Lawyer Luo’s live broadcast of popularization of the law, are you acting as a joke player?

Chapter 226 Lawyer Luo: The evidence of your attack on the woman’s accuser is very good, but now it’s mine!Bring it!

Everyone involved in this trial was watching.

Luo Kai sat in the dock and, as the defendant's defender, rebutted some of the case facts and evidence in court.

The case has entered the debate stage.

The most intense part has come.

Whether this case can be settled depends on Lawyer Luo's performance next.

It is a pity that this case cannot be broadcast live on the entire network, otherwise the barrage would have started flying by now.

Luo Kai's voice was loud and his eyes were like lightning as he stared at the hypocritical woman sitting on the plaintiff's bench. Then he looked up at the three judges presiding over the case:
“Dear Judge, there are many strange things in this case, there are disputes, and there are things that are inconsistent with the facts. We think we can raise them specifically for questioning in court!
Now that we have become the original defendant and have gone to court, let us discuss the facts, discuss the facts of the case, debate and refute. We first state our point of view, that is, in this case, our agent, also the defendant, did not violate the The woman's will did not commit any illegal act, and objectively it did not constitute a criminal act. She also had no subjective intention to commit a crime. Therefore, we maintain that our client is not guilty!

In the following process, I will refute it one by one from different angles and points, and provide evidence to prove it in court!
After all, evidence is king in court, and evidence speaks for itself. But you cannot just rely on a few words from one party's mouth to convict someone out of thin air. This is inconsistent with the justice stipulated by the law! "

Luo Kai's words echoed in the small courtroom.

Straight to the head start.

Just like writing a fragrant paper, just present the arguments first.

How to make an argument? Let’s look at Attorney Luo’s words to pick out and refute bit by bit.

The focus judge in this case has just been named.

It has been stated that it has been raised, so is it against the woman's will?

This is the focus of this case, this is the point of contention, and this is where both sides disagree.

Luo Kai even added two sentences at the end of his words. In these two sentences, the taste of needlepoint versus wheatgrass is full.

Especially when Luo Kai's eyes were fixed and he looked at the woman sitting in the plaintiff's seat who only heard crying but no tears.

The demo is already here, but you are still showing off your acting skills on such a serious occasion, right?

It was obviously extremely clever and used the law to create a very advanced fairy dance, but here it pretends to be a victim, which is simply funny.

You have been divorced 8 times.

Can you really raise your head and look at the three witnesses who are attending the trial this time?

That was the victim that this woman had framed.

A victim who once joined forces with a dating agency to perform an extremely clever fairy dance.

Really are!
Once a person is shameless, he is invincible, right?
Let's watch someone like me, Luo, ruthlessly tear off this woman's shameless skin.

There is also the lawyer who has been working with the dating agency for the past three years and has harmed countless people.

Also give me someone to wait for.

Don't be anxious, don't be anxious, come one by one.

I estimate that I will send a lot of people in this time.

……

After hearing Luo Kai's suggestion.

The three judges nodded.

Follow the process.

The presiding judge asked: “Defendant’s defense lawyer, please state your opinion and provide evidence as to whether the evidence in this case can be used and whether it is reasonable. You can refute and raise objections. This is the right given to the defendant by law!
Of course, the details of the case can be debated. Now the defense lawyer of the defendant is invited to ask questions in court. You, the plaintiff, should cooperate with the Q&A! "

In hearing cases, the judge is the core of the entire case.

It is up to the judge to initiate various court proceedings.

After the judge finished speaking.

The plaintiff, female lawyer, and mother-in-law sitting at the plaintiff's table were slightly uneasy.

This uneasy feeling came directly to my heart for no reason.

Especially when you see Luo Kai's deep eyes looking over.

The three people were greatly shocked in their minds.

Especially after hearing the outrageous rumors on the Internet: basically no one who is not strong enough in the metaphysics of fortune-telling, whether they are lawyers, defendants or plaintiffs, as Lawyer Luo's opponents, can leave with all their needs and all their tails.

But then the three of them calmed down immediately.

In their opinion, there is no possibility of overturning this case.

You need evidence, you need evidence, you need process, you need process.

Even the official personnel who specialize in handling cases were able to arrest people and squat because the evidence was too solid, too sufficient, and the chain of evidence was too complete.

It can lock people up for more than 100 days.

