Thick black school

Chapter 10 Thick Black Principle (Psychology and Mechanics) (7)
People today often mention the word scientist to scare ordinary people of my generation, but they don’t know that when scientists are smart, they are a hundred times smarter than ordinary people, and when they are confused, they are also a hundred times more confused than ordinary people.Newton can be called a unique scientist. He had two big and small cats. One day, he ordered a craftsman to open two holes in the door, so that the big cat could go in and out of the big hole, and the kitten could go in and out of the small hole.Anyone knows: only one big hole is opened, and cats big and small can come in and out, but Newton doesn't realize it. Isn't this a hundred times more confused than ordinary people?Newton said that "the center of the earth has gravity", of course we should believe it, but do we also believe when he said "big cats go in and out of big holes, and kittens go in and out of small holes"?Therefore, we must carefully choose scientists and theories, and beware of Newton's cat hole hidden in his theories.

Because scientists are sometimes a hundred times more confused than ordinary people, the theories of experts often do not make sense. For example, Smith is not an economist, but his theories do not make sense.The words of my generation are not enough to prove it. Is it true that the criticisms of experts are not credible?Alas, the gentlemen are at rest, the whole world is disturbed, and those who make endless troubles are all thanks to Darwin, Smith...you scientists.

When Darwin talked about competition, as soon as he spoke, he was a jackal, a tiger and a leopard. When I talk about thick black, as soon as he opened his mouth, he was Cao Cao, Liu Bei, and Sun Quan.Cao Liu and others are outstanding people throughout the ages. Their level of civilization is many times higher than that of wolves, tigers and leopards. Regardless of them, the specimens I used are much higher than those collected by Darwin.Therefore, the world created based on Darwin's theory is a world of tigers and wolves. The world created based on my theory is a very civilized world. Darwin can be called a scientist, and I can certainly be called a scientist, but Darwin is a scientist in biology, and I am a scientist. It's just a scientist of thick black science.

Darwin has studied biology for decades, and has studied insects, plants, birds, and animals all over the world. He has a high-level object in his laboratory that has not been studied, so his theory has left flaws.May I ask what higher animal?Answer: It was Darwin himself. He ignored human society, his own psychology and behavior, so the theory he created must have flaws.

In Darwin's laboratory, there is a higher animal. He has never studied it, so we might as well study it for him. Once Darwin was born, we used the method of collecting animal specimens to capture him alive and bring him to China with Chinese white rice. Feed him up, we use Darwin's method of studying animals, and observe him from the sidelines until he dies of old age, and we can find that his theories are self-contradictory.

As soon as Darwin was born, he dragged his mother's milk to eat, and sucked his mother's cream and blood into his stomach. If he was not given to eat, he would cry and scramble to eat. This can be called a competition for survival. Looking at it from this place, There is nothing wrong with Darwin's theory; when he grows up and can eat, his mother holds a cake in her hand. When he sees it and asks for it, but the mother refuses to give it to him, he puts it in his mouth, leaving half of it out. He will immediately reach out and take the cake from his mother. Take it out of his mouth and put it in his mouth.When his mother hugged him to eat, he stretched out his hand to drag the mother's bowl. If he didn't pay attention, he would fall to the ground and smash to pieces. This phenomenon is also a struggle for survival, and Darwin's theory is not wrong; if it is bigger, he can serve the bowl by himself. After eating, he would pass an empty bowl as soon as he was on the table, and asked his mother to fill it with him. After eating, he asked his mother to serve it again. There was a bowl full of rice in front of his mother, and he would not grab it anymore. The phenomenon of competition suddenly appeared. Isn't it amazing to reduce it?When he grows older, he will put rice in the retort, and he will not need his mother to serve it with him. Sometimes there is not enough food in the retort, and he is not full, so he will cry with his mother, and the mother will share half of her rice with him, so he will be fine. Yes, his mother doesn't want to share with him, so he can't snatch it.It was even bigger, the rice was not enough, mother gave him the rice in her own bowl, and he didn't want it, he would use the money in his pocket to buy food on the street to eat.At this time, there is no competition at all, isn't it even more strange?This is when a child falls to the ground, he only sees the milk on his mother's body. When he gets older, he sees the rice in the mother's bowl. When he gets older, he sees the rice in the pot.Not to mention this, Darwin grew up, learned well, became a university professor, and when poor relatives and friends borrowed money from him, he generously gave it to him. Later, when he had enough money, he used the money to do charity or seek public welfare. This phenomenon Wouldn't it be weird and weird to be the exact opposite of the competition?Here we can formulate a principle: "For the same person, the more intellectually advanced, the farther-sighted, the less competition." Darwin wrote a book and said that when he was a child, he estimated that he would eat his mother's milk and rob his mother. Tell everyone about the cakes in his mouth, but don't tell everyone about things like donating money, helping his family, and doing charity when he was a professor. This is one of the people who should correct Darwin's theory.

