Thick black school

Chapter 16
My knowledge will definitely become a specialist in the future, and perhaps a special university will be set up to study it.I plan to write down the process of the invention with the people who studied with me. Later generations, such as imitating the Song and Yuan Xuean and the Ming Confucianism, did a thick black study, and only then did they find the material.Or build a thick black temple with me, so that there are characters worthy of sharing.

An old friend Huang Jinglin met me on the streets of Chengdu and said: I haven’t seen you for many years. I heard that you are going to build a thick black temple.I said: Don’t write any more. Look at Lin Fang in the Analects of Confucius. When he saw Confucius, he only asked the three words "the book of rituals". This once-in-a-lifetime conversation is more than enough to be enjoyed.Jinglin said again: I am 62 years old this year, and because I admire your knowledge, I don't hesitate to worship you.I said: Could it be that I am younger than you, so I am not good enough to be your husband?It is your great fortune for me to include you in the gate wall. In the future, writing "my teacher, Mr. Li Zongwu" in your self-written score will be more honorable than "the former Qing Dynasty appointed a certain doctor".

In previous years, Luo Bokang from the same county wrote to me and said: "Many people say that you talk about thick black studies, but when I meet people, I argue that you are neither thick nor black." I replied: "I invented thick black studies. Private school students are all over the world. I call it 'Mr. Houhei'. I wrote to me for the first paragraph, and I wrote back for the next paragraph. I feel that these titles are more honorable than Wen Chenggong and Wen Zhenggong. I look forward to the ages and are always proud. No It is said that every person said that I am neither thick nor black, so where did I offend this one, and this one repays me? Huo Bokang, we have known each other for a long time, why did you say that Gan Yuan is bad, let him pay attention to his shin, so as not to By the stick of Nishan." Recently, many people advised me not to talk about thick and black studies, groan!Talking about the world, there are many evils to the original.

The thick black study biography and study records published in the past are records of my conversations with everyone. This Conghua is to expand the biography and study records.I used to write all kinds of writings, maybe no outsiders have read them, but now I dismantle his whole line and write them together with my new thoughts now.This time, Conghua is in the genre of essays, including four types of content: (1) The history of thick black; (2) The philosophy of thick black; (3) The application of thick black science; (4) The history of the invention of thick black science.I just write randomly, but it's not classified.

A person asked: If this is the case, why don't you write them in categories, why do you write in such a mess?I said: There are two types of writing: one is the textbook style, and the other is the quotation style.Whenever a kind of specialized knowledge arises, it is originally in the form of quotations, such as the Analects of Confucius, the Buddhist scriptures of Sakyamuni, the altar scriptures of the Sixth Patriarch, and the quotations of Confucian scholars in Song and Ming Dynasties. They are all written down by disciples based on what their teachers said.The Tao Te Ching written by Lao Tzu can be said to be a collection of quotations written by himself. Later generations studied their knowledge before sorting them out, classifying them into categories, and becoming a textbook.Houheixue is a specialized knowledge invented, of course it is written in quotation style.

Song Confucianism claimed to be "full of compassion", while I was "full of thick black".If you want me to speak, I don’t know where to start, as long as I speak according to the situation, I can say what I want to say, and I can write what I say with my mouth.Or talk about ancient events, or talk about the current situation, or talk about academics, or recount the trivial things in life, write when you are happy, and don't write when you are not.Either write a long article, or write a few short sentences, or say in general, or in specific terms, always follow the whim, without any constraints, and only then can I write my whole thought.

When we look at society with a thick and dark view of history, society becomes a transparent body. We can see the truth of society and come up with ways to improve society. I have an opinion on economy, politics, diplomacy and university system, etc. And this claim is based on my so-called thick black philosophy.My congregation can be said to be very mixed, like a big mountain, full of insects, birds, animals, vegetation, earth and rocks, etc., which are extremely irregular, and only irregularity is the natural state.If it is organized in an orderly and regular manner, it will become the form of a park. It is certainly good, but if it is artificially added, it will not restore the original appearance of the mountain.I put out all the opinions in my chest, good and bad, so that the overall performance of the mountain can be sorted out by those who are interested in this way, supplemented by those who are deficient, deleted by those who are redundant, and corrected by those who are wrong. Take wood and stone to build another house, or catch a few sparrows, pick some flowers and plants, and take them home for fun. It is even better if you can mine minerals on a large scale.Otherwise, digging some medicine on the mountain to heal the sick, picking up some cow and dog manure to fertilize the fields, is not a bad idea.My invention of thick black science is like Watt's invention of the steam engine. Later generations can use it for spinning and weaving, driving ships and trains, and starting any industry.The thick and black philosophy I talked about can do anything, the deep sees the deep, and the shallow sees the shallow.If you can get one body of me, if you extend it, you can become a school of your own.There are many schools of Confucianism, and many schools of Buddhism. In the future, my thick black school will also have many schools.

