Wine and Gun

Armalite: Thank you for your answer.

Quote from: Westland Criminal Secrets Network

Release date: 2017-05-05

As one of the operators of the Criminal Secret News Network, out of interest in the various criminal cases taking place in this city, I have attended many trials of criminal cases, but none of them have such a turning point as the trial of the Slade case. Dramatic, and the way it ended in such an amazing way - this high-profile trial ended yesterday, and many readers who follow this case must have learned about the outcome of this trial from various sources, but I still want to It would be a pity to have missed the details of what happened by fully explaining the cause and effect of the interrogation on the last day of the afternoon.

By now, everyone should know that the prosecution presented decisive evidence on the morning of the next trial: through the autopsy report and the test report of the forensic laboratory, the prosecution pointed out that the murder weapon of the sixth victim of the river dumping case was In Slade's office, it looked like a mountain of ironclad evidence. How shocked were the jury members when the prosecution threw out such details, the parents of some of the victims in the gallery, the mother of the poor little boy who died in the sixth case cried in court Come out.

I, like other bystanders, thought Slade was over at this moment, but apparently the defense's lawyers hadn't given up--during the afternoon's trial, they made several interesting points, one of which was Said that the keys to Stryder's office were backed up with a number of people, including Rowan and Aurelie Delphine of Mean. Of course, this can preliminarily show that it is not only Stryder who has access to the murder weapon, but it is still more difficult to show that the matter is not what he did.

The defense then produced Slade's examination report to prove that Slade suffered from tenosynovitis during the sixth case and was unable to pick up the heavy weapon. As the party who believes Slade is guilty, I actually doubt the veracity of this evidence. Moreover, even if he really couldn't pick up the murder weapon, he might have instigated others to do it in the office. In short, his office is very likely to be the first scene.

However, the scene of Slade standing in front of the jury and trying to pick up the murder weapon undoubtedly left a deep impression on the jury. It can be said that since the year of Simpson's wife murder case, defense lawyers have liked it very much. Playing the trick - who doesn't remember the scene where Simpson clumsily and laboriously tries to put on the gloves that belonged to the killer? Such a scene can obviously leave the jury with the same shock.

Although I have to admit, from what I've observed, Slade does appear to be recovering from tenosynovitis, and his clumsy movements don't seem like a fake. But the point is, how serious was the victim's illness when he was killed? Is he really unable to pick up the murder weapon? Now that his symptoms have gradually recovered, we can only listen to the side of the doctor who testified in court.

When these witnesses put their hands on the bible and solemnly swear, I always feel a sense of humor: I am skeptical of everything, which is one of the reasons I started this website. Exactly so, I always assumed they were lying, and what happened next proved my consistent point.

The two evidences presented by the defense in the afternoon trial were also reasonable, but it seemed that luck would have to rely on them to completely exonerate Slade. At that time, I thought it was 55/50 whether he could be convicted or not. , until the defense brings another witness to the stand.

That's a guy with a criminal record at first sight: bald head, scary tattoos, muscle knots. According to the introduction of defense lawyer Amarette, the gentleman's name is Blake, and he was brought out of prison to testify in this case.

The appearance of such a strange character obviously caught the jury's attention, and I've seen it more or less a few times before: a criminal in prison testifies on a case, and lawyers defend him on the grounds that he cooperates with the investigation Apply for a reduced sentence. It's not uncommon for things like this to happen, and I'm curious how effectively this man in front of him can exonerate Slade?

Even though I have attended so many trials, I still didn't expect the defense lawyer team's brilliant starting point this time.

"Mr. Black," asked Armalette, "do you know Albarino Bacchus?"

I admit that I was so confused by this strange beginning that I sat up straight.

"Yes," said the prisoner, his voice low and hoarse.

The lawyer said, "Tell me about what happened at that time."

"I'm a gangster, and I was in the Norman Brothers' gang before -- ah, at least before I was in prison, it was the Norman Brothers' gang." The man said frankly, causing a murmur in the auditorium: We all know that the Norman brothers were killed as a game by two killers, and then the gang was quickly devoured by their disloyal minions and coveted foes.

And Blake continued: "About seven or eight years ago, I got into a fight with another gangster after a drunken time. It's better to say, I beat him bào and then forget about it. Yes. The next day I found out that the bastard fell dizzy by the side of the road because of the blood loss. It was winter at that time, and of course he died overnight. I was very worried that the police would hold me accountable, but in reality he died. Of course they found me easily - I had a finger tiger on my hand when I punched someone, and I believe the finger tiger left a pretty unique scar on the body of the deceased."

Search [Book Reading Assistant] official address: www.kanshuzhushou.com Millions of popular books are free to read for life without advertisements!