Pulling out the tasks and companions in a specific "event" to discuss which is more important is actually a conceptual distortion and stealth - this sophistry itself is meaningless, and "tasks" and "companions" cannot be compared.

It's like taking out the stuffing and skin of a "bun" separately, and asking whether the "bun" is a filling or a skin, and which is the same as the skin and the filling.

What is the answer?

The answer is that simple stuffing and simple skin are not called buns, only if the filling is wrapped in skin, that is the bun - which is important between skin and filling? Is this comparable? Not because they are one in themselves! One and two sides, everything bears yin and embraces yang, even if it is a ring with only one side such as the Mobius ring, there is also yin and yang, there is "the other side", but its "other side" and "this side" are connected.

"Mission" and "companion" are themselves like buns, and they should not be separated for discussion: "

Companion, task, this is not an isolated concept in itself." Ninjas form a squad to better complete the task, and the members of the squad can cooperate to complete the task, for what? Ino

raised his face and threw the question to Akimichi Choza - let him give himself a problem, and now give him one too!

Akimichi Dingza asked, "Why?"

"Oh, why?"

Nara Shikahisa also heard for the first time this perspective of going beyond the limitations of companions and tasks to discuss this issue, and there was a sense of empowerment.

Ino said: "Because - life. Completing the task is not to complete the task, but to complete the task to get a gratuity, these honorarities, will allow the family to live a worry-free life. And a squad with a high mission completion rate and excellent reputation will get better and more missions - such as Kiki Kakashi.

Yamanaka said, "Kakashi... He seems to have been doing tasks alone all along..."

"Is that the point?" I mean task completion rate, degree of completion. So, the squad format will make the mission better ... Therefore, the members of the squad will also maintain the squad to a certain extent, and value the reputation of the squad above their own lives - this is the foundation of their survival. "

......

"Therefore, there is no one more important statement, everything is considered according to the time, the place, the person, and the task itself."

"Different people, based on such factors, will come up with different results. For example, a task of two million taels, in the same squad, the rich one feels that he will give up and give up, the risk is not necessary, the poor one is that I can die, the task cannot be lost, probably not poor or rich one, I feel that I can try again, in case it doesn't work, then give up..."

"You are like a simple carrying task, moving things from the head of the village to the end of the village, a group of subordinates, you let them sacrifice the life of a companion to complete this task?" Isn't that?

"You're in a great crisis like Konoha, everyone is in danger, and there are people who flee for the sake of their companions to look directly at the enemy - so what should be said about the behavior of such people?" Right? Different situations cannot be compared simply by companions and tasks..."

Ino's "answer" doesn't seem to say anything—but in fact, it does answer questions about "companions" and "missions."

Nara Shikaku smacked for a long time before sighing and saying, "Hey, a group of adults, not a single child can see it thoroughly..."

Many times, adults don't see as clearly as children!

"I'm talking about Ino...,"

Nara Shikahisa emphasized—there are so many bear children in Konoha, and he is not blind or deaf to know what ordinary children are. His own family's Shikamaru has a high enough IQ, but his thinking in this area is far less deep and broad than Ino Lai's - it is not a gap in IQ, but a difference in wisdom and pattern.

Yamanaka said, "You don't need to stress this. "

I have a question... There was a boat traveling in the river, which happened to encounter a large water, and the river was particularly turbulent and could not be stopped, even if it exhausted all means, it could only slow down. There are five boats directly in front of the river, and if they travel, they will inevitably hit - and the current section of the river has a clear rule that no boats are allowed to enter the water.

"On the side of this channel, there is a tributary, and there is a boat ferrying on the river."

"Now, this big ship has two options, one is to continue on its own course and knock over the five boats that docked illegally, and the other is to turn into the tributary and knock over the small boat of the tributary."

After giving the "Tram Problem" a makeover, Ino embarrassed the trio of pigs, deer, and butterflies - this is actually the same problem as the task and companion just now.

This is a problem after distilling the elements, extremerating the problem, and turning the bun into a simple stuffing or a simple skin:

based on this "sophistry" discussion will not be fruitful, because the premise itself no longer exists, air-to-air, whatever you want.

Akimichi Dingza frowned... Nara Shikaku also began to ponder, Yamanaka Haichi began to think, and all three fell silent.

After a while, Akimichi shook his head and said, "I don't know. Nara

Shikahisa said: "The five small boats on the main river channel are illegal. But the ship on the tributary is compliant.

"Yes."

Ino nodded.

When the big ship goes straight, it is the life of five small boats, and when it turns into the tributary, then the compliant boat on the tributary suffers a disaster of innocence.

It's a dilemma.

"Ino, then what is your answer?" Yamanaka asked directly.

Ino coquettishly: "Dad, I'm asking you." After speaking, he "snorted" and said: "I answered this question just now - this kind of sophistry, even if it is covered with a layer of philosophical skin, is sophistry, and you will lose if you think about this kind of question." It will become a logical, thinking shackle that puts people in, and then it becomes extreme, narrow-minded... What a bull's horn! "

Three: .

"This kind of bull's horn tip can't get results. Everything in the world is already in ruins, everything that is seen and heard, creates everyone's cognition, cognition is different, the result is different - but the method of cognition itself is the same - it does not come from sophistry. "

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like