Writing is all about interest. When interest comes, it is like a rabbit rising and falling, and it is fleeting.When I was writing, I quoted something or a certain theory, but there was no such book on my desk, so I followed Su Dongpo's method of "taking it for granted" and wrote it vaguely so as not to interrupt my interest.Writing this kind of text is different from talking about textual research. It is a kind of opinion in my heart. I have no way to talk about it. I have to borrow something, quote something, just like using a guy, borrowing someone else's occasional If there is no allusion available, it is all right to invent one and use it.

Zhuangzi's fables are a kind of insight in his mind. He specially wrote it with the help of the Kunpeng wild horse and the fisherman stealing Zhi. He only wanted to express what he saw in his chest. This person is nothing to ask.What you see in your chest is the owner, the Kunpeng wild horse, the fisherman Robber Zhi, all live in the house.Mencius said: "Those who talk about poetry don't harm their words with their words, and don't harm their ideas with their words. They use their will to oppose their will, and this is what they get." Reading poetry should be like this, reading Zhuangzi should be like this, and reading Houhei Xue should be like this.

The ancients said: "Wen Wang Zhou Gong, Gong Yi, like the speech of the line, take the image, and occasionally touch the opportunity, if Yi Yi can do it in one day, the touch of the opportunity changes little, then the image of the speech will be the same. It’s a little different.” What Dazai said! The strategists of the Warring States Period, like the people of Su and Qin, were familiar with the world and the world, and their lobbying masters also quoted a story or set up a metaphor at will, full of wit and wit. It is no different from Zhuang's fables and Yi's imagery.Song Confucianism first studied Confucianism, and then entered and exited Buddhism and Laos, and gained a lot from intensive research. His own thoughts have become a system, and then retreated to annotate the books of Confucius to understand the principles in his mind. The fisherman steals Zhi.However, textual research scholars in the Qing Dynasty, based on the text of the imperial edict, ridiculed every word, because their explanations were true, and the principles learned by Confucianism in the Song Dynasty were also true.Jiufang Gao Xiangma, who knows this meaning outside of the female herd Lihuang, can only read Zhuzi's Four Books Anthology, which is like Maoxihe's people who don't realize it and keep thorning.Alas, in the Houhei Realm, there are so few Jiufanggao, but there are so many people from Maoxihe.

The study of scholars in the Song Dynasty is inseparable from the Quotations of Confucianism in the Song Dynasty.However, the quotations come from the records of the disciples, and many of them are unreliable, as the predecessors have said.The study of kings in the Ming Dynasty was said to be extremely prosperous, but Yangming did not have many books in his hand. If he wanted to study the studies of the Wang family, he could only ask for his biography and records, and for the records of his disciples. Tianquan became the king after he proved the Tao overnight. The door is a big point of contention.I once said: If Yangming could write the theory of "four haves and four nothings" by himself, it would eliminate a lot of entanglements.There are dozens of explanations for the four characters of "investigating things to gain knowledge" in universities.If Zengzi had memorized the words of Confucius that day, and added one or two sentences to explain them under these four characters, not only would there be no such dozens of sayings, but there would also be disputes between Zhu Xuewang and Wang Xue.

I was in Chongqing, and a friend surnamed Wang said to me: "Sir, the conversation is very interesting. I will invite some friends to talk another day, and write down your words." I was shocked when I heard this. Come on, wouldn't it become the quotations of Confucian scholars in Song and Ming Dynasties?If we write down a Zengzi, imitating the style of writing in the university, and simply write it out, wouldn't there be many disputes in the future in the Houhei school case?So I hurriedly imitated the method of my family's "Da Gong" and wrote a handwritten quotation called Houhei Conghua. I declined private conversations to show my selflessness.In the future, if someone says, "I have personally heard what the leader of Houhei said", you must not listen to it.With my statement like this, there will never be another suspicious case like Tianquan's testimony.Every time I talk about a theory, I always explain it over and over again. I would rather repeat than simplify. Later generations will never give birth to many strange explanations like the four words "searching things to learn".It can be said that I have devoted my heart and ears to the thick black school.Hey! One suit and one bowl, who will pass it on!
Originally published in "West China Daily" in Chengdu, August [-]-[-], [-]

History of the Invention of Thick Black Science
Someone asked: "Your collection of words, you said that the content includes thick black history, thick black philosophy, application of thick black science, and thick black science invention history. If you don't classify and write it out, you will study this science Aren’t the people of this field dazzled? Isn’t it intentional to make them spend more energy?” I said, “Those who want to study this science should of course concentrate on studying it. The Thirteen Classics and Twenty-Four Histories of China, Wouldn’t it be confusing and chaotic to read it in general? And a true scholar finds out clues from the chaos. If you are afraid of paying attention, you don’t care about this knowledge. Principles and outlines, for those who are interested in this way, the first step is to elucidate it, and the second step is to compile it and make it into a textbook. task, not mine."

