You became a lawyer and sent the judge in

Chapter 400: Just dump the evidence on the table, how can you do this?

"Fuck! The trial is coming in, coming in!"

"The arrogance I suffered before is now coming back!"

"Lawyer Su Bai of Bai Jun Law Firm, this time, he directly sued the media that spread rumors and the law firm that slandered him!"

"It's cool!"

"I want to see how the media that spread rumors and that successful law firm that is both evil and evil will be dealt with in this court trial!"

"Hahaha, to be honest, I came here after seeing the Nandu media reports, but I am also very curious about the result!"

"Bai Jun Law Firm has suffered so many attacks before, and now it has sued the defendant. This can be regarded as safeguarding its legal rights, right?"

"Such unscrupulous media should be properly prosecuted!"

“Big support!”

As soon as the trial began, many people flocked to the live broadcast of the trial.

Most of them were because they saw the law firm entrusted by the defendant Dong Baihao in the case of Bai Jun Law Firm suing Dong Guoguo.

And the unscrupulous media after losing the second trial.

Regarding this, many fans of Bai Jun Law Firm and interested passers-by want to see what the outcome of this trial will be.

We also hope that Baijun Law Firm can safeguard its legal rights and interests.

So... a lot of people are paying attention to this live broadcast of the public trial.

at the same time.

At the plaintiff's seat, Su Bai waited quietly for the trial to begin.

There are few key issues involved in this trial.

The main problem still lies in unfair competition and rumors among successful law firms.

As for other media, whether they are urban media or people's livelihood media, they are all official media and need to pay attention to their influence.

Tianyu Media is an entertainment media, but its size is not small.

You also need to pay attention to your reputation.

There is no doubt that these three parties are involved in spreading rumors.

The evidence is conclusive and the determination is simple.

In this regard, Su Bai believes that there is no other objection to the determination of rumors.

The main purpose is to identify the issues of rumor making and unfair competition of Chenggong Law Firm.
.

....

The trial begins.

The previous series of court proceedings are completed.

On the judgment seat.

As the presiding judge, Chu Changhe banged the gavel and spoke slowly:

"In this case, the plaintiff Fang Baijun Law Firm filed a complaint against the defendants Chenggong Law Firm, West District Metropolis Media, West District Minsheng Media, and Tianyu Media."

"Accused West District Metropolis Media, West District People's Livelihood Media, and Tianyu Media for allegedly spreading rumors and spreading false content, which seriously affected and damaged the reputation of Baijun Law Firm."

"We also accuse the subject Chenggong Law Firm of disseminating information to the above media, spreading rumors and spreading false content, thereby constituting unfair competition."

"Excuse me, the plaintiff, the above is the corresponding accusation against you."

"Do you have any other objections to this?"

The above accusations are all written in the indictment.

Su Bai didn't have any other opinions about these, so he spoke directly:

"There is no presiding judge."

"Ok."

Facing Su Bai's answer, Chu Changhe nodded: "Then let's move on to the cross-examination session."

"Please ask the plaintiff to present your evidence."

"Good judge."

Su Bai sorted out the evidence in front of him, and then stated:

"The evidence we currently provide includes the evidence that Western District Metropolis Media, Western District Minsheng Media and Tianyu Media spread rumors against us at the beginning."

"Specifically involved are content hints such as videos, pictures, text, and title copywriting."

"The content published by the three media outlets all involved untrue slander against Bai Jun Law Firm and slander against me personally."

"These include - when it comes to publishing content, publicly stating that Baijun Law Firm is not a law firm worthy of its name."

“The statement is false – our law firm has no regard for the client.”

"It implies that our law firm does not accept the client's demands and only cares about performance."

"And not long ago, I took over a criminal case, and the second instance changed the verdict."

"These media spread rumors, claiming that it was because of me that the second trial sentence was changed."

"And he said that I deliberately wanted the defendant to be sentenced to death during the first trial, implying that I and the judge of the first trial had some illegal dealings."

"There's solid evidence in this."

"We have already presented the relevant evidence to the court."

"It includes videos, pictures and texts released by three media."

"We have marked the instructive content in these contents in detail."

"In addition, the evidence also contains materials that prove our innocence and prove that these statements are false."

"The above is the evidence our company presented to the three media outlets of the defendant."

"..."

After Su Bai stated this, Chu Changhe nodded slightly:

"These evidences have been identified by the Physical Evidence Bureau."

"The collegial court has understood."

"So as the defendants, West District Metropolis Media, West District People's Livelihood Media, and Tianyu Media have any objections to these evidences?"

The three media outlets had actually communicated with Su Bai in advance when the court served the summons.

and cooperate with its investigation.

The current situation is that all three media outlets have learned that they did something wrong.

The evidence is conclusive, what objections can there be?

There must be no other objections.

The attorneys appointed by the three media companies have a very clear understanding of this case, which is to minimize their losses.

As for the rest...just admit your mistakes.

And more importantly, they even want to refute.

Can you refute it?

What the other party presented was objective factual evidence. How could they refute it?

To deny the objective evidence presented by the other party and make the judge not accept the objective evidence of the other party?

This is simply impossible for them!

Therefore, faced with conclusive evidence, the lawyers appointed by the three media outlets had no way to refute it.

There is no objection, this is the common statement of the three attorneys.

After the attorneys appointed by the three media outlets spoke.

As the presiding judge, Chu Changhe turned around and asked Su Bai's request.

"The three media outlets on the defendant's side have no other objections to the evidence presented by the plaintiff."

"So, does the plaintiff have any claim for the losses caused to you by the rumors spread by the three media outlets?"

Upon hearing the presiding judge's question, Su Bai nodded slightly:

"some."

The three media outlets have caused reputational damage by spreading rumors.

The seriousness of the reputation caused under the circumstances is self-evident.

Very serious!

But the seriousness depends on how serious the objective factual consequences are.

In this case, it is difficult to prove the losses suffered by Bai Jun Law Firm.

Generally speaking, if spreading rumors causes property damage, you can claim property compensation. But what happens when reputational damage is caused?

Causes reputational damage...and damages potential property.

This time the reputation was damaged. For Bai Jun Law Firm, the loss of reputation caused the loss of certain case sources.

If this is brought forward and large compensation is demanded.

Then the court may not adopt it.

Because of the damage to your reputation, how many potential sources of cases will be infringed?

This kind of loss cannot be estimated and can only be compensated in accordance with general legal requirements.

Therefore, regarding the appeals of these three companies, Su Bai’s requirements are also very simple:

"Our request is that the three media outlets remove all of our harmful and rumor-mongering videos and issue a public apology."

"A public apology should last no less than one month."

"During this period, there must be no deliberate concealment, deliberate misleading of facts, or distortion of subjectivity."

"At the same time, we demand compensation for the damage to our reputation."

"The specific amount of compensation can be reasonably claimed through court mediation after the trial."

"The above are our demands for the defendant and the three media outlets."

Su Bai did not directly raise the amount of the claim at the trial.

Firstly, the amount cannot be too high.

Secondly, after mediation by the court, the amount of the claim will be more reasonable.

In response to these claims put forward by Su Bai, Chu Changhe turned his head and looked at the defendant.

"I would like to ask the defendant, do you have any other opinions on the lawsuit claims raised by the plaintiff?"

"Or is there anything that he thinks is unreasonable?"

The attorneys appointed by the three media outlets heartily agreed with this lawsuit.

But for Su Bai's lawsuit.

Two official media, West District Metropolis Media and West District People's Livelihood Media, still put forward certain opinions.

The lawyer entrusted by West District Metropolis Media stated:

"We have no other opinions on the plaintiff's claims."

"Just regarding the timing of the public apology, we also ask the plaintiff and the presiding judge to consider the impact of official media."

