As a Lawyer, You Sent the Judge In?

Chapter 296: Question law enforcement behavior! The presiding judge agreed to postpone the

 Chapter 296 Questioning law enforcement behavior! The presiding judge agreed to adjourn the trial.

 At the judgment seat.

Presiding judge Yu Cheng raised his head slightly and cast his gaze on the prosecutor's seat.

In this case, the defense has reached this stage and has not yet reached the stage of adjournment.

He wasn't quite sure what Su Bai's purpose was in proposing to adjourn the court.

Most of the time, adjournment refers to allowing the collegial panel and judges to take a break.

  Or to discuss and discuss a certain issue in the case.

But.…

Su Bai asked for an adjournment in the court hearing, which made him a little confused.

So he asked: "What is the reason given by the prosecution for adjourning the trial...?"

 “Please state.”

 At the table of the accuser.

Su Bai lowered his head to look at the materials he had sorted out. Faced with the presiding judge's question, he raised his head and said:

 “Presiding Judge.”

“The prosecution’s reason for adjourning the trial is to apply for an adjournment of this trial.”

“Please ask the collegial panel to adjourn the hearing and discuss whether to postpone the hearing.”

“The prosecution believes that the evidence provided by the prosecutor in this trial is insufficient and should provide additional evidence.”

 Additional evidence?

Su Bai’s statement attracted the attention of all relevant parties during the trial.

 The evidence in this trial has been sufficiently supplemented.

 What additional evidence should be added?

Yu Cheng frowned slightly: "Please give the prosecution a specific statement."

Su Bai said: "The prosecution believes that the issues related to law enforcement in this case are also one of the important evidences in this trial."

four years ago.

 After the law enforcement authorities filed the case, the delay in advancing it was the key to this case.

 Whether the case was withdrawn without basis or not advanced.

 These are the key reasons why this case lacks evidence when it comes to court today.

 After investigation by the prosecutor and this court hearing, he was strongly refuted by the lawyer of the litigant.

  It can be clearly seen.

 In this court trial, it is basically impossible to convict Wu Hao without supplementary evidence.

What should we do?

 It can only be supplemented with evidence.

 And the key direction of supplementing evidence is on the issue of law enforcement.

 Finished the statement in Su Bai.

 Fang Ming and Geng Hao, who were sitting at the law enforcement seats, had their expressions darkened.

 Especially Geng Hao.…

 He does not understand and does not understand.

Why did the topic of this case shift to them again?

 After all is said and done, do we still need to start from their side?

But

 Add evidence from them. What if something comes out of the investigation... What should we do?

Geng Hao raised his hand and said: "Presiding Judge"

“In this trial, we are not involved in many aspects. What evidence can be supplemented by us?”

“All the evidence that law enforcement will have has been submitted.”

  “There is no evidence to add.”

“Regarding the postponement of trial proposed by the prosecution and supplementary evidence, we would like to ask what evidence should be supplemented?”

Su Bai looked at Geng Hao with a smile and continued:

“Add the real reason why the case was withdrawn when it was favorable and possible to accuse and prosecute Wu Hao.”

Geng Hao frowned: "But does this question have anything to do with this trial?"

“The case was withdrawn at that time because the person in charge made a wrong judgment on the case, and the person in charge will give an explanation for this.”

“We believe that there is absolutely no need to provide additional evidence from this point and postpone the trial.”

 “Of course it’s necessary!”

Su Bai opened his mouth to retort:

“What is the reason why this case is in court today?”

“The main reason is that the case was withdrawn at the beginning!”

 “Why was the case withdrawn?”

“I really don’t understand. When this case was committed, the witnesses and material evidence were all gone. Why should the case be withdrawn?!”

“In this court hearing, the defendant was able to publicize his “innocence” and shout for the court to judge him.”

 “Where does he get the confidence?”

“His confidence comes from the fact that Zhang Yan passed away and the most critical and important plots and clues were lost, and no one can accuse him.”

“Only after identifying the insufficiency of the main evidence did he insist at the trial that he had not forced Zhang Yan!”

"anyway."

 “Why did Zhang Yan die of depression?”

“What was the reason why she died of depression and committed suicide?”

 “Is it just you who has been violated?”

“Is there any inaction on the part of law enforcement parties?

 In this case, is there such a possibility that Zhang cannot see the murderer who hurt him being punished by law.

 This resulted in a sense of despair and powerlessness. She, who had been violated in the first place, believed that the law could bring her corresponding rights and interests.

 But actually, she didn’t see it.

