Big play bone

It is still a familiar "screen" venue, clearly listing ten invited media comments and scores, the invitation medium of each year may be slightly different, but the authority and professional have enough guarantee, the audio score It is only one of the reference data of media comments.

The only interesting detail is that some rating columns are vacant, which means that the reporters responsible for the review have not watched this movie yet, there is no comment and score, temporarily from the lack, wait after watching, then fill in There are also very small special circumstances, and you may miss it, and the reporter will make "do not look at the comments and information" from the peers.

After all, there is only one day in the film festival, and the number of participating movies is too much, and each person must have something to pay.

However, yesterday experienced the premiere frenzy "lobster", all of the ten comments were debuted, one did not lack, the side proved that the movie "not to be missed", the audience evaluation medium is attended, and the first time is made The evaluation gives your own feelings in the scoring system of Cannes.

Italy's "Daily Real Impact", two stars, "concept outstanding, the lens is amazing, but the finished product is still incomplete."

Among the further detailed comments, this Italian media said that "Oggslan Mosmos has indeed a master meteorology in the formal level, but the kernel under the form surface is messy and shallow. Blue Rich Hall , Rhetue, Wiz and other actors have excellent performances, but they still have no more content to the film outside the form. What is the effect of David Fenqi Shoot? "

Russia's "Murosa", a star, "empty form, stiff performance and absurd atmosphere, indeed manufacturing enough black humor, even enough to get people; but how is the laughter, how empty content The outstanding gains of the formal levels, the virtual uniqueness of the whole movie, just like the emperor's new clothes. "

In a summary of a comment, they said, "The head is higher than the essence of the nature." Don't watch it. "

The word in the word can clearly feel the depression of Italian media and the Russian media, which is obviously the disappointment of the disappointment.

Blue Listed, the smile between the eyebrows is slowly penetrated, and the mouth can't help but rise: so the evaluation is completely expected, strict, can't be attacked, but with Blue Rich original for "lobster" Some of this work is a bit close. Obviously they all look forward to more, but the result is only a "beginning", Ongues left all the thinking space to the audience, which is really disappointed.

But it is also the effect of Oggs truly hope. As for satisfaction or not, it can only be said to be benevolence.

"I thought that criticism will be more violent." Blue Rich said.

Bradley is not loud up, "How to explain?"

"You know, when we were promoted in Berlin, they gave a two-polarization when I propagaed in Berlin. In fact, I and Tony had a very happy movie harvested such comments, because I liked and disgusted the emotions, this also explains our work. I really stimulate the feelings of the audience, rather than I have seen the sixty works for forgotten. "Blue Rich image vividly explained, and suddenly came.

The cover is not convinced, "You said, it is more worth celebrating than sixty-point movies."

"Yes, it means this." Blue Rich did not hesitate to expressed affirmation.

Brightley and covered are silent, and it is a very unique interpretation of the two reporters, but two reporters have their own unique interpretation. This is also a very wonderful moment.

Obviously, "lobster" is absolutely impossible to win the French media, and the evaluation of official audience can be seen as a cross section of the frenzy, showing different governing differences. Everyone has adhered to different perspectives.

Russia's "Murosa" just gave a star, so extremely so resolute view attitude, as the reporter in the first-style site fell, the final still is a few; it seems to evaluate the four stars The same thing is the same: there are not many, just two.

The United States's "Los Angeles Times", Four Stars, "mechanical ice-cold, stiffening movements, emotional soundtracks, and eventually consolidate a wonderful wonderful comedy, just right performance point bright works, and step by step The audience walked out of the cinema with a full-minded question mark. Undoubtedly the best year! "

France's "Ferro", four stars, weird, fresh, cold, humorous. Oggslan Mosmos once again successfully established a set of unique anti-Utopia social logic, pointing to the relationship between contemporary society And the narrative of love on love revealed a gentle cruel, making it a good shot! "

Single Luo lists the highest points and lowest points, you can immediately find many interesting small details:

One, two four-star and a star, two extreme scores are a minority, a total of ten media, accounting for 30%.

Second, the highest score is from France and the United States, the latter or Los Angeles media; the lowest media is from Russia. It is true that the geographical influence is still relatively weak. After all, the major media will send a representative to score, and the individual subjective factors have obvious influence, but more or less can explain some things.

