If you were asked to file a lawsuit, how come you were not found guilty?

Chapter 117 You just took a nap?Have you taken off your clothes?
"Based on the available evidence, it can only be concluded that my client did go to Song Yuanqing's house on the day of the incident and stayed there for more than an hour, but it does not prove that my client committed rape."

Wang Yajun spoke confidently: "With insufficient evidence, the accusations made by the prosecutor are too far-fetched!"

"So the defendant did not force himself to have sex with the victim on the day of the incident?"

Although the judge was asking a question, everyone present could hear that he was confirming the defendant's point of view. Are you sure you haven't done this?
"No, the defendant just went to have a meal on the day of the crime and did nothing else."

"Judging from the elevator surveillance display, the defendant Zhao Hongbo was in a panic when leaving, and his expression was obviously wrong. How does the defender explain this?"

From the defense submissions submitted before the trial, the judge knew that today's trial would not go smoothly, and he was mentally prepared for it.

"There are many reasons for panic. It may be because you think of some unfinished work, or maybe the trash can is on fire at home. Does panic mean you have done something bad?"

Wang Yajun answered calmly, gave two examples very humorously, and even asked the judge in the end.

This guy definitely doesn't specialize in criminal matters.

After a few words, Ren Zhen heard the details of Lawyer Wang.

"Then according to the identification results of the law enforcement agencies, the defendant's biological information was extracted from the victim's clothes. What's going on?"

Although the lawyer's speech made him uncomfortable, Bai Hui'an continued to ask questions in an orderly manner.

"The two of them are colleagues. They have a good relationship on weekdays. It is inevitable that they will have some fights. Colleagues in this company also know that it is normal to get some biological information."

Faced with this question, Wang Yajun obviously lost a lot of confidence, but he still answered bravely.

"I didn't fight with him!"

Song Yuanqing's eyes turned red instantly, and he yelled as soon as he slapped the table.

Although the relationship between the two was indeed getting better and better before the incident, and there was even a tendency to become boyfriend and girlfriend, as a conservative girl with little love experience, Song Yuanqing knew that she had never had any physical contact with Zhao Hongbo. It is even more impossible to get any biological information for no reason.

Ren Zhen quickly grabbed her and asked her to sit down. Wouldn't everyone in this family like to bang the table?

"The victim needs to control his emotions."

Although he was letting Song Yuanqing take control, Judge Bai's tone was obviously much gentler.

"Then defense lawyer, please explain again, what's going on with the biological information on the sheets of the victim's rental house?"

Once here, the judge's tone became cold.

If you play around, it will rub on your clothes, but it won't rub on the sheets, right?
"this."

Wang Yajun hesitated for a while. They only found out the day before the trial that the law enforcement agencies actually had such evidence. Naturally, they had no time to communicate with Zhao Hongbo.

"After eating, we took a nap on the bed. Maybe we were careless at that time?"

Zhao Hongbo is quite calm. The lawyer taught me so many things. Is it reasonable for me to express myself?
Wang Yajun breathed a sigh of relief.

He also knew that what Zhao Hongbo said was not true, but so what?
There is no direct evidence to prove that something happened.

It is not possible to convict based on oral confession alone, and certainly not based on the victim's statement alone.

As long as we don’t let go where we are unsure, then what we are saying is the truth!

What are objective facts?Sorry, only legal facts are recognized in court. Where can legal facts come from without evidence?
Who made the law stipulate that those who doubt the guilt should be treated lightly?
This is Wang Yajun’s thinking.After hearing Zhao Hongbo's explanation, even the judge couldn't help being speechless.

Do you believe this yourself?
After asking a few more questions, Wang Yajun and Zhao Hongbo refused to acknowledge any of them, and everyone who listened was furious.

"Now enter the court debate."

Judging from the written records of the court investigation, nothing substantive was revealed. However, only the judge himself knows how persuasive these answers can be in the judge's heart.

"According to the surveillance, the defendant entered the victim's home at [-]:[-] and left at [-]:[-]. I would like to ask Zhao Hongbo, did you take a nap so early? Or was it at someone else's house?

And how did you finish lunch and take a nap in one hour? "

The prosecutor's questions were not as painless as the judge's, and they pointed directly at the pain point.

After all, the court investigation process is led by the judge, and only allows both parties to present evidence and clarify the facts.

As for whether it is true or not, and whether both parties have questions, that is not something that should be resolved by court investigation.

But the court debate is the prosecutor's turn.

"I take a nap relatively early. I usually take a nap for 10 minutes at noon, isn't that okay?"

Zhao Hongbo is confident.

The prosecutor was noncommittal. Even if the other party answered like this, his purpose had been achieved.

There are some things that you can’t just deny, so the prosecutor’s last sentence is, is it still at someone else’s house?

It is to remind the judge whether Zhao Hongbo’s answer is consistent with common sense and whether it is possible.

"I would like to ask the victim, before the incident, did the defendant sleep in your house? Even for 10 minutes?"

There is no need to ask about the incident on the day of the incident, because the victim now claims that he was raped, so it is naturally impossible for him to accept his claim of taking a nap.

Song Yuanqing shook his head desperately: "I only came here for dinner twice, both times at noon, and left after eating."

"Even if you are a colleague with a good relationship, would you take a nap at someone else's house? I think the defendant's defense is unreasonable."

The prosecutor pointed out his doubts.

“I understand what the prosecutor means, but whether it is consistent with common sense does not directly affect the validity of the rape alleged by the prosecutor.

It doesn't matter if the defendant cannot prove what he did not do, because that is the prosecutor's duty. Therefore, the prosecutor should provide more powerful evidence to prove that the defendant did commit rape, rather than making judgments based on common sense. "

Wang Yajun's answer was at least correct in one thing.

The defendant cannot be required to prove what he has not done, but the prosecutor must prove what the defendant has done.

Although this is correct, what Lawyer Wang failed to understand is that the prosecutor's question was not to prove what Zhao Hongbo had done, but to prove to the judge that the facts inferred based on the defendant's answers were contrary to common sense. .

So how credible can his words be?
The prosecutor also knew that the failure to directly extract biological information from the victim would be disadvantageous in proving the defendant's rape, so he adopted a roundabout strategy in order to connect various evidences together and finally combine them to be strong enough to determine the crime. the occurrence of criminal conduct.

The prosecutor reviewed the evidence a little and asked again a common sense question:
"You said you took a nap, but did you take off your clothes when you went to bed?"

(End of this chapter)