Give you a company, see how you manage

Chapter 42 Are there more "methods" or "difficulties"?

The reason why there is the word "difficulty" in the world is because there is another word called "method".But the "solution" will not "emerge" out of the ground by itself, it requires us to make arduous efforts to find, discover, and create.Being a leader often encounters such troubles.You tell your subordinates one thing, he often "doesn't have a brain" and "opens his mouth"-this matter can't be done because,,.That is to say, for him, the existence of ,,,, will make this matter a "dead game", an "impossible task" at all.But, when you said to him—then why don't you think about it, wouldn't this matter be settled?Either he suddenly realizes and agrees with your statement, or he will quickly use his brain to find out,, negate your,,, making you dumbfounded.In fact, you can still find out,, negate his ,,, but obviously the essence of the problem is not here, but he did not intend to "find a solution" at the beginning, and his main focus was on "thinking about difficulties". Or "Find Difficulties" above.Therefore, the dialogue you have, in fact, can only become a "car wheel talk" in the end, with an infinite loop, and it is impossible to find the intersection point.Therefore, the more practical question is: Are there more "difficulties" or more "solutions"?

The reason why people in the world invented the word "method" is because there is another word in the world called "difficulty".That is to say, behind every "difficulty" in theory, there must be a "solution" to match it.It's like every man in the world is destined to meet a woman to be his wife. This is God's arrangement, and ordinary people are irresistible. That's why there is such a thing as "fate" in the world.But one thing is very important, even if a man meets his "destined" woman, "good marriage" will not be "at your fingertips", usually this woman needs a lot of energy and resources from this man to "pursue" of.Therefore, I am extremely opposed to the saying that "'fate'" can be met but not sought." Because this kind of statement can be called "reactionary".

The value of "do nothing, wait" is not constructive and productive, so it is "non-revolutionary", and it can even be said to be "counter-revolutionary".Maybe this "hat" is a bit big, but even the predestined "fate" requires you to "search" and "pursue". To put it simply, it requires you to "act".Conversely, things that are "at your fingertips" without any "paying" are unstable and not worth cherishing.In the same way, the "couple" of "difficulties" and "solutions" will not come together naturally.Even for every "difficulty", there is a matching "method" hidden in a certain corner of the world. This "method" will not emerge from the ground by itself, but requires us to pay hard work. Solid "doing" (thinking, searching, experimenting, etc.) to gain.Therefore, whenever we encounter a "difficulty", feel "no way", frustrated and want to give up, we must develop a habit: wait a minute!Let me think again.Is there really no other way?Believe me, as long as you can do this and develop a habit of "stopping" yourself for ten seconds at the moment of "giving up" to calm yourself down, many things will usher in a major "turning point".

Or, please develop such a habit: When your "difficulties" (not qualified, leaders do not support, the masses do not understand, nothing, no one, no money, no power, etc.) When you feel that you have reached a "dead end", please think again a second before you "give up": What else can "I" do?The reason why you think this way is that when many of us understand the concept of "difficulty", we tend to overemphasize "external factors" and ignore the more important "internal factors".We tend to exaggerate the "restriction" of "external factors", but unconsciously ignore the "activity" of "internal factors".Take the "classic difficulty" that we often talk about as an example: "Leadership does not support"-Have "you" thought about the "method" to win the support of the leader, and have taken practical actions to "try"? "The conditions are not met" - have "you" thought about ways to obtain these conditions, and have taken practical actions to "try"? "The masses don't understand"—Have "you" thought about ways to get the understanding of the masses, and "tried" with practical actions? ...

If you have never thought about it, let alone "tried" before, and just rely on the so-called "experience" to "wishful thinking" and come to the conclusion that "this thing can't be done", you are a big boss waste.Because, never say "no" to something that hasn't happened yet.There are many "inevitable" factors in the world, and there will also be a lot of "accidental" factors. Even if it is something you have done but failed, with the change of time, place, person and other environmental factors, there may still be some "accidental" factors. chance of success.If you have ever thought of this and "tried", but "quickly" gave up after a small "setback", although you are slightly better than "trash", you can only fall into a "slightly stronger than trash" "The "Title".A real smart person should be like this - instead of complaining about "others", think about what "you" can do.Because "things" are dead, "people" are alive.

We are "living" people, not "dead" people, so we have subjective initiative: we can "think" when we have brains, "communicate" when we have mouths, and "act" when we have hands and feet!These are things we can "control" ourselves, and should be "controlled" by ourselves.Think hard, practice well, and persevere. "Smart people" understand that "setback" is not terrible, because it can bring you not only "frustration" mood, but also more precious "experience" and "life experience". The "small loses the big".Such a person can "control" his own life without being "constrained" by others, and only such a person can eventually become a master!Remember, you only belong to your "self", underestimating "yourself" and giving up "yourself" is a crime against yourself and others!There is no "dead chess" in the world, only people who "can't play chess".

(End of this chapter)