Werewolf: I am Tianxiu, you win by lying down

[Player No. 6 please speak]

Player No. 5 is being investigated and killed, and the police badge flow is 9 and 1 is successful.

6 got up and threw a check on 5 who had just spoken. This was exciting.

Judging from 5's speech just now, it seems that he doesn't really want to side with player 2.

Although he said he would not take sides, judging from his attitude towards 3, he should be more inclined towards 2 and 3 wolves.

Even if he doesn't have such intention, others will think that he does. After all, 3 belongs to the No. 2 player on the side, and his 3 is a wolf, which is somewhat like beating a cow from across the mountain.

Because there is a saying that when beating a dog, it depends on the owner. 3 is the younger brother of player 2. If he clicks 3 to be a wolf, it will naturally make people think more deeply.

I don't need to talk about my journey to test Player No. 5, right? I just touched it around me. Anyway, it was either 5 or 7. I didn't think much about it at the time, so I just touched Player No. 5, and I ended up with wolf hairs.

As for the police badge flow of 9 and 1, I must have some ideas. The first police badge flow hits player No. 9 under the police. You can guess it without me telling you. I want to attract votes.

Player No. 4 has entered the first badge stream of Jumping Wolf. Regardless of whether he is a wolf or a good person, I am afraid he will not vote for me. In this case, I can only ask for the vote of player No. 9.

The big deal is a draw. I'm not afraid of talking too much anyway. The more we talk, the better.

So Player No. 9, no matter what, you have to vote for me. Even if you are a wolf, I advise you to fight against the barb. If you dare to cheat the vote, my police will definitely label you a wolf and beat you up.

The reason why the second police badge stream hits player 1 is because 2 lost gold to 1, and I can't tell whether 1 is a good guy or a wolf, so I just put him in the second police badge stream. There is no better candidate for him anyway. The police badge is gone.

And on this board, Digging Wolf may give the Wolf Crow's Claw a golden message, so that the Wolf Crow's Claw doesn't even know who is the wolf teammate and who is the prophet.

Although this will easily attract the attention of the prophet, but think about it on the other hand, many people are not very good at trading wolves, wolves, and gold. They always think that wolves throwing gold and water are just to attract votes.

And this is a loophole that the Wolves can take advantage of. If they do the opposite, it may have unexpected effects.

Of course, I don't want to fight 1 or 2 wolves. I am worried about player No. 1, and I hope that good people will not recognize No. 1 so easily.

Just now, Player No. 5 was playing with Rhythm Disk 1 and Player 2 did not see each other. This is one of the reasons why I can't worry about Player No. 1.

If 1, 2, and 5 are the three wolves, player No. 5 may deceive the good guys and force him to recognize 1.

I don't know if I'm overthinking it. Now let's listen to Player 1's conversation. He's speaking from the first position, so I really can't hear anything.

Player No. 6 talked about the reason why his police badge passed 9 and 1 successfully.

The first police badge stream is purely to attract votes. He wants to ensure that he has at least a tie-vote PK. It is unrealistic to directly get the police badge. No matter whether player No. 4 is a good guy or a wolf, it is impossible to stream with the police badge. The pressure is on him to vote.

Player No. 6 is very clear-eyed. It is already certain that the 4-Diamond Wolves will win the bandit vote, and he cannot turn back. In this case, let him go.

Now he only needs to ensure that he can get the vote of player No. 9, so he puts enough pressure on No. 9. As long as No. 9 dares to get the illegal vote, he will dare to beat No. 9 to the wolf.

The second police badge flow hits player No. 1 because he is worried about No. 1 and always feels that No. 1 may be in the Wolves.

In any case, 1 has taken over the golden water from Jumping Wolves, and 5 is still leading the rhythm plate. 1 and 2 are not on the same side. These circumstances indicate that 1 is likely to be in the Wolves, and he must not be easily regarded as a good player. .

