You became a lawyer and sent the judge in

Chapter 131 Straightforwardly, I suspect you of perjury!
Boom boom boom!
On the seat of the trial bench, Wang Jianjun listened to Su Bai's statement.

He looked down at the material evidence of the trial.

Immediately afterwards, he looked at the accused's seat and said:
"With regard to the issues raised by the litigant, does the attorney for the accused party have anything to say...?"

Put the pressure directly on Yan Shang.

After Yan Shang took a deep breath, he realized that he could not continue to talk about this topic or let the other party go deeper.

So he directly changed the topic and led the topic to other places.

"presiding judge."

"I disagree with the litigant's point of view...."

"State your point of view."

Wang Jianjun directly asked Yan Shang to make a statement.

After Yan Shang sorted out the information on his side, he said:
"According to the statements of the parties' lawyers."

"Lawyers for the litigating party are completely shifting the focus of Lin Haoxue's sentence."

"First:"

"According to the original evidence...it has been pointed out that all the criminal suspects are on Lin Haoxue.

It was not stated by the litigant, but because Lin Haoxue discovered the victim's body, he was charged as a suspect. "

"But after a long period of screening and screening of many suspects, it was determined that Lin Haoxue was the biggest suspect at the time, thus confirming that he was a criminal suspect."

Yan Shang explained this point.

He directly denied Su Bai's accusation.

What Su Bai meant was that because Lin Haoxue discovered the woman's body, the law enforcement identified him as a suspect, charged him, and handed over to the prosecution.

This matter, regardless of the original situation is not the case.

But this is certainly unacceptable.

Otherwise, it is easy to create the impression of violating the rules and making accusations at will.

At that time, it will definitely be a more troublesome thing.

So a rebuttal must be made.

After explaining this point, Yan Shang then answered other targeted questions raised by Su Bai.

continue:

"In response to the lawsuit, we do not have strong evidence of Lin Haoxue's crime, but handed him over to the prosecution. We also disagree."

"First:"

"Under the circumstances at the time, all the evidence and suspicions have shown that this crime was committed by Lin Manhao."

"And there is Lin Manhao's confession."

"The fact of Lin Haoxue's crime has been confirmed by our side after repeated investigations and searching for evidence.

It is our responsibility to hand it over to the prosecution.

As for confirming the evidence, it is the responsibility of the prosecution. If the judgment is made, it is the responsibility of the court and has nothing to do with us. "

"The litigant accuses us of negligent behavior, which we believe is unreasonable."

"And, according to the relevant provisions of the law, only after the court's judgment can it be determined that the facts of the crime exist or that the facts of the crime do not exist."

"The court has not made a judgment yet. The litigant said that our policy was negligent in responding to Lin Haoxue's accusation. Are you directly challenging the definition of the law?"

"Why do you believe that Lin Haoxue is no longer a criminal? The court has not passed the judgment yet."

"As for the issue that the litigant said that we did not have strong evidence at the beginning, the presiding judge, we believe that the litigant is completely using one-sided information to induce the direction of the trial."

"There is no strong evidence for what the litigant said, and this statement is complete nonsense."

"The fact that Lin Manhao was convicted of a crime at the time was that the victim's nails contained Lin Manhao's DNA."

"Isn't this strong evidence...?!"

In order not to take the blame on his own side, Yan Shang directly dumped the problem on other parties.

And also asked Su Bai two questions.

Su Bai's eyes fell on Yan Shang.

interesting.…

No wonder I was able to sit across from each other today... just relying on these few rhetorical questions.

Maybe some ordinary lawyers will be overwhelmed.

If you follow the other party's way of thinking.

indeed.

If such a judgment can be made, the three parties, the public security, the prosecution and the law, all have certain responsibilities.

After all, the three parties are related.

Of course.

Su Bai didn't know whether Yan Shang said this on purpose.

The high probability should be... let him not only inquire about one side?
Look at other places?

Su Bai didn't know if there was any other meaning in these words.

It's just... these words are not very friendly to the members of the collegial panel in the trial seat.

If you plead, just plead, why do you want to get rid of the responsibility relationship with other parties?
Wang Jianjun:? ? ?

I don't care if there is any other meaning.

Do you think you can influence my judgment by doing this?

I follow the facts of the law and decide what to do!
I lost the defense in the court trial. Is there any problem in convicting you?

Otherwise, how could the High Court let me, the vice president, decide this case.

After Wang Jianjun heard Yan Shang's defense, he felt a little displeased.

However, this did not affect too much on the subjective judgment of the trial.

Just one sentence, how to judge how to judge! .
.... ...

However... in the face of Yan Shang's questioning.

Su Bai was silently delighted.

It's you who brought up this topic yourself...

I originally wanted to stay behind and talk, but since you said so, then I had no choice but to follow your wishes.

Yes!
There is indeed Lin Manhao's DNA in the nails of the victim's woman. If you say so, it is indeed strong evidence.

