Revolution 1938

()Chapter 47

The meeting room fell into silence. For Communist Party members, when their ideals and role models are ruthlessly destroyed, the blow to them is definitely more harmful than the long march across the snow-capped mountains.

The industrialists in China began to accept the real proletarian revolutionary thought after the gunfire of the October Revolution mentioned in those revolutionary documents. In their minds, the Communists of the Soviet Union were their bright lights, that is, Their role models, all the industrialist revolutionary fighters in China almost followed the method established by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and worked hard to build a republic in their hearts to save this seriously ill country from fire and water.This is also the reason why the fire of China's revolution will never go out.

Today, however, the top decision makers of the party learned about the demise of that great country from the narrations of two future visitors, and they also knew that the country they knew was not as great as they imagined.

"Perhaps, all the leaders here will ask, is class struggle really unnecessary?"

After Li Kaixin waited for a while, seeing that no one spoke, he continued.

"No, of course not, class struggle is an inevitable outcome of the development of human society, and it can never be eliminated. I think on this point, all the seniors here must be clearer than me.

But what I want to say is that class struggle is not the so-called bloody struggle of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. From the perspective of human instinct for beautiful things, class struggle cannot be a pure bloody struggle.

"How can a revolution be bloodless? This is a fact that a large number of predecessors have already proved with their lives." Seeing Li Kaixin start to talk about the essence of revolution, such as class struggle, Zhang Luofu, as a theoretical researcher of the party, naturally start talking

"Yes, when there are fierce conflicts between two classes, no matter whether one of them is willing or not, the other will naturally take drastic counter-revolutionary measures centered on eliminating the other party's vital forces.

But please note that counter-revolution here is a neutral word, which is opposite to the word revolution.

Why do you say that?Because for the two classes that may be in opposition, the other party is a counter-revolutionary of one's own side, and one's own actions are of revolutionary significance from its standpoint, which is determined by the position of the class itself.

However, does class struggle necessarily use violence to achieve the destruction of one class by another?We can now take a look at how the typical class struggles in history came about

The first typical class struggle was the French Revolution. Do all the leaders here have any objections to this? "

"That's right, that's the germ of the proletarian revolution, the beginning of the path for the advanced elements of the bourgeoisie to discover the proletarians." Zhang Luofu pushed down the glasses on his nose and said seriously.

"Yes, the French Revolution, whether it is the Western bourgeois historians or the proletarian historians, thinks it is a class revolution, because it is a pure bourgeois revolution. Because he laid the path for the current Western bourgeois government to lead the country, no Western country will deny him, and thus let us see the essence of class struggle more clearly.

But is class struggle necessarily bloody and violent?No, to a certain extent, apart from the French Revolution, the bourgeois revolutions in almost other Western countries did not have excessive bloodshed. Why? "

"Because, the feudal aristocracy retreated and compromised!"

"Yes, the chairman is right. The feudal aristocracy retreated and compromised. Why?"

"Because the people are not on their side."

"Yes, because of the people"

"From ancient times to the present, all peasant uprisings or regime changes can be called class struggles, because the class represented by the people at the bottom abandoned the ruling class. Why did they abandon it, because the people at that time could not live normally. Or to use Marx and Engel's theory, the productivity at that time could not meet the needs of the growing people.

Whether in the East or the West, in the era of feudal dynasties, all class struggles were manifested as struggles between the feudal aristocracy or the landlord class against the peasants and small business owners at the bottom, and the struggle between these two classes ended in military struggle. of!Why, because of power.

Let's look back at the class struggle between the bourgeoisie and the feudal aristocracy. Why, except for the French Revolution, other countries are moderate, non-violent, and less bloody revolutions, also because of strength. "

"Because the bourgeoisie has power?"

"Yes, Boss Zhu is right! Power, this power does not refer to military power, but refers to a more advanced productive force compared to the hostile class.

When it comes to productivity, I believe that everyone here is familiar with Marx and Engel's theory and understands it more thoroughly than I do. However, why are productivity divided into advanced and backward?That's because the productivity itself has the characteristics of the times and development, and only the emergence of advanced productivity can promote the real progress of society.

For example, it can be seen from the history of our country that although the struggle between the feudal landlord class and the bottom-level peasants and small property owners has continued, because the advanced nature of the two sides is not obvious in terms of productivity, every time the peasants revolt or change the dynasty, it is a change. Drugs are nothing more than improving the skills of governing.And was there no class struggle in those prosperous times?No, it's just that the ruling class noticed the contradiction between the two classes and tried to ease it.

Therefore, despite countless historical reincarnations, due to the lack of advancement in productivity, the class struggle in our land is always accompanied by large-scale social unrest and bloodshed.Often it is always one group trying to physically eliminate another group to achieve victory in the struggle.

After the struggle is over, due to the lack of advanced productivity, the ruling class often uses various means to cleanse the dissidents that may exist within the class. Why, because these people are the witnesses of the struggle, they know the essence of the struggle, so they can easily relaunch the struggle.

What's more, why was the ruling class unwilling to popularize education to the broad masses of the people in the feudal era, whether in the East or the West?Because education will allow the people to clearly understand the nature of class struggle and easily grasp the relatively low-end productivity at that time, and also because it will threaten the exploitation of the people by the ruling class.Therefore, when a struggle breaks out between two groups with similar productive forces, it will inevitably be bloody and violent.

Let's go back and look at the bourgeois revolutions in the West. Why do they often adopt relatively moderate methods in their struggles?Because in the balance of power between the feudal aristocracy and the bourgeoisie, the productive forces represented by the bourgeoisie are much more advanced than the feudal aristocracy.

In the era of industrialization, the bourgeoisie mastered the production technology and materials of large-scale industrial production, and their ideas were more acceptable to the people than the feudal aristocracy. Therefore, in most Western countries, not only their people, but even Even most of the feudal aristocrats have joined the bourgeoisie. The feudal aristocracy has no resistance at all. If it goes against the times, it will inevitably lead to the doomsday of the French Revolution. Therefore, most of the feudal aristocracy in the West The aristocratic class has adopted a constitutional monarchy or a parliamentary system to peacefully evolve into a bourgeois state.

And this phenomenon is actually an extremely important reference for us workers, why?

Let's further analyze the proletarian revolution. The only victory of the proletarian revolution occurred in Russia. Comparing the two parties in the struggle at that time, since Russia was the country with the lowest degree of industrialization in the West at that time, the productive forces controlled by the Bolshevik Party at that time Not much more advanced than what the ruling class had mastered at the time.

Even when the revolution broke out, due to World War I, the degree of industrialization in Russia had been weakened to the extreme. At the same time, due to war and hunger, both parties in the struggle could not bring benefits to the Russian people at that time, so it can be said that regardless of In terms of whether productivity is advanced or strength, there is actually no difference in strength between the two parties at that time.If the society at that time was not on the verge of collapse, it is not clear whether the revolution was successful.

But why, when the struggle was won, did Soviet Russia have to resort to bloody suppression to prevent the restoration of the original class?Because the productivity of the Bolshevik party was not much advanced at that time!Therefore, it was not possible for all classes in Russia to follow willingly.Therefore, in order to ensure that the fruits of the revolution were not stolen or overthrown, the Soviets at that time naturally adopted bloody suppression to maintain their rule.This is both a helpless choice and the only choice. "

"You are talking nonsense, you are slandering!" Hearing this, Qin Bangxian, who was sitting in his seat frowning, couldn't help but jumped up.

"Perhaps Political Commissar Zhang's use of the word productivity is indeed too academic or a bit out of touch with reality. Although Marx said that the development of productivity is the driving force of all class struggles, it is always a bit confusing to use productivity to explain related phenomena. .

In fact, the status quo of the Soviet Union can be explained in terms that everyone can understand. After the victory of the October Revolution, the Soviet government did not change the poverty and backwardness that Russia had shown at that time. of people are not getting what they want.

Even after the revolution, the living conditions of the lowest class, such as peasants, became even worse. In order to maintain the livelihood of urban residents, the Soviet Russian government even forced the peasants to hand over the surplus for the winter. He was shot or exiled for the crime.

To put it bluntly, for the complete industrialization of Russia, the Soviets adopted the method of scissors directly to the peasantry, forcing the peasantry to disappear or enter the cities to become the working class. of farmers are transformed into agricultural workers to achieve the goal of agricultural industrialization.In this regard, the methods adopted by the Soviets are not fundamentally different from the British cannibalism.

I don't know how the heads of state understand this approach, but in my understanding, this is not socialism, let alone industrialism, and it is clearly an act of banditry.A doctrine that does not allow all people to live a good life is not a good idea. Only brutal imperialism or capitalism can do this kind of behavior.If industrialism does the same thing, then it doesn't matter if it doesn't. "

Xia Haian's words immediately made the atmosphere of the scene more dignified and subtle. Everyone's face changed from cloudy to cloudy, and they kept silent. On the face of Qin Bangxian who just jumped up excitedly to refute, the chao red blood permeated the dark sallow His face looked so unnatural.

From Li Kaixin's point of view, there was a feeling of wind and rain in the venue at this time, and the situation became more complicated.