World of Gods

　　 I read the comment of the last testimonial and realized that I had made another serious mistake.

　　 I feel that I cannot write the "principle" perfectly, and even feel that the principle is too great. I am an ordinary person without the confidence to write and I am very unconfident, so I say that what I write is "the principle".

　　 eventually caused a misunderstanding, making readers think that "Eternal Fire believes that the story is incompatible with the truth."

　　 Actually, I think that the principle and the story are difficult to be compatible, and the principle and the story are the perfect combination.

　　 Throw the topic first, the core of this book has always been the principle, not the reason.

　　 Principle and principle are never the same thing.

　　 This is my mistake. I failed to clarify the boundary between these two words in the book and in the testimonials.

　　 Principles and principles are overlapping but completely different concepts.

　　 Reason, this word basically has three meanings.

　　 One, the affair, rules, and reason in life.

　　Second, a deeper meaning is also "the law of things".

　　三, in the ancient classics, the deepest meaning of truth is also the reason that Tao was born, and it is the extra attribute of Tao. No one can understand this thing. There are countless interpretations of Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching, without any absolute authoritative interpretation, so don't tell me which novel author can write this kind of truth.

　　 So, in fact, truth has only the first two meanings.

　　The most commonly used context of truth is almost all of the existence of "fuzzy perception" in terms of perception, experience, instinct, common sense, and life.

　　 Take the simplest example, the Pythagorean theorem.

　　一, the reason:

　　 Now, a 3 cm wooden slat and a 4 cm wooden slat are placed at a right angle, so an adult told the child that the third wooden slat only needs 5 cm to form a right triangle.

　　 The child asked why. The adult said that this is the Pythagorean theorem. If the two right-angle sides of a right-angle shape are 3 and 4, the hypotenuse is 5.

　　 This is the truth, you can perceive it vaguely, knowing that it is, in essence, "what is this".

　　 There are also some simple truths in daily life, such as rain on cloudy days, people have to study hard, and the soil can help the crops. These are all truths.

　　 Two, theorem:

　　 The child further asked, what is the Pythagorean theorem?

　　 So, the adults use various methods to prove the Pythagorean theorem.

　　 So the question is, who can prove the Pythagorean theorem with stories?

　　 I think no one can do it, and no one has done it.

　　 Suppose I go back to ancient times and write a cool point for the protagonist to prove the Pythagorean theorem. Then, I would like to ask the readers. Is the Pythagorean theorem cool for the readers, or is it because the story makes the readers cool?

　　 After the reader is cool because of the story, will he prove the Pythagorean theorem?

　　 The Pythagorean theorem seems to be easy to prove, so let's replace the Pythagorean theorem with Fermat's Last Theorem.

　　 What is the result? The result is that readers do not understand Fermat's Last Theorem, and even suspect that the author may not really understand it, but they can understand the "truth" that "the protagonist proves Fermat's Last Theorem to shock the academic world", so it is cool.

　　 The reader is refreshed because of the truth in the story, and in essence still can’t understand Fermat’s Last Theorem, and will not feel any refreshing emotions from this theorem.

The 　　 theorem is "why a thing".

　　 Then, what is the principle?

　　三, principle

　　The principle is why, it is the law of the law of things.

　　 The most rigorous way of proving the Pythagorean theorem needs to be axiomatic, which is like the content in "Geometric Elements".

　　All theorems should come from axioms.

　　 And the first principle that I repeatedly mentioned in the article is very clear. It is the core, most indispensable, and indispensable fundamental proposition in every discipline.

　　Fourth, what is the most important thing?

　　 The most important thing is that truth can be perceived, vaguely realized in life, and can be fully integrated into the story, because the story and the truth are perceptual, instinctive, experienced and "experienced".

　　Reading novels and watching videos is essentially the human body and brain experiencing or simulating experiences. They are all physical responses. Even if it is emotions, it is mainly the function of nerves and neurotransmitters.

　　 However, the principle is different.

The principle is completely beyond the perception of the human body. This thing itself cannot be determined by human beings. When Lao Tzu said "Tao", when Heraclitus said "Logos" and other Greek philosophers talked about "the origin of everything." At that time, this thing began to brew.

　　 Only then did we know that in this world, there is something indescribable, and that thing is the "first driving force" of this world, which can be called the origin or the avenue.

　　 Then, this avenue, this origin, this first driving force is the "first principle" of our entire universe.

　　 But the problem is that this philosophical and perceptual "principle", because it is too general, is closer to a kind of truth.

　　 Measured by the standard that we can do it if we understand it, do we really understand it? Obviously we don't understand it.

　　 The true principle is the foundation of the field of knowledge.

　　Like Newton’s three laws, they are the principles of classical mechanics.

　　Who can tell me, a novel author, how to write Newton's three laws as a story, and then let children who have never learned Newton's three laws to understand classical mechanics by reading the stories?

We can make up a story to say that the apple hit Newton’s head, making Newton want to understand Newton’s three laws, but the story itself cannot explain Newton’s three laws clearly. It must be "explained" or even rigorously proved. The way, in the eyes of many readers, is not a story, but a preaching.

The principle of 　　 requires a rigorous proof process!

　　 It doesn't make sense.

　　Officially, because the principle requires a rigorous proof process, I said that the story is incompatible with the principle.

　　 Principles and principles are two-dimensional things.

　　 You can perceive the truth vaguely, but the principle, you have to give up instinct and touch it with human reason and thinking.

　　 I wrote 3.7 million words, but I couldn't tell the readers the truth and the principle. It's because of my lack of writing ability. I'm sorry.

simply put.

　　 The reason why I say that the book of Gods is different is not because I am writing principles, but because I am writing principles.

　　 Although I feel that I have not been able to write the principle well and have always used the theory to cover up, but I am really not writing the theory, I am writing the principle.

　　 Anyway, I don’t have face, and I'm cheeky to tell the truth. If there are readers who still can't tell the truth from the principle, but still feel that the principle can be written in a story, then I can't say anything.

　　 So, you can say that Eternal Fire is so thick-skinned that you can brag about writing principles.

　　 You can also say that Eternal Fire doesn't understand the principle itself, but it writes the principle, which is too arrogant and can't write well at all.

　　You can also say that the story written by this guy like Eternal Fire is not well integrated with reason.

　　 You can also say that truth and story can be integrated very well~www.readwn.com~ You can even say that someone can write the principle into the story, this is your freedom, but I personally do not recommend that.

　　 may be there in the future, but it is not now.

　　 Even if it is a sci-fi masterpiece like "Three-Body" and "Me, Robot", the Dark Forest Theory or the Three Laws of Robots, no matter how good it is, it is separated from the principle by countless dimensions.

　　 This article is just a rational discussion and does not involve other things.

　　 is to make a metaphor:

　　 After talking about the truth, you immediately feel that you understand.

　　After the principle is finished, you are at a loss and don't know what you are talking about. You need to mobilize your brain to think slowly in order to thoroughly understand and apply it.

　　 Finally, I let out a long sigh. My writing skills really need to be improved. I wrote 3.7 million words, but I didn't let the readers understand that what I really wrote was actually the principle.

　　 This is my biggest gain from writing this testimonial, and it is also a signal that I will continue to work hard to lay a solid foundation for writing.

　　 Look, now I have the motivation to continue studying.

　　 The final testimony is over, no longer discussing the explanation.

　　 I went to study hard! Manually wrap a red belt around your forehead and make a fist with a small expression!

　　For the new book!

　　(Https://)

First set a small goal, such as 1 second to remember: 　shukeju mobile version reading URL: