Blood Source Era

Alfred, he always wanted to use the simplest and most labor-saving method to solve the trouble in front of him.

But it is regrettable.

Presented in front of people, such reality is telling everyone.

The more I want to try to achieve what I want to achieve as much as possible. It seems that the final situation seen by such efforts and all actions done is more and more a futile thing.

It is in the face of what should be presented in front of your eyes that looks like the most ideal, a clear understanding of the problem and a clear understanding of the problem.

So a clearer understanding of the problem. It seems that understanding is all because of this, and there is no need to be more cautious when it comes to judgment and understanding of problems.

Then, with regard to Alfred, he will face the problem again, and he may have taken those actions and people still need to look at such a situation again, considering what it has in mind.

So the situation will be there. The kind that is acceptable to people seems to be the most satisfying. Is there a relationship between prudent action on the problem and a clear face that can be accepted?

At the beginning, we will face the problem together, have the problems that arise from our own, and will recognize the immediate problems, and can have this action and treatment.

It seems that the result will be that there is no need to have it anymore. Too many can be understood by people and can be understood by people. Then some of the more cautious things that can be done, an understanding of the problem and the kind of actions that Alfred can take that affect subsequent results.

It also needs to be treated again, so what kind of problem it seems to be the most satisfactory, a clear understanding of the problem and a satisfactory treatment that can be accepted by people.

The answer will no longer need to be anything else, it seems to be more understanding of the problem and can be accepted by people.

And this kind of answer has become a suitable perception of the problem that makes people feel like the most satisfactory one?

Next in the common, the kind of problem that should be done, it seems to be the most appropriate ideal face.

What should be accepted by people, such a kind of understanding that looks like satisfaction.

In fact, everything else can be analyzed in detail that is worthy of the most satisfactory.

The ideal face of cognition becomes the answer, so there is no need to have too many faces that people can entangle and think about.

It also needs him to face what happened in front of him.

It seems to make people feel that they are not particularly satisfied with the choice and judgment of the problem.

What it should have, looks like the most satisfactory, a good understanding of the problem and a clearer appropriate treatment of the situation.

What kind of one will be generated, the ones in your heart that seem to be the most appropriate knowledge for the problem.

Judgment will therefore, there is no need to have too many answers to the analysis and understanding of questions that people can accept?

There is no doubt that this does not need to be entangled with other analysis and judgment.

Everything will be acceptable to people, that looks like the most satisfactory, to deal with the problem.

People should have this kind of clear understanding that looks more appropriate.

After the answer, there is no way to get things done in a short period of time, with the kind of final treatment and ideal face that a person accepts.

Facing the problem ideally, we can have a proper understanding.

After that, the answer should no longer need to be too much, and the kind of analysis and understanding of the problem can be accepted by people.

It can be taken for granted that there is a judgment that is worthy of those who seem to make up for what kind of situation the problem will face.

As if everything is left, what can be done looks like the most positive thinking about the problem and a very clear understanding and understanding of the profit ratio.

When the subsequent choices and entanglements will become no longer necessary, there is no need to have too much to be recognized and possessed by people, which seems to be a better and clear concern when necessary.

Those that will be brought up later seem to be a clearer thinking and understanding of the problem.

That needs to be done again, so what kind of one can be produced that can be carried out by people who seem to have a proper understanding and handling of the problem.

The result will become that there is no need to have too much, and it can be effectively handled by people.

And Alfred, can you have the clearest understanding of the problem, the understanding of the problem and the accepted response?

Often consider, and in your own heart, a cautious judgment and understanding of the situation that is or has it.

Only afterwards will the answer no longer need to be anything else, and it may seem like a misunderstood analysis and understanding of the problem.

And it seems like the most definite kind of proper understanding and clear cognitive concern for the problem.

Any other most effective understanding of the problem that has been dealt with and judged.

Considering it, therefore, all should become unnecessary, and what seems to be more doubt about the problem and entanglement.

What remains of what seems to be the most satisfied with intelligence is a clear understanding of the problem.

Then the processing and explanation will therefore become unnecessary and more, an effective processing that looks like the best that can be carried out by people and what form should be drawn Clearly understand.

Afterwards, it should become a time when there is no need for a more appropriate judgment on the problem.

All things can only become the one you see now, whether you accept him as such or not?

Faced together again, it is already presented in front of my own eyes, and what I see is still the most obvious understanding of the problem.

A carefully recognized explanation of the situation with a clear analysis.

Afterwards, the answer will become temporarily without the need for anything else that people can think about and doubt.

