Revolution 1938

() The atmosphere in the entire venue has been deadlocked and silent!The flickering beam of light from the projector reflected scattered rays of light in the cigarette smoke permeating the room, reflecting the faces of everyone in the room pale.It makes the atmosphere in the house more intense.

"What Comrade Hai'an said just now is indeed the truth. In fact, I think all the leaders here are very clear that these problems cannot be avoided." Seeing that everyone was silent, Li Kaixin decided to break the deadlock.

"As for the status quo of the Soviet Union, for all the heads of state, before we appeared, it was indeed as you know, it is a model for the proletariat of the world to learn from. Why? Because the Soviet Union is the only one that has hardly any outside help. A country that relies on the strength of its own proletariat to achieve the victory of the proletarian revolution is indeed worthy of our example.

However, the victory of the proletarian revolution in the Soviet Union does not mean that we, China, must follow exactly the same path.Why?We are going to talk about the essence of class struggle.

There are multiple forms of class struggle, mainly economic struggle, political struggle, ideological struggle, and violent struggle. The first three are Marx's theories, while the fourth is Comrade Ulyanov's summary.

According to Marx's theory, the proletarian revolution should start with economic struggle, and at the same time carry out political struggle, and use ideological struggle as the driving force to realize the struggle with the bourgeoisie, and finally realize that the proletariat controls the superstructure of the country and realizes that the country resembles society. change of doctrine.

Why did Marx say that, because these are summed up from bourgeois revolutions, most of the bourgeois revolutions in western countries almost use this method to realize the transition from the feudal dictatorship to the capitalist system.There are very few violent revolutions, and even if there are, there are almost no riots in the whole society or the phenomenon that the society is on the verge of collapse. "

"What about the French Revolution? Isn't it?"

"The French Revolution was actually a real violent revolution that only happened in Paris. At that time, there was no phenomenon that the society was on the verge of collapse in France. After all, most of the nobles and people in the French society at that time supported the revolutionaries. Therefore, in addition to Except for those stubborn royal families and great nobles, there was basically no bloody violence in the whole French society. Instead, what was really bloody was the disputes within the bourgeoisie afterwards. This has to be said to be a very great irony.

Looking at other countries, Germany is the Kaiser's automatic parliamentary reform, Britain is the automatic constitutional monarchy, and even Japan relies on the Bairi Reform to realize its constitutional monarchy system, although Japan itself has strong feudal remnants, But it has to be said that the current dominant force in Japan is still the bourgeoisie.

Besides, the United States, this country is actually not much different from our country, it is just a colony, so when their bourgeoisie defeated the external colonial forces, the opposing classes in the country became the gap between the industrial bourgeoisie in the north and the slave bourgeoisie in the south. struggle, and these two classes are themselves bourgeois, and there is no obvious advancement or backwardness among the productive forces they master, so in the same way, in the end, they have a violent revolution that has swept across the country. "

"Do you mean that the class struggle ends in a violent revolution? It must be that the forces between the two opposing classes are relatively consistent."

"No, it's not power, but the advanced nature of productive forces. Power is not absolute. In a certain period of time, the class represented by backward productive forces may have greater power, but it cannot be said that the class representing advanced productive forces It cannot be overthrown.

Let's take an example. During the [-] Revolution, was the bourgeoisie in our country really more powerful than the Qing Dynasty?I can't see it, and I believe all the chief ministers here have witnessed it, and they know it better than me. "

"Yes, the Qing Dynasty did not lack power during the [-] Revolution, what they lacked was popular support."

"Yes, as the Prime Minister said, popular support, what is popular support? Before the rise of the bourgeoisie, the Qing Dynasty did not have popular support. No, didn't those Qing generals who died in the Sino-Japanese War of [-]-[-] relied on popular support? To put it bluntly, people's hearts are the recognition of the productive forces held by a class. Therefore, when the bourgeoisie did not grow up on the land of China, the people's hearts were still on the feudal class.

Peasant uprisings such as the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom and the Small Knife Society seem to be opposing the Qing government. They are the revolution of the oppressed peasantry against the feudal aristocracy. However, they do not represent advanced productive forces, but are also supported by the feudal aristocracy. Although they were the oppressed class when they started the struggle, so the revolution always went smoothly at the beginning, but as time went by, they gradually exposed the characteristics of the productive forces they really represented.Therefore, in the end, their original oppressed class inevitably abandoned them. The final results of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom and other revolutions can already explain the problem.