Third, the focus of four stars and a star is actually the same: stylized narrative model and image atmosphere, the four stars called "Wonderful Comedy", the first star called "empty hole", like and hate They are all surrounded by the same thing, further confirming the role of individual subjective factors.

This also illustrates "lobster" is a movie similar to "super off", the same content and elements, how many people like to hate it.

However, "lobster" the author style is far from Tonykey, then the adventure, the final feeling of "stinging" is not so much.

In addition to the highest seven media, all seven media have given relatively moderate two-star or Samsung, or neutrality, either neutrality, so that two can have a main melody of official audience, continuation The status after the end of yesterday's premiere.

Among them, four Samsung.

The United States's "Time Week", Samsung, "Different elements have a unique viewing feeling; but it is also interference and interruption, and even some empty cave is ignorant. This may be Bluest ceremony Hall performance is the most obvious and most powerless thinking. But this is not his fault. "

France's "Freedom", Samsung, "Most of the movies have a uncomfortable weird, and the steak of the chicken skin is strong in the stomach; but the lobster is still showing Lans Mos. For a thinking of the post-modern social relationship, the narrative style between humor and ridicule boundaries, undoubtedly bringing the audience to more interesting and horses, and those doubts are just success. The performance of the Tiancheng is still a highlight, blue Gong Hall's light is easy to stand out, every minute is a pleasant enjoyment. "

The British "Looks and Listening", Samsung, "Lans Mos takes rid of his comfortable field, less pessimistic, some black humor style makes the viewing process no longer like dog teeth, but the blue Samos is still successfully looking for a perfect balance point. Excellent audio-visual language is complement to the stiff performance style, and the audience has once again proves the perfect adaptation of Blue River Hall again. "

Thailand's "Bangkok Post", Samsung, "Lansmos broke his boundaries, made a more bold attempt in the framework of social structure, eventually constructed a weird and wonderful black comedy. A large-scale ceremonious cave form will undoubtedly challenge the bottom line of the audience; but both soundtracks and clips have given a more abundant level, letting watching pleasure. The performance is undoubtedly a pleasing existence. "

Detailed reading these comments, you can find that it is either praise, but the score is still only Samsung; either Samsung evaluation, but in detail, there are many problems, this contradictory comment method, it is precisely The conflict in the minds of each film review.

I don't like it, but I can't say it, I feel very unique.

In fact, in the other three two-star comments, it is only compared to the "Samsung Comments", "two stars comments" seems to be caught up.

2386 prospects

In addition to Italy's "Daily Real Impacts", there are two media, both of Germany's "Times Week" and the British "screen", give two stars.

Germany's "Times Weekly", "movie is firmly grasped by a cold tone, which is very attractive from setting to the concept. The performance of ice-cold machinery is more enjoyed. But after entering the middle section Beginning is lost, the director does not seem to be 100% determined to determine his narrative center, not only the black humor's maximum core: human beings turn into animals; and in love and family, relationships and class theme thoughts have a swing Offset, resulting in all the energy accumulated in the first half of the smoke and eliminating clouds. "

The word "hate iron is not a steel" in the word "hate iron", and later, this magazine also wrote a deep film review analysis, from the whole story frame to the main clues to the branch layout, then in-depth analysis of the plot The assumption of rotation is deeply regrettable for the "chaos" of the final finished product. They think that "Oggs Laymos completely has a chance to shoot a classic classic masterpiece."

At the same time, the chapter also emphasized the exception of the entire actor's lineup, but also the blue ceremony, this Westerr, Lei Herz and John C Riley and other actors have dedicated the exciting performance. It seems that there is a wooden fact. The smart performance method gives the role more worthy of the connotation, which is the reason for the "movie with countless possibility".

"The whole script is also in the whole movie, the only context is clear, the image three-dimensional role is the David played by the Blue Gift Hall.

Emotional assumptions and strokes of the idea, complete and vivid, delicate and profound, Blue Rhine Hall gives roles in limited space; unfortunately, this is the only full role, while other roles Let the actors do not have more space and limit the movies to further.

The result of finally presented is that David and other roles, David and plot main lines are slightly peeled off. Because the role and plot intended, the true core thinking of the plot is not clearly established, and the strength of the condense will present a collapse state. Further, affect the resonance of the audience. "

Later, this chapter entered the perspective of "Lobster" crew, Blue Rise and even active and Ogus shared the views, and the two sides exchanged each other.