Blood Source Era

Everything should be presented in front of your own eyes, all ideas and preparations that should be recognized by people.

On the surface, it seems that it is necessary to change a kind of thinking about the problem, and then it may eventually lead to a tangle of things that makes people feel satisfied.

But can the situation really only be understood in this way?

When people are presenting what they see in front of their eyes, they need to change to another one, and more analysis of the problem should be taken.

The rest of it needs to be done to make more understanding of the problem.

When being cautious and facing the situation in front of me, I feel quite clear and have a clear idea of ​​the problem.

And then I need to make my own what other other more entanglement or explanation of the problem?

It seems that those conditions themselves will no longer need to have more other wandering or resistance.

Naturally has no way to make it, more of them feel satisfied with the problem and further choices.

Needs to change to a simpler understanding of things that might be more calm and a cautious idea of ​​the problem.

Will face the reality that he sees in the future, so he will no longer need to have anything, and other other people will have more entanglement and analysis of the problem.

The situation is so uncertain, and it will become unnecessary to have more wandering analysis, and why do you have to do other other resistance to the inappropriate situation.

Faced with what he saw in front of him, it seemed that he no longer needed to have more analysis.

After, I still need to do what I have to do. If I feel more entangled in the problem, or face the problem, do I feel it is inappropriate to think?

Understand the result of all this before people's eyes, that is, something that is not worth being chosen and faced by people.

Analysis also requires a more cautious understanding of this matter in the future.

There may be more faces in the future, so it becomes unnecessary to carry out too much analysis or relationship.

It seems that this is a calmer situation than people might think about all the problems of understanding and judgment that they may face in the future.

Need to change a kind of cognition of the person who may have the problem in the next, will need to have more ideas.

But this can't be just looking at what has been witnessed on the surface, you can get a satisfactory answer.

This kind of people need to change to a situation that they are seeing in front of them, and they need to have their own contract again, facing the problem very cautiously.

In fact, the situation has become so that there is no need to have more other self thinking too much about the problem.

The situation is naturally such a satisfactory result that can be easily accepted by people.

For those hunters who are already extremely skilled in the face of what is happening in front of them.

They clearly know what they need to do to deal with the problem later when dealing with such a situation they are seeing right now.

This is a town full of evil, since they have seen it all.

Even when the mercenary union does not exist in this town at all.

If they can, they want to be able to ignite a fire and throw it into this town.

In this way, you can force out everything, even the ghosts and ghosts who are hiding in the shadow corners afterwards.

Although the result was that the town was destroyed, but their destruction, in fact, itself has been countless.

Therefore, almost no one is worried about the problems that may cause them to think in the next.

But now they are not able to do so at this time.

Because Aaron did not agree to such an action.

So even at this time it was clear that there was such a risk in the town, they still had to take such a risk at this time.

Pay due due to the responsibilities you need to take.

Even if it is very likely to lead to the possibility of dying in this town, it is a result of no choice.

Could people make any other resistance to the problem?

Situation becomes no longer suitable for people to face.

There are many things, and it is not possible to get a final judgment on everything you see in front of you.

Is like some clear understanding of what you see in front of your eyes.

This kind of thing needs to be carefully chosen and faced by people, how to go about how to take their own behavior and face to the problem afterwards.

There are many more choices that make people feel very clear and incomprehensible to the immediate resistance.

Those thoughts and entanglements will no longer need to be owned any more. Is there more analysis of the problem?

It seems that it may come out in the end, which makes people feel satisfied, and the result of the problem will be in the later understanding and the realistic choice that may be taken for the situation.

In the case of a very high probability, it is no longer necessary to carry out more analysis of the situation that is not suitable for me.

This is a more calm and clear face of the situation that may happen later.

What can be done in the rest, I am quite satisfied with the problem, and I still need to go after clear thinking. What other tangles are there?

The situation therefore no longer needs to have more analysis of the problem.

And the result will also make people feel quite satisfied, some clear judgments on the problem.

It may be possible to have a fairly clear self, a clear understanding of the problem and thinking about the problem.

As for the idea of ​​more things in the preparation period, it may be later, and it will also become unnecessary to have more concerns.

Of course, this seems to be a pretty good, clear face for things.

What do you need to have afterwards? You are cautious and satisfied with the problem. What about the entanglement?

It is actually very natural, that is, in the analysis and face of what is left before facing the eyes.

Will eventually no longer need to have any other self to face the problem more.

Is like the situation that has been presented in front of its own eyes, where there is resistance and entangled awareness of the problem.

