I was watched by the Internet police during the live broadcast of law popularization?

Chapter 282 Only a public trial of a case can be truly fair and just!
"Are you questioning the presiding judge?"

Li Chen's continuous questioning made the presiding judge of the trial a little annoyed.

In such a case, the main reason why he chose to go to the defendant's family before the trial was that it was a hot topic of public opinion and it was difficult to make a normal verdict.

According to previous plots, such a thing is not complicated:
Even though it took a few days for the victim to report, it does not mean that she was not raped.

The defendant admitted his behavior on the recorder.

Normal logic:

If the victim was really voluntary, how could she change her story and claim that she was raped?

The behavior of the woman's parents is actually not difficult to understand.

The two were introduced on a blind date, and their emotional foundation is not very stable.

The female victim hesitated for a few days, considering that this was her fiancé, whether to tell her mother about this.

After her parents found out, they chose to find the defendant with a voice recorder and asked him if he had raped their daughter.

The most important thing is that the man admitted his behavior.

Rape!

If you really haven't done it, how could you admit it? ?

The defendant is not a child and does not have complete logical thinking.

He personally feels that the reason why the other party can admit it openly is because he feels that the other party is his girlfriend and they are engaged, so there should be no problems.

To put it bluntly, this is the consequences of weak legal awareness!
Just like those netizens on the Internet who did not know the truth, they were also misled by the public opinion of the defendant's family and only saw the shameless side of the woman.

After the case was reported by the media, the nature of the matter changed. The original rape case became a justified extortion case.

No one thinks about the problem from the woman's perspective.

I was reported for rape after getting engaged. How could this happen?

There are also some funny words that some people say to invite the husband to die.

Are you asking your husband to die?Are you sure he didn't want to die?

It was precisely because of public opinion that the presiding judge was in trouble.

It is precisely because of his scruples that he does some things that feel abnormal.

The source of concern is that the evidence for the accusation is not clear enough.

He wants to achieve a win-win situation and give both parties a satisfactory result.

If the trial is not open, no one else can see it, so the matter will naturally become less serious.

He believes that as time goes by, those netizens will quickly forget about this seemingly absurd rape case...

I thought that the other party's family would agree to my request, so I asked the woman to get a letter of understanding...

But he never expected that the other party not only refused to ask for forgiveness but also asked him to have an online trial.

Is this case a case that can be heard online?
He didn't expect that the other party's lawyer would be so tough, interrupting the prosecutor's indictment in the trial court, and even questioning himself...

“There are many things that people don’t understand about the current court hearings.

As a defense lawyer for the defendant, and also defending innocence, since I discovered that my client was unfair during the trial, I should raise it in court. "

After hearing the other party's inquiry, Li Chen responded without any sign of weakness.

The prosecutor only looks at the case, and he can understand if his position is wrong.

But as a judge, you should remain neutral before the case is formally tried.

You are the lever of the scale, how can there be any reason to tilt it from the beginning?
Assuming that the prosecution has sufficient evidence, Zhang Yong himself raped his wife. I can understand why you do this.

But what is the evidence now?
A voice recorder?

Oh……

And that video of a girl being brought into a wedding room half-heartedly?Li Chen suddenly remembered that the other party's evidence of rape against Zhang Yong also included a surveillance video from the corridor outside the wedding room.

But the video was not enough to prove that Zhang Yong raped the other party, so it was automatically filtered out by Li Chen.

In his defense opinion, he also mentioned this time:
The comparison of the woman's situation before and after the incident was based on the video in the elevator.

The woman was intimate with Zhang Yong before being "raped", and there was no abnormal behavior after being "raped". This completely does not meet the definition of rape.

Can half-hearted behavior be defined as rape?
Li Chen thinks not.

The definition of rape is rape against a woman's will.

First of all, the word "violation" cannot be understood, so it must be clearly stated.

One party clearly expresses unwillingness, and the other party ignores reciprocity and forcibly has sex. Only in this way can it be called rape.

You didn’t give a clear signal, and the man thought you were trying to flirt...

"As for the procedural issues, the presiding judge sees no issues."

The chief judge of the trial also began to respond to Li Chen’s questions:

“The first point you mentioned, the question of applying for the presiding judge’s recusal, has just been given a clear answer by the presiding judge.

The second point is that this case was brought by the woman, and the presiding judge conducted a closed trial in order to protect the woman's privacy. This is also for your benefit. "

After hearing this, Li Chen couldn't help but twitch the corner of his mouth...

Good for us?

Good guy.

Then according to your opinion, we still have to thank you?

"Presiding Judge, I'm interrupting."

After he finished the second point, Li Chen raised his hand again: "What you said is for our own good. I really have a hard time understanding this sentence.

Before the case goes to trial, I think my client has given a clear answer.

There are three reasons why they want the case to be heard online publicly.

First, they did not believe that their son had raped the other person.

Second, they made a lot of unfavorable comments online in the early stage of the incident. Only through an open trial so that everyone can see clearly what is right and wrong can those netizens be guided correctly.

I think my client also made it clear that he was willing to bear the blame on the rapist's family.

The third point also takes into account the apology for the pressure caused by the trial court's fair trial of this case.

They don't understand the law and publish favorable comments online before the trial, which puts huge pressure from public opinion on the court and other law enforcement agencies. They are also very guilty.

With this mentality, they applied for a public online trial of this case, just to clear themselves or the other party's innocence.

I personally believe that open online court hearings will be beneficial to the court, the respected presiding judge, the prosecutors from the prosecutor’s office, or the martial arts association personnel from the reporting agency.

The public prosecutor accused Zhang Yong of rape and opened an online trial to let netizens see the facts of Zhang Yong's rape.

Only when they see it, they will stop thinking wildly, and public opinion will naturally be self-defeating.

On the contrary, a non-public trial will only make netizens more suspicious of the authenticity of the case, which is also detrimental to the normal order of society. "

The presiding judge of the trial couldn't help but twitch his lips slightly when he heard this.

Good guy!
According to what you said, we still have to thank you?

He really wanted Li Chen to sit in his place and let him hammer the hammer.

This is really out of place. I don’t know how difficult it is for me...

　Damn it, I almost got lazy again

　　
　
(End of this chapter)