 Fell into a more desperate situation and chose to end his life. "

 “Is this possible?”

 “Of course!”

 “What is this legally called?”

 “Then cause and effect!”

“Although law enforcement parties do not need to bear criminal liability legally.”

“But why was Wu Hao not detained and no corresponding progress made after the case was filed?”

“After Zhang Yan committed suicide due to depression, for what reason was Wu Hao acquitted?”

“It was law enforcement that had foreseen at that time that the prosecutor would dismiss the prosecution case.”

“It is still clear that Zhang Yan was not forced by Wu Hao, and the case was dismissed.”

“Or perhaps, he knew that the court would acquit Wu Hao due to insufficient evidence.

 You don’t want to go through the relevant procedures and think it’s a waste of time, so you don’t submit a request for public prosecution? "

“The above three points are the reasons why most cases are withdrawn.”

“I would like to ask the law enforcement side, what is the reason for Wu Hao’s case?”

Geng Hao remained silent and did not speak.

Su Bai continued to ask:

“However, no matter which of the above reasons it is, it needs to be determined by the supervisory department and the court.”

“The right to take responsibility does not lie with law enforcement!”

“Why should law enforcement withdraw the case?!”

“What right do you have to withdraw the case and declare Wu Hao acquitted?!”

“Before a judgment is made, Wu Hao is a suspect.”

“If this suspect is really a criminal, what kind of behavior did the law enforcement officers commit?!”

 “By virtue of this alone...”

“We believe that the Bai County law enforcement department still has relevant evidence and is significantly related to this case.”

“So I applied to the court to adjourn the hearing and discuss whether to postpone the trial and whether the prosecutor needs to continue to add relevant evidence!”

 Facing Su Bai’s opening statement.

Geng Hao didn't know what to say, or how to say it.

 Apply for an adjournment of the hearing...to postpone the hearing.

 Investigate the law enforcement parties and then obtain relevant evidence for the case.

Doesn’t this mean conducting relevant reviews of the persons responsible for the case that year?

 But he was the person in charge of the case that year!

He knows this case very well. Is there any problem or problem in it?

It is possible to postpone the trial, but if law enforcement officers or the original person in charge conduct relevant reviews, problems will inevitably arise…

 So Geng Hao had a very headache for Su Bai's request.

.

 …

 At the judgment seat.

As the presiding judge, Yu Cheng was pondering over whether to postpone the trial.

 Honestly speaking, this case has reached this point...how should I put it?

 There is not much additional evidence.

At this trial, many people understood in their hearts that Wu Hao had forced Zhang Yan and committed a criminal act.

 But there is no evidence!

 How to make a judgment without evidence?

 There is no way to make a verdict without evidence!     But supplementary evidence...What evidence needs to be supplemented?

It needs to be added that Wu Hao personally or indirectly admitted that he forcibly violated Zhang Yan.

Or, Zhang Yan accused Wu Hao and judged Wu Hao through relevant auxiliary evidence and the situation.

Just now, the witness statements and exhibits provided by the prosecutor were refuted.

 The main reason is the lack of relevant direct evidence.

 However... Su Bai's proposal to postpone the trial to supplement evidence is a good suggestion.

 Dong dong dong!

Yu Cheng banged the hammer and spoke slowly: "Adjourn the court."

 Then he and the other two judges discussed whether to postpone the trial.

 The other two judges did not have much opinion on whether to postpone the trial.

One of the judges said: "If this trial is not postponed, relevant evidence will be supplemented..."

“According to the existing evidence, it is not enough to convict Wu Hao of guilt.”

“But in this case... Judge Yu, you should also know that all the evidence and suspicion point to Wu Hao’s guilt.”

“But without key confessions and direct evidence, a complete chain of evidence cannot be formed.”

“So my opinion is to let the prosecution continue to investigate and supplement relevant evidence.”

“If there is evidence... then the relevant judgment can certainly be made.”

“If there is no evidence, the deferred judgment will have the same result as this judgment, and it will have no impact on us.”

“So I agree to postpone the trial, Judge Yu, what do you think?”

Yu Cheng turned his head and looked at the other judge.

 Another judge had no opinion on this issue: “I agree with Lao Feng’s point of view.”

Yu Cheng nodded slightly: "In this case, let's postpone the trial."

"Um."

"good."

 The other two judges echoed in unison.

.

 ….

 Soon, after Yu Cheng and the other two judges completed their discussion on whether to postpone the trial of this case.

 The court will be held again.

 All eyes were focused on the judgment seat.

after all.…

Whether the trial is postponed will determine whether Wu Hao is found guilty in this case.