This is something that requires sufficient evidence to support.

Although the coercive measures were later changed due to the participation of Lawyer Luo and the search for the case.

But the defendant (male) who was locked inside the fence, wearing shrink handcuffs on his hands, was locked inside the fence instead of sitting in the dock to argue, which can explain a lot of problems.

He is currently a criminal suspect!

There is only one more trial process to go before he is sentenced as a criminal.

So under such circumstances.

Although Lawyer Luo's reputation has spread throughout the Internet, in this case, the three people sitting at the plaintiff's table do not believe in evil.

I want to give Luo Kai's edge a good test.

Look at how strong this person who is already famous in the world is in his 20s.
This young man has just entered the legal profession for more than a year and has only obtained a professional certificate. He has not been a professional lawyer for a long time. Is his strength a joke among netizens?
Does reputation really match strength?
All I saw was the court.

Lawyer Luo, who was sitting in the dock, glanced at the defendant (male) who was imprisoned in the fence with a desire to survive in his eyes and wanted to say something.

She gave him a calm look.

He had just taken a certain amount of time to quickly sketch out the defense statement in his hand.

It's like listening to the teacher underline the key points in the book during class. If the teacher asks questions, you can quickly answer them!

what?
Are you asking whether this defense statement should be submitted after the trial?
Will it be illegal to write and draw like this?
will be rejected by the judge.

No, no!
The judge had received a copy of the plaintiff's indictment and the defense submitted by the defendant before the trial.

The secretary has prepared a copy here.

The submission process has long since ended.

So there is nothing serious about writing or drawing on it.

In the courtroom, everyone held their breath. Luo Kai loosened his collar and then opened his mouth to rebut one by one:
“We maintain that the defendant is not guilty because he did not violate the woman’s will both subjectively and objectively, there was no fact of committing a crime, and there was no criminal behavior from the beginning.

Of course, thank you for your permission, Your Majesty. In this case, we will interrogate the plaintiff in this case in court for the details of the case!And point out one by one from these details, there is no violation of women's wishes! "

Luo Kai said this and picked up the defense statement in his hand.

As the defendant, when arguing in court, what he holds is a defense statement, which corresponds to the plaintiff's indictment, one attack and one defense...

The indictment in Luo Kai's hand was slightly tilted and raised, and in a loud voice he started from the first point of doubt in this case:
"As a defense lawyer, between the time I received the case and the hearing, after repeated confirmations with our client and listening to the testimony of relevant witnesses, I confirmed that the defendant did not violate the woman's wishes! This is reflected in the following aspects.

First of all, the first point of doubt is that according to the elevator surveillance evidence 1-2, after the engagement, the defendant and the plaintiff were smiling happily in the elevator. Let's see this evidence and it will be played in court. Yes, yes, this is the scene. The man is leaning against the corner of the elevator, while the woman is shy and making intimate gestures. "

Luo Kai asked the secretary to help present the evidence in court.

The clerk quickly retrieved the evidence on his computer and played it in court.

And marked the number of key frames.

What Luo Kai said was played in court.

This piece of evidence is also projected on the huge curtain next to it, so that everyone can see it.

The trial process was captured on camera.

These evidences are all collected by investigators during the course of handling the case.

It has been strictly examined by the prosecutor, that is, the prosecutor during the review stage.

Both parties can use it to provide evidence!
As for whether the evidence is true?

If the evidence is false, who bears the burden of proof?

This is the prosecutor's responsibility!in criminal cases.

The entire case process is like a colleague cooking.

The process of filing a case for investigation and handling can be seen as collecting ingredients.

When the prosecutor conducts an appraisal to check the legality of the evidence, it also checks whether the evidence collected is illegal?Is there anything illegal?
It's like checking the collected ingredients for poisonous mushrooms or something.

If there are any, remove them promptly.

The prosecutor plays the role of quality inspector in this process.

If there is a problem with the subsequent food, the quality inspector will be held responsible.

That's probably the truth.

Then comes the trial stage, where all the ingredients are chopped and then cooked over high heat for stir-frying.

After the trial is over, a delicious meal can be made.

Ah!
Therefore, the prosecution is responsible for the authenticity of the evidence.

The plaintiff and defendant are responsible for producing evidence.

It is slightly different from that in civil cases, whoever advocates and who gives evidence is responsible...

Pull it back again.

