Shenhao started as a military training anchor

Chapter 749: Instructor Huo is really trying his best to uphold fairness and justice

Luo Xiang received Holly's invitation and responded in the affirmative. He would come to participate in this debate and participate as an on-site referee.

"Instructor Huo" is famous enough on the Internet that Luo Xiang is also paying attention to the large-scale event of the International Chinese Debate Competition in Colleges and Universities.

I am particularly looking forward to the debates at several major universities in the rule of law area.

This time the debate competition between Southwest University of Political Science and Law and East China University of Political Science and Law chose a topic that closely followed hot social issues, such as the issue of juvenile delinquency. He was also very interested in hearing the views of major law schools and universities.

As a participant in the Criminal Law Amendment Bill, it is inconvenient for him to express his private views on some sensitive matters to avoid causing greater social impact.

It is most appropriate for college students to debate.

Although the debaters on the court are top students from the law school, their private instructors are all professors from the law school.

It can be said that no matter what the outcome of this debate is, it represents a new understanding of "minor crime" in domestic legal circles.

It is possible to promote the reform and development of relevant laws.

Significant.

On the night when Luo Xiang arrived in Jiangcheng, Huo Li had people arrange food and lodging, and personally came to receive him.

Holly treated his friends in academia and literature and art circles with great respect.

Lin Xiao, the principal of Xizheng, also came over to have dinner together.

"Mr. Huo."

Holly walked into the box, and Colonel Lin stood up and called him politely.

He smiled and nodded, shaking hands with Colonel Lin.

The two have known each other for a long time.

A large number of members of the legal department of Yisu and Haikuo Investment Group are alumni of Xizheng.

Some are still professors at school.

Temporary job at Holly's company.

Although it does not have as brilliant a record as "Nanshan Pizza Hut", the alumni of Xinzheng have indeed solved many difficult economic cases for Holly's company.

There is a close relationship between schools and enterprises.

"Mr. Huo, I have long admired you." Luo Xiang extended his hand to Holly.

"Professor Luo, welcome to Jiangcheng as a guest." Holly shook hands with him, greeted him politely, and invited, "I've kept you two waiting. Let's chat while we eat."

After sitting down to eat, Lin Xiao sighed, “This event organized by Mr. Huo has far-reaching social significance, and the topic chosen this time has attracted much attention.

I really didn't expect that Professor Luo Xiang would agree to participate in this competition.

Your arrival will push this debate to a new level of enthusiasm and height. "

Luo Xiang smiled and said: "After receiving the invitation from Mr. Huo, I took a look at the debate topic and thought it was very interesting. Combined with the current social issues, it is worthy of in-depth discussion.

Mr. Lin is right. Mr. Huo holds this debate, which is of far-reaching significance. "

Holly smiled and said: "I am only responsible for building bridges. You are the ones who spread the law. Professionals do professional things."

The two smiled and had a drink with Holly.

We had a simple meal together.

Holly said goodbye to Luo Xiang and Lin Xiao, and on the way home, he saw the trailer video of Luo Xiang's participation released on the Qiangyin platform.

The comment section was once again in a frenzy.

Zhang San is important enough in the hearts of netizens.

He himself is also very popular on the Internet.

"Damn it, it's really coming!"

"I'm looking forward to Teacher Luo Xiang's analysis."

"This debate is very interesting."

"I feel like this debate has the potential to influence the verdict of some recent cases."

"Instructor Huo must have read the comment section. Netizens want to see Zhang San. He really invited him here."

"The instructors are really trying to maintain fairness and justice."

"Wow, my family, I'm crying to death. Instructor Huo is the best protector."

……

The rule of law debate in Xinzheng attracted a lot of attention.

The whole network is looking forward to it.

On that day, Qiangyin also sent its best on-site director to coordinate the live broadcast of the debate in the academic lecture hall of Xinzheng University.

Just started the live broadcast.

The popularity has reached the top of the list of hot searches for Qiang Yin.

More than five hot search terms are about this debate. It attracted a large influx of netizens.

Before the debaters from both sides entered the room, the number of people in the live broadcast room exceeded 500,000.

The increase is rapid.

When the debaters appeared, the host, the referee, and finally the special guest Luo Xiang appeared, the number of people in the live broadcast room had exceeded two million.

Debate competition is a very niche topic on the Qiangyin platform.

However, the three layers of buffs of "Instructor Huo" + "Zhang San" + "Hot Social Events" are superimposed, which is comparable to the popularity of a big show in the entertainment industry.

When the debate began, the number of people in the live broadcast room had reached 350 million.

The topic of this debate is actually somewhat detrimental to the opposing side.

As an opponent, East China University of Political Science and Law holds the view that "the age of criminal responsibility should not be lowered."

Because of the occurrence of various juvenile crime cases, netizens are indignant, and naturally the opposing views are not very popular.

But East China University of Political Science and Law, an old law school, has strong strength.

I competed in this debate at the highest level.

No matter in terms of debating skills or arguments, they are not inferior.

You come and go with Xi Zheng.

The tip of the needle is facing the wheat awn.

"They are all fantastic players."

"What should I do? I seem to have been convinced by the other side."

"To be honest, my position is no longer firm."

"So damn strong."

"No matter what the result is, seeing the performance of these top law school students today gives me full confidence in the future construction of the legal system in our country."

"..."

The game of three arguments for the affirmative and three arguments for the negative pushed this debate to a small climax.

The two of them were like walking databases, listing a large number of cases to explain their views in all aspects such as criminal psychology, criminal behavior, etc.

There was thunderous applause from the audience.

The number of viewers in the live broadcast room has exceeded five million.

Even before the debate ended, many netizens had already made slices and posted them online.

Netizens in the live broadcast room are also frantically calling for both players.

I stayed in a state of excitement to watch the one-hour live broadcast of the debate.

Finally, the host turned the topic to Luo Xiang.

This is what all netizens are most looking forward to.

Teacher Luo Xiang still spoke in a calm tone: “In today’s debate, the contestants on both sides are very powerful, which reflects the profound heritage of two top domestic law schools.

Regarding the hot events that everyone is paying attention to recently, what I want to say is that I have always held the view that the life of the law is experience, not logic. If empirical facts continue to prove that there are problems with legal logic, then this logical problem is worthy of correction. .

In judicial practice, there are many cases where children under the age of 14 have committed serious crimes. It is difficult for these children to convince the public because they lack the logic to distinguish right from wrong.

We can no longer look at the problem of juvenile crime from an optimistic perspective. We blame all the reasons on education, the economy, left-behind children, etc., and believe that children are kind. This kind of logic is suspected of hypocrisy.

What the law needs to do is to impose necessary punishment on those who commit heinous crimes. Only punishment can bring about correction.

This is what I want to express.

Finally, I am very grateful to the organizer for inviting me to see a meaningful debate on the rule of law.

Once again, applause is given to the debaters on both sides.

Especially excellent. "

"Teacher Luo said it very well."

"There is a logical problem in the inherent goodness of nature."

"This debate is thought-provoking."

"Thank you for your hard work, Teacher Luo."

"Salute to all legal professionals."

"Today's debate was very exciting. I was not distracted throughout the whole process. The contestants on both sides were great."

"The result of the debate is no longer important. This debate has given us a new way of thinking about illegal and criminal issues."

"Thank you, Instructor Huo, for preparing this legal education activity."

The barrage in the live broadcast room received rave reviews. (End of chapter)

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like