Player No. 3 should be a good person. Although he is on the side of No. 2 and is still canvassing votes for No. 2, his behavior looks like two wolves of No. 2 and No. 3. But judging from the attitude of No. 5 player toward him, No. 3 and No. 5 are Not meeting each other.”

Player No. 5 can say that no matter who is the prophet, No. 3 is in the wolf pit, which is enough for me to recognize Player No. 3.

Unless the player No. 5 on the hard disk is the Claw of Wolf Crow, he doesn't know that No. 3 is his Wolf teammate, so he just wants to play 3 with rhythm as an anti-push position.

But it's a bit too malicious to play the game like this for the police. I'd better identify the player No. 3 first. If he is still a member of the Wolf Team under the police and his speech is not good, then I can only play the game No. 5 is the Claw of the Wolf Crow.

In fact, there are four people in the wolf team, excluding the No. 2 player who jumped hard. If I check that 5 is a wolf, there is a one-third chance that he is the Claw of the Wolf Crow.

Anyway, no matter whether he is a small wolf or a big wolf, we must push him out of the game today. If the small wolf self-destructs in the outside position, it means that 5 is the Claw of the Wolf Crow. Only when the small wolf explodes two can he use his skills. Unlock.”

It makes sense for 6 to recognize player 3. Although 3 is on the side of 2, from the perspective of the common side relationship, 3 and 5 cannot be wolf teammates, unless player 5 is the Claw of the Wolf Crow.

But this would be too hostile to 3. There is no need to forcefully say that player 5 is the Crow's Claw in order to fight 3 as a wolf.

Theoretically it makes sense, and it is indeed possible that such a situation would exist, but it is designated not to be discussed like this now.

If he dares to play the three wolves of 2, 3, and 5, I am afraid that the person in the late position can smash his head.

Therefore, we can only recognize 3 temporarily.

The most important thing is that if the four people in the front position speak, he can't hammer them all, right?

2 is a fierce jump, 5 is a kill, 1 is beaten into the police badge stream by him, and 3 is a wolf. That really offends them all, unless he is crazy to do this.

That's all I'll talk about when I go to the police. I'll repeat it again at the end. Player No. 5 will be killed. Police badge stream 9. 1 goes smoothly. 9 must vote for me for the police badge. That's it. Passed.

[Player No. 7 please speak]

How should I put it? 6 has enough power to kill player 5, but I'm not very satisfied with the logic.

The reason why he is powerful is because he can kill 5 people. It's not like a wolf can do it.

Actually, judging from their speech and behavior, it seems that 2 and 5 do not meet each other. Otherwise, how could player No. 5 push out a good person who is on the wrong side?

Player No. 3 works so hard to canvass votes for No. 2. In this case, 3 is the wolf in the 5th game, which is equivalent to demolishing the wolf teammate. It will make people think that 2 and 3 are both wolves, which is not very logical. .”

The most important thing is that player No. 5 says he won't take sides for the time being, but I think most people can feel that he doesn't really want to take sides.

For a person who is about to join the Wolves, if player 6 is a fierce wolf, it would be great to throw gold water to him to attract votes. If this gold water is thrown out, there is a 80% chance that 5 will be completely pulled down. At that time, it will be equivalent to five players on the field. Alpha wolf.

And tossing him to kill will help him open his eyes. He will become a prophet on the side. For the wolf, this is not a wise choice.

That's why I said that player No. 6 gives 5 the strength to kill. This strength does not only refer to the strength of the killing, but also the strength to 5 the killing.

If I were a wolf, I would give him 5 golden water to drag him into the water. This is better than throwing him a kill.

The first thing Ren Fan said when he stood up was his evaluation of player No. 6.

The investigation is powerful, but the logic is not very good.

According to him, 6's strength is not only reflected in the information of killing, but more importantly, this killing is for player No. 5.

From the perspective of 6 being a wolf, it is not a wise move for him to kill 5.

A person who was about to join the Wolves team was suddenly sent to the Prophet team. Such an operation was very stupid.

Although giving 5 a kill is very likely to push 5 out of the game, but what if 5 has an identity?

Moreover, the statement made by police officer 5 does not sound like he is meeting player 2. If 2 and 5 are two wolves, will 5 fight 3?

In other words, on the 2nd and 5th pairs of wolves, it is quite difficult to use the No. 5 player as a counter-push.

Instead of doing this, it would be better for player No. 6 to kill Ren Fan, and then use his speech to win votes for No. 5. This would be the best.

But 6 chose a more difficult path, that is, to help a good person correct his perspective, that is, to play against the 2 and 5 pairs of wolves that are a bit difficult to play. From this point of view, 6 really does not look like a jumping wolf.

Player No. 6 is strong, but I'm not very satisfied with the logic, because he didn't focus on game 5, which is Wolf Crow's Claw.

When I say this, some people may think that I am nitpicking. The possibility of 5 being Wolf Crow's Claw is relatively small. It is understandable that Police 6 would not be so inclined.

At first glance, this sounds okay, but when combined with the actual situation on the field, it is wrong.

Because the speech of player No. 5 is a bit strange. It doesn't sound like 2 and 5 are wolf teammates who met each other. If 2 and 5 are both little wolves, there is no reason to hit player 3 and say that he is not good at canvassing votes for number 2. of.

There is only one explanation that is more reasonable. 2 and 5 are wolf teammates who have not met each other. Player 5 does not know whether 2 is a prophet or a wolf. 3's speech mentality is not very good, so he wants to take the lead and beat 3 into a counterattack. Push.”

Only this way is reasonable. I say 2 and 5 are two little wolves. I don't really believe it. 2 is not the wolf king. 5 can sell his teammates to hit the hook. There is no wolf king in this board. 5 is 2's wolf teammate. It is only right to give 2 a beating for incitement after following 3’s remarks.”

Even if he doesn't want to charge player 2, he is unlikely to cause trouble. Therefore, as a prophet, 6 should speculate that 5 is the Claw of the Wolf Crow, instead of saying that this possibility is very small.

This is what I am dissatisfied with the statement of player No. 6. If his plate 5 is likely to be Wolf's Claw, and he explains the logic I just mentioned, I will definitely side with him without hesitation.

After all, it must be powerful and logical. If such a prophet doesn't take sides, who else can take sides?

It's a pity that Player No. 6 didn't talk about what I wanted to hear.

To be honest, Ren Fan really hopes that 6 is a prophet. In this case, 5 has a high probability of being the Wolf's Claw. If he touches the Wolf's Claw on the first night and pushes him out of the game, the good guys will have a great chance of winning.

But there is hope, there is indeed a problem with player No. 6's logic, or he is not satisfied with the game.

At best, 6 is not good enough and didn't think of what he should have thought of as a prophet. But at worst, 6 has the wrong perspective and may be a jumping wolf.

Player No. 2 throws gold water to 1. Naturally, the strength is far inferior to that of 6. But if you think about it carefully, if he is a wolf, why not throw a check to 3?

No matter whether you can beat the prophet or not, there is always a chance that you won't. It is unwise to throw gold and water at the person who has just spoken in the previous position. There is a high probability that a good person will be sold.

From this point of view, the behavior of player No. 2 is not consistent with a fierce jumping wolf, and there are 2 and 5 double wolves. 2 should be killed by 3, right?

The most important thing is that 6 hasn't recognized 4 from the policeman yet. Not to mention 2's crazy dialogue with 4 to canvass votes. Judging from the position pattern, if 2, 4, and 5 are the three wolves, there is player No. 3 in the middle. Can you not accept the investigation?

If he didn't answer the check, does that mean that he is most likely not in the Wolves? This logic and idea were not discussed.

So, although the prophet 6 is very powerful, I don't want to side with him when it comes to the police.

