I was watched by the Internet police during the live broadcast of law popularization?

Chapter 257 Bringing into the perspective of customers, just ask if you are afraid? ?

Li Chen had also seen this case on the Internet in the world before time travel.

That was also a hot topic on the Internet, and netizens were also divided into two camps:
The reason why the driver is considered guilty is mainly because the customer asked three times why he did not follow the navigation. This is the first point.

The second point is that when a female customer asks three times and fails to get a reply, this also increases her fear.

In other words, if the car owner can communicate with the other party in time, the girl will not have extreme thoughts, let alone make extreme actions.

Netizens who think the driver is innocent, they think that everything is because the female customer thinks too much.

The driver is an old driver. People know which road is the shortest. Can it be called yaw if you take a shortcut?

In the final analysis, it is the female customer's own problem.

The judiciary later believed that the other party was guilty after repeated simulations.

Since customers get on a car with an operational nature, they must provide certain safety obligations and guarantees.

The driver's matter, to put it bluntly, is a contradiction between two people.

The driver was in a bad mood because of the customer's delay, and he didn't care whether the passenger was wearing a seat belt or not.

You are an operating driver, not a private car, why didn't you remind her of the other party's behavior?
The Road Safety Law clearly stipulates that it is illegal for the co-pilot not to wear a seat belt. It does not mean that there is no problem if only the driver wears a seat belt.

The second point is that you are a truck driver and you belong to the service industry. How can you bring anger to work?
Li Chen hadn't spoken yet, but the live broadcast room exploded:

"No, this can also be sentenced?"

"One thing to say, I feel that the sentence is right. I, a big man, will quietly open the phone to take a look at people who don't follow the navigation."

"Analyzing the problem rationally, both parties have problems, but I personally think that it cannot be sentenced."

"Isn't that woman thinking too much? Are there few similar problems now?"

"Brother, you are really unlucky. Once this happens, you will bid farewell to the hauling industry forever, right?"

There is nothing wrong with this matter, even if the platform lets him do it, no passenger will dare to take his car...

"As for your case, there are still many controversial points. If you really can't accept it, you can file a complaint."

After thinking about it for a while, Li Chen told him his answer, and the male netizen said worriedly, "If I protest, will my sentence be aggravated?"

"Of course not. When you were judged in the first instance, the District Prosecutor's Office did not protest the judgment, so the original judgment will be upheld in the second instance at most, unless they can find that you have new charges in the case."

"I see, thank you, Lawyer Li."

"you are welcome."

Li Chen responded with a smile.

In his world, the case of a customer falling to death has been included in the subject of the legal examination and considered innocent.

But the law test is a law test, and he and reality are two different things.

If everyone could act in accordance with the law, there would not be so many outrageous incidents and judgments.

"Let's analyze this real case."

Li Chen began to analyze the case to control the rhythm of the live broadcast room:
"I read everyone's comments, and there are many different opinions. Let's first analyze this case from the driver's perspective.

From the driver's point of view, the female customer's problem is the overtime.

You asked me to come to pick up the goods, but the things were not ready, so I waited for more than 30 minutes in vain.

Time is money. Originally, you can’t earn much money from this order. In order to save time, I suggest that you spend more money and I will move with you, which can also be faster.

But you think that I should tie you up to move when I come to buy goods. This is not in line with the platform's regulations, and I have no such obligation.

The next step is to wait for the timeout.

The platform has a deadline. If the waiting time is too long, it is considered an overtime, and more fees will be paid.

During the waiting period of 10 minutes, this customer only took more than 30 minutes to get it done, that is to say, the previous 10 minutes were just waiting for nothing, so what about unloading?
On the way, the driver wanted to save time and prepared to take a shortcut.

At this time, the female customer asked again, why don't you follow the navigation?
The driver who thought of being prostituted for nothing became very angry and ignored him.

The female customer also felt fearful because of his actions and wanted to jump out of the car.

According to our normal perspective, does the truck driver know that she is going to jump out of the car?
He must not know, right? If he had known, he would not have accepted the order.

Since the customer's jumping incident is short and sudden, it is difficult for the driver to make the right choice.

I read someone in the comment section said brakes.

Can a medium-speed car with cargo behind it brake suddenly?

Once the brakes are slammed, the female customer will be thrown out immediately. This is inertia. You must know that half of her body has already leaned out of the window.

So I suggest that those tourists who talk about braking should take a driver's license test first. "

"From the perspective of the driver, he also took a series of measures after the incident, so he should not be held criminally responsible for the crime."

After hearing Li Chen's results, netizens also shared their own opinions:
"I said the driver should be innocent, but you still don't believe it."

"It's so funny, a group of people are still pointing at the driver from the customer's point of view!"

"Is the brother who asked the question still alive?"

"What are you in a hurry for? Lawyer Li hasn't finished speaking yet, has he?"

"Let's think about this issue from the perspective of female customers."

Li Chen continued to analyze the case: "As a user who needs to move, maybe for some reason, she lives very frugally and is unwilling to spend more money to let someone move with her.

The quarrel is because the two sides have different ideas.

One thinks that if you come to move my house, you are obliged to help me move things together, while the other thinks that there are platform regulations, and you can't do it if you can.

This is the first factor, let's talk about the second, which is also the main factor for the occurrence of the case.

On the way to move, the platform has already planned the route, but this company does not have a prescribed route to drive. For the first time, the female customer just asked with doubts, asking the driver not to follow the navigation?

This point is also the common psychology of most people, and they over-trust navigation.

We come to an unfamiliar environment, what else can we rely on without navigation?
Here, I would also like to remind everyone that the car for pulling goods is different from the private car for taxi, and they have a fixed price.

A route costs more than 30 yuan within five kilometers. It is up to the driver to decide whether to take a shortcut or how to go.

However, the female passenger's first question did not reach a corresponding answer, so she asked the second, or even the third time, but the other party still hadn't answered her.

If we assume that we are a girl, will we feel fear when encountering a situation? ? "

(End of this chapter)