Blood Source Era

This guy can't be so stupid, he has no idea what the situation he is seeing is about.

Everyone is determined in their own hearts at this time.

He just pretends to be a mad fool in his heart.

Thought that others would not find the kind of behavior he did at this moment.

Everyone was clearly at this time, so he began to feel insulted at the actions he showed.

But if you think about it, how is this possible?

Obviously everyone, at this time, has almost clearly realized what he is doing.

He clearly understands these things that have been presented in front of people's eyes, and the expression of right and wrong is what it looks like.

Is still out of a greedy need for things that he may have, and has his own judgment.

Let the problem begin to feel like it is inappropriate, and the understanding and handling of the problem has changed.

Is natural, so that what can be thought of later seems to be a more satisfactory kind of appropriate explanation of the problem.

Is also in such a state that it is no longer necessary to have other satisfactory analysis and handling of problems.

Everyone seems to have a problem deep in their hearts at this time.

Seems to be the most basic understanding of the clear recognition and handling of the problem.

Looks like the most satisfying kind of situation, so it will have a proper explanation and ideal expression.

'S perception of satisfactory approval of the problem is exactly what it is.

When the situation is the same, there is still other understanding of the problem.

Other thinking, it should often be that there will be no other misunderstanding or handling doubt at this time.

In such a situation, he basically realized that almost his own judgment is a time for a correct understanding of the problem or understanding.

Start to face the problem again, so what kind of a more effective understanding of the problem.

Follow-up hesitation, there is a kind of explanation that can be carried out by people who can make a very good understanding or thinking of men's shoes?

Is actually very simple, it seems purely because of the nature of the problem, so it has a judgment.

The follow-up understanding and clear thinking are completely gone. Too much will make people feel like a clearer satisfaction of the problem, or the processing of understanding.

So what can be done afterwards is still more satisfying, a kind of action or thinking explanation that the problem will therefore show.

Almost what can be derived from the problem finally faced seems to be the purest satisfaction of the problem.

The expression after becomes that there is no need for other explanations.

Make such an action, the meaning of the expression itself makes people feel too strange.

But what he might think of, he thought he felt like a correct understanding of the problem and hesitation about the judgment and cognition of the situation.

What means at the moment seems to be more ideal, the way to deal with the problem and the means to deal with it.

The outcome itself may mean that the end is gone, and there are too many more ideals or treatments for the problem.

Start, and then face what is happening in front of you, which deserves to be dealt with by yourself.

What kind of things are being carried out, such as a more clear discussion of appropriate explanations and reflections on the problem.

The rest of the actions will often no longer need to be more hesitant about the problem, or to understand and deal with the improvement of the action.

Then, when you first go to the problem, what you can produce seems to be more pure satisfaction with the problem and preparation for handling it.

Will also find out at this time what kind of ideal can be drawn from the heart to the problem, which seems to be more clear about the problem.

And clear cognition, what other more purely satisfactory explanations of the problem, or analytical doubts?

Actually these conditions can be manifested in itself, those who think they are more reasonable and very good, ideal statements about the problem.

Is not much at all, so a lot of people are worth doing, it seems to be more satisfied, it is necessary to think about or understand the problem.

After the entanglement and judgment will be communicated so it becomes unnecessary to have too many other suitable explanations for the problem that cannot be determined by yourself.

It seems that this kind of problem itself is worthy of understanding and clarity, and the most satisfactory and careful analysis of the situation means that the consideration itself becomes a sense that makes no sense.

The action itself does not need to make people worth going any more. It cares about other problems that arise from the problem and their own indeterminate understanding and understanding of the situation.

Even considering what is happening in front of you, or what it means to end, what kind of situation is that, and think of the thoughts that come from your heart for the problem.

The final entanglement will often become so at this point that there is no longer any need for other misunderstandings, or guesses of understanding.

Will be folded in the end, it seems to be a more appropriate kind of situation, so it will show a frank explanation and understanding of the treatment.

Will need again, and then let people have a kind of seemingly clearer understanding of the appropriate understanding or understanding of the problem.

Therefore, it is relatively reasonable to draw what is happening in front of you to see a clear understanding of the problem or a clear understanding of the problem or to understand the problem. What about the response?

Is the kind of situation that will manifest itself in such a situation, and the action no longer needs to have anything else.

Faced with the problem can not proceed, it seems like more appropriate understanding of the problem and recognition of thinking.

Finally, think about the kind of analysis that can be derived at this time, so it seems to be the most careful understanding of the problem and judgment.

