I Really Didn’t Want to Be the Savior

Chen Feng thought about it for about five seconds.

But in the end he did not stand up and clearly support Irun’s point of view. He only said vaguely: "Iron Academician’s analysis is reasonable and in line with my personal guess, but there is no Conclusive evidence. Irene Academician said that I have seen some mysteries that no one can see, and that does not exist."

"I just synthesized the results of the predecessors and added my own Some bold speculations have reached these conclusions. But since I customized the title of the book "Madman’s Conjecture". This means that these theoretical knowledge are my very bold and bold speculations, and I still need everyone to work together to prove one by one in the following years. Or falsification."

His words were very conservative and did not stamp Irun’s views.

Of course, this again showed his crazy side.

In this way, he admitted that the relevant knowledge in the fields of physics and biology in "Madman’s Conjectures" are conjectures that have not been rigorously demonstrated.

Skip the rigorous scientific experiment and give the answer directly.

He looked very swollen.

If you change someone like this, you will definitely be slobbered to death.

However, the mathematical problems he solved in "The Conjectures" have all been checked.

One after another Chen’s theorem is being serialized in several top academic journals in mathematics at the rate of one episode a week.

A person who can achieve such an achievement in the field of mathematics at the age of twenty-five, even if he seems to be nonsense in other fields, people will inevitably think about it before questioning.

I Lun’s attitude towards Chen Feng was obviously disappointed, but he didn't say much. After almost finishing the question, he walked down and sat back next to Chen Feng.

"Mr. Chen, what are you..."

After having tolerated about two minutes, Yilun still asked.

Chen Feng smiled and shook his head slightly, "The time is not ripe. You think about problems more from an academic point of view, but I can't just consider these. In the current era, social productivity is still insufficient, and there are still many contradictions. Need to be resolved. For example, between countries, classes and classes, between skin color and skin color, and even between two adjacent regions of the same country, there will be contradictions that are higher than competition. Before these problems are resolved, whether it is Neither ordinary persons nor leaders can bear this."

Iron nodded.

He got it.

Before he felt that Chen Feng could become an excellent politician in addition to being a musician and scientist.

Now it seems so.

He can always stand at a higher angle and look at everything with a more comprehensive perspective.

"I didn’t think it over. I thought this was a good opportunity before, so I made a decision. I’m sorry."

Chen Feng shook his head, "It’s okay, this is more telling you are A professional academic worker."

"Humans are very lucky to be able to get a perfect leader like you in all aspects."

"I have won the prize."

The semi-academic and semi-casual speech on stage continued while the two communicated in low voices.

There are not many attendees, but they are all elite scholars from all over the world, and there are some people who can speak on stage.

About an hour later, Chen Feng heard an interesting argument from a social science and economics tycoon.

He did not rush out of his professional scope to prove whether aliens existed, but completed a large-scale social experiment in five years.

Today is the release day of his final report.

This meeting was also called by him.

His social experiment contains two aspects.

First, invite up to 500,000 volunteers in a remote town to participate in the experience.

The content of the experience is a theme simulation life that is regularly unfolded, and the title is "If the end of the world will arrive after ten years, one hundred years, and one thousand years."

Volunteers participating in the experiment range from billionaires to homeless people, perfectly simulating a small social community.

In the past five years, this big man has held up to 21 social experiments in the small town, focusing on the suspense of these three time periods.

Second, as many as several millions of large-scale questionnaire surveys, the survey content is consistent with the theme simulation life.

The two aspects are complementary to each other, one is theoretical calculations, and the other is actual exercises.

The experimental results are very interesting, showing extremely diverse and three-dimensional feedback.

People's feedback showed great differences based on the difference in the age of the doomsday and the volunteers' own conditions.

Assuming that the end will be ushered in ten years later, most of the ordinary persons who accepted the theme simulation life and questionnaire surveys said that it was a matter of ten years later, and they have to consider it, but they cannot be themselves at the moment. For the whole life, you must settle the credit card bills in front of you, and then when you have some money left, you must quickly stock up on more bullets, and then find a safe place in the countryside.

If you are a bachelor, you may add High Level in the end. If something really happens, you will be crazy.

If you are a middle class, you will try to maintain your own business and career, still have to stock up guns and ammunition, and will try to form your own team.

