Rewrite the Technological Landscape

It is a lithography machine and a chip. This time, the people who eat melon are very happy to see it, but the stakeholders are getting more and more nervous. The lithography machine, the chip, which is not Intel’s lifeblood, The more the quarrel between the two sides, the more panicked a lot of people will be. It’s not a good thing for stakeholders to make things really messy. More people look forward to a friendly environment so that everyone can develop together and make a fortune together.

　　 Especially in the current globalization, more people hope that I can freely choose products that I think are more cost-effective, without worrying about what will happen next.

　　 But recently, some media have begun to write some nervous articles, which probably means that the strength of the Dafeng Group will trigger some further confrontation, how much such confrontation will probably lead to, and what results it will cause.

　　 If people of later generations see what Meng Qian has done, some people will also wonder if it is really appropriate for 2009 to be so rigid. Will it be too anxious?

Again, after 2009, the technological landscape is largely a foregone conclusion. If you want to rewrite the technological landscape, you must be strong in 2009, you must seize the technological high ground, you must seize the market, seize talents, and you can improve your technical level by keeping a low profile. , But instead of competing for the pattern division trend in 2009, in the next ten years, relying solely on the development of technology to confront the next key Silicon Valley of U.S. capital, it is better not to think about rewriting the technological pattern from the beginning.

　　 But for 2009, when the overall national strength is not as good as five or six years later, Meng Qian’s Gang did not completely fail to consider the overall situation. The reason why Meng Qian put the press conference on October 15 was because the current US visit to China was on that day.

　　 Every time someone says something to drive Apple out of China, they will be scolded to doubt their lives. The reason is simple. The sentence is that so many people in China rely on Apple for food and really drive Apple out. What should these people do?

Of course, there are many people who say that Foxconn can increase orders from other mobile phone brands without Apple’s orders, and Apple partners can look for other brands to cooperate. For the time being, no matter how big or how long this impact will last, anyway, at least in terms of short-term benefits, it’s true. The drive to drive out Apple will definitely affect many people. This kind of direct drive out of Apple is somewhat extreme.

　　 So the same logic applies in the United States. When the United States drove Chinese companies out of the United States, American stakeholders related to these Chinese companies will also face this problem. This is also a very extreme approach.

　　 But why didn’t China do such extreme things but the U.S. did it? You can make a bold guess because the U.S. has two parties...

　　 And Silicon Valley is an important base for a certain party.

　　 This may be why when the U.S. government chose an increasingly extreme approach, those technology companies with a large amount of business in China have expressed their opposition, and even kept saying that China is good.

Because it seems that the US government’s approach is suppressing the development of Huaxia Enterprises, and it seems to be beneficial to US technology companies, but the problem is that this advantageous method is too extreme. The world has long been one of you and me. Your situation is now. This is a game that hurts both sides. This is not the way technology companies want to suppress.

Just as the United States suppressed Huawei and ZTE and other companies, resulting in a 30% reduction in Qualcomm’s market revenue in China, Micron Technology reduced its sales in China by 20 billion in a year. Both Qualcomm and Micron have made strong accusations for this, while Microsoft, Intel, and Google And other companies also have different degrees of damage, can they be happy with this kind of trick of killing one thousand enemies and hurting one hundred and eight hundred.

Looking back at history, when Silicon Valley companies and the authorities are the same party, it is obvious that Silicon Valley companies have always been inclined to monopolistic suppression and at least literal suppression. This is the case for the suppression of Europe. It has been almost 8 years. To abolish European science and technology, but from the beginning to the end did not adopt the means of harming both sides, all the way down the European companies, this is also the reason why Europe hates the monopoly of American technology companies, after all, they suffer greatly.

　　 So Meng Qian wanted to let the world see the attitude of the U.S. government when everyone speculated.

Facts have proved that Meng Qian’s prediction is correct. Even though he has been arguing with Intel recently, all the news after his visit to China stated that this was a positive meeting, and there was no mention of Dafeng Group’s relationship with Intel. Things, this makes things more inclined to enterprise disputes, at least on the surface.