2Although this prophet is not very powerful, there is nothing I can criticize in his overall speech.

I'll just stand aside from player No. 2 for now. Your Majesty, I'll listen to another round of speeches. You may change your mind, maybe you won't. We'll talk about it then.

Okay, that's all I want to say to you, police officer. He's a good guy. That's it. That's it.

[Player No. 8 please speak]

The prophet who jumps between 2 and 6 must be on the side of 6. Player No. 7 also said just now that throwing 6 to 5 will kill him very hard. In this case, his prophet's popularity will be great. If he doesn't side with him, Who’s on your side?”

Actually, as 7 said, if player No. 6 is a wolf, will he kill someone who is hostile to the prophet? There is absolutely no need to do so.

If he wants to kill him, it's best to kill him for player No. 7, and then recognize him as No. 5, in order to gain favor with him and win votes. This is only logical.

The fact that 6 can give 5 a kill means that his behavior is not in line with the Wolves' profits, so we can only think of him as a prophet.

Player No. 8 is on the side of 6. In his opinion, 6 should be the prophet.

If 6 is a fierce jumping wolf, there is no reason to kill player 5 unless he has water in his head. A good person who has a high probability of taking advantage of the wolf team, instead of dragging him down, he will advance the prophet team. This Not logical.

Therefore, Ren Fan is right to say that player No. 6 is not only focused on the word kill, but also because the person being killed is number 5.

Comparing the strength of players 2 and 6, there is no doubt that the police officer wants to side with player 6. Any hesitation on his part is a sign of disrespect for the investigation.

Player No. 7 said that the logic of Game 6 was unsatisfactory and there was no prophet's perspective. I disagree with this.

Which prophet comes up and claims that his kill is the Claw of the Wolf? This will give people the illusion that he is trying to arouse the hostility of the good people towards 5, so he forcibly claims that the 5 is the Claw of the Wolf. This The mentality and behavior are not good.”

Although Player No. 5's speech does not sound like he has met with No. 2, it does not rule out that he is trying to create an identity for himself. After all, everyone has different ideas. There is no need to make it sound like he has not met No. 2 just because of No. 5's speech. Yes, it must be the Wolf and Crow's Claw.

What's more, it's not like Player No. 6 didn't mention this. I think he didn't talk about 5 being Crow's Claw just because he thought it was inappropriate for him to have 5 as Crow's Claw.

And the speech of player No. 5 is indeed not very good. He said that there is a problem with player No. 3 helping 2 to canvass votes. How can there be a problem with this? If he stands by 2 and does not help 2 canvass for votes, who is he canvassing for? Is it possible that the so-called standing by the side is just a problem? Just empty words?

Player No. 5 likes to show off. If others think differently than him, he will treat others like wolves and judge others by himself. He gives me the feeling that he is too murderous.

Originally, I thought that 5 might be a wolf, and 6 was thrown to him for investigation and killing. Naturally, I was very willing to stand by 6.

Player No. 8 seems to only agree with Ren Fan's statement that the 6 is thrown to 5 and the killing force is strong, but does not agree with Ren Fan's subsequent remarks that 6's logic is problematic.

He felt that player No. 5 may not be the Claw of the Wolf Crow. Everyone has different ways of playing and thinking about playing with wolves. It is obviously unreasonable to conclude that No. 2 and No. 5 will not meet based on the statement of the No. 5 police officer.

To put it another way, what if player No. 5 is the Claw of Wolf Crow? Who can figure out right away that he is the Claw of the Wolf and Crow who has never met 2? If not, then he is not a prophet?

Ren Chaofan's requirements for player No. 6 are too harsh.

Player No. 8 feels that just by throwing 6 to 5 to kill him, it is enough for people to side with him. Whether the police officer should turn around will depend on the situation at that time.

It would be outrageous for police officer Ren Fan to sideline player No. 2.