Darwin robbed food when he was a child, and there was a certain rule, that is: "Snatch when you are hungry, and don't grab when you are full."But there was one exception. When he saw something delicious, his mother told him not to eat too much, but he refused to listen. As a result, he couldn't digest it after eating too much, and he fell into a serious illness.From this we know that food is limited to satiety, and oversatisfaction is harmful.We can formulate the second principle: "Competition should be based on the need for survival. If it exceeds the need, there will be harm." Darwin only said that when a child, he would rob food and grow fat, not because there was too much food. However, he got sick instead, so Darwin's competition has become a competition without boundaries. Europeans believe in his theory, and the world is in chaos. This Darwin's theory should be revised.

Darwin said: "All things are in competition with each other. Different species need different food. The competition is not fierce, but the closer the same kind, the more intense the competition. The competition between tigers and cattle is not as fierce as the competition between tigers and tigers, and the competition between wolves and sheep The competition between wolves is not as fierce as that of wolves, and the competition between Europeans and other continents is not as fierce as that of European countries." His statement is proved by the First European War, which is true, but Darwin created this theory. destroyed him himself.Darwin's biography says: "In 1858, his good friend Hollis sent a paper from South America and asked him to publish it on his behalf. Darwin read this paper, which was exactly consistent with the results he had obtained after ten years of hard work. , I am very disappointed. If I fall on others, for the sake of reputation, I must be jealous, or my manuscript will be buried, but Darwin did not, so I handed this paper to Riel and Fuga for publication. There are also such studies on weekdays, and I urge him to turn his daily research into a paper and publish it at the same time as Hollis’s paper on July 1858, 7, so scholars all over the country are sensational.” The words of this biography are so, on his behalf The biographer originally praised him strongly, but actually attacked him, which is tantamount to saying: his theory cannot be established at all.why?He is the same European as Hollis, closer than other Europeans, the same Englishman, closer than other Europeans, they are good friends, closer than other Englishmen, and both study Biological people are closer than other friends.The publication of Hollis's writings would be enough to deprive Darwin of his name, and it would be the most harmful to him. Darwin did not suppress him but announced it for him. Wouldn't it mean that the closer the same kind, the less competition?Darwin was a British man who was able to make such concessions to his own kind. Why did the British compete so fiercely during the European War?We can formulate the third principle: "People of the same country, those with low morality, will compete with each other the closer they are to their peers, and those with high morals will retreat more as they get closer to their peers." The Darwinian theory should be corrected three times.

Darwin said: "The fiercer the competition, the more the fittest will emerge." This statement is unreliable.The fierceness of the first European war was unprecedented in history. I would like to ask Darwin: Which country is the most suitable for the outcome of this war?After all, the losers and the victors are all suffering from deep pain.Isn't his statement unsubstantiated?Looking back, Darwin did not compete with Hollis, but enjoyed a great reputation through the ages, which is the most suitable word. His common practice was broken by himself.After his thesis was published at the same time as Hollis, he continued to study and published "On the Origin of Provenance" in November 850, which has since become famous all over the world.Few people know the name of Hollis. This is because Darwin worked harder than Hollis.We can formulate the fourth principle: "There are two ways to compete: those who attack others will conflict everywhere and often suffer defeat; those who return to self-improvement will not conflict and always gain the upper hand." Darwin did not defeat Horace This Darwinian theory should be amended four times.

Someone asked: I don't compete with others, if others want to use the strategy of power competition to attack me, what will I do?Answer: There is a way to do this. We can formulate the fifth principle: "Everything should be based on the interests of both oneself and others. If you can't have both, you should benefit others without harming yourself, or you should benefit yourself without harming others. "With this principle, people and I take care of both sides. If someone comes to invade, I will do it with the three words of "not harming myself". If he can attack and I can defend, what can he do to me?This Darwinian theory should be amended five.

