Genius of the Rules-Style System

Eight twenty.

Surrounded by the crowd, Zhao Yi walked into the venue wearing a suit and tie with straight steps, and the noise in the air quickly cooled down.

Under everyone's gaze, he walked up to the podium, stood in the middle, glanced down the stage, and immediately noticed the guests in the first row.

Yang Zhenning, Edward Witten, next to Yang Zhenning is...

Ono?

No, it's that, that... He thought about it for a long time and still didn't know the name, so he could only look at the others.

George Smoot.

I had already met George Smoot two days ago, so there was nothing strange about him, but the person sitting next to Smoot was a little surprised.

"Sheldon Glashow?"

"This old man...will he come to my report meeting?"

"It shouldn't be..."

Zhao Yi looked at Sheldon Glashow with a calm expression, and couldn't help but have doubts in his heart. When he went to Europe to participate in the data analysis work of the Nuclear Organization, he met Sheldon Glashow once at the meeting, but the two never talked about it. Any word, because the manuscript that was previously submitted to Sheldon Glashow for review and demonstration of the Higgs particle was like a stone sinking, it was equivalent to being directly rejected.

He also heard Kibor talk about Sheldon Glashow's stubborn character, and later seemed to be very dismissive of his use of computer methods to demonstrate the results of physical experiments.

Zhao Yi also knows about Sheldon Glashow and knows that this old man does not believe in string theory, or that he does not believe in theories that are 'impossible to prove'. The boundary theory of particles is related to string theory, and it is also 'impossible' in certain procedures. What has been proven cannot be judged by Sheldon Glashow.

"Has this old man changed his mind? Does he think the boundary theory of particles is acceptable?"

He thought and shook his head immediately.

Change your opinion? Are you kidding me? Absolutely impossible.

If you are a young person, it is not very difficult to accept new theories and review previous academic judgments. However, a stubborn old man who won the Nobel Prize in Physics and is well-known in the academic circle wants him to change his views. From an academic point of view, it may be harder than asking him to commit suicide.

Many people think that the academic circle is inclusive. In fact, in the theoretical physics circle, this is really a ridiculous statement.

In the theoretical physics circle, mutually exclusive theories are like enemies, and trust in theories is no less than religious fanaticism.

Edward Witten is proof of that.

In addition, researchers of different theories are like religious believers. They hope that others will believe in the theories they are committed to research, and at the same time they crazyly reject theories that conflict with their ideas.

Sheldon Glashow is an obvious example. He rejects all theories that are inconsistent with his own ideas. His attitude towards string theory researchers is like treating a 'fraudster', especially 'fraudsters'. They will not be sanctioned by the law, but continue to do "fraud" work and live a very good life... Is this annoying?

"fine……"

Zhao Yi thought with some relief, "Edward and this old man were not arranged to sit together."

…

Sheldon Glashow and Zhao Yi looked at each other, their looks very sharp, and there was no trace of friendship in them.

Of course he didn't 'change his views', but came here specifically to expose 'academic fraud'.

The demonstration of supersymmetry is the basis for the development of theoretical physics and will attract the attention of the whole world. He hopes that there will be a demonstration of supersymmetry, but it will never be based on a "scam" new theory.

What do you do if you want to debunk a new 'scam' theory?

First of all, you must have enough understanding of the new theory, and you also need to have enough understanding of the new theory's demonstration of supersymmetry issues.

At Sheldon Glashow's level, it is not a big problem to understand Zhao Yi's paper. Some small details still need to be figured out, but overall he has understood it.

Now Sheldon Glashow is ready to listen to the report carefully, then find out the problem and expose the issue of 'academic fraud' on the spot.

That's exactly what he's here for.

Sheldon Glashow believed that he came with justice. Even if most of his "colleagues" were optimistic about the content of the argument, the truth was often in the hands of a few.

He sat sternly on the chair with his arms folded, his expression cold and serious.

If he were a handsome young man, with such actions and expressions, he would definitely be regarded as a "cold male god". Unfortunately, Glashow only had a long face. When the camera was pointed at him, the reporters and cameramen couldn't bear to see the scene. I couldn't help but complain in my mind, "A typical stubborn old man."

soon.

The cameras were all pointed towards the stage.

Zhao Yi thanked the arriving guests and talked about the arrangement of the academic report, "My report will be divided into morning and afternoon. The morning will take about three hours, mainly explaining the mathematical structure of particle energy and demonstrating supersymmetry problems. explanation and analysis, and will set aside some time for questions.”

"The report in the afternoon will mainly explain in detail the difficult points in the argument."

"Then start now..."

