Losing Money to Be a Tycoon

　　 Soon, someone else spoke.

　　 "Wipe, I haven't noticed before. When you said that, I discovered that the non-recommendation rate of our game has reached 47%. This...I will be taken off the shelf if I look at it!"

　　 "Is our game so bad? Obviously there are more than 80% praise rate on other platforms!"

　　 This is the chief planner of another local game company in Jingzhou. Unlike the previous game, this is a stand-alone casual mobile game with a buyout system.

　　 It stands to reason that the reputation of stand-alone games should be better, but the problem is more serious!

　　 Yan Qidian opened the Chaolu game platform page, and sure enough, the non-recommendation rate of these two games is very worrying. One is 44% and the other is 47%!

　　 The Chaolu game platform does not have a rating. There is only a very straightforward "recommend" or "not recommended". If the non-recommendation rate reaches 55%, the game will not pass the trial period and will be removed directly.

　　 And if the game has passed the trial period, but for some reason the non-recommendation rate reaches 65%, the game will still be removed.

　　 Only a few days ago, the non-recommendation rate has passed the 40% warning line, it can be said to be very dangerous!

　　 Yan Qi felt a little puzzled.

　　 shouldn't it?

　　 He knows that although these two games are old games, their operations on other platforms are basically stable, and the reputation is good.

　　 The first game is the Krypton mobile game. Although it is definitely not comparable to those excellent masterpieces, in the domestic mobile game circle, how can it not be reduced to a non-recommendation rate of 44%?

　　 The second game is a stand-alone game with a buyout system. The overall reputation in the game circle is not bad. The non-recommendation rate reached 47%, which is even more outrageous!

　　 Before, when Yan Qi signed the contract, he noticed that the Chaolu game platform had such a rule that if the recommendation rate exceeded 55%, he would be removed directly, but he didn't care too much.

　　 On the one hand, because half of the money can be refunded, there will not be too much loss, on the other hand, because there is a special weighting algorithm in this non-recommendation rate, Yan Qi feels that it is unlikely to be reduced to this step.

　　According to Chaolu game platform regulations, the specific recommendation rate and non-recommendation rate are not calculated according to the number of players, but are calculated after each player is given a weight.

　　 To put it simply, players who spend more time on the game platform, spend more, and buy more games of a certain type have a higher weight when they recommend or not recommend.

　　 There is a very important indicator here, which is the playing experience of a certain type of game. For example, two players A and B, player A spends more, but player B plays a lot of action games, then when judging action games, the recommendation or not recommendation of player B will take a higher weight .

　　 Generally speaking, this is a relatively objective and comprehensive evaluation mechanism, even if there is a certain deviation, it will not be too big.

　　 But... At present, this mechanism seems to be working abnormally?

The other people in the 　　 group were also alarmed, and they all showed great concern.

　　 Because this mechanism of the game platform will also affect them!

　　 These game companies have signed an agreement with Chaolu Game Platform. After the game is launched, there will be a one-week "trial period". If the non-recommendation rate exceeds 55%, they will all be removed!

　　 At first, everyone thought that this shouldn’t be difficult. After all, the recommendation rate of the game is less than 45%, which is almost equal to less than 2 points on the 5-point system on other platforms.

　　 There are not many 2-point games on other platforms?

　　 In addition to this weighting algorithm, as long as it is a game of acceptable quality and bug-free, it is not normal to get a passing score during the first time it is launched?

　　 But looking at the two games now, things are obviously not that simple.

　　 "What's the matter? How can the non-recommendation rate be so high?"

　　 "Is this weighting algorithm not working? After all, the Chaolu game platform has just been opened, so the information on the players on this platform is very scarce, and this weighting algorithm cannot distinguish the players clearly."

　　 "It is possible! Moreover, it may also be due to the small number of players and small samples, so there will be a large deviation in the probability, resulting in inaccurate ratings."

　　 "That's not right. Players must buy the game to evaluate. Players who don't like this game type won't buy it at all. Why would they not recommend it?"

　　 "Anyway, I have to quickly improve this rule. The bug in our game is about to be fixed. It will be online in two days. What if it is also removed?"

　　 Everyone is very attentive, while helping with the analysis, @群主 thinks a way.

　　 As a result, the group owner hasn't come out to express his opinion, and the person in charge of the first game has spoken again.

　　 "Because the new platform has less player data, the inaccurate weighting algorithm is really a problem, but it is not the main problem!"

　　 "I was wondering at the beginning how the non-recommendation rate could be so high, and then one of our employees lurked into the player group and discovered what was going on!"

　　 "It turns out that some game guilds are taking advantage of the loopholes. After recharging in the game, they want to use this method to get half of the refund!"

　　 "Because other players can also benefit from the game being removed, there are still many players who support it. Now the non-recommendation rate is getting higher and higher!"

　　 The person in charge of the stand-alone game also suddenly realized: "That's it! That can explain why our game is obviously a good-quality stand-alone game, but the recommendation rate is so high!"

