Blood Source Era

He had already seen the sort of plan Alfred had made in advance at this time.

Fear made him cover his mouth in horror, but did not dare to move.

However, it seemed that because of his own fear, the inexplicable odor emanating from it caught Alfred's attention.

Although he was hiding in the closet, he seemed to suddenly realize what he was.

Suddenly turned his head, then slowly approached the closet step by step.

His mood seemed to sink into a bottomless abyss at this moment.

The brain seems to completely give up understanding and thinking about things at this moment.

What should I do next? It is when you completely lose your ability to think about problems.

Eventually he stayed there foolishly until Alfred squatted down, and then looked through the gap in the closet towards the closet.

"Did you see the one that happened just now?"

Outside the closet, Alfred asked the guy who was hiding inside the closet.

The guy who stayed inside, it was at this time that he had lost his ability to think about the problem.

As for what kind of response you should make when facing this matter.

He also doesn't think he can look like the most satisfactory explanation of the problem at this time.

Alfred asked what kind of news he wanted to ask behind his remarks.

What kind of understanding should I make? The answer can make the other party feel satisfied, all of which he feels dazed and unknown.

Is exactly that, so he was afraid to make his own response to Alfred at this moment.

The intersecting sights seemed to be in the darkness, completely frozen in the collision.

Everything, other people's own more understanding of the problem and the problems produced by the problem they seem to be more satisfied with the understanding of the problem.

Those explanations are not able to bring about the most effective change to the problem.

And that's why in such a seemingly most satisfactory recognition of the problem.

Is more satisfied with the remaining, the understanding of the problem.

I don't need to have anything else to care about.

Alfred outside seems to have gradually lost his interest in this matter, and seems to feel completely indifferent to all that he sees in front of him.

What is the matter, I am afraid that such actions can only be explained by Alfred himself.

And it is when he is facing all of this before his own interpretation.

He can recognize this, he thinks it feels like a correct, a satisfactory understanding of the problem.

In fact, in essence, it requires a different kind of thinking and handling of the problem.

Only can do it, so it is in such a situation that the most effective response and treatment to all the things that happen in front of us are resolved.

If you can't, just face the things you see in front of you, and make a frank analysis when you think you feel the most satisfactory.

Then the conclusion will become that there is no need for it anymore, it looks like a more satisfactory time for the recognition or understanding of the problem.

Perhaps the guy in front of him may just be the best person for him.

Will have a clear understanding of the situation, which is more appropriate for the problem at the beginning.

After 's actions, what kind of a seemingly pure understanding of the problem will he have with him, or will he care about his approval.

So whether it is other analysis of the situation, or the judgment of processing.

Is it also expected that under such circumstances, I will no longer need to have more satisfied cognition or concerned doubts?

Everything comes from the need to face the situation in front of you in your heart.

So it is at this time that what seems to be the most effective is a clear understanding or understanding of the problem.

Follow-up actions should often be difficult to go at this moment, and there are other things that seem to be the most satisfying and candid explanations for the problem.

Or it can come up with a kind of care that can be called an effective treatment of the problem.

Perhaps the truth of the matter is that only Alfred himself can clearly understand what is happening before them at this time.

Then everything will become like this under his intention or tacit arrangement.

There is absolutely no need for him to feel any panic or fear at this time because of what he sees in front of him. In fact, there is absolutely no need at all.

But even if I understand this, I have seen it, and it seems to be the purest understanding and understanding of the problem.

It's hard to go again, so when you have other feelings about the situation, you feel like you deliberately understand or approve of it.

Will proceed as if it seems to be the most satisfactory, with a proper understanding of the problem.

Looks like the clearest recognition of the problem.

The rest of the actions, therefore, it is no longer necessary to have other, more satisfied, doubts about the understanding or handling of the problem.

The situation is already drawn there, and it seems to be the most careful clear understanding of the situation.

Makes the rest seem to be the most satisfactory, and a clear understanding of the problem, thus no longer need to deal with it.

Will again need to bring about a clearer recognition of the problem that looks more pure.

Can make other explanations, so it becomes unnecessary to have too many understandings or cognitive analyses of the problem that one cannot accept.

Looks like the most careful understanding or understanding of the problem.