I have all kinds of opinions in my heart, I don’t know whether they are true or not, I will write them in close-up, and I invite readers to refute them. The stricter the rebuttals, the more I welcome them. I focus on explaining the doubts in my mind, and I don’t want to create original opinions.You guys have criticisms and rebuttals, which were published in newspapers. I always study carefully, and if I think the criticisms are correct, I will modify them myself. If I think it is wrong, I will not reply, so as not to become a lawsuit , There is an attitude of losing research and learning.I am a person who advocates independent thinking. In my heart, I will never be oppressed by anyone. At the same time, I also respect the independent thinking of others, so I cannot refute my words.If the thick black history and thick black philosophy I advocate are overthrown by others, I will let him be the thick black leader and call him a disciple under his sect. Why?Obey the truth.

The truth of the universe is clearly in front of us, and we can directly study it ourselves, without asking others to study it for us.Philosophers in ancient and modern times are the introducers of me and the truth. What they introduce is wrong in the middle and cannot be known. You should leave their words and study it directly.A friend read my text and said: "These issues have been discussed a lot by Western and Eastern philosophers, but you have not quoted them, and you rarely use academic terms. It can be seen that you usually don't care about these theories There is very little research.” After hearing these words, I translated the text I had written, and deleted the names of philosophers and academic terms as much as possible.If nouns are not enough, just create one yourself and use it to express your feelings directly and rely on nothing.Occasionally, the theories of ancient and modern people are quoted, but I use my bucket scale to measure his theory, not his bucket scale to measure my theory.In other words, it is I who judge ancient and modern philosophers, not ancient and modern philosophers who judge me.

In the past, scholars in China spoke poems and books, Confucius said, and Mencius said.After the coup d'etat of [-], Darwin's and Rousseau's were the first words to be spoken, and some Dewey's and Russell's were added later, purely based on other people's thoughts, what is the truth of the universe, and I did not stretch my head to see what it is, which is too much. lazy.If the person who refuted me quotes a sentence from Confucius, that is to say, he uses Confucius as the judge and the Four Books and Five Classics as the new criminal law, and calls Li Zongwu to come to the case pending trial; , taking their works as the new criminal law, and called Li Zongwu to come to the case pending trial.I will never go to trial like this.Someone asked: "Who can judge you?" I said: "You can judge me, use your own heart as the judge, and use the facts in front of you as the new criminal law." For example: "Li Zongwu, according to your Say, why didn’t I see a person doing something like this yesterday? I saw a dog doing something different today? It can be seen that what you said is not true.” If I can judge in this way, no matter how far I lose, I will I will set up a stern and selfless moral monument with you.

The theories of Newton and Einstein are allowed to be doubted and attacked by others, and they have never forced believers, but as a result, no one is not a believer.The person who commented on Taishang Induction said: "Someone who doesn't believe in this book will suffer all kinds of evil rewards." Guan Shengdijun's Jueshi Zhenjing said: "If you don't believe in my religion, please try my sword." This is because of these two books. The academic theory contained in it cannot be studied, and it has no choice but to intimidate.My position in the thick black world is equivalent to that of Newton and Einstein in the scientific world. If people are not allowed to doubt or attack, it is tantamount to saying: the thick black science I invented is equal to the Taishang Laojun's induction article, and Guan Shengdi's Awakening of the World Sutra, isn't it me who slanders myself?

Some people say: If everyone thinks independently and creates their own theories, will the ideological world not be in a state of chaos?I said: There is no such thing. There is only one truth in the world. If there are two or more theories that contradict each other, you don’t have to suppress one. Just ask him to study it thoroughly, and the truth will be discovered naturally. Where, no one can object.For example, dressing and eating, eating, everyone researched independently, the result is that you eat when you are hungry, and wear when you are cold, which is the same.All the so-called conflicts are born out of mutual restraint.If all kinds of theories are independent, just like trees in the forest, their roots are independent, what is the conflict?The tree is born in the forest, whether to adopt it or not is up to the craftsman, I will announce my statement, whether to adopt it or not, it is up to everyone, how can I have the leisure to litigate with others.If it is necessary to strengthen the people of the world, do what you say, you are really looking for trouble, and conflicts will almost arise.Cheng Yichuan and Su Dongpo couldn't see this, so Luoshu split the party, making the political situation of the Song Dynasty turbulent; Endless pen and ink lawsuits.But I am not. If readers want to learn thick and black knowledge, I will not hesitate to teach them. If they oppose me, they are willing to make mistakes, so I have no choice but to sigh.