　　Some people didn’t understand yet, and asked: "Huh? But what good is it for players to remove the game? Wouldn't they not be able to play it?"

Someone immediately reminded: "No, players can still play even if they are removed from the shelves, but they will not open new servers and will not have follow-up maintenance. But the problem is that the current games will not have follow-up updates and Maintained!"

　　The group is all the person in charge of each game company, and I don’t know much about these aspects, so I quickly analyzed the truth.

　　 Obviously, this refund system was exploited by players!

　　According to Chaolu Game Platform's regulations, if the game's non-recommendation rate is too high, it means that this game has a serious problem. Taking the game off the shelf and giving a partial refund is a responsible behavior for the player.

　　 But now, players obviously do not recommend it because the quality of the game is not good, but for a refund!

　　 Of these two games, one is a Krypton online game that has entered the end of its life. On the first day of server opening, some game guilds settled in.

Give everyone a red envelope! Now you can receive red envelopes on the WeChat public account [Book Fan Base].

　　 After studying the mechanics of the platform, these people suddenly discovered that it seemed more beneficial for them to take the game off the shelves!

　　 According to the rules of the platform, they can continue to play after the game is removed, but no new players will join, and there will be no future version updates of this game.

　　 But for this old game, there will be no version updates!

　　Even if it is updated, it is mostly content that is not painful or itchy, and the impact on the fun of the game itself is not great.

Moreover, mobile games are all small server operations. On average, a new server is opened in two or three days. Therefore, for these old players, whether new players come or not does not affect their gaming experience, because even new players come. Will go to the new server, not the old server.

　　Retiring the game means that players who recharge can get a half refund.

　　 Don't underestimate this half of the refund, how many krypton games will engage in this unlimited, undifferentiated 50% promotion?

Now I have enough money in one breath. After the game is off the shelves, I get half of the rebate. I can no longer recharge in the subsequent game, but I can rely on the money from the previous krypton to stay ahead of other players and continue to dominate the game. Good luck.

　　 And the players of that stand-alone game, obviously also for this purpose.

　　 For them, there are even fewer restrictions, because this single-player game has also entered the end of its life. It is difficult for developers to recoup the cost if they invest resources to develop new versions. It is better to develop new projects.

　　 Therefore, removing this game can directly save half of the money for these players without any negative impact.

　　 Since it can be done just by clicking the "not recommended" button, why not just click it?

　　 And, as many people have analyzed, the new platform cannot well determine the real weight of players, and the players who have just been transferred are some players who are more greedy for immediate benefits. These two points further contribute to this phenomenon.

　　 That's why it developed into what it is now.

　　 Soon, the group leader came out to speak.

　　 "Don't worry, everyone, we have already noticed this problem."

　　 "The platform has negotiated urgently and decided to make certain changes to the agreement. After the game is removed from the shelves, you can apply for re-listing after the changes, but there is a time limit."

　　 "After being removed from the shelves for the first time, you need to apply again after one month; after being removed from the shelves for the second time, you can apply again after two months, and so on."

　　 "For games that are re-launched after being removed from the shelves, old players who have already evaluated them before will not participate in the evaluation, and the original evaluation will only be used as a record and will not affect the data during the trial period when it is released again."

　　 "If the game still does not pass the trial period, then continue to be removed according to the previous rules, and the next application is extended to two months later."

　　 "If the game has passed the trial period, then old players can regain the latest version of the game by making up the difference."

　　 Yan Qi carefully analyzed this new regulation and found that some loopholes were plugged.

　　 At least the game will no longer be directly sentenced to death, but can be appealed again.

　　 is equivalent to violently dying from the previous instant, turning into an infinite resurrection.

After some games with too many bugs and incomplete game content are removed from the shelves, they can be modified and then launched again; those games that have been maliciously removed from the shelves by the players will not be evaluated by the previous players after the next release. Change a group of players~www.ltnovel.com~ This is more fair.

　　 But the problem is... this method seems to be a temporary solution rather than a permanent cure!

　　 Sure enough, someone in the group soon raised objections.

　　 "This method doesn't work. The most profitable time for a mobile game is the first one or two months. After being maliciously removed, it will take one month to go online again. Isn't this all a delay? This time is too long!"

"Yes, and changing a group of players does not necessarily solve the problem. If most players on the entire platform want to use this method for half-price prostitution games, wouldn't most of the games be taken off the shelves? Can't open it!"

　　 "Don't blame me for speaking straight. In my opinion, this measure is too layman. Obviously a person who doesn't understand games came up with it.

　　 "Yes, this measure doesn't work at all, just cancel it! The low-rated games are not recommended for resources, there is no need to remove them! It is also a loss for the platform!"

　　 However, the group owner was unmoved: "Sorry, the rules are the rules, this cannot be changed."

　　 "For players who deliberately point no recommendation or maliciously remove the game, we have countermeasures, but we can't announce it yet. Don't worry, we will definitely give you a satisfactory answer soon!"

　　Https://

　　 Only one second to remember the address of this site:. Mobile version reading URL: