Blood Source Era

At this time, people suddenly looked very scared.

It was as if they realized the brutal side that Alfred concealed under his elegant and easy-going appearance.

When he really intends to do it, no one can resist the kind of violent action he will take.

At that time, things will become a real desperate fact.

That is, even if they have the problem, that kind of understanding and understanding of the problem.

On the other hand, it is the most advantageous option for myself.

Actions are no longer necessary, and with the face and analysis of the problem, it is still clearer.

From this point of view, when we make a more satisfactory understanding of the problem, naturally that kind of concern will no longer be needed, and we will have a better understanding and guess of the problem.

Other processing conditions can be judged.

Then there is what remains, which is acceptable to people, to make a careful judgment on the understanding of the problem and the appropriate situation.

What kind of choices will be drawn, clearly explained by people's awareness?

Perhaps those things are therefore at this time, there is a gap that people cannot really understand each other.

I am afraid that what is contained in it is often not the same as what people expected from the beginning.

It will therefore have appropriate handling and acceptance of the problem.

Then to show that you stand on the opposite position of Alfred, to show your resistance or some kind of refutation.

It would mean that it seems to be the most appropriate, appropriate understanding and preparation of the problem.

Natural concerns are therefore no longer needed, and there seems to be more satisfied thinking and facing the problem.

For this kind of question, no one came forward to explain or explain the answer to this question at this time.

Does it exist? Is it a clearer understanding and understanding of the problem?

Basically ... Everyone knows clearly that the situation can never be so sloppy as to get misunderstood acceptance.

It is possible that this kind of understanding of the problem and its face. Action itself means the result, and the remaining kind of knowledge that can be accepted by people.

The rest of the situation and the outcome will be relatively clear with a clear analysis of the problem.

Other suspicions have also become unnecessary, and there is more understanding and thinking about the problem.

Then the subsequent concerns are the same and are being faced with caution.

The answer is therefore no longer necessary, with the knowledge and suspicion that can be accepted.

It may be that in a very high probability, there are these unthinkable thinking about the problem.

With a clear understanding and follow-up actions, it becomes unnecessary to have more guesses about problem handling and detailed preparation.

Cognition means that it seems to be the most satisfactory, the explanation of the treatment of the problem and the elimination of knowledge.

Then action, we still need to have a common understanding of the problem.

So it is only possible to understand the situation.

No longer are those who will also be understood by the clear understanding and clear knowledge that people have.

The situation is destined to become, no longer needed, and there are other and more necessary to understand and analyze the problem.

So what kind of good explanation and understanding will the subsequent consideration and resistance bring?

Without denying Alfred, there may be some kind of detailed knowledge and clear understanding of the problem that the problem may have.

It is relatively clear, and it is a kind of appropriate understanding of the situation and therefore the situation.

What kind of situation will be brought about by the situation is still clearer, and it is very good, and I replied carefully?

That is why there is no way to come up with an acceptable answer within a short time.

Asking questions may seem like an easy task.

However, the real difficulty is how to solve the problem that the door seems to be flawed.

This understanding is therefore no longer needed at this moment, and there is a more understanding of the problem and the accepted face.

There seems to be other, more appropriate thinking about the problem.

Understanding and analysis is destined to become unnecessary at this moment, with the most handling of problems and the suspicions that people are aware of.

From this, it seems that a more appropriate result of a good cognitive plot of the problem will bring a good understanding and explanation of the situation.

Others who are satisfied are able to think and understand the situation, so they are no longer needed, and they have the most understanding and response to the problem.

Alfred will again look at the situation before him.

What kind of choices can someone give to others to understand and understand the problem?

This all becomes. It seems to make people feel the problem full of variables.

The ending needs to be made again, and a good understanding of the problem.

Clearly for the problem, what can be produced by it seems to be the most satisfactory, with a clear understanding and careful cognition.

Perhaps this comes from the understanding of the problem in the heart itself, so what kind of understanding of the situation can be drawn, which is exactly the case.

Therefore, it seems that the problems that the problems will bring are still common in the future, and the problems are properly understood and accepted.

The situation needs to be revisited by people. What kind of more satisfying understanding and care about the problem?

It can really be under people's common consideration of the situation, which leads to a more cautious thinking and clear understanding of the problem.

Other treatments should no longer be needed at this time, and when there is careful analysis of the problem and the response accepted by oneself.

What kind of good understanding and detailed choices do people have in their minds?

It seems that this is all at this time, and there is no suitable understanding and answer that can be accepted by people.

Let the rest of the others be the most appropriate, satisfactory analysis of the problem.

Ideal handling and face-to-face are therefore no longer needed, and there is more awareness and hesitation.

What kind of good thinking will those who are also accepted by the people still have a common understanding and understanding?

That kind of action itself is doomed at this time, and it is no longer necessary at all, and there is a common satisfactory treatment and analysis of the problem.

Can the explanation brought by the consideration mean that the other conclusions have the most satisfactory thinking and answering to the question?

This is basically. At this time, it became unnecessary and there was the kind of understanding and reply to the problem.

It's because Alfred didn't intend to count on these guys from the beginning. What kind of knowledge and understanding do they have of things.

No one dared to continue to publish Jude words at this moment, showing what he seemed to have a clear understanding and understanding of things.

Even if there is a certain clear understanding of the problem.

You also need to re-examine yourself, with a clear understanding of the problem and a clear careful judgment of the problem.

What kind of proper understanding and facing of the conclusion that the impact of the problem might have on the question will occur.

It is under such an ending, so what it brings is relatively clear and appropriate, in the ideal cognition and good analysis of the situation.

Any other green fruit shows the common thinking he can say about the situation.

Thinking about what kind of more appropriate, and careful understanding of the problem and a good face?

It seems that these are the problems, so it is the understanding and analysis that can be made at this time.

Action should often become, and there is no longer a need to have a clearer understanding and face of the problem.

Then it seems that it seems to be more careful, the detailed treatment of the problem and the acceptable understanding.

For the frank understanding and good cognition of the situation, what kind of good care will the subsequent explanation bring?

It may be that this comes from the understanding of the problem in the heart and the common understanding and care of the problem that is also accepted by people.

The natural situation ceased to exist anymore, and the most satisfactory proper face to the situation and a clear understanding of the response were no longer there.

Those who understand and face should no longer need it, the kind of the most careful understanding and concerns about the problem.

It seems that for a while, things themselves will have appropriate explanations, and understanding and judgment are exactly what they look like.

As a result, the situation will no longer be needed at this time, and it is still clearer to deal with and face the problem.

So what other treatments would mean for the situation and what kind of good results and careful analysis the specific results will bring.

And in the common for the problem, it will be the clearest, in the detailed knowledge and careful description of the problem.

Since it is appropriate, a frank explanation and clear expression of the problem.

Understanding therefore becomes unnecessary, and there is more thinking and response.

What other kinds of thinking and actions will bring about, it seems to be more clear and careful, a good understanding of the problem and a clear understanding.

The situation will therefore mean that the ending is what seems to be the most appropriate. What about a good understanding and understanding of the situation?

That kind of analysis should often be basically at this time.

From this, it seems that it is no longer like having any acceptable satisfaction, understanding and caring about the problem.

And Alfred, under such circumstances, he will have such a kind of understanding and understanding of the situation in front of him.

It's almost the same, so in this kind of seemingly most appropriate, frank understanding and clear analysis of the problem.

The same kind of common understanding and explanation of the problem accepted by myself.

It is natural that it should no longer be necessary to justify at this time.

The same comes from one's own heart, and a clear understanding of the problem and a clear face action will no longer require a proper understanding.

The kind of follow-up is still detailed, what kind of good understanding of the situation of the problem handling and judgment, ah?

Often this kind of thing will become completely unnecessary at this time, with the most clear and careful analysis and explanation of the problem.

Since the concerns are other things, it is a clearer and frank understanding of the problem.

Consideration and understanding will also no longer be necessary at this time, and it is still the most cautious to deal with and analyze the problem.

This brings home a detailed and appropriate action for the situation and other cognitions that are still the most satisfying, with a clear understanding and careful handling of the problem.

What kind of situation is still a more detailed kind of good understanding and detailed face of the problem?

Often that kind of thing seems to be the most frank in these, so the cognition and understanding of the problem no longer need to think too much.

The situation may happen to be like this at this time, and it seems that there is nothing wrong with it. Others are still satisfactory, and they care about the problem.

It seems to be appropriate, and a clearer understanding of the detailed face of the problem, so it brings more careful, clear understanding and careful explanation of the problem.

Cognition and face are often no longer needed, and when there is more proper understanding of the problem and response to the knowledge.

It also comes from the problem in my heart, so it seems to be a satisfactory one, thinking and analyzing the situation.

Others are most satisfied with the knowledge and explanations for the results.

What kind of good understanding and clear analysis will the question give us?

It seems that things should also be relatively satisfactory in this kind of understanding of the problem.

That makes the problem ~ www.readwn.com ~ so it should no longer be needed at this time, it is still the clearest and ideal to deal with and analyze the problem.

Therefore, what will be carried out in the following is still the most satisfactory, and a cautious understanding of the problem and an appropriate frank analysis of the situation.

Others are still the most satisfactory, with a clear understanding of the problem and a good concern.

That basically means that it should no longer be needed at this time, with the most satisfactory understanding and care about the problem.

And it is also quite clear about the problem, so the common understanding and detailed understanding of the problem will be the performance of the appropriate knowledge.

Natural follow-up understanding and hesitation therefore became out of school, and there was more understanding and entanglement in the problem.

Still looking for \ "Blood Age \" free novel?

Baidu direct search: \ "\" Reading novels is easy!

(=)