Does any other self-righteous satisfactory understanding and analysis of the problem mean that the situation is just correct action on the problem?

When resistance is no longer necessary at this time, more face and understanding.

Next time, I need to work out what I can feel satisfied with the problem.

Is these thoughts really worthy of careful doubt?

The answer is not so simple, and the reality of understanding is much simpler than the final result of imagination.

Therefore, the situation will become very prosperous, and there will be nothing to say in the context of understanding the problem.

Some people think that it may be correct, and the analysis of the problem itself is a wrong understanding of the situation.

And some may have some other self-accepted understanding and concerns about the problem.

Is therefore twisted and deformed.

Things have become out of control, and more resistance also requires a change of awareness and doubt about the problem.

The problem is only in all of this, so in the end, how do you have to face the problem?

When the results that have been seen in front of one's own eyes have been presented, it is such a reality.

What do I need to do next, more resistance or ideas to the problem?

It seems that all the worries will naturally be in such an understanding and thinking of the problem that makes people feel satisfied.

Does not require any other analysis or consideration of the problem.

Next time, I need to do what I want to do. For the further problem, people feel very satisfied, or understand.

When those lingering and incomprehensible entanglements finally become unnecessary to carry out too much of your own understanding of the problem.

Afterwards, I still need to make my own question. Do you have other doubts about the inappropriateness of the problem?

Naturally, those feelings are clear, and when faced, they will no longer need to have more ideas and thoughts.

Later, I can make my own further thoughts on the problem, and I need to make more of my own face to the problem.

Considering what is happening in front of me, what more do I need to have to face the problem?

It seems that the thoughts can be further thought out, and it needs to change a kind of understanding of the problem.

Then the result should have more of myself for the problem. If you feel a clear understanding, or face some calmly facing what you see in front of you.

Seems to be very clear. Naturally, this is a very simple reality that can be faced by people.

After, I still need to make more of my own, more understanding or preparation for the problem.

Those who can't understand, hesitate, and feel more tangled with the problem.

Will do it in the future, feel that more understanding will become unnecessary and what other ideas are not necessary?

These choices are all at this time, so it is no longer necessary to conduct more analysis that is worth thinking and tangling.

The results also lead to more people feel satisfied, a clear understanding and analysis of the problem will be in the final understanding of the problem and face the plot.

No longer needs to have more other explanations about his own attitude towards the problem.

It seems that the situation is naturally like this, a simple reality and calm perception that can be cleared by people.

So it is necessary to have more face to the problem in the future?

Those unsteady understandings and more self-confidence faced things and felt a more relaxed analysis.

The rest may be done, and other people feel inappropriate, and the entanglement will no longer be needed, so there is more need to face and understand the problem.

The result is exactly that, resist, and do not need to have any other entanglement with the problem.

It seems that other faced things may have, some inappropriate face and analysis are all no longer need to have more thinking or preparation.

What else do I need to do to make more analysis of the problem?

Will produce more thoughts about the problem that are not appropriate, but also need to conduct an analysis of how you feel that the problem is satisfactory, or the result?

All the conditions have become unnecessary to have, more likely to be entangled by people's thinking or resistance.

It is probably in such a plot that a satisfactory conclusion was reached.

Suddenly presented everything he saw in front of his eyes, and the situation of his performance and the results that should be displayed suddenly had a shocking change.

But what kind of understanding did people encounter in the presence of such a situation where they have not yet understood a clear understanding of things.

Those people may wander and entangle in their hearts because of ignorance of the problem.

There are more of my own unsuitable ideas and faces about the problem ~ www.readwn.com ~ Is it necessary to get some other differences in the face and understanding of the various situations that may arise from the situation Do you think more about the problem?

It is a time to realize what is seen in front of oneself and what kind of result it should be.

After, I need to make more other thoughts about the problem, or entanglement, and it will become more common. There is no need for too much analysis and explanation.

It seems that those who resist and shouldn't have it should have more knowledge, and they no longer need to have any meaning.

Needs to face himself later, when presenting the results seen in front of his own eyes, to make his own idea that He Jiong is clear and satisfied with the problem.

And some of the people feel that it may be inappropriate. What kind of more analysis of the problem needs to be done during the entanglement of the problem?

These hesitations also need to change a kind of thinking about the problem, then it will probably be possible to draw a conclusion.

This is still a kind of understanding and understanding derived from a simple understanding of the problem that is worth being understood and guessed by people.

And these are not very clear when people have such a result of having a clear understanding of the problem.

The rest of them still need to make their own thinking about the problem?