I was watched by the Internet police during the live broadcast of law popularization?

Chapter 327 Correct and reasonable response method. Is it possible that the victim may commit a crime by posting the video online?

“I watched the barrage in the live broadcast room, and many people thought that what the netizen who was framed in the subway station did was right.

The reason why I say this is because I empathize with this netizen directly.

Some netizens are also asking:

Speaking of Lawyer Li, what should we do if we encounter such a problem? "

After disconnecting from netizens, Li Chen began to answer questions from netizens in the live broadcast room: "I was innocently wronged by others, but I couldn't find a reasonable way to solve the problem.

I don’t do anything, and it’s not like I can’t swallow this breath in my heart…”

"Now, I will give a unified reply to such questions."

The barrage in the live broadcast room was a bit confrontational, so the mute mode started.

“First, we have to face up to the problem.

Before taking the next step, we must be sure that we ourselves have been wronged. "

"I have to say that there are always some people who have such an extreme mentality and think that they are naturally beautiful. If someone glances at her, she will think that you are peeking at her. If you use If you use your mobile phone to do other things, others will think you are secretly filming her. We cannot rule out the existence of such a group of people, let alone the fact that there are indeed some special people who have special hobbies.

For example, if there is nothing wrong, which cell phone secretly takes a picture of someone's skirt, or someone's dirty hands on the bus.

The most despicable thing is that after they commit bottomless behavior, they then slap the blame on the victim, putting the blame on the victim, and making outrageous words and deeds.

Why are you being photographed secretly if you are dressed like this? You must not be a good person dressed like this.

We men have a group, and women also have individual groups, but individual groups cannot represent a whole.

I also don’t want the extreme opposition between men and women to appear again in my live broadcast room. You can say that you haven’t met good people, but you can’t say that there are no good people in this world. "

"Now let's start answering the questions."

“First, we need to figure out the focus of our needs.

What do we need when we are wronged?

Apologize?

Since you have wronged me, you must stand up and come up with a reasonable solution for your behavior.

compensation?

There are so many people in a public place, and you actually opened your mouth to say that I was filming secretly. This caused great harm to my young heart. I can no longer trust anyone.

There are many ways to compensate victims, but the most effective way to comfort them is through monetary compensation.

Only money can make up for my mental loss and make me forget those unpleasant things. "

"But whether it's an apology or compensation, there needs to be a reasonable degree, and the range of this degree is acceptable to others."

“I’ll take this netizen as an example:

He was framed by others while riding the subway. He was arbitrarily accused in front of so many people. Afterwards, he was pulled off the bus by the company's security personnel. The subsequent apology was in line with the impact of the whistleblower. The forces are not proportional.

You framed me on the subway. Since it was a false accusation, you should apologize to me on the subway in front of everyone. This is a critical point, and the solution is simple:

When we encounter a similar situation and someone raises a question, we can also ask him back.

The reason why you said in front of so many people that I secretly photographed you is because you thought my behavior was abnormal.

But what should I do if I can prove that my behavior is not abnormal?

At this time, the whistleblower will also give corresponding replies to your questions, and this reply must be saved as subsequent legal basis.

And when the other party gives you a reasonable answer, you can move on to your next step.

The formation of a thing requires a variety of elements, and a third party is also required to come forward.

The other passengers on the subway are a complete third person.

You can confirm the other party's reply again and invite a third person on the subway station to be a witness and confirm the whistleblower's reply again.

Because an irrational reply does not have any legal effect, repeated confirmation can prove that the other party's reply is a well-thought-out answer, and you will still be on the right side even if it comes to the court in the future. "

“Next we enter the second stage, what if a third party intervenes in the process of proving one’s innocence?

For example, if management personnel or law enforcement officials come forward and want to take us down for private negotiations, how should we solve the problem?

First of all, we must control our emotions, because anger cannot solve the problem. Only by calming down and adopting reasonable methods can we maximize our interests.

Whether they are law enforcement officers or security personnel, their stance is neutral at the beginning.

Of course, in order to avoid encountering unfair people, our mobile phone recording must not be stopped. This is a way to reasonably prove that we have been subjected to illegal means.

The next thing is also very critical, everyone must remember it!

You must be the first to describe the process of the case, because you say that the other party is unjustly accusing you and the other party reporting you for secretly filming are two completely different concepts.

It would be completely detrimental to us if we give a bad impression to a third party.

If you talk about the problem first and tell the other party that you are prepared to prove your innocence, the other party has no reason to take you out of the car to solve the problem.

If the other party does this, we can also accuse the other party through the audio and video recording on the mobile phone, saying that he and the other party are in a group.

During the implementation of this link, you must control your emotions and avoid unnecessary conflicts with the other party, because whether it is the security personnel of the subway station or the law enforcement unit, they are obliged to maintain public order.

And irrational behavior may eventually become a violation of public order and be punished by public security. "

"Again, temporary anger cannot solve the problem, and your behavior like that netizen is also very dangerous.

If you post the quarrel between you and the other party online, you will most likely be sued by the other party. "

Li Chen looked at the netizens in the live broadcast room with a serious face and said: "Because this matter itself is between you and the other party.

There is no problem if others discover abnormalities and make accusations, and the law does not clearly state that citizens cannot report citizens.

I feel that you have a problem and raise a question. If you have no problem yourself, I will apologize and put you down. Although it is unacceptable, it does not violate relevant legal regulations.

However, general insults and abuses that do not cause actual serious consequences are generally not enough to constitute a crime, and it is difficult to constitute a civil infringement of reputation rights. The martial arts association department or the court will not accept the case. Only when the reputation has been seriously slandered and has caused a relatively bad social impact can it be accepted. "

"The behavior this netizen posted online will bring serious public opinion consequences to the other party, because your behavior is invading her privacy. At the least, you have to pay money and apologize, and if the circumstances are serious, you may go to jail."

(End of this chapter)