Demon Lord

[This film review is free of charge. After watching the movie, I want to write something. I didn't expect to write about two thousand words. I will post it here as a movie recommendation. It will be updated at night today. 】

Watching the whole movie, if I'm not willing to admit it is a "movie" that fits the public's impression, as far as the structure of the film is concerned.

Nowadays, the movies that people are familiar with are basically Hollywood. If you use structure, you can probably use "three-act structure" or similar terms to summarize it-in other words, "routineization", Similar to today's web articles, what are the reasons for retiring, pretending to be a face-to-face, and so on, everyone has figured out the structure, just write down.

The best movie I've personally seen this year is "The Edge of Tomorrow". In terms of drama and commercialization, it is of a very high standard. The compact and dense plot lens stretches the suspense to the end, and then everyone is happy.

However, after reading "The Endless Life", I feel completely the opposite.

After watching the movie, I looked at the screen with some cyanosis. Someone who had watched Weibo before complained that the movie had no ending, or that the ending appeared abruptly, but I didn't feel that way. I felt that I saw a novel. It is not a movie, because its structure, narrative, and bridges from the beginning to the end are all Han Han's iconic novels, and the ending is the same.

I can't write down the answer to say that this film is good or bad, but I can say that it is a successful film that fits its central theme.

It's not just the popcorn movie that's called a movie, it's not the ending that's called a movie. It's all in people's minds, and it's not countable. It was shot, it was a movie, it was a director's work, and you have to admit it.

In contrast, Tomorrow's Edge gives me the feeling of "clear, refreshing, and enjoyable", but "Later" will bring me a "sorrowful", "sad" and a kind of difficult to describe. Lingering loss.

Each author has his own style of writing, and each director has his own rhythm. The rhythm of "The Endless" is not tight, but it is not loose. Its main line is actually irrelevant. After reading it, I feel like I remember It's not the so-called paragraphs, golden sentences or some details that are hot on Weibo. I feel that I have forgotten the plot all in one mind, all I can remember is the sigh in my heart after the film.

The characters in the play and their stories are very simple, but they give me a sense of "realism" because life is like this. Hao Han (one of the male lead) thinks that the spirit of adventure is everything he pursues. Teacher Jiang adheres to the rules. Life is walking around under the **** of others. They embarked on a journey and encountered one after another "trivial matters"-I wanted to give examples, but felt that those plots were not really important. What was important was that "the journey : On the road, I met strangers, did something I hadn't done before, shared a short journey life together, and then at the end of the journey, I didn't say goodbye to each other. this is the truth.

In my opinion, the journey of the two protagonists in the film is actually a microcosm of life. The vastness burned his home without leaving a way out. Teacher Jiang followed the flow but has his own firm goal. Some people say that they represent idealism and realism. The two extremes, in fact, I feel that they represent everyone: each of us has an ideal, but swings between "compromise with reality", no one is a pure xxist.

Alu, the donkey friend they met on the road, cheated the car after gaining their trust. Many people did n’t understand when they saw this scene ... It ’s not that they are not a liar, but why the director wants the protagonist to be so. How miserable-he is unlucky enough, why was he stabbed when he first trusted someone?

Because this is real life, not just strangers encountered on the journey, anyone you know and trust in your life may take everything away from you when you are not far from your destination, without hesitation Abandoned you in the wilderness.

Even if he ever really cared about you and trusted him, but what?

There are many bridge sections discussed in the film. They are either funny or philosophical, but in fact I only have one feeling after watching the movie: all the funny is just to cover the sadness behind it all-you can only laugh out loud In order to dispel the unexplainable distress in my heart.

In fact, I said, "I cried with a smile." I really felt this way when I watched this movie. Those who are still in school or who have not stepped out of their world are scolding the film for being unknowable, unstructured, and incomprehensible. In fact, just like the liar Alu said, "You have n’t even seen the world, where's the world view?" Regardless of age, I think that as long as people who have actually embarked on a journey and experienced some experience, they will feel all this seem The irony behind the loose plot.

The day after I watched this movie, I still woke up with some of the emotions brought by the movie after I woke up. I do n’t think it ’s arrogant. If a movie can make people feel this way, actually It has succeeded in itself.

At the end of the film, Teacher Jiang became the winner of life and took that Alaska back to the starting point of the journey. He did what Haohan wanted to do in the past ... but Haohan never appeared.

Where has Haohan gone?

I remembered that in the middle of the film, Hao Han and Teacher Jiang were sitting in a car. There was a paragraph in the radio: The general idea was that a gentleman had four cats, but in fact he really wanted to have a dog. He talked a lot of nonsense. Before I remembered the reason, I was judged by the radio host.

In the second half of the film, on the same radio station, the gentleman said that he finally gave away his four cats and raised a dog. The radio host said: This seems like a small step, but it is actually a big step in life.

The gentleman replied: Well, I'm on the roof now. Then broadcast the busy tone-yes. He jumped off the building and committed suicide.

At the end of the film, a replay of the two men's words on the car was replayed. Haohan said that the paragraph was very long. The main idea was: when leaving, see more, say more, maybe the last look, the last sentence.

These seemingly unrelated things are actually the consistent style of Han Han's works ~ www.readwn.com ~ It sounds a bit ridiculous, but when I think of the vastness that has never appeared in the end, I think his final outcome is like this thrown Like the man who dropped the cat and tried to raise a dog, he died.

When the frog was boiled in warm water, Haohan covered the pot with a lid and said firmly, "This is reality." This was indeed the reality he knew-he worked for many years, failed for many years, and was a loser from the beginning to the end of the film. He tried to take a step, but he always ushered in a cruel ending ... This is also a reality. In reality, there is no "I will succeed if I take a step", "I will succeed as long as I work hard", but the cruel reality is actually It is because many people work hard, but they are still losers.

This is true whether it is a relationship or a career.

This is a film that deeply touches me, but my understanding is not necessarily the intention of the director. The success of the film is also here. Its value is to make people think, not just to laugh. My evaluation of "Afterlife" is actually "Cruel". It hides the knife under the surface of a funny story. When you can't see it, you laugh and laugh, but after seeing it, you find that you have been Stuck a wound. No score, I suggest older friends to see it. If you are still at school, you don't really need to watch it, because you won't feel much when you look at it, and you really only feel "unintelligible."