Military? No, I'm Just A Car Company

can be foreseen,

This time,

The New York Times article was not bought, but instead aroused hatred among many netizens.

"Even though the facts are already in front of us, the New York Times even turned to Facebook, completely treating our readers as fools.

online,

Someone expressed their opinion.

A simple post immediately aroused the response of many netizens.

for a time,

Netizens were angry and criticized the New York Times one after another.

Obviously it was a very simple vent, but the netizens of Meilijian felt the restriction and restraint from it.

To know,

The people in the United States, the most disgusting thing, is that their behavior is restricted by others.

That is called freedom.

Without access to correct news information, their freedom is also restricted.

Then the person who caused this result will definitely become the object of reproach.

Once they started scolding people, the "mother content" in the sentence was surprisingly high, and the level was not worse than that of Xia Guo's Heizi.

that's it,

The New York Times ushered in 25 unprecedented insults because of its own erroneous reporting.

"No junk papers, get me out of America, we don't need it.

Someone posted a photo on the Internet, and the person in the photo held a banner with this sentence written on it.

Now,

Things got bigger.

The editor-in-chief of The New York Times would never have imagined that just leaning on Facebook in his reports would cause such a big response.

"Are these people a little too sensitive?"

The editor-in-chief looked at the overwhelming denunciations on the Internet, and suddenly fell into contemplation.

The latest issue of The New York Times has only been on the market for less than three hours, and it has provoked so much abuse.

Throughout the short history of the United States, it is unprecedented.

The underlying reason is that Wuling has established a position in the hearts of netizens around the world through the Dragon Son S supercar, which is no longer something that can be easily broken.

The New York Times takes itself too seriously, and has always looked down on the Son of Dragon S forum, and the resentment in the hearts of netizens has long accumulated too deep.

Previously,

The Dragon Son S forum has been suppressed by Facebook, so that netizens can't attack the New York Times article.

Can't catch it now, they can't wait to drive the New York Times out of America.

This kind of phenomenon can only happen to the United States.

In the eyes of netizens here, there is no so-called "patriotism"

The standard of all behaviors is just to go our own way.

so,

Even if the Dragon Son S Forum represents Xia Guo Wuling, and New York Times is closer to them, they will inevitably be driven away by banners.

"Fortunately, I still kept a hand, otherwise I would have been harmed by you gang of scumbags."

The editor-in-chief looked at the criticism on the Internet with a sigh of relief.

"These guys are really not easy to fool, but in this way, it has won a lot of exposure for the New York Times.

"Blessed in disguise, haha..."

Black and red are also red.

The more the New York Times was scolded on the Internet at this time, the more people paid attention to this newspaper.

Although it bears notoriety, it can reap the increase in valuation.

Or to say that behind this country, there are no human feelings, and some are just business.

A vocal media, a national-level newspaper.

After making a mistake, the first thing that comes to mind is not correction, but the scolding from netizens, how much benefit it can bring to him.

This kind of thing is hard to imagine in Xia Guo.

Although black and red are also red, but that is only for individuals and private companies.

If you encounter national media newspapers, this kind of thing is absolutely impossible.

Just today,

A new New York Times article will be published soon.

[It's just a flashback before the fall. The creators' brief return cannot change the decline of the Dragon Son S Forum, and its demise has become an established fact. 】

[Don't be fooled by the eyes, the return of the creators is just a tribute to the death of the Dragon Son S Forum. 】

[The defeat is set, and no amount of struggle is futile. In this confrontation, it is only a matter of time before Facebook defeats the Dragon Son S Forum. 】

Articles like this have been published several times in a row.

The New York Times still defied all opposition and stubbornly believed that it stood in line with Facebook.

In the face of abuse from netizens, he turned a blind eye.

This "Battle of the Century" was originally named by the New York Times. At the same time, because of standing in line with Facebook, the New York Times has also become an enemy of most netizens.

certainly,

They don't care either.

How can a large newspaper and magazine care about the speeches of ordinary people?

The editor-in-chief of The New York Times has always followed this guideline.

in the afternoon,

The New York Times released another video of the interview.

The report is an explanation of the New York Times article by an "expert".

"From the beginning, we knew what would happen if we published this article.

The "expert" has a calm expression and looks overconfident.

It seemed like everything was in his hands.

"Of course we are aware of the sudden user growth of the Dragon Son S forum, and we also know the favoritism of netizens towards the Dragon Son S forum. We have thought of all the situations.

"However, we are a media that seeks truth from facts, and we only express the most correct views."

"And at present, the most correct point of view is that the Dragon Son S Forum still cannot hide its decline, and bankruptcy is only a matter of time."

"So, when we wrote the latest article, we did not take this trivial matter of the Dragon Son S forum seriously, we chose to ignore it directly, and then jumped to the inevitable result. 99

"We also know that writing like this will definitely arouse the anger of readers, but we still choose to stick to ourselves, because we are the media that tells the truth and never perfunctory.

"If anyone can't see the good intentions of the New York Times, then neither can I."

"After all, the current trade competition is too complicated, and you can't blame you for not understanding it."

The "expert" suddenly joked, "If you can understand it casually, then we economic experts can go to the factory and screw the screws.

"You said yes? Obviously screwing is a job that is not suitable for us at the moment.",