Big play bone

The movie presents life from the birth to evolution, long and great, magnificent and mysterious, beautiful; also puts forward a more profound theme:

What is the meaning?

This is the ultimate torture in the field of philosophy. Who are I? Where is it from? Where to go?

Freud has not been able to answer, that is because everyone has different understandings and enlightenment; Alfonso-Calon also has no answer, but to penetrate their own understanding in the movie, let every one The audience feels your own things after the end of the viewing.

In the ending of the 'Dark Knight', Nolan puts forward a reflection: Dark and Brightness really do not have two opposes? Or is it integrated with each other? Is there still existence after losing evil? Is pure evil and pure justice objective?

Now through 'centuryism', Kelong proposes another more deepest essence and more unsealed presence or absence:

Because of the meaning of, due to the meaning of embarrassment, or because of the existence? Is life to maintain the return of the soul, or the upgrade of chasing higher ideas should be cut off, how is the essence of life definition?

At the end of the root, this is a story of survival, but more tells a story that is required.

As for how to think so, every audience will find your own answer.

It seems that huge and sharp and deep motifs, but all perfectly abuses in the ups and downs of commercial movie shells, Kelong uses local film technology to create an incredible, and cannot be replicated. This is at least in this way.

The complementarity between the screen and the light and shadow, the space and the composition, the role, the story, the lens and the philosophy and other factors have formed a response, and the charm of the movie art is completely played. Like Martin Skosi The 'Hugo' is general, showing a film world built by film and light shadow. This is the point that Christopher-Nolan has not been able to do.

There is no doubt that this is a full work! Impressive! "

"Hollywood reporter" as one of the top most authoritative magazines in the industry, not only in the United States, but also has a super high position within Europe, although France's "Movie Manual" has repeatedly spits "Hollywood reporter" It is also too popular at the business, but the annual ten choice of two magazines every year, but there is a mutual flow between the editorial department, not watching each other, but understanding each other.

Michael Phillips is almost exhaustive all the words of praise, and will send "stellate gravity" to the full throne!

But for the audience belonging to Michael, this seems not to be surprised, because on the Cannes Film Festival in May, Michael has sent a full review of "Drunken Villagers"!

In fact, in 2013, I just had half. Michael has already believed that "drunning township is" is the best number one seed, and now "gravity" is born, which also let Michael can't fall into two difficulties.

Michael couldn't help but remember the famous Roger - Ebert.

Two film reviewers are friends.

In January 2005, Michael made a severe criticism of comedy movie "Dance / Male 2". "I hate this work, hate every minute of this work, those self-righteous, stupid, concealed, blank At all moments, the kind of self-propelledness that thinks anyone will like this work, I hate it fooling the audience because it believes that you can entertain the audience. "

At that time, the commencement of the scriptte and the comedy actor who appeared in this work was inappropriate. Insult Michael with ugly dirty words, I even thought that Michael did not qualify for a film reviewer, no qualifications. Comment on his work, because "he has never gained a Pully award."

After listening to such news, Roger strive, "As a Pubei winner, then I should have the qualifications of comments, I must admit: Robert Schneider, your movie is disgusting, and let People are nausea. "

This is a small episode, but has become a chair of Roger and Michael.

Although Roger is the only film reviewer who has won the Pulitzed prize in the history of the entire film review, Roger has never been a shelf. He is keen to meet other collections, and I met Michael, two people under the stage. I have become a friend who is friends, often talking about the wine, and calls the wine in the movie festival.

In fact, the taste of the two film reviews has a lot of different, the most typical example is "Civil Kane", this movie is the best shadow of Roger, but Michael believes that O'Sson - Wells It's hard to be too well, this work may be able to rank among the best list of the best list of shadows, but it is absolutely not the best choice.

In turn, Michael's personal shadow history is "2001 space roaming", which is "too commercial" choice by Roger.

However, these so-called disagreements let them get together to cherish each other's friendship:

If all the tastes of all film reviews are the same, the existence of art descending, disputes and differences is the core nature of art arguments, and also urged artists to create an important driving force for the development of genre, and growing; although they are between them There is a difference, but it is reasonable to make each other, and it is impossible to persuade each other. This also means that the other party's view will become a new perspective of his own re-examine.

Of course, Michael and Roger also have many of the same kind of vast taste. For example, both people have very annoying "Tiger Qianlong 2" who have received their popular welcome, but the "future water world" double-double scraping, two Individuals especially like the boldness of the crude plasma movie.

In addition, in recent years, the strong rise of Blue Rise, they also adhere to similar views:

This talented new generation actor is undoubtedly spiritual, and his focus and dedication are also admirable. The only concern is that after young, whether the blue ceremony can insist on the exploration of the acting, and whether it can break through themselves. They are expected to be expecting the future of Blue Rise, "maybe more than Hanks."

Daniel - Dai-Lewis, Si'an - Pan, Meilier Strip, Catherine - Hepburn and other actors have no doubt, but they don't have much interest to commercial boxes, and there is not much more capacity.

Harrison-Ford Tom-Cruis, Brad-Pitt, Little Robert-Downey's audience is important talent, and their charm in the box office market is really scratched, but the discussion of acting and art levels Unable to be satisfactory with drilling.

Tom Hanks is the only peak superstar with box office and acting, Johnny Derp once has the opportunity to replicate the brilliance of Hanks, but his image is bound and life problems have become fatal.

Now, it's a blue ceremony.

Many common points have made Roger and Michael a close friend, which is also a difficult friendship.

In April this year, Roger-Ebert's cancer recurrence, after all the long-term resistance, still did not have the enemy's torture, and finally speaking with the world in April 4.

Before the death of Roger, Michael once visited the old friend, and Roger's biggest regret was that his physical condition may not be able to go to France to participate in the Cannes Film Festival. Later, this is true. Before the opening of Cannes, Roger completely left his loved movie.

So, when I watched "Drunk Villagers" at the Cannes Film Festival, Michael did not say. The movie made him remember the old guy who gave the movie to the movie in a lifetime, and let him think of the old guy who lying on the bed but still not forgetting movies.

Among the film reviews written for "Drunk Villagers", Michael said this. "Do you still remember the start of life? Musang folk songs, do you mean miss life?"

For them, miss the movie, I miss my life. Their life is concentrated in the movie screen, and concentrated in the confused and of Le Wenee Davis. Even now, re-recall that Movie, Michael is still tears.

Now, I have read "Constitutional Gravity", Michael once again remembered Roger, because Roger's appreciation for Blue Rise, this young actor dedicated two peaks in just a year, indeed let They saw the future of the future; also because Roger's sincere and love of the movie, all all all condensed in the lens of the karon!

The movie is in them, and it is not available.

1500 movie charm

When I watched "Constitutional Gravity", the first time in Michael was still still the figure of Roger.

Unlike "Drunken Rural Areas", this time is not because of the movie theme and the core, but because Alfonso gives the movie charm, the charm of the movie screen.