“Player No. 7, although you are on Side 2, which is different from my side, I don’t think you are a wolf because your powerful speech against Player No. 6 touched my heart.

Although I don't agree with the second half of your statement, I know that you are not trying to beat player No. 6. You are just too harsh on No. 6.

Do you think that 6, as a prophet, should have thought that 5 is probably the Claw of the Wolf Crow, because 2 and 5 don't look like the wolf teammates they met.

But in fact, not one of the ten prophets would be able to think that Pan 5 is the Wolf's Claw, because most people have a subconscious mind, and the police will not be so complicated.

As I said just now, which prophet would come up and say that the wolf I killed was a big wolf?

Maybe you are right. Player No. 5 is the Crow's Claw. Player No. 6 did not think of this because he is not thinking well, but this does not mean that he is not a prophet. What do you think?

In my eyes, you are a good person who is on the wrong side, and the reason why you are on the wrong side is not that your logic is bad, but that your logic level is too high. If others do not meet your requirements, you feel that the other party is not a prophet, but Sometimes prophets are not as perfect as you think.”

I hope you can turn around, because I heard you must be a good person. If you were a wolf, you would only talk about how the second half of 6 is not like a prophet, but not how powerful the first half of 6 is.

6 is the prophet, and 2 and 5 are wolves. My suggestion is to test player No. 3. If 5 is the Crow's Claw, you can't recognize 3 just because 5 is hostile to 3.

Player No. 1 is most likely a good person, but Player No. 2 may not have the guts to throw gold at his Wolves teammates who have spoken in the front position.

The benefits of doing this are very small, or even almost no benefits, but the risks are huge. It will attract the attention of prophets and good people to 1, and once 1 becomes the focus, it will easily lead to identity exposure.

If the prophet wants stability, he will put 1 in the first police badge to test it out just in case. If this is the case, he will shoot himself in the foot.

So, I think if 1 and 2 don't meet, there is a high probability that player 1 is a good person. Instead of hitting 1 with the police badge flow, it is better to test player 3.

Although player No. 3 may be a wolf, judging from the common relationship, there is a high probability that Player 3 is a good person, so I won't call him a wolf when the police call him, and I will admit it for the time being.

Police officer, let's see if he will look back. If he is still a member of the Wolf Team, he must be put into the first police badge stream for verification.

Police, player No. 4 should be a good person. If No. 4 is a wolf, I'm afraid that No. 2 will throw gold water to No. 1, but to No. 3 to kill. Unless 2, 3, 4, and 5 are wolves in a row, otherwise, 2 will not have no defensive moves against 3.

But the possibility of four consecutive wolves of 2, 3, 4 and 5 is too low, and the police can't test it, so we can only say that 2 and 4 are not two wolves. Player 2 is not so hostile to 3.

Recognize player No. 4, and if the policeman chooses the wolf, it will be a 9. If 9 votes for 6, there is no problem with the policeman's speech. It doesn't sound like a wolf, so you can play the four wolves and call the policeman.

Okay, that's all I want to say to you, police officer. Stand by player No. 6, but don't stand to death. That's it. It's over.

[Player No. 10 please speak]

6 is thrown to 5 to kill. If he stands aside, he will have to play 2 and 5 as two wolves. But to be honest, I don't think 2 and 5 can be two wolves.

If 2 is a fierce jumping wolf, how much profit can he get by throwing gold water to 1? It's better to throw a check to 3 behind the police.

Don't worry about whether you can kill the prophet. As long as you kill the enemy, you will still have the strength. As long as you don't attack the idiot, even if you kill the dream catcher or the alchemy witch, you will still make money.

If the people being checked are civilians, there is a high probability that they can resist being pushed out. Even if the prophet holds the check in the back position, it will not be as powerful as him. When the time comes, the good people will only think that it is a desperate check and kill.

With such a huge profit, Player 2 chooses to throw gold and water to Player 1. Is it like what a werewolf would do?

