My Boss, the White-haired Nun

What is it that binds you?

morality, law.

When I have money, the law can't restrain me.When I am "extraordinary", morality can no longer restrain me.I often see the kind of villain set by the rich and the young in the novel, saying something like "In such a big society, it is easy for the rich to make a person disappear."It's normal for villains to be bad.However, what is abnormal is that this matter itself seems to have become a reasonable "rule" by default.

The villain is not a villain because he said these things, but he is a villain because he said them to the protagonist.Even when the protagonist in the back of the story gets rich, he starts to become a similar person, but in a more subtle way.

This is terrible.

Because he is subtly instilling in you, "In such a big society, it is easy for rich people to make a person disappear", this kind of thing is correct.

His heart can be punished.

In the first American superhero movies, you rarely saw those superheroes who directly killed someone. They were usually caught and handed over to the police, and then the law judged their crimes.

This is actually instilling a concept - the law is supreme, and only the law is qualified to judge crimes.

Representative characters such as Batman.

This is of course true.

But then those screenwriters let those criminals escape from prison again and again for the comedy and excitement of the story.Once again confronting superheroes and becoming stronger, heroes must be relied on to save the world.

It's certainly storytelling, and there's nothing wrong with the hero saving things.

But few people pay attention to a problem. After obtaining the story itself, one thing that such a plot setting actually implies is——

The law is no longer enough to restrain the bad guys.

So in this case, the persistence of superheroes has become pedantic instead. When facing criminals who are not bound by the law, means beyond the law seem to be the more appropriate method——

Young people who grow up under such stories will of course have doubts about the power of justice.

When it comes to Batman, you have to mention the Joker.This is of course a very classic pair of old enemies. The game between them is very, very exciting and very, very story-telling.

The final outcome is that justice defeated evil. After Batman went through countless sufferings, he still did not give up his persistence and won the final victory.

Seems like a victory for justice.

But it is not.

The screenwriter arranged countless sufferings to increase the twists and turns of the plot, increase the storyline, and highlight the image of Batman as a superhero.

This purpose was certainly achieved.

But the logic of this story is actually——

Because Batman is a superhero, "Superman", he can stick to it.This is where he surpasses ordinary people.

At first glance there is nothing wrong with it.

But this meaning can also be reformulated.

Only those whose will surpasses that of ordinary people can persevere.

What about ordinary people?

It is actually implying that for "ordinary people", if you have gained extraordinary powers and faced enemies who have escaped legal sanction, it is more efficient to apply the same means of violating the law.

There is even a special word to beautify this kind of thinking, called "happy kindness and hatred".

In order to express the will of the superhero, the screenwriter will add a lot of suffering to him.

But in fact, this is also telling many people.

Being "Batman" was exhausting.It's not as refreshing as "Happy Enmity".

So when you regard "Batman" as your standard, you have actually been indoctrinated with two thoughts in your subconscious.

1. The law is not enough to restrain the rich.

2. When you face a bad guy, the most appropriate way is to be worse than him.

If you ask these two sentences decades ago, people will answer you that this is definitely wrong.But under the influence of countless "Hong Kong movies", "superheroes" and "network novels".The correctness of these two sentences among young people is changing, and many people are taking these as truth.

Even when I criticize this matter, you will think I am pedantic.You'll think it's right, you'll think I'm naive, you'll think I'm lacking the beatings of society.

This is actually a very scary thing.

This is a form of cultural indoctrination that makes you lose faith in your country and laws and wears down your collective consciousness.Let you distrust the collective even more and want to be a lone ranger.It became a mess of loose sand.

For example, some ethical films and moral films are often made in foreign countries, satirizing society.At this time, this group will get excited, saying that China has never photographed these things.

But no one realizes that the premise of saying this is that you have acquiesced that there is a problem in this society, but the Celestial Dynasty is too hypocritical and hides it from others.

Does anyone realize how much distrust of China is hidden in this sentence?

Does anyone realize that as a member of the Communist Youth League and a successor of socialism who have received compulsory education all the way, their roots are upright.Who instilled these ideas in you?

For a long time, I have been puzzled by a problem.

I found that contemporary young people lack "awe" and are very violent, especially when they are on the Internet. If they don't understand it, they will curse other people's whole family and death.Such extremely vicious words.

I have been very confused about where the problem is. I thought it was education.It is the unqualified person who is a teacher who leads to the confusion of students' thinking.During that period of time, education has become the blame man in my eyes, and all social problems can be thrown on education.

But then I slowly discovered that this pot can be thrown more accurately.

Most of the problems actually lie in "social education".