Darwin said that human evolution is due to competition with each other. From various aspects, we think that human evolution is due to mutual compromise.Because the evolution of human beings is due to the joint force. If each other can give way, each line of force can move forward and the world can evolve.For example, if I want to hurry, I'm flying on the road, and when I see someone bumping into me, I should step aside to pass, so as not to delay the journey.According to Darwin, when you see someone bumping into you, you should push him to the ground. If someone bumps into you along the way, you should push him down along the way. When you meet pedestrians, you will make a circle. I will make a path in the middle and walk forward.I would like to ask people who are on the road in the world, is there such a way?If we want to talk about "survival of the fittest", we must understand the principle of giving in, only the fittest can survive.From Darwin's point of view, the biological world is full of competing phenomena, but from our point of view, the biological world is full of giving-in phenomena.Try to enter the forest and take a look, you can see that all the branches of the trees give way to each other, and the leaves and leaves give way to each other. All the branches and leaves are developing towards the empty space, which is clear and orderly.Trees are ignorant things, and they can all give in to each other. It can be seen that giving in is the nature of the biological world, because without giving in, there can be no development, and this is the case for all living things.In the deep mountains, birds and birds call each other, and where hundreds of beasts gather, there is more time for peace and harmony, and less time for fighting with each other.When friends of my generation go back and forth with each other, there are more times when we live in peace, and less time when we fight with each other.We can formulate the sixth principle: "In the biological world, those who give way are constant, and those who contend are changed." It seems that there is nothing wrong with Darwin regarding the variation as the routine. When there is a conflict between the two in the situation, we should Take the branches and leaves of the tree and develop towards the empty space.Wang Meng saw Huan Wen and changed his official position to Fu Qin, and Yun Shouping saw Wang Shigu's landscapes and changed to flowers.In the big universe, there are many empty spaces, that is to say, there are many ways to survive, and there is no need for people to compete with each other. This Darwin's theory should be revised six.

According to Darwin, everything that is powerful should survive, but from our point of view, it is the powerful that will perish first.In the prehistoric world, there are tigers and leopards everywhere. His strength is greater than that of humans. It is suitable for human beings to fight against him. Why are tigers and leopards extinct?Before the First World War, the Kaiser was the most powerful and suitable to rule the world, so why would he fail?Yuan Shikai is the most powerful in China, so he should succeed, so why would he fail?With these facts, Darwin's theory becomes suspicious.After careful deduction, we know that tigers and leopards were wiped out because all human beings wanted to beat him, the Kaiser failed because the whole world wanted to beat him, and Yuan Shikai failed because all China wanted to beat him.With the same thinking, it becomes a line of joint forces with the same direction. Tigers, leopards, Kaiser, and Yuan Shikai were all defeated by joint forces.We can formulate the seventh principle: "Evolution is due to the resultant force." Those who understand the resultant force will survive, those who violate the resultant force will be eliminated, those who understand the resultant force will win, and those who violate the resultant force will lose.With observations like this, those who use power to bully others will be naturally eliminated.Seventh revision of this Darwinian theory.

Darwin's mistake can be explained with an analogy.If we say to people: "Biological evolution is like a child growing up day by day." Someone asks: "How does a child grow up?" We answer: "As long as he does not die and survives, he will naturally grow up." : "How can we survive?" Answer: "As long as there is food to eat, you can live." Question: "How can you have food?" Before we could answer, Darwin answered from the side: "When you see other people have food, go to it." If you grab it, you will naturally have food to eat, and the more you eat, the faster your body will grow.” You guys try it out: Is Darwin’s answer wrong?From our research, we know that Darwin is right to say that biological evolution is due to survival, and that there is nothing wrong with saying that survival is due to food. However, in the last sentence, it is wrong to say that food is due to competition.Let's just correct his last sentence, and that's right.Question: "How to fix it?" is the usual saying: "Everyone eats when there is food." In fairness, Darwin taught people to compete without limits, and there are inherent disadvantages. We teach people to compromise, which has no limits and has disadvantages.Ask: "How can I avoid abuse?" We can formulate the eighth principle: "Give in to others until it does not hinder my survival, and compete with others until I can survive." This Darwinian theory Those who should be amended eight.

To sum up, human beings evolved from beasts, and Darwin's practice of beast society to human beings is returning humans to beasts.His theory can be divided into two parts.He says "biological evolution" and that's partly pointing out the facts.He said "the competition for survival, the strong prey on the weak", which is partly the reason for explaining evolution. There is nothing wrong with the facts, and the reason is wrong.Ordinary people mistakenly think that the reasons are good because the facts are good, but they don’t know that there are many reasons for evolution, competition can lead to evolution, mutual accommodation can evolve, and refusing to fight but not yielding can also evolve.Competing and giving way, changing to develop in the empty space, can also evolve.Or with other conditions, such as Kropotkin's so-called mutual assistance, our so-called joint force, it may not be impossible to evolve.Darwin disregarded all kinds of reasons and only regarded competition as the only reason for evolution, which is negligent in his observations.It is concluded that Darwin's invention of "biological evolution" is equivalent to Newton's invention of "gravity".

A revision of Kropotkin's doctrine
Kropotkin's mistakes were also the same as Darwin's.Darwin ruled out human society based on the conditions of animal society, so there are flaws in his theory.Kropotkin, because he wanted to refute Darwin's mistakes, especially in Manchuria and Siberia, investigated the conditions of various animals and primitive humans, and invented the theory of mutual assistance to refute Darwin's theory of mutual competition.He can pay attention to human beings, which is more advanced than Darwin.However, the society of primitive people is different from the society of civilized people after all, and when Kropotkin inspected primitive people, he also observed them from the sidelines and did not live with them for several years.My generation, however, lived in a civilized society and lived with it for several years, so we were able to discover Kropotkin's mistakes and point out his flaws.

Primitive humans, without organization, became anarchic. Kropotkin's theory of mutual aid came from primitive society, so he advocated anarchism.Therefore, Kropotkin's theory can also be divided into two parts. He advocated mutual aid is good, but it is wrong to advocate anarchism because of mutual aid.

The evolution of organisms is like a child growing up day by day, from insects to beasts, to savages, to civilized people; it is like us, from babies, to teenagers, to adults.Darwin studied biology, focusing on animals, just like the era when children robbed their mothers of food, so they advocated competition.The researchers of the Kropotkin Institute mainly focused on humans in the primitive era, which were more evolved than animals. The children were a little bigger, and they did not grab the food from the mother's mouth, but only asked the mother to serve him with food, so they advocated mutual aid.As for the phenomenon of growing up and living independently, neither of them has seen it.

The evolution of a country is like a child growing up day by day.During the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period in my country, the strong preyed on the weak, and it was the era when children robbed food.Later, it evolved, Han abandoned Zhuya, and his mother shared food with him, but he didn't want it.After further evolution, in the early Ming Dynasty, when Zheng He went to Nanyang, various countries paid tribute one after another, hoping to get a reward from China. This was a loan from poor relatives and friends, and they generously gave it.After further evolution, in the Ming and Qing dynasties, the state converted the barbarian land to the natives, and paid a certain amount of money every year, which was equivalent to doing charity, taking in the children of the poor, giving them food and clothing, and extending the training of teachers.The evolution process of our country is vivid.

The civilization of the West was more than 2000 years later than that of my country, and its evolutionary level only reached the Spring and Autumn and Warring States Periods of my country. Therefore, the law of the jungle is very similar to that of my country's Spring and Autumn and Warring States Periods, and Darwin's theory of mutual competition came into being.To prevent children from snatching food, authoritarian means had to be used. Therefore, Mussolini's rule of Italy and Hitler's rule of Germany are very similar to Shang Yang's rule of Qin, and both achieve the same effect because they are products of the same period.Qin Shihuang unified the six kingdoms, but still enforced autocracy, and died in the second generation. This is a further evolution of the world, which means that the body has grown up, and wearing children's clothes has to be broken.In the world of Wen Jing, the government was lenient, known as Zhi Zhi, this means that when the son grows up, without the interference of his parents, he can become a good person independently.There were frequent turmoil in the later dynasties. This is the reason why the son grew up and the parents were too indulgent, so they went on and on.However, because of its daily routine, if you want to treat a baby the way you treat a grown-up son, you can't.Therefore, those who rule the country today, such as imitating Mussolini and Hitler, have always followed the example of Shang Yang, and returned to our country in the Spring and Autumn and Warring States Periods.

(End of this chapter)