Player No. 10's side is the same as Ren Fan's. He feels that No. 2 and No. 5 cannot make two wolves.

The most important thing is that the act of throwing gold and water from 2 to 1 is not in line with the Wolves' profits.

Obviously there are a lot of benefits and benefits from throwing a kill to player 3, but 2 just throws gold water to player 1. Only a prophet can do this.

When it comes to strength, essentially speaking, player 2 is really powerful, while player 6 is only superficially powerful.

Actually, in addition to giving 5 a kill, player No. 6 shows that he is very powerful. In terms of logic, he is in a mess.

If nothing else, let's just talk about police badge flow. How can we get 1 and 2 wolves? We also said that it is not ruled out that player 1 is the Claw of the Wolf Crow. 2 will throw gold and water to him and give him a message. If that is the case, 2 just wants to trick player No. 1.

Because this gold water is not so easy to pick up, the late-position prophet will definitely suspect that 1 and 2 may be two wolves. When the time comes, if we try 1, we will not even have a chance to activate the skills, and we will be pushed out of the game. ?”

Player No. 6 can say that 1 and 2 may be twin wolves, and even suspects that 1 is the Crow's Claw. His perspective is explosive.

The other one is the one picked by player No. 7. As a prophet, No. 6 should focus on talking about No. 5 being the Crow's Claw, because No. 5's speech does not sound like he is meeting No. 2.

In the end, player No. 8 said that this was not a breaking point at all. No prophet would insist on asking the police that his investigation was the big wolf.

Okay, let's take a step back. This is not the breaking point of player 6. Then he can't even recognize the 4 under the police. Is there something wrong with his logic?

The conversation between player No. 2 and No. 4, plus the position pattern of No. 2 and No. 4 being two wolves, must have led to the conversation that No. 4 is a good guy with a high probability, but was No. 6 mentioned? No.

Player No. 6 did not reveal the logic of the game. He was very concerned about the logic of the game. I cannot recognize such a prophet.

I even suspect that player No. 6 throws a kill to 5 just to gain strength. After all, most people think that 6 is a wolf and will not throw a kill to a good guy who is about to be on the wrong side. The fact that he can throw a kill to 5 shows that He is most likely a wolf.

Perhaps player No. 6 has this calculation, so in my case, there is no strength in killing 6 to 5.

Player No. 8 is crazy about inciting votes for No. 6. I think No. 6 and No. 8 are most likely two wolves. No. 5 and No. 6 are definitely not on the same side, so No. 5 can recognize it.

Player No. 3 is on the side of No. 2, and he is working hard to canvass votes for No. 2. I feel that his reputation as a gangster is not great. At least today, I can't think of him as a wolf.

And player No. 7 must be a good person. If he and No. 6 were teammates of the Wolves, he would have already rushed to set the pace based on his speech in the first half.

But there is something wrong with the logic of player No. 7 playing 6 again. I think the game was very good and won my heart, so 7 must be a good person. Even if I am on the wrong side, 6 is a prophet, and 7 must be a good person. .”

As long as his trump card is wolf, he won't spend half his time wondering why player No. 6 is so powerful.

Okay, that's all I'll talk about when the police come on. The good guy with the trump card, the No. 2 player on the side, 6 and 8 should be the two wolves, and there are two more wolves before the police come down. That's it, passed.

[Player No. 11 please speak]

I just like the prophet who is killed by Diuzha. This is interesting. The gold water is too boring.

Just listening to what the police officer No. 5 said, I felt that he was being a gangster because I didn't agree with what he said.

When a policeman stands aside, he or she does not simply state his position and attitude. This is just the most basic thing. In addition to these, he also needs to help the prophet in his mind count votes.

Otherwise, why bother commenting on the prophets? Isn't the fundamental purpose just to make good people who are outsiders agree with your logic and then follow your side?

Player No. 3 wants to side with 2. He thinks 2 is a prophet. In this case, it is normal for him to vote for 2 in dialogue 4.