　　 Meng Qian believes that in the next few years they will slowly take the approach of suppressing European companies to suppress the Dafeng Group, but Meng Qian has been prepared for such suppression.

　　 Seeing the official attitude of the United States, many people began to focus on technology with relative ease.

　　 Dafeng Group also slowly turned a low profile. Everyone didn’t know what Meng Qian was doing during this period. In fact, Meng Qian has been busy promoting the development of 4G recently. This is the most important thing in Meng Qian’s view.

In accordance with the history of 4G development in the past, the LTER8 version of FDD-LTE and TDD-LTE standards were released in March 2009. The draft LTE standard was completed in principle, and LTE entered the substantive stage of research and development. In October 2009, the International Telecommunication Union A total of six candidate technologies were collected, and then by the spring of 2012, the final approval of the 4G standard was completed.

　　 The world began to increase 4G investment in 2010, and China Xia also started TD-LTE large-scale technology trial construction in six cities in 2010.

The 4G development promoted by Meng Qian in this world is from the inside to the outside. From the overall development of 4G, it has entered the version customization stage in October 2009. If all goes well, the final approval of the 4G standard should be one year ahead of schedule. Even earlier.

　　 Early commercial equipment will also be available in the near future. China has started TD-LTE large-scale technology test construction in 12 cities since the beginning of 2009.

　　 More importantly, under the impetus of Meng Qian, Huaxia solved the two major problems. Starting

　　 One is the density of base stations. At the beginning, China had only 220,000 base stations in 2009, which is not enough for such a large China. It must be developed to at least 400,000 base stations.

　　 In this life, there must be people who remember how Meng Qian fooled Huawei to build base stations to develop 3G. Coupled with the relationship between Dafeng Group and Huawei ZTE in recent years, China Xia now has more than 400,000 base stations.

　　 The second one is the terminal problem. 4G mobile phones, 4G software vendors, and 4G-related chips have constrained China's 4G development for a lifetime.

　　 Now this problem has been solved. Dafeng Group has chip design experience, not to mention mobile phones. Recently, the media has exposed that Hongmeng 4 will be a 4G mobile phone, and other mobile phone brands will gradually follow up.

　　 Meng Qian originally promoted the development of 4G, which is a good thing for China and the world. For the time being, Meng Qian really wants to push the technology in a low-key manner.

　　 It's a pity that the tree wants to be quiet but the wind keeps going.

In November 2009 ~www.ltnovel.com~ the market research company ABI released data on 4G patents. It was this time in the first life. The data at that time was Qualcomm accounted for 24%, Huawei accounted for 10%, and LG accounted for 9%. , Nokia accounted for 9%, Samsung accounted for 7%...

　　 But the data in this life has become Qualcomm accounted for 16%, Dafeng Group accounted for 16%, Huawei accounted for 12%, LG accounted for 8%, Samsung accounted for 5%...

　　 Dafeng Group, who wants to be low-key, can't keep it low.

However, the 4G era is different from the 5G era. There will be no standard competition between Huawei and Qualcomm. After all, Huawei and Qualcomm are not competing with Qualcomm for 5G standards, but for channel solutions. However, in the 5G era, there are Huawei, Qualcomm’s LDPC and France’s three major Turbo2.0 programs can be contended, and the 4G era is much more harmonious on this issue. This is the Turbo program. There is nothing to fight for in the channel program.

Therefore, in the 4G era, what to talk about may be the purest proportion of patents. Whose proportion of patents is larger, especially core patents, even if it is an international standard in name, it will actually be even greater. It has the right to speak and is threatening, just like Qualcomm can lie down and make money and everyone can't do anything about it.

At Qualcomm headquarters, Jacob, who is drinking coffee, has recently watched the confrontation between Intel and Dafeng Group. He feels thief. He also thinks about how to take advantage of the opportunity to pit Intel and Dafeng Group. But who knows that a piece of data directly connects Dafeng Group and Dafeng Group. Qualcomm pushed to the focus of public opinion. The fastest full text of 噺⒏⑴祌 んττρs:/м.χ八㈠zщ.còм/

　　 I eat melon and eat it on my head.

　　...