Zhao Yi opened the PPT on the computer on the podium and began to enter the first part, "First is the mathematical structure of particle energy, which is the boundary theory of particles. In my boundary theory, the mathematical part of energy constituting particles is the core and the argument. Fundamentals of Supersymmetry Problems."

"The 'energy structure' here may react with the outside world, that is, other tiny particles or the space they are in, to affect the state of the particles..."

"Energy framework, or energy mathematics of particles, must first analyze the characteristics of particles. In my report on particle boundary theory, I explained that energy framework allows particles to keep moving..."

He elaborated on the energy mathematics of particles.

Everyone in the venue was listening carefully. Zhao Yi's demonstration of supersymmetry was based on the boundary theory of particles. First, he explained the mathematical problem of particle energy in the boundary theory, which laid the groundwork for the next argument. Basically, if you don’t have a deep understanding of the energy mathematics of particles, it will be difficult to understand the following argument.

Zhao Yi spent about forty-five minutes explaining the mathematical problem of particle energy. He just gave a general overview and marked the key points for easy use in the subsequent argumentation process.

The instructions at this stage are completed, leaving a short rest time for the guests.

The scholars in the first few rows also started discussing.

George Smoot couldn't help but admire and said, "Every time I see it, I am shocked. The perfect mathematical structure and the self-formed closed-loop logic."

"It's a perfect theory."

George Smoot turned to Masukawa Toshihide and said seriously, "Its perfection is that there is nothing that conflicts with it in the existing physical system."

"It is brand new, but it can be perfectly integrated into the system. It even seems to complement many theories, such as string theory."

Masukawa Minying nodded and said, "Yes, it's really perfect."

"It's just deception."

Sheldon Glashow snorted disdainfully, "I admit that its mathematical structure is indeed perfect, and I agree with what you said, but there is nothing new in physics that does not conflict with any existing theory. Because not all theoretical physics is true, and most of it is even fictional and false, and will be proven wrong in the future.”

"He just found the balance of all theory, found the mathematical balance of theoretical physics."

Masukawa Minying looked over and felt that what Glashow said made sense.

George Smoot didn't look back, "Ignore him, it's just sophistry."

He thought for a while and added, "According to his logic, both Einstein and Newton were wrong. They just found a balance point that does not conflict with the discovered physical laws, or the laws of nature and the universe."

"Puch!"

Masukawa Minying couldn't hold back this time and couldn't help but burst into laughter.

Glashow glared at him fiercely, then glanced at George Smoot and snorted dissatisfiedly.

Masukawa Toshiying noticed Glashow's expression and frowned immediately. At first, he thought that George Smooth was joking when he said Glashow looked down on RB people. Now he found out about his attitude towards him and discovered what George Smooth said. It's all true, Glashow doesn't even have basic respect for himself.

Glashow had a conflict with George Smooth, but he glared at him fiercely every time?

Masukawa Minying also looked at Glashow unfriendly, and his expression became very dissatisfied. Glashow noticed and immediately stared back. The two stared at each other for a long time, and were finally interrupted by Zhao Yi's words on the stage.

"Everyone, let's continue..."

"The following part is an overview of the argument for supersymmetry. I will use the energy structure of particles as the basis to construct the boundaries of fermions and bosons..."

Everyone became extremely serious.

In "Boundary Theory of Particles", Zhao Yi constructed the boundary of photons, which can be said to be an "example of the application of boundary theory." However, the difficulty of completing the boundary structure of fermions and bosons is completely different.

First of all, we need to clarify a concept: what are fermions and what are bosons?

According to the distinction of existing particle systems, in a system composed of identical particles, if only one particle is allowed to be accommodated in a quantum state of the system (that is, a microscopic state determined by a set of quantum numbers), such a particle is called a particle. Miko.

In other words, particles with semi-odd spins (1/2, 3/2...) are collectively called fermions and obey Fermi-Dirac statistics. Fermions satisfy the Pauli exclusion principle, that is, there cannot be more than two fermions. appear in the same quantum state.

Leptons, nucleons and hyperons all have spins of 1/2, so they are all fermions. Resonant particles with spins of 3/2, 5/2, 7/2, etc. are also fermions.

Neutrons and protons are atomic nuclei composed of three types of quarks, with a spin of 1/2 and an odd number of nucleons. Because neutrons and protons are both fermions, the spin of an atomic nucleus composed of an odd number of nucleons is a half-integer.

Bosons are particles that follow Bose-Einstein statistics and have spin quantum numbers of integers (0, 1,...), such as mesons, deuterons, helium-4 and other composite particles, as well as Higgs particles, photons, Elementary particles such as gluons, and Z.