 It even determines whether to implicate the law enforcement officers who were responsible for the case at that time.

  At the presiding judge's seat on the trial bench.

 Yu Cheng struck the hammer and spoke slowly:

“In response to the prosecution’s opinion on adjourning the trial.”

“The court believes that this trial does lack relevant evidence to judge Wu Hao, the criminal suspect involved in the case.”

"at the same time."

“The court believes that there are still doubts about relevant issues in this trial.”

"based on above."

“The court announced that the trial will be postponed.”

“The prosecutor is requested to complete the supplement of relevant evidence and then open the court again for trial.”

 Dong dong dong!

 The hammer fell, and Yu Cheng circled around the court to hear all parties: "Does the parties have any objections?"

Su Bai: "No objection."

 Li Xiao: “No objection.”

Geng Hao originally wanted to say something more, but now the presiding judge has pronounced the verdict.

Even if I raise an objection, it will be rejected, so I can simply say that I have no objection.

 There is no objection from all parties.…

 The trial is over and the trial has been postponed while the prosecutor continues to add relevant materials.

.

 ….

   …

Su Bai breathed a sigh of relief while sorting out the relevant litigation materials.

 According to the evidence provided by the prosecutor at this trial.

 It is indeed not enough to judge Wu Hao.

 But what?

so what?

 Can it affect the final judgment against Wu Hao?

Does not!

 The trial has entered a postponement, and the prosecutor will conduct relevant investigations for this trial.

Then this case will definitely be solved in the end...

 Overall, it’s not a big problem.

 It’s just a postponement of the trial, which will take a certain amount of time!

.

 ….

at the same time.

 Outside the court hearing.

 Wu Ye and Li Qing are both anxiously waiting for the outcome of this trial.

 Because this trial involves old cases that may have many personal privacy factors, it was not held in public.

 Wu Ye and Li Qing originally planned to go to the court to observe the case as relatives.

It’s just that the court’s management of this trial was relatively strict.

 Hand did not agree to allow the two of them to observe.

so.…

 The two had no choice but to wait outside the court for the final verdict.

After Sun Shiyan walked out of the court hearing, Li Qing immediately surrounded him.

“Lawyer Sun, how is it? How is my Xiaohao? Has he been acquitted?”

Sun Shiyan saw the anxious expression on Li Qing’s face and replied:

 “This court hearing has not yet reached a verdict.”

 “There was no judgment? Why not a judgment?”

Li Qing frowned and asked.

Sun Shiyan slowly explained: “It’s because the prosecution applied for a postponement of the trial.”

“This time, at the trial, the prosecutor did not have enough evidence to prove Wu Hao’s guilt.”

“Wu Hao should have been acquitted.”

“The presiding judge agreed to the prosecution’s postponement of the trial.”

“It will take a while before the court is held again to know the final result.”

“Lawyer Sun, you just said that my Xiaohao should have been acquitted.

 It’s just because the trial was postponed that there was no acquittal, right? "

Sun Shiyan nodded: "That's pretty much what it means."

When Li Qing heard this, her heart instantly calmed down a lot.

 She didn’t know what deferred trial meant.

 But I heard...the presiding judge originally wanted to acquit Wu Hao.

 The big stone in my heart couldn't help but fall a lot.

 I couldn’t help but think silently: My son is fine!

in addition.…

 Zhang Cui also left the court hearing with Su Bai.

en route.

Zhang Cui said worriedly: "Lawyer Su...is this case very detrimental to us?"

“I think at the trial...the defendant kept talking and the presiding judge didn’t refute him.”

Su Bai nodded and told the truth: "The situation in the courtroom at that time was indeed very unfavorable to us."

"but.…"

“Since the presiding judge agreed to postpone the trial.”

“The prosecution continues to add evidence.”

“Then this case is developing in a direction that is unfavorable to Wu Hao.”

"Do not worry.…"

“Well, I understand Lawyer Su.” Zhang Cui nodded silently.

After leaving the court, Su Bai drove straight to the supervision and review department.

 Submitted relevant materials about Zhang Yan’s case.

 And directly pointing to the person responsible for this case, there are certain problems.

Li Xuezhen:? ? ?

Lawyer Su...have we submitted the inspection and review materials so early?

Su Bai: Although there is supplementary information from the prosecutor, the prosecutor will investigate this case.

but!

There is nothing wrong with doing this!

 Hundred benefits and no harm! .

 ….

 PS: Please give me a monthly ticket~

 (End of this chapter)

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like