From another perspective, the power of the proletariat represented by our Chinese Labor Party cannot be compared with the current superstructure, but why have we come over the years and gradually gained a firm foothold? Why, Because our Chinese Labor Party itself represents a more advanced productive force, but why are we now adopting the same method of violent revolution?Because between us and the productive forces represented by the bourgeoisie, the advantage is not obvious.So most of them are not willing to accept us”

"Comrade Li Kaixin, you just said that our party represents advanced productive forces, and that there is not much difference between the productive forces represented by us and capitalists. Isn't this contradictory?"

"Yes, it is contradictory. Why? Because of the difference between reality and ideal. What is the ideal of industrialism?"

"Realize an industrialist society, realize the equality of all, realize the high development of social productive forces, and greatly enrich material wealth"

"Yes, this is the highest ideal of our industrialists. Because of this ideal, our party represents the highest development goal of mankind at this stage, and the productive forces we represent are the most advanced.

However, there is a gap between ideals and reality. The fact is that the productivity we have now is basically the same as that of the bourgeoisie, and we have not actually produced subversive productivity with them.As a result, we are on par with the bourgeoisie in terms of productivity.

And this gap between ideal and reality can tell the bourgeoisie that we will inevitably replace them, and it can also tell the bourgeoisie that this is the best moment for them to eliminate us and prevent us from replacing them. Therefore, the assets that control the superstructure of the country at this stage The class has chosen the simplest and most effective means of suppression, which is violence, so we also have to use violence to give back to each other. "

"Comrade Kaixin, according to what you said, what kind of situation is it that we are now cooperating with the Republican Party to fight against Japan?"

"Boss Zhu, as I said just now, class struggle has different forms and targets, because the starting point of class struggle must be the contradiction between advanced productive forces and backward productive forces, and the contradiction itself also has primary contradictions and secondary contradictions. Yes. When there is no external force intruding, our contradiction is the contradiction between the proletariat’s pursuit of advanced productive forces and the vested interests represented by bourgeois productive forces. Since the former will inevitably replace the latter, our actual productive forces With no difference, they finally embarked on the road of violent revolution.

However, with the invasion of Japan, our people's demand for national sovereignty exceeds the pursuit of productivity. Why, because national sovereignty is above everything else, all doctrines must bypass the issue of sovereignty. "

"We industrialists are for the realization of the equality of the people and for the destruction of the country. How can we put national sovereignty above communism?"

"Yes, Chief Qin is right. The ultimate goal of our industrialism is to realize the rise of the proletarians of the world, destroy the country, and finally realize the disappearance of ruling tools, and finally realize that the government truly serves the people. However, this Is it the reason to support the war of aggression?

When we industrialists talk about the destruction of the country, we do not mean that we still need to use aggressive wars to destroy other countries, but that we want the proletarians of those countries to stand up and destroy the superstructure that oppresses them, and establish their own services. Fu, so the essence of what we call eliminating a country is to eliminate the ruling class that oppresses the people in this country, and realize the equality of everyone in this country.It's not about encroaching on the country's territory.Not to mention that the national borders are eliminated in this way, and the relationship between countries is no longer considered.

The territorial sovereignty of a country has always been the core interest of a country. In this regard, no ruling class can bypass it. Whether it is the bourgeoisie ruling the country or our proletariat leading the people, we must ensure the integrity of our country’s territorial sovereignty. Whoever betrays the national interest in this is the sinner of this country and will be cast aside by the people of the whole country. This is not something that the so-called doctrine can override.

Why do we believe in industrialism? Isn't it to find a bright future for our country and to let the people of our country live a good life? If we can't even guarantee the core interests of our country, let our people Living in a state of being bullied and humiliated by foreigners, what qualifications do we industrialists have to say that we represent the most advanced productive forces?

Therefore, when the Japanese invade our country and let our people live in dire straits, we must unite all classes, all political parties or organizations in the country to fight the invaders to the end, no matter whether there is any relationship between these classes or not Contradictions, at this time, we must let go of everything, put aside the contradictions, unite, fight against those invaders, and ensure the unity and integrity of our country. "