Entertainment: Starting from the talk show contest

There are plenty of people who support each point of view.

The auditorium under the stage was full of thousands of people.

In addition to the teachers and students of the school, there are many people from the society present.

They all came to watch after seeing the announcement of the debate competition posted by this well-known university through various channels, and they were interested in this debate topic.

At this time, alumni from both sides of the debate are also cheering for the teams they support, hoping to win the debate.

After the pros and cons have finished speaking in the first debate, the intense attack and defense stage came next.

The second defense of the positive side stood up and asked questions about the second defense of the negative side.

"Just now the opposing view is that there is no deadline for getting married and having children."

"Then I would like to ask the opposing debater three questions."

"First, do you agree that the human body has the best reproductive time?"

"Or, if you think that people don't have to marry and have children, then come to the second question, what do you think of the ancestral precepts left by your ancestors: there are three ways to be unfilial, and the one who has no descendants is the greatest?"

"The third question, if you have the idea of ​​getting married and having children, but fail to do so at the right age."

"When you are old, other conditions are met, and the fertility window has closed."

"In this case, will the opposing party still stick to the original point of view?"

"Please answer the second defense of the opposite party, thank you!"

These three questions are advanced layer by layer, and it can be said that they are not sharp.

The students in the audience who supported the opposite views were all sweating for them.

"These questions are hard to answer!"

"Yes, if you are not careful, you will fall into the pit."

And the students who supported the affirmative view shouted excitedly: "Good job!"

In fact, the students of these colleges and universities also have their own considerations and worries about the topic of this debate.

Although their age seems to be a bit young for marriage.

However, in the current social atmosphere, basically after graduating from university, within a few years, they will start to face urges to marry.

Before getting married, they still need a certain amount of time to contact and screen their partners.

So from a practical point of view, many students' subjective consciousness believes that the sooner they consider this matter, the better.

If you think about it early, you will leave yourself plenty of preparation time.

At this time, the second defense of the opposing side was also ready to answer.

She stood up and answered one by one.

"To answer the first question from the opposing debater, we agree that there is an optimal window for human reproduction."

"But we do not believe that getting married and having children is necessary for everyone."

"If you haven't found a suitable partner, or if you have too much pressure to live, or just don't like it, don't need married life, etc., in these cases, there is no need to go against your personal will and living conditions to choose a person who is not sincere. object to marry."

After the words fell, many audience members applauded loudly.

They felt a sigh of relief when they heard the student speak out his heart completely.

If they can successfully meet someone who is suitable in all aspects and they like, and the economic and life pressures are not so great, they don't need to resist marriage and refuse to have children.

What they resist is marrying and having children with someone they cannot accept, or entering into marriage without the conditions.

What they are afraid of is that they choose the wrong person, so that they will ruin their present and the rest of their lives, and they will not be able to create a good parenting environment for their children.

The debater classmate just now continued.

"Then on this premise, let me answer the second question of the affirmative party."

"That is how to look at the ancestral motto 'There are three ways to be unfilial, the greatest is to have no descendants'."

"In the case that the core needs of individuals for marriage cannot be met, even if they barely meet their parents' wishes to get married and have children, is this what Zhengfang understands as 'filial piety'?"

"If so, please forgive me for not agreeing."

Hearing this, many audience members nodded in satisfaction.

The debater was not led into the ditch by the opponent, but jumped out of the framework set by the opponent.

It can be said that it is a very clever way of solving problems by bringing everyone into the situation she set.

At the same time, what more viewers are curious about is how to really refute this fallacy.

This is also the dilemma that everyone generally faces when communicating with their parents.

Many people don't agree with it in their hearts, but they are stupid and can't say it, and they can't say the moral kidnapping point of view of their parents.

So I look forward to learning from the answers of these outstanding debaters in today's debate competition.

On the stage, the female debater continued clearly and loudly: "There are three types of unfilial piety, and there are two others."

"Ah Yi is obedient, trapping relatives is unrighteous, and one is not filial."

"The family is poor and the relatives are old. If you don't work for a salary, you are not filial."

"The first sentence means that if you obey your parents' wrong words and deeds without correcting them, you will trap your parents in unrighteousness, which is one of the manifestations of unfilial piety."

"Knowing that it's not the person we want to marry or when we want to marry, our parents still insist on pushing us into marriage in order to let us have offspring."

"This is wrong words and deeds, and we should correct them instead of blindly following them."

"Because our lives are our own responsibility."

"As for the second sentence, it means that the family is poor and the parents are old. If you can't mix up an official job and receive a salary to support your parents, it is the second manifestation of unfilial piety."

"I believe that not many people will take this sentence to modern society to discipline young people."

"Because it is neither suitable as the mainstream value of modern society, nor makes sense, because there is no industry that cannot make money to support parents."

"This just shows that the words of the ancients had their corresponding social environment and context at that time."

"If everything is copied and used, it will only appear blind and ignorant."

"To sum up, for the ancient teachings, we need to look at and listen to them dialectically, instead of blindly following the imperial decrees!"

After this paragraph was finished, there was another burst of warm applause from the audience.

The initial slack on the faces of the debaters on the affirmative side was gone, replaced by nervous expressions.

Each of them felt threatened by their opponents.

The brain is also constantly spinning, thinking about how to refute for a while.

But off the stage, the audience who supported the opposing view was hooked, and even the supporters of the affirmative view had to admit that the opposing debater made a lot of sense.

"There are reasons and evidence, and the refutation is just right!"

"I finally know how to answer my parents. Next time, I will try to use these points of view to convince my parents."

"Obviously the opposing side has made very sufficient preparations in advance, and the argument is really good!"

"It's so enjoyable to listen to, and it's really refreshing to watch the master fight!"

"I thought the opposing side would fall into a trap! But it turned around so quickly, haha!"

"Don't jump to conclusions so quickly, it's still early!"