If you are a big business man in the upper class, you will try more cooperation based on the preparations made by the middle class, and quickly pay for Musk to complete the space travel as soon as possible. Research and explore.

If you have the opportunity, you must get a ferry ticket.

When this question was changed to a hundred years later, people's feedback changed.

The bourgeois tend to think nothing about it directly. That is all after his death, so what should he do if he manages so much.

The middle class will probably add one more item, that is, not to keep future generations, so that future generations will suffer. As for yourself, try to spend your money just in time when you die.

The big bourgeoisie still sponsors space projects and remains enthusiastic about the future.

Replace the problem with a thousand years later.

The answers of most people are straightforward.

A thousand years? what is that? What does it have to do with me? My ashes will never be seen that day.

Just dealing with the bills, work, and business in front of me is enough to make me feel bad. Will I take care of things a thousand years from now?

Are you crazy?

Chen Feng was not surprised by this result.

This is the thinking mode of normal people.

When he himself passed through the millennium earlier two times, his thoughts were similar to this.

Just living in reality is tiring enough, and there is no time to worry about the flood after death.

But the scholar on the stage cited some interesting phenomena.

All classes have similar views on the end of the decade, but some people have shown obvious differences between the century and the millennium.

These people said that they have to work harder, find ways to create more value, and try to do their best.

There are not many people who speak such words, but there are still many differences that can be found.

For example, some big businessmen and politicians will speak beautifully, but they are beautiful enough to reveal strong hypocrisy. Their essential intention is to obtain visible benefits through self-packaging, such as money And fame.

Some people's answers were more constructive. They immediately started to use their brains and kept asking what form this "doom" would come in, how to avoid it, and how to fight it.

Most of these people are scholars, and they have to be very successful scholars.

The big man who gave the speech finally concluded: "It took me five years to complete this social experiment, and the result is not optimistic. I think that when the crisis is far away, there is only food and clothing without worry, and Only those with a considerable level of knowledge and a very high personal moral character may consider a sense of responsibility relative to illusory."

"But when the crisis is imminent, almost everyone will quickly fall into fear of doomsday, we will Seeing the collapse of social order, the streets will be full of gunfire and flames, robbery will become a job, and similar lives will not be respected. Maybe our population will have dropped by at least half before the real end. ."

The scholar's view is very pessimistic.

Chen Feng, who has seen the doomsday scene many times, did not refute him.

First of all, the doomsday assumed by this scholar does not actually exist.

According to his description, this is an irresistible doom in the first place.

But the facts Chen Feng sees in the future prove that when technology is sufficiently advanced, everyone can live without worry, can receive higher education, and people do not need to prey on each other to obtain sufficient benefits. After the material conditions, as long as there is enough time to complete the psychological construction, even in the face of irresistible and time-foreseeable doomsday, humans will still brace oneself and want to try.

In addition, this Economics from Oxford University also made another mistake.

His experimental sites and questionnaire survey sites are limited to Europe and North America, and the overwhelming majority of the people surveyed are native English speakers.

This scholar ignores the Chinese population, which accounts for one-fifth of the global population.

So his large-scale social experiment, which seems to be of great reference significance, is actually biased.

Chen Feng intuitively believes that if you ask the same question to a native Chinese speaker, you may get a completely different answer.

A person’s development of the Three Views is highly related to the environment and education he has been in contact with since childhood, as well as to his native language.

Human thinking needs to be based on language media.

The principles and philosophy in people's hearts are not nihilistic concepts, but should also be self-summarizing theories based on different language structures.

These theories constitute a person's code of conduct and will determine the direction in which he will think and make decisions when facing each choice.

People of different native languages ​​can easily show completely different coping styles when facing the same problem.

Chinese and other language families show great differences in many aspects, such as pronunciation, text pattern, sentence expression, logical structure, and emotional display.

Chinese is a fast language that favors accurate expression and is more specific.

English is a slow language that tends to extend metaphors and is relatively abstract.

Chinese speakers tend to focus solely on the present, which seems practical.

Native English speakers are easy to focus on the future, and the knowledge is broad enough, and native English speakers with high sentiment are easy to focus on the future. Therefore, when facing the "doomsday problem," scholars in Europe and the United States did not disappoint.

But unfortunately, the most people in this world are still ordinary persons with relatively narrow knowledge.

