"Congressman Marty must have been a good man in his last life, but he has been so successful in this life."

The favorability of Chinese netizens to Marty rose sharply, and the secretary quietly told Marty.

Marty's face is calm, but his heart is full of smiles. It seems that he has come here today.

Lin Fei has been paying attention to Marty, the expression on Marty's face is hidden from others, but not from him.

He could see that Marty was very happy, and he smiled, thinking that it would be best for you to come.

You come here, and the good show in the back will be more exciting.

The court has already started the trial.

China implements a party-based trial model, and the basic feature of this model is confrontation.

Judges and juries, as adjudicators of cases, do not actively investigate evidence, call witnesses and question witnesses, but are in a passive and detached position.

It is only responsible for hearing the evidence and statements made by both the prosecution and the defense. The prosecution and the defense submit their own witnesses and evidence to the court to question their own side, and make rebuttal questions to the opposing witnesses.

Judges and juries assume judicial adjudication functions on the legal issues and factual issues of the case, respectively.

The first step in the trial is to make an opening statement.

Attorneys for both parties present their arguments, with the plaintiff's attorney first, followed by the defense attorney's turn.

The lawyer for the plaintiff Ball's side was the official lawyer.

He began to explain the case, including the situation of the victims of the case, the place where the case was killed, how the case was discovered, the conflict of the case, etc.

These statements are known to almost everyone in the courtroom.

But this is a court procedure, and they listened patiently to the plaintiff's lawyer.

Then the defendant's lawyer, Gill, stood up, represented the three barristers, and began to make a statement for the defendant.

Gill described that Obama is a person of high moral character and a law-abiding person, including Obama's performance after becoming a member of parliament.

In fact, most of what she said is true, such as abiding by the law, but of course there is no virtue, this is to create a better image for Obama.

However, what Jill said obviously did not impress the people in the gallery.

From time to time, the gallery booed, interrupting Jill's statement.

They think these words.

Don't believe a single word.

It's all lies!:

Chapter 429 Questions [please customize]

This kind of booing is naturally commonplace for a top lawyer like her, and it has no effect at all.

After the lawyers for both sides finished their presentations, they began to question the witnesses.

The first to testify was a police detective, who was also a witness at the scene at the time.

"How did you know there was a murder there?"

The plaintiff's attorney asked the detective.

"We didn't know there was a murder at the time."

"We got a call to the police."

"Just arrived at the abandoned parking lot."

the detective said.

"Who is the caller?"

"Do you know"

The plaintiff's attorney continued to ask.

"I don't know, the caller didn't leave his name or other information."

"We checked the phone number."

"It was a public phone, and no one could be found. It is estimated that someone who happened to pass by the parking lot noticed it and called the police."

The detective apparently knew nothing about the caller.

"You were there, what did you see?"

Lawyers for the plaintiffs decided to sidestep the question.

"We rushed to the scene, when."

"Saw a group of people."

"There were also two people who scuffled together, and their clothes were stained with blood."

The detective introduced what he saw at the scene at the time.

"Who are the two scuffled?"

"Can you point it out?"

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like