"We are willing to apologize."

"After all, inappropriate remarks were made due to some personal subjective factors in our media, and we are willing to take responsibility for this."

"But in terms of the time for a public apology, we do not agree with a one-month public apology time."

In addition, a lawyer commissioned by West District Minsheng Media also elaborated on this idea.

They all thought that a month's public apology was too long, and they had no objections to compensation.

Because Su Bai took the initiative to propose compensation, he could stop and reconcile.

As lawyers, they also know very well that the amount of compensation will not be too high.

There is no big dispute at this point.

As the presiding judge, Chu Changhe spent too long hearing that the three media outlets advocated a public apology.

Then he asked: "The three media outlets of the defendant believe that the public apology takes too long."

"Based on the evidence now submitted by the plaintiff."

"The short videos you posted have been viewed tens of millions of times and forwarded hundreds of thousands of times."

"At the same time, it led other media to follow suit."

"Do you have anything to say about this?"

The lawyers appointed by the three defendant media outlets also knew very well what the presiding judge meant by asking this question.

Why did the presiding judge ask this?

It's because the three media outlets spread the rumors immediately.

It caused others to follow suit...

This is why Bai Jun Law Firm sued three of their media outlets but not other media outlets.

Because these three media were the first to publish, most of the other media followed suit.

The meaning of the presiding judge's question is also very simple. It means that the situation of the three of you is relatively serious.

If you want to shorten the time for a public apology, you must give a reasonable explanation.

West District Metropolis Media entrusted a lawyer to continue making statements.

This time the content of the statement pointed the main finger at Cheng Cheng Law Firm.

"presiding judge."

"I know that the news we spread has caused huge losses to the plaintiff."

"We are also willing to take responsibility for this, but there is one thing we want to explain."

"We spread the news because the person in charge at the time had a certain relationship with the lawyers of Chenggong Law Firm and learned that his lawyers had information to report."

"Because his personal relationship was relatively good, there was no further confirmation, which resulted in us becoming the main responsible party for spreading rumors."

"For this point, we will hold the person in charge at the time accountable."

"Considering that our public image has been privately used by some people to slander us, we believe that the publicity period for this apology should be slowed down."

The statement made by the lawyer commissioned by West District Metropolis Media simply put the blame on the person in charge at the time to reduce his own responsibility.

In fact, the person in charge at the time did bear the main responsibility.

But Su Bai is accusing the main body of their media, and the main body of their media cannot throw away their responsibility.

Based on this, the lawyer entrusted by him raised the issue to the person in charge at the trial.

Similarly...the other two media also followed the example of the person in charge of the Western District Metropolis Media and made corresponding statements.

They all put the problem to the person in charge at the time to reduce their own responsibilities.

The responsibility was even placed on successful law firms.

On the defendant's seat.

Yu Cheng and Li Ming were sitting in their respective seats, both looking very ugly.

According to the current situation, the plaintiffs have not yet produced evidence against them.

But.…

The attorneys appointed by West District Metropolis Media, West District Minsheng Media, and Tianyu Media made their statements very clearly!

That was the person in charge of the media contacted by Li Ming. It is very likely that the chat records between him and the person in charge have been handed over to the investigators.

Let the plaintiff have the evidence!

So in this way, all the fingers are pointed at their law firm!

unambiguous evidence!

Li Ming glanced in the direction of Yu Cheng:

"What should we do now?"

"The current situation seems to be that the plaintiff has obtained conclusive evidence."

"We will probably lose the case!"

Yu Cheng looked serious and said nothing: "Wait and see."

"It's not time to sue us yet."

"You may not lose the case."

Yu Cheng said this, but actually he felt a little uneasy in his heart.

Because judging from the current status of the trial, the other party is likely to have actual evidence!

So in this court hearing, their Success Law Firm fell into absolute passivity! .

....

PS: Please give me a monthly ticket~

(End of this chapter)