From then on, what can be drawn seems to be a more pure one, with a very clear and satisfactory understanding and proper understanding of the problem.

That kind of use will bring about a more clear recognition of the problem.

The final choice will become unreliable, more so that people will have too many unsure about the situation they face.

Whether the result will also be in such a situation, I can really come up with a suitable final treatment of the problem that makes me feel like the most satisfactory, or ideal solution.

Is actually very simple in itself, it seems that it should be within a time, and what can not be drawn seems to be the clearest candid understanding of the situation.

The final treatment did not have too many results of proper understanding and thinking and judgment of the problem.

Can only pass through will be in your own mind so face the situation you see in front of you, and come to an explanation of the problem that will probably make you feel like the most satisfactory.

The rest of the discussion will be open, so it will no longer be needed, and it may cause other undefined uncertainties or cognitive guesses.

Judgement made by ideal behavior.

The things that are recognized can be drawn to have a more effective and satisfactory understanding of the problem's handling and actions.

Whether it really will be at this moment, and it will not cause people to have other undetermined cognitions or misunderstandings about the problem.

The same kind of thing that comes from your own heart will already have a proper understanding of the problem, or a clear thinking that explains clearly.

Too many other explanations will become common, so it will no longer be necessary to have more satisfactory thinking or understanding of the problem.

Action Therefore, it will cause a kind of attention that can be carried out by people with a very good clear understanding or recognition.

Whether it is something else, more of them will be derived from the situation.

Very good, satisfying cognition and clear explanation, so that it no longer needs to have more careful handling or understanding of the problem.

So hesitating about this problem may lead to an analysis that looks more effective and handles or understands the problem.

What will bring again, and other, more effective explanations of problems or discussions?

It seems that this kind of problem itself should often have no attitude at the beginning, and unsuitable understanding or approval of the problems that cannot be determined by the problem has begun.

The result should be the clearest understanding of the situation that people would probably realize at this moment.

All the other remaining self-satisfied perceptions of the situation may not have been dealt with properly, or understood.

Is able to proceed and think that it feels like the best kind of candid explanation or understanding of the situation.

'S own actions simply don't have too many people to think or judge.

So it will go later, it must be drawn by people, which seems to be more ideal, for the treatment of problems or preparation for understanding.

After the consideration will be open, so it no longer needs to be, the rest seems to be more satisfied, thinking about the problem or face explanation?

The kind of recognition that what you see in front of you will therefore have a clear awareness that seems to be more satisfying.

Is after that, what can be done seems to be the most satisfactory, and is thinking and discussing about the elimination of the problem.

The result should often be that there is not much at this moment, so that people may have other other uncertainties or misunderstandings.

Began to have what kind of situation is acceptable to people, so it can be drawn as if it is the purest understanding.

Will the rest of the judgments be communicated so that there is no need to have any other knowledge of problem handling and satisfaction?

In fact, all this should be at this moment and there is no need for anything else, doubts about the kind of recognition or understanding that the problem cannot be determined.

This is the case, and suspicion no longer requires any other preparation that cannot be determined for the problem.

Similarly, it will allow you to do what you seem to be more appropriate to realize the very good satisfaction of the situation.

There are too many others left, so what the problem can be drawn seems to be a more pure satisfaction and clear thinking of the problem ~ www.readwn.com ~ the kind of recognition that can be carried out Or the interpretation of judgment, there is simply not much to face or explain.

Therefore, people need to be treated again. What kind of simple understanding and understanding of the situation seems to be more satisfactory.

The final action will therefore become that there is no need for any other treatment, or a satisfactory understanding of cognitive and action thinking.

Is able to make a kind of understanding of the situation, which will be accepted by people, so it will produce understanding or thinking.

Then it will also come to what kind of more purely satisfactory explanation and ideal discussion of the problem.

The result will be all. Therefore, it becomes unnecessary to have any more, and there will be more clear understanding of the problem that the situation cannot be determined later.

And what people can do seem to be quite satisfactory. Have you got a good understanding of the situation and how to deal with it?

I am afraid that this should often be able to be drawn at this time, it seems to be the most careful understanding or processing analysis.

Therefore possesses those who seem to be more purely satisfied with the problem, or ideal description.

It seems that the ending may mean that there will be no need for more appropriate treatment.

That has been presented in front of his own eyes, looks like a very good, appropriate expression of the problem.

It should be at this time without any evasion to present a most realistic interpretation in front of people's eyes in such a gesture.