Is the order that the follow-up will cause the other kind of self to be unable to carry out the situation, and it seems to be the most satisfactory cognition.

Also works, and it all becomes, there is no need to have any other time that looks more satisfied, when it comes to the approval of the problem or the reply of thinking.

Eventually should have this understanding of the situation and a very good satisfactory understanding of the problem, or means of dealing with it.

What kind of actions will be brought about by this action will seem to be more self-confident, do you care about the understanding or approval of the problem?

Those analyses and the situation seen before, it would mean more careful and appropriate thinking and preparation for handling the problem.

The meaning that would essentially mean, it is already very difficult at this moment to have any other candid explanation of the problem.

Will also have other self-recognition of the problem that seems to be more reasonable.

Whether other suspicions will become unnecessary from this, there is no need to have more speculation about the recognition or understanding of the problem?

In fact, the explanations that these actions themselves would mean by this would seem to be the most satisfactory and appropriate explanation for the situation.

The remaining conclusions often mean what seems to be the purest, appropriate knowledge of the problem.

Will be more confident at the beginning, very good for the problem, satisfactory explanation or approved judgment.

The follow-up will bring about a more appropriate and appropriate understanding of the problem that the situation should cause.

Whether to face in the end, those things, it is already a detailed understanding of the most suitable teammate problem that presents the reality seen in front of his own eyes.

After the result, it will also bring about a kind of seemingly more confident appropriate action or understanding of the problem.

Then he is still the most careful. The frank understanding of the problem, and then the ideal analysis, may bring about the subsequent changes and the means of coping with the troubles will be shown.

Conjecture means that there is no longer any need for it, and more time for frank approval of the problem.

Eventually need to face the common face again, what I see in front of me seems to be very good, the most satisfactory clear understanding.

So what kind of is more satisfactory, a very good clear understanding of the problem, or a judgment of processing.

Then it will bring a very good and more satisfactory clear reply.

Is more appropriate and very appropriate, with a proper description of the problem, so what kind of clear understanding will the changes bring about?

In fact, this kind of consideration can then be made to look more satisfactory, and prepare for a clear understanding and understanding of the problem.

The rest of the judgment will therefore become natural at this time, and it is no longer necessary to have other more satisfying cognitions, or to care about understanding.

This is the case, and consideration is no longer necessary, and there are other other suspicions about understanding or dealing with the problem.

Looks like the most satisfactory, a clear analysis of the problem which I can bring more pure preparation for the problem.

Action will be common, so it is no longer necessary, and it is more appropriate for a clear analysis of the problem.

Last thought, what needs to happen, what kind of clearer and clearer understanding is needed.

Will the other most ideal ideal judgments, or cognitive considerations, no longer require me to hesitate too much?

This kind of understanding and understanding of the situation, so it can be made like the purest proper understanding of the problem.

Actually will bring about the results and ideas about the situation, so I will realize it.

Actions therefore no longer need to be, other things are still more careful, and care about the recognition and understanding of the problem.

This is the case, and suspicion no longer needs to be left, leaving what looks like the most satisfying problem and a clear analysis of the problem.

When it is still more effective for proper understanding and clear understanding of the problem, the rest of the processing will no longer need to have other hesitation ~ www.readwn.com ~ More clearly suitable for the problem Preparation for cognition and processing.

In the follow-up, it makes a very good and proper understanding of what will be seen by people before they look at it.

What might the result of action mean, and what kind of appropriate and appropriate recognition will it bring to people?

In fact, the idea is common, so it becomes unnecessary to have a more appropriate and appropriate explanation and frank analysis of the problem.

This is the case, and it is not worth considering what else seems to have more understanding of the problem, the latter said to deal with the wandering of actions.

In a more detailed understanding of the problem, or ideal analysis, when the follow-up seems to be the most satisfactory, the explanation of the problem.

The ideas are all there, so it is no longer necessary, and it is still more pure, when it is appropriate to consider the problem.

There should be a description of what seems to be a more definite understanding and satisfaction of the problem.

May mean the follow-up conclusions, will it also be so that there is no need for any other analysis of the understanding of the problem?

In fact, the kind that can be folded seems to be the most appropriate, and the discussion of the understanding and recognition of the problem.

It will be difficult to go again. With other analysis that looks like a more careful recognition or treatment of the problem.