's parks.

……

【12】

12. You can buy any animal peripherals for children under [-] years old, including rabbits.

13. After purchasing a rabbit doll, children aged 17-[-] should discard it within one month.

18. People over [-] years old cannot purchase rabbit toys.

Rule No. 12 is very easy to understand, as long as you are aware of "spiritual pollution".

Obviously, both "rabbits" and "rabbit toys" exist as a source of "pollution", and the most critical point of "pollution" is to break and distort a person's "inherent cognition."

However, before the age of 12, human consciousness is chaotic, and neither the understanding of the world nor one's own three views have yet been fully formed.

In this inherently chaotic state, there is no distortion, so "mental pollution" is ineffective for children under 12 years old.

Then there are thirteen to seventeen years old, which is an age when all cognitions and concepts are gradually established.

During this period, the child's cognition is in a state of change from chaos to clarity, so he still has a certain immunity to "mental pollution".

By analogy, after adulthood, a person's understanding of the world is basically formed and stable, with a complete and clear framework.

This is the soil where "spiritual pollution" can best work, which can return everything to a state of chaos.

in conclusion:

At this point, it is absolutely certain that there is strong "spiritual pollution" in the zoo, and one of the "sources of pollution" is "rabbits"!
【13】

[-]. If you see someone wearing rabbit earrings following the crowd into the elephant park, you must give up visiting the park.

[-]. If this article is violated, the park will not be responsible and cannot provide a solution.

Rule No. 13, the first part mentions "rabbit" again, but it becomes a "person" wearing rabbit earrings.

At the same time, it was also pointed out that after such people enter the "Elephant Park", they must give up visiting.

This shows that when the "person wearing rabbit earrings" and the "elephant" meet, something very scary will happen.

And the consequences of this incident are also quite terrible, completely different from before.

"No solution can be provided", that is to say, this impact may directly push the "pollution level" to the highest level, leaving no way to resist it.

The reason why this judgment can be made is because the previous dangerous situations actually mentioned "time", such as "a quarter of an hour", such as "before leaving the park". Although they cannot cure the root cause, there is "time to react".

So for now, the ranking of dangers in zoos should change again.

The "some kind of existence" that was originally considered the most dangerous in the Rabbit Park has to be downgraded one level, and the most dangerous thing has become "a person wearing rabbit earrings outside the Elephant Park."

in conclusion:

No matter what, don't break the rules in this situation! ! !

……

【14】

[-]. The Lion Park is safe.

[-]. If you encounter any unresolvable danger and are unable to seek help, please go to the Lion Park immediately, by any means necessary, and by all possible means.

At this point, I finally saw a rule that made me feel a little more at ease.

"The Lion Park is safe", this is exactly the conclusion drawn in the previous rules, and it has been confirmed here.

Based on what was said before, except for the situation where it is impossible to react according to the previous rule, as long as you can have reaction time, you will be saved.

"Immediately", "whatever it takes" and "do whatever it takes", these words without exception prove the safety of the Lion Park.

The "white lion" is an absolute ally.

This is the conclusion of this rule!

……

【15】

[-]. Be wary of friends who have lost you more than once.

[-]. Especially when they repeatedly advise you to go to the aquarium or elephant park.

The last rule seems to be for "normal people".

As has been analyzed before, "being separated from the crowd" and "alone" are likely to be manifestations of the "early stage of pollution". Then, friends who have "lost themselves more than once" are likely to have been contaminated.

As mentioned in the second part, this contaminated person is likely to do two things:

First, I advise you to go to the aquarium.

Second, I advise you to go to the Elephant Park.

First of all, it is actually very easy to understand to advise you to go to the aquarium, because it can be seen from the previous rules that "aquarium" is probably also synonymous with "polluted".

It does not exist in the first place, but it is possible to see it. At the same time, there are "staff" who will sell tickets, but they must refuse. This means that whether it is the "staff" selling tickets or seeing the "aquarium" "The people themselves are no longer in the "normal category".

In this way, if a person is really taken to the "aquarium", he will probably be "contaminated".

Of course, there is no mention of the consequences of seeing or even entering the aquarium, but judging from the previous rules, there should still be hope.

But the second behavior - dragging you to the elephant park is a bit intriguing.

Because there is no big danger mentioned before entering the elephant park "normally", it is just to "make sure" that what you see is a real elephant.

Currently, there is only one danger that will appear in the elephant park, and that is seeing "people wearing rabbit earrings" among the people entering.

But this situation is actually easy to avoid, that is, pay attention to whether there is such a person before entering.

In such a situation, you still need to be wary of the advice of "friends", which can only explain one situation...

That is, once you follow this "friend", the most serious situation will probably happen!
This means that your "friend" may very well be the "person wearing rabbit earrings" in the eyes of others, but you won't be able to detect it yourself.

At the same time, it also shows that when your lost "friend" reappears and offers you such persuasion, you are also "contaminated"!
in conclusion:

1. Be wary of friends who have been separated more than once.

2. After people are "polluted", they are likely to become "people wearing rabbit earrings"!
……

At this point, all fifteen rules in the "Tourist Code" have been analyzed.

Everyone in the top class is becoming more and more aware...

The horror of this rules-based realm...

It was hell!

(End of this chapter)