Anyway, I don't feel there's anything wrong with it. There's absolutely nothing wrong with the police standing by to help canvass votes for the prophet I think.

Player No. 5 thinks that 3 is a wolf just because 3 canvassed votes for 2, and even wants to label 3 as a public wolf pit. His behavior and mentality are not good in my opinion.

Player No. 11 seems to be on the side of 6. According to what he said, he wants to side with the prophet who loses the killing. Or in his mentality, he is more inclined to the prophet who loses the killing.

In addition, player No. 5's speech was not good in the first place, and 6's killing was thrown to 5, and his butt naturally sat on 6's side.

Player No. 10 just said that there is a problem with the logic of 6, and there is also a problem with the police badge flow. He should not play 1 and 2 double wolves.

I'm confused, why can't the game be played? Player No. 2 throws gold to 1. The correct logic must be that 1 and 2 don't meet. Player 1 is a good person, and 2 throws gold to 1 to canvass votes.

But what if player No. 2 takes a different approach and wants to lose gold and water to his Wolves teammates as an identity? This kind of routine seems not uncommon, right?

And from the perspective of player No. 6, 2 and 5 are two wolves, and 3 and 5 don't seem to meet each other. He can't tell whether he is a wolf or a good person from the speech of player No. 1. What happened to the police badge stream?

I don't think there is anything wrong with the police badge flow of player 6. Not to mention testing player 3, 3 and 5 pairs of wolves are said to break the sky with a small probability, and 5 with the Wolf Crow's Claw is also a small probability event. Why does player No. 6 have to play 3 and 5 double wolves when he is on the police? Is 5 the wrong 3 for Wolf Crow Claw? It makes no sense at all.

It's normal for player No. 6 to recognize No. 3. His police badge hit No. 3 only to open his eyes. At least that's what I think.

Player No. 3 cannot enter the Police Badge Stream. Players behind the police can listen to the speech. Player No. 9 under the Police has entered the first Police Badge Stream. In this case, is there a better choice than Test 1? Obviously it is there is none left.

As for player No. 6 not recognizing No. 4 as a good person, I feel outrageous. Why should he recognize No. 4 as a good person?

I didn't see the ticket type, and I didn't hear the speech. Why did he want to recognize player No. 4 from a distance? Some people think that No. 4 can be recognized directly, but some people are more cautious. After all, this is Listen game.”

If the co-author does not recognize Player 4, then there will be no prophetic perspective? What kind of logic is this?

What's more, if there are two police officers, 4 and 9, and he recognizes player 4, what will 9 think? He is still counting on 9 to vote for him.

If player No. 9 goes to vote for 2 because he recognized 4, wouldn't 6 be a big loss?

Having said so much, I just want to tell good people that the so-called 6 logic problems are not actually a problem.

But player No. 6 has a strong investigation and killing force for No. 5. No one can deny it.

Player No. 10 said that 6 is about fighting for strength. 2 and 5 cannot be two wolves. I listened to his speech and he was playing 6 throughout the whole article. This is not a good person's mentality. It is more like a werewolf charging with rhythm.

I think 2, 5, and 10 may be the three wolves, and there is a high probability that one wolf is under the police. If the four wolves are under the police, player No. 12 will have to fall into the wolf pit.

I think 1, 3, and 7 are all good people. As far as the current situation is concerned, it is impossible to compare 1 and 2 as wolves, but it is absolutely no problem for 6 police badges to hit 1.

Similarly, you can't play 3 or 5 pairs of wolves until you're sure that player No. 5 is the Crow's Claw.

Although player No. 7 is on side 2, he spoke well, especially the strong logic of 6 in the first half of the game. I particularly agree. A wolf would not talk about this.

So, 1, 3, and 7 have to be put aside temporarily. If there are any problems with them chatting, the police will consider whether they are wolves at that time. That's it. That's it.