Saint of the Confucian way

Tears

Zhang Zhongjing's position in traditional Chinese medicine is too high to be measured. He is the first person of true medical ethics. Even after the epidemic febrile disease school became popular, he still respects him as a medical saint.

The book has never denied the status of Hua Tuo, but we should make a clear distinction between Hua Tuo in the romance of the Three Kingdoms and Zhang Zhongjing in traditional Chinese medicine.

Don't say Hua Tuo's position is higher than Zhang Zhongjing. Will you blackmail me and let others see jokes?

My readers can't be so cute.

Not who is famous in the non professional field, who is famous in the professional field. Fame and status are not the same thing.

That's what I said, but a lot of people ran to support it. What hatred do they have with this book.

It's OK to black the book in other ways, but this way really hits my point. Really don't black the book in the right way with wrong attacks. It's too hard.

It's not once or twice.

For example, like Sun Bin's bin, the word "bin" means kneecap. Yes, but there are three kinds of bin punishment: Bin Bi, bin foot and bin punishment. Only bin punishment is to remove the kneecap. As the historical records says, Sun Bin is Bin foot, which means to cut off the lower leg below the knee. This statement has long been popular, but there are still people who oppose it. It has to be said that it is necessary to dig out the kneecap.

Just like one breath equals one second, my setting refers to the time of rapid breathing in the process of fast running. Like "hour", it is a military calculation method. In fact, it is to enable modern readers to have a more specific concept of time and reduce reading disabilities. Even the author's simple intention can't be seen. What's complacent? Manual nose picking.

In addition, hand, foot and mouth disease is a modern disease, not in ancient times. It can be calculated according to pathology. In ancient times, it was children's mouth ulcer and acne. The disease pathology is very similar, but the disease name in later generations is more specific and detailed.

Others accused the six Asian saints in the book of being wrong. King Wen and Xunzi had a high status, so they didn't say it. As for the other four, they are "canonized" figures in the "now" Confucius Temple. Why do some people look down on them? They have to be replaced by others and insist that the author is making up nonsense?

Do you really think I think any disciple of Confucius will canonize others if he likes it or not?

People are not sages. Everyone can make mistakes. I'm certainly not omniscient. I'll change if there is a mistake, but someone is wrong and looks down on others. What does it mean?

It's not that I'm not calm. In fact, I don't want to say this, but I've been repeating these things since the book was issued. I can't hold it for nearly a year.

Alas, this kind of thing, I said, someone must say that your author has a wrong mentality, does not accept criticism, is narrow-minded, how about the remaining evils? I don't say, many readers are misled, and really think I'm making up and taking the fake seriously.

Well, in fact, I'm not very angry, because I'm good at introspection. After all, I was the most ignorant for a while. I also felt that I was very powerful. I didn't have any skills, but I looked down on others' skills.

To say this today is to prevent readers from being led astray by those people. Please take the correct content of the book as the criterion and build a socialist and harmonious yuan continent under the guidance of Confucius, Mencius thought, Xunzi theory, Dong Zhongshu's great unification representative and... Who dare not go on!