From the above definition, we can find that all particles are distinguished according to their spin quantum number, and there are only two types: fermions and bosons.

Electrons are typical of fermions, and photons are typical of bosons.

The photon that Zhao Yi demonstrated at the beginning was just a typical example of bosons. Now he wants to demonstrate that bosons are a leap from typical to whole. The same is true for fermions.

Using mathematics to construct a typical difficulty and constructing an overall difficulty are definitely not on the same level.

This is also the key to the argument for supersymmetry.

As long as the energy composition of fermions and bosons is constructed, the follow-up step is to conduct 'symmetry analysis' from a mathematical and physical perspective based on the structure.

…

The energy structure of fermions and bosons is the core of the argument for supersymmetry.

Zhao Yi spent an hour and a half analyzing the energy structure of fermions and Bose, and filling in the mathematical theoretical values ​​of the initial energy points one by one.

Later, the edge energy architecture will be summarized in the form of mathematical equations and functions.

Then, compare.

The argument is almost complete here.

Through the comparison of mathematical arguments, we can already see the shadow of symmetry between the two theories. As long as we conduct detailed analysis, we can draw conclusions.

Many people were ready to applaud.

But Zhao Yi's argument is not over yet. He still has a core content that he has not discussed, which is the calculation and analysis of the overall mathematical structure to prove that fermions and bosons already have symmetry from the beginning of their formation.

This part can be understood with simple mathematical examples.

For example, take the number 0 as the symmetry point.

-

7, -4, -2, 1, 2, 3, 5 and -17, 3, 4, 5, 7, what is the symmetry of the two sets of data?

If you add two sets of numbers together, it is easy to conclude that the sum of the former set of numbers is -2 and the sum of the latter set of numbers is 2.

The mathematical framework for the initial formation of particles is much more complicated.

After Zhao Yi completed the energy structure of fermions and bosons, he began to demonstrate the overall mathematical structure. Many people did not know what he was going to say, because this part of the content seemed to have some "incidental content" at the end of the paper. Meaning, many people thought it was a promotion based on this.

When they discovered that the energy system that Zhao Yi had constructed as a whole could analyze the symmetry of the initial state of the particles, many people opened their mouths in surprise.

"Let's see..."

"The quantum spin of fermions is a semi-odd number, and it tends to take the form of a γ (t, n) function. The initial curve is..."

"Bosons are exactly the opposite. The energy division curve shows...the initial curve is..."

"In the customized interval, the energy is in point units and presents a symmetrical combination form. I call it the positive and negative energy form, which combines the pairwise values ​​of several functions..."

"When they are initially formed, due to the difference in comprehensive energy, a fixed value of spin difference will be formed..."

"so……"

Zhao Yi continued to narrate.

The venue was quiet.

Now everyone who can understand understands what Zhao Yi is saying. Even if they don't understand, they can still follow the train of thought and think. Many people's expressions have also become very surprised. It seems that it is the first time they know about the supersymmetry problem argument. Made it this far.

Same goes for Sheldon Glashow.

From the beginning of the academic report to just now, he had always had a cold expression of being dismissive and refusing to let strangers in. He just looked at the stage with a mocking look. Now he has become much more serious, and his brows have also wrinkled.

If we only use the mathematics of particle energy structure to demonstrate the supersymmetry problem, it can be said that we are using our own set of logic to 'fictionally' construct the mathematical logic of the supersymmetry problem. But if we add the analysis of the overall structure, it will be different. , which is equivalent to saying that the mathematical framework of the architecture has logically formed a closed loop, and people cannot refute it even if they want to.

You say that the supersymmetry argument for the energy theory architecture is fiction?

But why is it such a coincidence that while assuming symmetry, the whole thing is analyzed to show symmetry?

It's like taking out a lot of products, and someone comes and puts a price on each product. No one knows whether his price is correct, but it is just in line with the public's positioning. It is not good if it is completely accurate.

Finally, when I added up the prices of all the items, I was surprised to find that the resulting figure was the same as the total purchase price of all the items.

Surprised or not?

Coincidence or not?

Who dares to say that others mark prices randomly?

Sheldon Glashow was a little confused for a while. He couldn't accept a brand new, fictitious 'fraud' theory. However, the logic of the 'fraud' theory formed a closed loop that did not allow for refutation. All the points he had thought of before were closed. After a while, all the preparations were in vain.

His brows furrowed tightly.

"impossible!"

"This fraud theory can't be so perfect! It's impossible, there must be something wrong!"

"Must have!"

Sheldon Glashow listened more carefully. He was very sure of his judgment and thought that there must be some problem that he had not thought of.