But you can accuse a person of a crime with one-sided evidence? !

Why? !

What does the legal definition say? !
Can a person be convicted of a crime just by DNA verification?
You don't know how this DNA came from?
After the trial has progressed to this point, the defense and progress of the parties to the lawsuit are all about the evidence and whether the evidence complies with the rules of the procedure.

dong dong!

"The litigant is invited to make a statement."

"Good judge."

Su Bai said: "May I ask the accused, you said that you interviewed many people and locked up many suspects. Is there any evidence to prove it?"

"Also. Our side did not conduct the induction trial one-sidedly. The strong evidence mentioned by the accused refers to the DNA inspection report."

"The DNA identification report is indeed a strong piece of evidence for the general situation."

"However, according to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, the meaning of evidence and the legal category."

"which states:"

"Materials that can be used to prove the facts of a case are all evidence, including physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, victim statement, criminal suspect, defendant's confession and explanation, expert opinion, inspection, inspection, identification, investigative experiment, etc. Transcripts, as well as audio-visual materials and electronic data.”

"DNA identification is evidence, but according to Article [-] of the Criminal Procedure Law, there are also clear regulations on the scope of evidence."

"Evidence must be verified to be true before it can be used as the basis for a verdict. The result of the appraisal is not the final conclusion. It still needs to be reviewed and judged by the relevant departments through the judiciary in conjunction with the whole case and other evidence. After verification, it can be used as the basis for the verdict."

"However, in this case, during the review stage, the facts were not directly determined in combination with other evidence, and the factual basis of Lin Haoxue's crime was determined directly through the DNA test report, which is obviously not in line with the legal basis."

"at the same time."

"According to our client Lin Haoxue's statement, he had already stated and explained the source of the blood on his body at that time."

"The statement of the criminal suspect is a key source of evidence in the evidence."

"When there is a conflict of evidence, according to the law, it should be verified to be true. In other words, the source of the blood on Lin Haoxue needs to be verified to confirm that the DNA identification report is correct."

"Only relying on a DNA evidence does not represent a strong evidence."

"Similarly, if only one piece of DNA evidence is produced, and the statement of the criminal suspect is not verified, the procedure violates the rules. How can the DNA report be determined to be accurate?"

"In other words, we question the legitimacy of the source of the DNA report!"
.
....
Now it's time to start questioning the veracity of the evidence
Su Bai made statements from the types of evidence defined by law to the interpretation and application of the Supreme Court's guidance.

Combine the case again.

The last sentence formed a sentence of explosive killing.

Without considering the whole picture of the case, how to identify the criminal suspect based on a DNA report alone..?

In any case, it can only be said that DNA is used as the main evidence, not the only evidence.

Now that the criminal suspect has put forward his own explanation, it needs to be verified, and the next trial and judgment can only be carried out after verification.

It's okay if the suspect can't come up with other evidence and explanations.

With explanations and rebuttals.

The suspects are already questioning the origin of your DNA.

You still talk about DNA, then I have to question the authenticity of the source of your DNA report!

This point, Su Bai originally planned to mention it later.

But he didn't expect Yan Shang to directly bring it up, so he would be blunt and just go ahead with it.

Actually.

From the dossier and evidence above.

Su Bai has always had doubts about this DNA test.

You have done the DNA test, and you have confirmed the facts of Lin Haoxue's crime.

Do you still care about spending a little time to investigate the source of the bloodstains that Lin Manhao said?
Normally not!

To know.

Not to verify the relevant important testimony provided by the criminal suspect, which is considered a major violation in the process.

If the lawyer proposes it in court, the court will basically decide that the evidence for the accusation is insufficient and the prosecution will lose the case.

The main evidence is there.

You are still working so hard, you insist on violating the rules.?

Among them, if there is no problem, who will believe it?

This is the mutual supervision of the three parties!
Such a big process loophole, don't you know?

Impossible not to know...

Impossible not to know... Another question arises.

tsk tsk...

What the hell is this not an unjust, false or wrongly decided case? !
.
.... ...

After Su Bai questioned, Yan Xiang broke out in a cold sweat.

This question... is indeed a difficult one.
.
.... ...

at the same time.

Outside the court hearing, in Luo Daxiang's live broadcast room, many enthusiastic water friends left messages and comments.

"Good guy, I call him good guy, isn't the most exciting thing coming?"

"Hahaha!"

"This question is simply utterly utterly questioned. It directly questions the source of the evidence. If this is not handled well, I think the career of the accused lawyer will be over."

"Based on Lawyer Su's question, I think there is a certain problem with this. Otherwise, Lawyer Su wouldn't have asked directly."

"However, in this wave, I think the defendant's lawyer got himself involved. If he didn't bring up any DNA, Lawyer Su might not question this point."

"But if you bring it up now, the other party can't answer well, but it's really the end of your career as a lawyer."

"Indeed... When I first heard the question raised by the defendant's lawyer, I was still thinking, did lawyer Su overturn this time? Waiting for this to come out!"