My book "Zongwu's Conjecture" was spread to Beiping, and last year someone took out the thick black school and reprinted it.Asked his nephew for permission, and said: "Your uncle, who was born with stereotyped writing, now talks about Europeanization in everything. His old man's writing style is really out of date. When we change it with him, the meaning will not change his, only change it to a new style." That’s it.” I heard it, and immediately sent a letter to say: “The Spring and Autumn Period written by Confucius, can others change a word? They only know that my pen and ink are stereotyped, but they don’t know my thick black study, the way and content of thinking. Its organization is completely in the form of stereotyped writing. It is impossible to see it unless it is based on stereotyped writing. The Song Dynasty taught Neo Confucianism, and Wen Tianxiang and Lu Xiufu came to the end. Most people say that they can be regarded as Neo Confucianism students. After the Ming and Qing dynasties Stereotyped selection of scholars, a thick black leader came out to end, which can make stereotypes attractive. My thick black philosophy is completely derived from stereotypes, which can be regarded as the real quintessence of the country. I also hope that the gentleman who preserves the quintessence of the country can trace back from the thick black theory Stereotypes, just the stereotypes in the pen and ink, can you not tolerate it? If you want to reprint, you must keep the original text unchanged, otherwise you don’t need to reprint.” Who knows that when the book was printed later, I changed it a bit. I hereby declare that it was published by Peking The thick black study is a fake copy, so as not to delay future studies.

Generally speaking, if there is a special knowledge, there is a special style of writing, so the style of the Analects of Confucius is different from that of the Spring and Autumn Period.The style of Laozi is different from that of Analects.The style of Buddhist scriptures is different from that of Lao Tzu.Thoughts are in the heart and words are in the paper. The inventors of specialized knowledge have different thoughts from others, so their writing is also different from others. Houheixue is a specialized knowledge, and of course there is another style of writing.The hearer said! "Li Zongwu, don't boast! Anyone can write your kind of writing." I said, "Not bad! Not bad! This is because of my thick black knowledge, anyone can do it."

When I write words, I set three requirements: "I can see it, I can write it, and I can understand it." Only these three requirements are enough.When I write, I only write out the opinions in my heart. I don't know grammar, let alone the distinction between classical Chinese and vernacular Chinese.The "Zongwu Conjecture" published in the 16th year of the Republic of China and the "Discussion on Social Issues" published in the 18th year of the Republic of China are like this.Someone asked me, "What style is it?" I said, "It's a thick and black style." In recent years, many celebrities' writing has a bit of thick and black style, which means that China will be happy!
Someone said: "I will translate Houheixue into Western languages ​​for you. You can change the allusions of Cao Cao and Liu Bei into Western allusions, so that foreigners can understand them." I said, "My thick black studies must not be translated into Western literature cannot be replaced by Western allusions. Westerners must read Chinese books and study Chinese history if they want to learn this knowledge. It means that if we want to learn Western science in our country, we must learn English and German.”

In the Beijing fake version of Houhei Xue, there are a few places where my stereotyped style of writing has been changed to a European style, which is not important, but there are two points. The original text is insane, so I have to declare:

[-]. I invented the thick black theory, which was confirmed one by one by Chinese and foreign ancient and modern things, and I felt that the truth was good, so I took the well-known Cao Cao, Liu Bei, and Sun Quan as examples.Going back further, and taking Liu Bang and Xiang Yu as an example, the intention is to make readers draw inferences from one instance, and follow the principles of the Three Kingdoms and the Chu and Han dynasties, so as to run through a twenty-four histories.The original text said: "During the Chu and Han Dynasties, there was a man who was thick but not black, and his death was the loser. Han Xin was the same. .” This was originally a character from Chu and Han, and now he gives advice and feels more cordial.In the Peking fake version, these few sentences are deleted, and it is said that Han Xin failed because he was not black, and Fan Zeng failed because he was not thick.Gentlemen, think about it: there are characters in the Twenty-Four Histories who are not thick and black and who are not losers, how rare! How can I single out Han and Fan.The Peking fake version inevitably lost my original intention.

(End of this chapter)