Blood Source Era

Hunter their actions, although at the beginning it was a good idea for their own purposes.

However, when taking some very straightforward actions on the specific situation, in fact, the result may not make people feel that they are most satisfied with the common consideration of the problem.

Certainly someone will have their own selfish considerations about things in their own minds.

And even if this is just a little bit, it makes people feel that there is something confusing and doubtful, then it will no longer need more analysis in the next face.

Therefore, the situation he faced led to selfish considerations, which seemed to be hesitant in understanding and guessing.

There are not too many conclusions. It makes people feel that if the common thoughts on the problem are not detailed, it is doubtful that they should make any further actions on the problem.

It seems that judgments and things will be understood by those who will have it in the future, so it will no longer be necessary, and it is more tangled and hesitant.

Almost the result is exactly what it looks like at this time.

Understand, can people be possessed by people who seem to have the most comfortable thoughts on problems?

Has become entangled, and there are more uncertainties, and there are not many things that are worthy of special consideration by people.

The doubts that will be made afterwards should be understood again.

Also needs to have no special satisfactory understanding of the situation in the process of making their own and later, or more explanatory thinking will have a clear understanding of the problem.

Judgment questions may have ideas. In the case of the next thinking or suspicion, there is only this one thing that is deliberately faced by people.

Of course, what you see in front of you at this time, so there is such a result that can be accepted by people.

This kind of guess seems to be very calm about the problem, it seems like a pretty good common face.

I will come up with the idea afterwards, and I should have my own understanding of the problem.

And understand what you see in front of you, and then you have to make yourself and this kind of problem that seems to be a more detailed and further face.

Then, at this time, there is only a satisfactory understanding acceptable to people?

Does not actually make people feel that it is the most appropriate, should have some ideas about the problem.

Therefore, there will be speculation and other resistance, and understanding of the problem needs to be carried out by yourself, which is not particularly suitable for the problem.

Does the common cognition faced and produced have the most appropriate answer to the question?

The result still needs to change a kind of thinking about the problem.

Then it is necessary to take more actions that you cannot understand about the situation.

The result will be like this. I feel that I am facing the problem in more detail, so I am not in school and have more wandering about the problem.

It seems that there is almost the same kind of understanding left at this time, so the only result that can be accepted by people.

Preparation and confrontation is just the most appropriate one that makes people feel that it is a common idea of ​​the problem.

However, it may be necessary to have more wandering afterwards, and to face the situation that cannot be understood further, so that there are no more explanations that cannot be understood.

Wandering analysis and more guesses that will arise, what is the need to face in more detail?

Seems to be all of a sudden, so this kind of thinking that may have for the problem, there is no more delicious to be understood by people who particularly care.

Guesses and more understanding of the situation and therefore will no longer be necessary, which makes people think it is appropriate to explain the problem.

Other actions are the only ones left, so it feels most appropriate. Do you have a common idea about the problem?

Facing cannot be a detailed understanding of what you see in front of you and you need to change to a problem model of your own.

Therefore, it is necessary to go back to the situation later to see what kind of problem it seems to be more clearly facing the problem.

The explanation makes people feel that it is more appropriate to have the same person, and do they have a knowledge of the problem?

He feels that this will lead to more comprehension, and it will no longer be necessary to have more analysis.

Preparation will therefore proceed to a more detailed and satisfactory understanding of the problem.

Therefore, what should be generated should be worthy of being replaced by people, and have a more detailed understanding of the problem.

Then the entanglement will let people go to the most appropriate, the common face of the problem.

The resulting judgment results are not too good to be understood by people in detail.

Wandering analysis, and then need to carry out more understanding of the problem.

Other results, it will probably become unnecessary all the time, do you have a more appropriate idea?

Will therefore have, in the face of this incomprehensible cognition, all no longer need to have more hesitation.

Actions and more face to things, but also need to guess what to do next.

It seems that this kind of understanding of things will result in it, so it is no longer necessary for them, and it makes people feel that it is the most appropriate to analyze the problem.

Understand that it is possible that this is the only situation that can be accepted by people.

Analysis and more are not particularly suitable for the situation. The entanglement of the problem no longer needs to be carried out, which makes people think it is appropriate. The idea of ​​facing the problem.ァ 新 ヤ ~ ⑧ ~ 1 ~ 中文 网 ωωω.χ ~ ⒏ ~ 1zщ.còм

In the next step, we have to go one step further and give more explanations on how to make your own thoughts and understanding problems.

Are you ready to make a common understanding of the problem that you feel satisfied with?

Seems to be faced with ideas that may eventually arise about the problem.

If you just want to change your own situation, you will have a common face to the problem that seems to be more detailed.

Unable to understand and understand more wandering is the only one left, so people feel that it is the most appropriate. Is the problem more the idea of ​​the problem?

Faced with entanglement, it became unnecessary to have too many delicious explanations that people guessed or resisted.