"Hahaha!"

"At first I thought so too, but after thinking about it, how could Lawyer Su overturn because of this!"

"Lawyer Su: Damn it, the lawyer opposite is sending you a big gift!"

"Hahaha……."

"Ms. Luo, what do you think of this trial? Is there something wrong?"

"Yes, yes, Mr. Luo, what do you think?"

"..."

Facing the fans' inquiries, Luo Daxiang said with a smile: "At present, it seems that the litigant side has a certain advantage, but the specifics still need to be further confirmed through court trials."

What Luo Daxiang said was a little vague, but he had already determined in his heart that there were certain problems in this case.

But he's live streaming...

The trial has not yet ended, so it is certainly not possible to directly say that this case is a wrong one.

at the same time.

Jiangdu, in a community.

After hearing Su Bai's question, Hu Yulong was stunned for a moment.

Watching the live broadcast of the trial.

No...is this question raised so sharply?
What did Yan Xiang do!

It's like this to file a lawsuit!
It was pretty good at the beginning of the questioning, but later on, the other party turned back.

What's going on here?

Hu Yulong rubbed his brows irritably, and stared at the live broadcast of the trial.

There can be no problems in this case!

otherwise.…

Thinking of the consequences, Hu Yulong couldn't help shivering...
But he can't do anything now, he can only pin his hopes on Yan Shang.

Hope to be able to rebut it.

Hu Yulong looked nervous and didn't say anything more.

Simultaneously.

Kong Jiantu, who was on the prosecutor's seat, couldn't help but secretly rejoice in the face of Su Bai's offensive statement.

so far so good.…

Fortunately, he didn't get involved in this matter.

Otherwise, after the trial is over, his identity as a public prosecutor will be lost.

Not only must it be lost, but it is also very likely to cause other unexpected things...

hiss.…

The top domestic criminal lawyers are indeed awesome!

Kong Jiantu said silently in his heart, and also hinted that he must be cautious in his words and deeds in the future.

If you can say less, you can't say firmly.

call.…..
.... ...

In court.

Yan Shang had already adjusted his emotions and raised his head slightly to look at the courtroom.

Li Xuezhen looked at Yan Shang with a small face excitedly.

When he noticed that someone was looking at him, Yan subconsciously looked towards Li Xuezhen.

???

What is this for?
.
 …
Trial desk.

On the presiding judge's seat, Wang Jianjun listened to Su Bai's statement.

Frowning slightly, he looked at the other two judges.

Zhou Yun and Zhu Chaoyang nodded slightly, and Wang Jianjun rang the gavel and said:
"Now, let's summarize the points of dispute between the litigant and the accused."

"The litigant believes that the accused handed over to the prosecution without substantive evidence, which did not conform to the process, had certain negligence, and determined that its evidence had certain errors."

"The defendant believes that there is no error. The key point of no error is that the DNA identification is the main evidence, and the DNA identification is used to refute the problem of the first-instance judgment."

"Does the prosecution have anything to say?"

Kong Jiantu: I don’t even have time to hide, so what?Did not say.

Kong Jiantu knew in his heart that he had nothing to do with this trial.

If you talk too much, there will be other things.

So shut up or shut up.

"Judge, we have nothing to say."

dong dong!

"Ok!"

On the presiding judge's seat, Wang Jianjun sounded the gavel.

"The point of dispute between the two parties is whether the DNA test can constitute factual evidence for Lin Haoxue's guilt. Do the litigants and the accused have any objections to this point?"

Su Bai: "We have no objection."

Yan Shang: "We have no objection."

"Well, neither side has any objection to this point, so let's plead against this point."

"Does the litigant have anything to say?"

Su Bai said: "Our side questioned the authenticity of the DNA report submitted by the accused."

"We request the other party to confirm the complete process and accuracy of the DNA identification report to verify whether the DNA process violates the rules...is it perjury!"

Boom boom boom!
"application passed!"

"Now the accused party, please provide the accuracy of the real DNA report and the complete process."

"Ok."

Yan Shang nodded and opened his mouth, and then handed the prepared materials to the staff around him.

After the presiding judge Wang Jianjun read it, he handed it over to Su Bai.

Su Bai just browsed through it roughly, and asked another question: "I would like to ask the defendant's agent, how can you verify that this DNA report is not forged?"

"What do you mean? The authenticity of this DNA report has been verified by relevant agencies, and there will be no problem. If you think there is any problem, you can conduct the verification again."

Facing Yan Shang's explanation.

Su Bai stared closely at Yan Shang's face.

You pretend you don't understand, right?

Pretending to be ignorant, right?...

Is this what I'm asking?
What I am asking is, how do you determine whether your DNA report is a process forgery?
explain more clearly.

Is this DNA report framed?Don't pretend you don't understand!
ps: Ask for a monthly pass~

　Thank you for the reward, sorry, I was thinking a little more today, but suddenly something happened...

　　
　
(End of this chapter)