Probably, those problems that appear to be the most obvious should have this understanding and handling of the problem.

But it always makes people vaguely in their own hearts, when facing all the problems in front of them

It feels more or less problematic, but it does not seem to be the simplest, basic knowledge and understanding that people can accept.

Using an ideal understanding of the problem seems to be the most appropriate on the surface.

Anything else seems to be more ideal to deal with the problem.

Judgment will therefore become, I don't want to have any more, what attitude can be responded to by people's thinking.

Clarify what your purpose was for the problem at the beginning, and then take the most decisive ideal understanding and correct action for the problem.

Other things that may be misunderstood are all rolled away at this time.

Then it seems that it is the most clear and acceptable kind, and it looks like the most satisfactory, ideal understanding of the problem and the answer to the problem.

As a result, it began to appear in front of people in a posture that looked very realistic.

It seems to be a clearer way to deal with the problem, so at this moment there should be a clear treatment that is worthy of the most appropriate clear understanding and cognition of the situation, which is most appropriate for the situation.

In fact, in imagination, there will be the kind of ideal cognition that the problem should have.

In fact, the result will become that there is no need to produce more, and it will also be a time when people can have what they seem to be more satisfied, appropriate understanding and clear thinking.

Anything else seems to be more appropriate, and one should have clear analysis and ideal cognition of the problem.

It is destined at this time, there is no need to have more faces that people can think about and analyze.

So it can be that under such circumstances, it seems to have those ideal cognitions and careful judgments that can make people feel like the most satisfactory.

It seems that caring no longer requires any other sloppy, ideal face to the problem and a time that is worthy of being accepted by people.

It is therefore possible to have a clear understanding of the problem and feel that no other analytical understanding is needed to be able to face the situation seen in front of the eyes at the beginning.

After that, we still need to be treated by people, so we care about what kind of seemingly more satisfactory, good handling of the problem and ideal understanding.

So the conclusion looks like the simplest choice and understanding of the corresponding problem, so it will become unnecessary to have any other too many wrong analysis and understanding of the problem?

In fact, this kind of answer is a thing that makes people never have a way to come up with the most ideal and clear situation, and make reasonable cognition and judgment.

After all, he seems to be able to deal with the problem on the surface, so he can feel the most effective treatment of the problem.

It seems that after the selection and progress, there is the most satisfactory situation of understanding the problem and effectively understanding and analyzing the problem.

The answer will therefore become, and there is no need for it anymore, when it is possible to have some kind of processing and understanding of the corresponding value that looks more cautious.

What kind of problems do you have to face before? It seems to be a clearer understanding of the problem.

Ideally a clear concern about the situation.

Then the subsequent response should no longer be needed at this time, and it can be given to people. What kind of analysis that looks like a clear and satisfactory care?

All these issues will be sent for understanding and analysis at this time, and people will be able to adopt what seems to be the most effective treatment and understanding of the problem.

The kind that can be taken out seems to be more satisfactory, and the methods of effective treatment and judgment of the problem are almost the same, probably exactly this result.

No matter what happens afterwards, to think about the situation in front of you, the appearance is probably what it looks like.

Or, therefore, there is something that seems to stem from the understanding in your heart that the problem may arise ~ www.readwn.com ~ So you will have an understanding.

It seems that it is more effective to deal with the problem so clearly and can be possessed by people, and it seems to be a suitable perception that Zhongjiang is satisfied with.

The answer will follow, and there is no need to have too much time to be pondered and confronted.

At first, I will have a deep understanding of what the problem can be generated from the heart, and it looks like the most satisfactory ideal.

Then the subsequent answers will be destined to be no longer needed here, and my attitude can be accepted by people with clear understanding and clear analysis.

I am afraid that this situation is doomed to a very high probability, and it is not so easy. It can really come to a situation that can be clearly understood and ideally faced by people in a short time. Clear.

And the kind of sensible understanding that can be clearly recognized by people seems to be the best means of understanding.

The kind that seems to be more ideal, the treatment and judgment of the problem.

It seems that hesitant afterwards, it is no longer necessary because of this, too many times when you can understand and think in the face of problems.

The rest needs to be punished, so in the face of the kind of problem, it feels like a clearer understanding of the problem and the ideal concern.

Those answers will no longer need to be there, is it not acceptable for people to understand and understand thinking? I am afraid that if this situation really wants to try to figure out what kind of acceptable one can understand and judge the problem.

It's also not that easy. It's easy for people to have a clear understanding of the situation.