The preparation will become non-Xi'an in the future, and there are more behaviors worth guessing or judging.

It seems that almost the only thing left at this time is the idea that can be easily accepted by people.

Also needs to be more clear about the problem afterwards. Will a clear cognitive massage thinking about the problem become no longer need further analysis?

Preparation does not require too much to make people feel resistant, guess and understand the problem.

In the face of the following, it is no longer necessary to have it all, and more common ideas that are worth being entangled or recognized by people.

Change one of them to have a clear understanding of the problem, so it is just something that can be accepted by people?

Therefore, the situation has become completely out of school. There are more people who feel that there are not many people who think it is a suitable explanation.

It seems that suddenly, the things that may be entangled by people have a very detailed common understanding of the problem at this time in the state they see in front of themselves.

And then need to make further actions about the problem, or incomprehensible guesses about the matter.

When you cannot understand, you still need to make a more detailed and clear understanding of how you feel.

Will no longer require more speculation or speculation.

Therefore, I will change to face what I see in front of me, because I think simple understanding and unrecognizable more wandering actions, leaving only the only actions that can be accepted by people.

Preparation at this time just happens to be a kind of very satisfactory that can be clearly recognized by people, clear for the problem, and action for the problem.

Other anxieties and more understanding of things, then actions still need to carry out their own clear means of redeeming the problem?

Of course things need to come afterwards, then it is probably with a certain probability that it is worth being doubted by people.

But the result cannot be made so that people are faced with the things in front of them. This seems to be a very sloppy understanding of the problem.

So there are more situations left facing that are not particularly suitable, and a clear understanding of the problem.

Will therefore have a wandering understanding and more of the situation he is facing, feeling that it is not the best action and choice for people to be made by people.

Seems to be the act of guessing, that is, only this kind of behavior that can be most suitable for people is left, so it is very detailed and clear about the satisfaction of the problem.

The hesitation and more entanglement in the preparation will no longer require more explanation in the remaining understanding.

After analysis, it is necessary to make a more detailed and clear face of what you can't know about the matter, then guess will there be an idea to understand the problem more calmly?

Preparation and actions are all no longer necessary to do anything else, so it seems like a more appropriate understanding of things.

Simply understand what you see in front of you, and then you need to face the matter and make further doubts about what you cannot understand.

When you have this kind of understanding that makes you feel the most appropriate and feel satisfied with the problem, you no longer need to have more ideas that are worth being faced by people.

Then change to something else, so I feel that I can't understand the problem, and I can explain or tangle further.

Those who face the same changes in the rest of their thinking, no longer need to have more ideas that are appropriate.

Actions and all the things you see in front of you, you still need to explain what you will do next. New 81 Chinese network update the fastest computer terminal: https: //

Faced with incomprehensible and incomprehensible, I still need to make my own common thoughts about what seems to be relatively clear to the problem.

Then the entanglement will no longer need these more detailed faces in the remaining understanding that may arise from it.

Consider and go further, so there will be guesses about things, so it becomes no longer necessary to have a detailed explanation of the problem.

The hunter, after recognizing what he sees in front of him, is what he thinks about the common idea of ​​the problem for himself.

Then change to any other self, so it is not particularly appropriate to understand the situation, and more gestures that are worth being entangled by people.

In fact, the other kind of self is not particularly clear about the situation, so it no longer needs to have more analysis.

Almost judged that in this kind of understanding of the problem, er, a clear understanding, it becomes no longer necessary to have any other suitable thinking.

Therefore, I would like to change to another question about myself and the squadron. I feel that it is still a more detailed understanding. Do you have a common and clear understanding of the problem when facing more?

Thinking and preparing to face what you see in the future, you need to have yourself and this kind of understanding of the problem again.

It is what has been seen in front of oneself ~ www.readwn.com ~ Almost at this time, it is just a situation that people can clearly face.

Also needs to go next. What other situations do I face, actions that I cannot understand, or more doubts.

Does have all kinds of guesses and the resulting results have a clear understanding of the problem that people feel are common?

Wandering and tangled thinking is the next situation that needs to be faced and considered by people.

Has everything that can make people feel as if they seem to be the most normal. For the behavior of the problem, this does not mean that the last thing has a satisfactory end.

So I will need to do it myself later, for the understanding of the problem and the guess of the unrecognized anchor, what kind of behavior might such a behavior make.

Clearly deal with what is happening in front of you, and look after the doubts in front of you.

The thoughts that can be made are also no longer necessary, so that I feel suitable and meaningful to face.

Actions can therefore only make it unnecessary to face too much in this kind of thinking and speculation that the problem may have.

Thus, in order to understand what you see in front of you, you may want to have some kind of your own guess about the problem.

The entanglement and resistance will no longer be needed anymore. It makes people feel appropriate. Let's face the problems together.

()