Luo Kai waited for everyone to watch the footage captured from the elevator surveillance camera.

There is not much time, just more than a minute.

Everyone can afford to wait.

Everyone also saw the original and defendant in the surveillance footage. The two parties were fighting like a young couple about to get married.

Everyone present felt uncomfortable!

Both the original and the defendant felt that they were executed in public at an embarrassing time.

And it was still on such a solemn and solemn occasion.

But the embarrassment only lasted a moment.

This piece of evidence is related to the interests of both parties, whether the case is won or lost.

Others were a little embarrassed. How close the plaintiff and defendant were before, and now how fiercely they are at each other after the relationship broke down!
Sure enough, showing affection will kill you quickly.

As for the most embarrassing thing...

It was the three witnesses sitting in the spectator stands.

Because they seem to have experienced the same situation.

They have also been trapped by the same immortal tricks.

He can be regarded as an inexplicable "senior".

……

After showing the first piece of evidence collected by official investigators.

Luo Kai raised questions in court: "Just now the plaintiff cried with her own words and confirmed with certainty that she was forcibly dragged into the wedding room, but just now it was shown through the surveillance camera and everyone saw it!

This was consensual, and there was no fighting, pulling, twisting, etc., so the defendant’s remarks seemed to need to be verified, or they were completely nonsense!

How should the plaintiff give a reasonable explanation for this? The woman’s attorney can also answer it in court! "

Luo Kai didn't want to give the woman any shame.

As soon as the first piece of evidence is shown, the firepower will be full.

You have the nerve to say that you were forced.

You look at the evidence from the elevator perspective.

Do you still have the nerve to say you are a victim?

Where is the face?Where is the face?
Compared to the woman, there is no evidence to make a family accusation.

Luo Kai's angle and method of rebuttal are all supported by evidence.

Moreover, the evidence was collected by official investigators.

The evidence is very strong.

But evidence alone cannot prove whether a woman's will was violated.

Because there will be more evidence to be displayed in court, so that a complete chain of evidence can be formed.

Luo Kai asked with sharp eyes.

The judges also turned their attention to the plaintiff on the plaintiff's bench.

The woman looked panicked.

But the female lawyer sitting next to her gently patted the person next to her with her hand.

Let her take it easy.

The next thing will be explained by the lawyer as it has been rehearsed in advance.

Professional people do professional things.

The female lawyer coughed lightly: "Defendant's defense lawyer, regarding the question you just asked and the evidence shown on the surveillance camera, this scene occurred before the case occurred and cannot be used as direct evidence of what happened next. !
It's like a madman goes out on the street with a knife to kill people. He hides the knife in his coat and is photographed walking on the street like an ordinary person. This cannot be used as a reason or evidence that he is not a mental patient! "

Good guy, come up and refute it directly.

Direct denial.

This evidence.

Useless.

Because he was the supervisor before the incident.

Doesn't have any effect.

This logic.

tsk tsk!
Very forceful explanation.

But it seems to be a little bit sideways.

Then the female lawyer said from another angle: "Our client is the plaintiff and the victim in this case. In the evidence just shown, the role and status of the plaintiff is that of a person who has just become engaged to his fiancé and whose parents have just agreed. The little girl is married, so it is completely reasonable to make the following state!
After all, who could have imagined that the fiancé would commit illegal crimes in the subsequent process?What's wrong with a little girl who longs for love and beautiful facts?Therefore, I think this evidence has no effect. In the classification of evidence, let alone direct evidence, it is not even considered indirect evidence!Our answer is complete! "

The female lawyer finished.

Look at Luo Kai with an indifferent look!

And added: "The plaintiff, our client, was harmed when she was dragged into the wedding room. During the official investigation, she made a record and stated that she was locked in the room for a whole day. God, I have been subjected to all kinds of treatment that can be said to be like a devil, and I am even still standing..."

Before the female lawyer could finish speaking, an inexplicable uneasiness suddenly surged into her heart.

It's like handing a knife to the other party!
The corners of Luo Kai's smiling mouth became wider and wider.

Opponent.

You cry in court, trying to arouse everyone's sympathy.

And also presented evidence.

You want to attack, right?

well.

Your evidence is good.

Very sharp.

Like a knife.

But it's mine now.

Luo Kai said to the judge with a smile: "Your Honor..."

(End of this chapter)