So ordinary persons who are native English speakers are easily immersed in the fear after abstract reinforcement, and have no time to ponder the sense of responsibility.

According to Chen Feng's calculation, the ordinary person of Chinese native language will be quite different from the ordinary person of English native language department.

It’s not that the ratio of native Chinese speakers can be reversed, but the ratio of focusing on the future and staying in the present will be much higher.

Because I think about Chinese quickly enough.

When a person's overall knowledge level is narrow, and his understanding of the nature of the world is not so profound and extensive, the fast structure of Chinese makes it easier for people to think about the future.

The slow structure of English makes people’s minds have to stay more focused on collecting the information they currently need to collect. Slow decision-making is the current problem that needs to be solved, that is, the repayment of credit cards and so on.

But at another level, Chen Feng, through his observation of the future, believes that top scholars, whether they are native Chinese or English, can actually look to the future based on the present.

When the native speakers of the two native languages ​​reach Peak in their respective academic fields, there is no distinction between superior and inferior.

The knowledge of these people is perfect enough, and the world view is grand enough to escape their limitations.

At this time, the impact of the structure of the mother tongue on people's feelings will be reduced to the lowest.

In fact, there is a new logical paradox hidden here.

Is people with more knowledge more ethical?

This is not the case.

Knowledge does not cultivate morality.

Ethics originates from the education that people receive from childhood and self-learning in adulthood.

The abundance of knowledge does not completely mean that the morals are noble or not.

It just means that people with high morals will add some extra sense of responsibility as a driving force when learning knowledge. This part of the people will have a higher degree of concentration and desire for new knowledge. .

Therefore, the proportion of people with high moral standards among the top scholars is relatively high.

But it does not mean that there are no scumbags among scholars, and individual cases still exist.

Even though Chen Feng thought so, he was a little unconvinced, but he did not stand up to refute him on the spot.

When the meeting was over, he took the initiative to talk to the Oxford professor.

He talked about his doubts privately, and invited the other party to return to China with him. He also conducted this kind of social experiment in the Chinese native language department.

Professor Oxford had given up on this idea, but he couldn't refute Chen Feng's doubts, saying only that the funding was limited.

"Don't worry about the funding, I will do it. We skip the social experiment of the small town model and focus on questionnaire surveys, and strive to come up with a conclusion within a week."

Oxford The professor squinted his eyes, "Mr. Chen, are you sure you want to beautify your motherland?"

Chen Feng shook his head, "So I invite you to come instead of me personally. The final statistics will also be determined by You are solely responsible for it, I just watch, never intervene, it will be more convincing."

"Okay."

Chen Feng rolled his eyes and decided to take care of himself Alma mater.

"Cooperate with Jiangnan University in Hanzhou, right?"

"No problem. My team has not been disbanded yet, when will it start?"

Chen Feng blinked, "Now."

Some ordinary persons seem to be very big things, but at Chen Feng's current level, they are actually just two sentences.

……

After Nine Heavens.

The base number of questionnaires in China is as high as one million, which is already very meaningful.

Looking at the results before him, the Oxford professor was dumbfounded.

Chen Feng is full of comfort and emotion.

There is no gap without comparison.

Although most native Chinese speakers did not show a particularly obvious tendency to face the crisis after a hundred years and millennia, they basically agreed to work hard, study hard, and try to realize more self-worth. .

Only less than 30% of people show obvious a matter of no concern to oneself.

As for the crisis ten years later, the performance of the Chinese department has not disappointed. Few Chinese have shown obvious violent tendencies in the face of this irresistible end.

In fact, there are still some, but this violent tendency is more biased towards the “enemies” with unknown circumstances behind the doomsday.

If you really can’t resist at all, most people tend to stay with their family at the last moment.

Professor Oxford is very dissatisfied with the results of the survey, and angrily accused, "The Chinese are too hypocritical!"

Chen Feng did not deny, "This may be hypocritical, too." If 70% of the people in a huge civilization are willing to be so "hypocritical" and spend their entire lives in the "hypocrisy", it has become a certain degree of sincerity again. Isn't it? Merchant hypocrisy is to gain More immediate benefits, but with such a large proportion of the population of "hypocrisy" in China, can we get more benefits from hypocrisy? Even if this is the case, will you let go of your prejudices because of our "hypocrisy"?"